Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Other Cheney Behind the Scenes

By Robert Dreyfuss, The American Prospect. Posted June 13, 2006.


Since 2005, Dick Cheney's daughter Elizabeth has held a powerful position guiding Middle East policy. And like father, like daughter: Liz is a key player in the push for regime change in Iran and Syria.
061306_story1
061306_story1

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Dreyfuss

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

At the very heart of U.S. Middle East policy, from the war in Iraq to pressure for regime change in Iran and Syria to the spread of free-market democracy in the region, sits the 39-year-old daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney. Elizabeth "Liz" Cheney, appointed to her post in February 2005, has a tongue-twisting title: principal deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs and coordinator for broader Middle East and North Africa initiatives. By all accounts, it is an enormously powerful post, and one for which she is uniquely unqualified.

During the past 15 months, Elizabeth Cheney has met with and bolstered a gaggle of Syrian exiles, often in tandem with John Hannah and David Wurmser, top officials in the Office of the Vice President (OVP); has pressed hard for money to accelerate the administration's ever more overt campaign for forced regime change in both Damascus and Teheran; and has overseen an increasingly discredited push for American-inspired democratic reform from Morocco to Iran.

With the unspoken support of her father, Cheney has kept a hawk's eye on Iraq policy within the department, intimidating opponents of the neoconservative axis within the administration. And, less visibly, according to former officials who've worked with her, she has made her influence felt in choosing officials, selecting (or blocking) the appointment of ambassadors and other foreign service officers, and weighing in on other bureaucratic battles at the department.

Now, according to the Financial Times of London, Cheney is coordinating the work of a new entity called the Iran-Syria Operations Group. The unit was established "to plot a more aggressive democracy promotion strategy for those two 'rogue' states," reported the Times. In February, the State Department announced that Cheney would oversee a $5 million program to "accelerate the work of reformers in Syria," providing grants of up to $1 million each to Syrian dissidents.

And in the current fiscal year, she will oversee a similar, $7 million regime-change grant program for Iran, though funding for that effort is expected to grow to at least $85 million soon, to include both a propaganda program and support to Iranian opposition groups. "She came in knowing very little about the Middle East," says Marina S. Ottaway, senior associate and co-director of the Democracy and Rule of Law Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who has worked with Liz Cheney on democratic reform issues. "She had a mandate to do democracy promotion, but she had very little familiarity with the subject. ... They deliberately picked a person who was not a Middle East specialist, so that the conventional wisdom, well, let me rephrase, so that real, actual knowledge of the issues in the region wouldn't interfere with policy."

Liz Cheney catapulted into her current job after a rather undistinguished career that leapfrogged from public to private life and back again. In her early 20s, she did a stint at the State Department while her father was secretary of defense in the first Bush administration, and then headed to law school at the University of Chicago and worked for Armitage Associates, a firm run by Richard Armitage. As an attorney, she worked for the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, and served briefly as a U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) officer in Hungary and Poland. Her Middle East experience was, well, limited.

Asked about Liz's familiarity with the Middle East, a former staffer at the Middle East Institute, a Washington D.C., think tank, says that she dabbled in the Institute's Arabic language classes. "And she'd come to our annual conference," she said. That's it. That was, however, apparently enough to get her named deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs (NEA) in 2002.

A quick climb up the ranks

In an administration in which policy toward Iraq and the Middle East was mostly guided by know-nothings and the inexperienced, perhaps it isn't surprising that Liz Cheney got herself named to a top position at Near Eastern Affairs. How, exactly, she ended up at NEA in the first place is something of a mystery, although no one interviewed doubted that it was at the behest of the vice president.

One former deputy assistant secretary at NEA said that the bureau was offered the choice of either Liz Cheney or Danielle Pletka, a neoconservative hard-liner who is the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Pletka, a sharp-elbowed insider who helped write the Iraq Liberation Act in the 1990s, was reportedly seen by Secretary of State Colin Powell and NEA as the greater of two evils, and so Cheney got the job.

During the preparations for the Iraq War, Cheney had a back seat at NEA, with a portfolio covering Middle East economic issues, including oil. However, according to insiders, her real importance was to serve as an ace-in-the-hole at the State Department for the vice president's office. Her presence had a sobering effect on many of the department's Arabists, most of whom were known as opponents of the war and were considered suspect by neoconservatives. "All during that year, you had the vice president's daughter sitting there at State Department meetings," says Chas Freeman, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia. Says another former U.S. ambassador to several key Middle East countries otherwise known for his tough-minded ability to stand up to Arab strong-men: "I would find it confining, if not intimidating."


Digg!

Robert Dreyfuss is a Prospect senior correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Can you spell nepotism?
Posted by: HeroesAll on Jun 13, 2006 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd really like to see some of our resident rightists try to justify this. After all, what does it matter that someone with no knowledge and no experience is appointed to such a delicate position? Why should it matter that a member of a group that derides the 'reality-based community' is in a position to cause thousands (or tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands) of deaths? Not to mention overthrowing their choice of governments, based solely on their commercial interests.

What the hell gives these bozos the idea that they're entitled to pursue 'regime change' anyway? The arrogance is appalling. I suspect they'd take an extremely jaundiced view of anyone even considering pursuing 'regime change' in the US. Who the hell do they think they are? Do they really believe that the US is special? (Mind you, a lot of the rest of the world does believe that the US government is special, if you mean 'kicked in the head by a horse' special).

Sorry. Just needed to vent a little. The world's going to Helena, and the wilful ignorance of some, and the ruthless behaviour of others, really gets me down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Can you spell nepotism? Posted by: katinmn
» RE: Can you smell nepotism? Posted by: symcokid
» Hear! Hear! Posted by: feller
» RE: Can you spell nepotism? Posted by: mrcentrist
More fascinating political gossip! Don't bother with universal healthcare/progressive taxation....
Posted by: cry0fan on Jun 13, 2006 2:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We leftist political activists are too busy making the Left relevant to the everyday lives of everyday Americans, so that is why American Liberal/leftist websites are focusing on political gossip and trivia like this article, when they are not focusing on Identity Politics, that is...

No wonder the American majority has been swept off its feet by liberalism!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Totally nonresponsive... Posted by: brunowe
Simple case of incest!
Posted by: kgs1947 on Jun 13, 2006 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheney's policies have a long history of incestuous affairs...corporate ones and now closer to home. Wow...what a sick administration!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

heinous tricks
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 13, 2006 3:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Liz and Dick doing heinous tricks either they will fail and fall or Iran/Syria will fail and fall. Most folks in the world would prefer a Liz/Dick failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disgusting
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 13, 2006 5:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can not say much more. The more I learn about the government, the more evidence I see that it does no service for the american people.

It must be nice that all you need is daddy. Merit is not worth considering.

And even sadder, these criminals are prolific breeders.

This sucks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Disgusting Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Disgusting Posted by: aussidawg
Like a Hereditary Monarchy
Posted by: gogm on Jun 13, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this a cozy family relationship! Kinda like the Bushes! Our government is becoming like a monarchy more and more every day.

Except real monarchies in Europe work by serving as symbols of national identity and by providing various services to their nations. Not the Bush or Cheney dynasties!

George Bush is proving George Washington was wrong and George III was right!

Our country was founded to avoid this!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're a plant
Posted by: Third_Eye_Open on Jun 13, 2006 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I have seen you here, you have done nothing but complain about any issue that happens to come up, yet suspiciously, you don't provide any intelligent, insightful plan for how to counter the "identity politics" that you spew-on about daily.

So I ask you, who do you work for, since they obviously aren't that bright, or can't afford to hire someone who can properly write an insurgent article. You don't know the least about any of the issues, and I would bet you are more than likely a child with a intimate knowledge of 'ctl-c and ctl-v'. So unless you wanna talk about some real issues, or how you see the other side of the coin on any issue, shut your fuckin pie hole, Nancy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You're a plant Posted by: Io
» and you're a animal Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: You're a plant Posted by: kmeyer
» dont feed the trolls Posted by: may261989
» Just Cleaning UP Posted by: feller
Such a nice family!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 13, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just keeps getting stranger and stanger, doesn't it? Let's face it, this is going to make one hell of a black comedy one of these days! Let's just keep reminding ourselves, for the sake of our own sanity, that someday this entire period will be a thing of the past. Yes, twenty years from now we will all look back on this and laugh, right? Right?....I'm trying to convince myself....It isn't working.

The arrogance of these people is amazing! How is it that this hideous little bitch (Liz Cheney) can run roughshod over State Department protocal? There's got to be some kind of law against this sort of thing! It took almost fifty years for this country to recover from the damage that Joe McCarthy did to the department of state when he literally gutted it, throwing out suspected "communists". And now I find that the Cheney family are trying to bring us back to square one?

God help this country if the republicans are allowed to retain control of the House and the Senate next year. One might think that the American people would have learned their lesson by now and yet I am once again reminded of the words of H.L. Menken when he said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public".

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
http://tomdegan.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Such a nice family! Posted by: feller
» RE: Such a nice family! Posted by: Lincoln fan
What's New?
Posted by: chica on Jun 13, 2006 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we have another Cheney influencing/implementing a dangerous foreign policy along with her narfarious dad and mother ( when she isn't writing propagandistic text books to further the dumbing down of our public schools). I am begining to understand what the French people felt when they stormed the Versaille. What will it take!?... another fake election? Elections are a distraction to make you think you have a voice when there is none. Personally, I don't have much faith in the upcoming Nov. election UNLESS we all demand of paper reciept regardless of party. Is that so hard?
The only comfort I have regarding the "detention camps" currently being contructed by Brown and Root is that now we will have some place to hold the many miscreants that populate our so called government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's New? Posted by: xi_people
» RE: What's New? Posted by: chica
Neocon political tool - but also chief contract negotiator for Halliburton and KBR
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 13, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very interesting article, which talked a lot about the neocon political empire agenda - but there seems to be an important subtext here:

"As an attorney, she worked for the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, and served briefly as a U.S. Agency for International Development (AID) officer in Hungary and Poland. Her Middle East experience was, well, limited."

Consider her background - the World Bank provides the incentive and funding for many global megabucks engineering and oil projects - like the Chad-Cameroon pipeline - where the money flows into the hands of firms like Halliburton, KBR and Bechtel, global engineering concerns with a very heavy presence within the government. Limited knowledge of the Middle East, but quite a bit of knowledge about government-private sector-World Bank-IMF contracts.

"In her job as PDAS, Cheney is responsible for nearly all of the management and administration of the bureau, says White. "In one way, the PDAS is like Stalin in the early 1920s communist party, controlling personnel, able to promote, not promote, put people in key positions. This is an extremely powerful position."

So, she can appoint people from her father's business circle into key positions where they can push heads of states to accept contracts from some players, but not from others. See for example, the recent Egyptian ammonia plant contract awarded to KBR, or Saudi Aramco awards contract to Halliburton.

"She has been known to insist on seeing a head of state without inviting the American ambassador to accompany her, in violation of protocol, often threatening the ambassador with the power of her contacts."

Well, this must be so that she can deliver the message without having to worry about the ambassador knowing about it - messages like, "We want this contract awarded to KBR. If you don't, I will make your life as miserable as humanly possible."

"She's got her own foreign policy, her own agenda, and so of course she wouldn't want the ambassador to know what she is talking about when she meets a head of state.""

I don't doubt that a lot of her agenda revolves around the lunatic political policies of the neocon "Project for A New American Cock-up", but I'd guess she's also up to her neck in managing business deals for her father's cronies, and in securing oil companies access to Mideast oilfields. This has been Halliburton's primary interest for years; if ExxonMobil gets the rights to an oilfield then you can bet Halliburton will get the services contract.

This explains the follwing exchange between John Tierney (D-MA) and a Halliburton/KBR official - of course they were far more concerned with the oilfields then with troop safety!

If you read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins, there's a short passage where his job is explained - "...and the owners of American engineering firms become fabulously wealthy". Think KBR, Halliburton, Bechtel, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

did you catch the film, ie depiction of real life - SYRIANA?
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Jun 13, 2006 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This recorded history gets darker and darker. Do not, though, be so dismayed at a father hiring a daughter regardless of her possession of less than adequate qualifications. Sometimes fathers see some spark of ability that others don't, so don't just focus on the issue of nespotism. Focus, instead, on the government's willingness to allow her to in fact partake in, create courses of future actions which your loved ones in the form of foot soldiers will have to support and defend with their lives - not theoretically in discussions and not with the lives of the Cheneys but with the lives of your loved ones. And for what? For democracy? For freedom? Whose? Certainly not those of the citizenry of the United States of America. But even that is becoming a misnomer as the only state that seems to be united that of the ruling leaders who are united and committed to raising the level of their financial interests by using such positions to create policies that will serve and protect their personal financial accounts and holdings. The second half of the phrase does not describe them either, as their reason for their actions has nothing to do with America the country and its people BUT everything to do with using your resources - your soldiers, your tax money, your trust in them - to kill the American dream and to build the world according to their personal dream and their vision. So what is your part in this as a citizen of Ameica? Although certainly other factors precipated it, was your Civil War not enough to have abolished slavery?? Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country is a question well worth remembering. Your leadership asks you to be slaves. I do not think this will work in the America I know. But still, tough questions must be asked. Just re-read the Liz Cheney article, review the Syriana film starring George Clooney and then take a look in the mirror and ask yourselves a tough question. Why is all this - the foray into Iraq, into Iran, the steps into Syria being done? For whose welfare? For whose prosperity? For whose future? Against potential terrorism? So you are being told and so we are continuing to be told with these staged reports of Al Quaida this and that! I don't deny the existence of terrorists and those who plot against America. What I do deny, however, is the ever present and continuing right of your leaders to try to fool you. I am surprised at their lack of understanding of the intelligence of the American people. As a Canadian I have a vested interest in your country realigning itself according to the principles on which it was founded. May it do so. God bless America the true, not what it is becoming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One thumb down Posted by: feller
» Where's your other thumb? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Where's your other thumb? Posted by: blitzmesser
» At the Video Store Posted by: feller
The People Who Count The Vote Decide Everything
Posted by: Christie on Jun 13, 2006 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must concentrate on getting rid of the electronic voting machines and the optical scanners. Read Robert Kennedy's article on voter fraud in just Ohio.He concludes by saying that Bush is not the legitimate President of the US. Search "voter fraud" and discover many Sites that document how widespread voter fraud is in several key States.

We must insist on paper ballots and hand counting. People who ask when the American people are going to wake up either do not realize or keep forgetting that Bush/CheneyCo and many other supposedly elected officials were not the choice of the majority of Americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheny and democracy: Is this rehab?
Posted by: mythbuster on Jun 13, 2006 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whenever I hear these neo-con idiots lecture the world about democracy, it's clear that they've turned the world into their own 12-step meeting. The parallels are obvious. First, they invoke a Higher Power, who, not surprisingly, is right out of the Book of Joshua. A God who loved the Middle East enough to destroy it. Second, they constantly talk about spreading liberty while actually curtailing it at home. And isn't that what addicts do? They just talk, talk about their sobriety while they pine for a fix. And the neo-con fix is war. Third, their "recovery" is more important than other people's lives. You have to bomb the Muslim world to save it, you see. Of course, I'm a little pissed that the survivors of Haditha didn't send a thank you card to the Marines for liberating them from their parents and brothers and sisters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is a plant?
Posted by: geen on Jun 13, 2006 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you talking to the author of the article? Are you talking about a comment posted by a reader? Who is Nancy? It's difficult to understand who you are accusing - perhaps rightfully, I don't know and can't tell - of being a plant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who is a plant? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
WHAT A FAMILY! 3 BITCHES & COUNTING!
Posted by: chanceny on Jun 13, 2006 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry - all I could focus on was 5 (FIVE) kids. 5 more Cheneys. At least her sister won't be able to add to the contamination, since her proud poppa proposes legislation banning gay adoption. But 5! Is she taking up the slack or sumthin? Of course she's qualified for her position considering the cronism, the almost mandatory incestuous criteria submitted for employment resumes that has been passing as expertise and nailing the jobs for 5 years! Maybe #5 will keep her at home or give her a much needed nervous breakdown! Meantime, let's just cross our fingers and hope that her name will be such a downer, noone will bend over for her policies of daddy-approved destruction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Liberals are so nice Posted by: feller
» Who are you calling liberal, commie? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» Execute Mumia Posted by: feller
Refreshing
Posted by: feller on Jun 13, 2006 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so refreshing to see that a politician's kid is smart, hardworking and not harassing people or involved in embarassing public drama all the time. In other words, this young woman is a role model. The Kennedys and their drugged, drunk kids(Patrick the Congressman just pleaded guilty to DUI, you know, the drunk who didn't have a dirnk the night he plowed into a concrete barrier at 3:30AM outside the Capitol.)

You can see many young professionals like Ms. Cheney in the downtowns of America's cities and in the office parks of America's thiriving suburbs. The future is good hands with a generation that does not measure its validity by tearing down its country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: efreshing Posted by: concerned Canadian
Seems like we just have to take it
Posted by: mrcentrist on Jun 13, 2006 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great. So wonderful to learn that Cheney's daughter wants to help Bush and his cronies make a bit more mischief in foreign countries. Maybe after the United States creates some more unpleasant events around the world, the people of the world will say "Gosh darn it, enough is enough!" (and then do nothing) ...... And then they'll watch on TV as the USA kills more and more people, at which point they'll *really* stomp their feet and say "Enough is enough!!" (and then do nothing) ... etc ... etc... In other words, the right-wing regime of the United States has nothing to worry about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jennherne
Posted by: jennherne on Jun 17, 2006 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just an idea. If she wants war soo much; compel her to enlist in the marines!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]