Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why the Religious Right Fights Cancer Prevention

By Gene Gerard, Truthdig. Posted June 13, 2006.


Conservative groups have caused an uproar by opposing a vaccine for the second-deadliest cancer for women.
Advertisement

The Food and Drug Administration advisory panel approved a vaccine for the human papilloma virus (HPV) last week. The vaccine appears to be 100 percent effective at protecting against the most prevalent viruses that cause cervical cancer. While public health professionals view the vaccine as miraculous, many conservative organizations oppose it on the grounds that it might encourage promiscuity among adolescent girls. Now that the FDA has approved the vaccine, conservatives are already working feverishly to limit or even prevent its use.

The pharmaceutical giant Merck produced the vaccine, known as Gardasil, which will be nothing short of a lifesaver for countless women. Cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer killer among women in America, striking nearly 14,000 each year. Of those, nearly 4,000 die. Poor women and women of color will benefit the most from the vaccine, as Latino and black women suffer the highest rates of cervical cancer. Lower-income women typically lack the funds and health insurance necessary to have regular screenings for HPV.

Despite the benefits of the vaccine, conservative organizations began to rally against it last year. One of the most vocal opponents was the Family Research Council. The council, according to its mission statement, "promotes the Judeo-Christian worldview as the basis for a just, free, and stable society." Last October the council's president, Tony Perkins, spoke against the vaccine. "Our concern," he said, "is that this vaccine will be marketed to a segment of the population that should be getting a message about abstinence. It sends the wrong message." He went on to say that he would not vaccinate his 13-year-old daughter.

Yet another organization that promotes abstinence is the Physicians Consortium. The head of the consortium, Dr. Hal Wallis, is also critical of the vaccine. In his opinion, "If you don't want to suffer these diseases, you need to abstain, and when you find a partner, stick with that partner." The founder of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse also opposes the vaccine. This organization was formed "to promote the appreciation for and practice of sexual abstinence (purity) until marriage." Leslee Unruh, the organization's founder, stated firmly, "I personally object to vaccinating children against a disease that is 100 percent preventable with proper sexual behavior."

Now that FDA approval is official, conservative organizations are strategizing to blunt acceptance of the vaccine. Much of this effort is directed toward the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This committee is a part of the Centers for Disease Control, and is responsible for establishing the classification of vaccines that the government recommends. This recommendation prompts states to require a particular vaccination, typically guarantees that insurance companies will cover it and determines the level of public funding.


Digg!

Gene Gerard has taught history, religion and ethics for 14 years and is a contributing author of the forthcoming book "Americans at War" (Greenwood Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
". . . A JUST, FREE, AND STABLE SOCIETY"
Posted by: ssegallmd on Jun 13, 2006 1:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, Tony Perkins through his Family Research Council "promotes the Judeo-Christian worldview as the basis for a just, free, and stable society."

That's rich coming from the political Christians in America, the people that run Texas, for example, famous for Christians like George Bush and Tom DeLay. Freedom and justice, yep, that's what they're all about. Just ask the people of color from Tulia, TEXAS, or the RETARDED and MINOR citizens that have been executed for capital crimes there. Even the Supreme Court, the same one that made George Bush president, declared that there was no evidence that marijuana was a medicine and that businesses can snatch private property from individuals as "eminent domain" - yes that court - found the practices there to be less than just and free.

Political Christians have taken over the Kansas state school board as well where they have brough so much of that freedom and justice there in the form of the freedom to become inculcated in "intelligent design".

Now Tony Perkins wants to present America with the gift of freedom again: the freedom to get cervical cancer as punishment for having had sexual intercourse. That's biblical justice according to the Christians running this country including James Dobson, Pat Robertsom, Jerry Falwell, Pat Roberts, Rick Santorum and George Bush.

I realize that all of you nonpolitical Christians cringe like the rest of us at the thought of that version of Christianity. But like it or not, it's the variation that has risen to power and which represents America's brand of Christianity and which promises to bring us, "a just, free, and stable society"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Aussiedawg: Something Different Posted by: ssegallmd
» One Final Thought... Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: One Final Thought... Posted by: ConnecttheDots
Religion = madness
Posted by: sapatatanka on Jun 13, 2006 1:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This just goes to prove, yet again, that at least one segment of American society has gone utterly, completely, and totally nuts. It has long been my opinion that ALL organized religion is a form of madness; do you need more proof?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» By that line of reasoning.... Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» RE: eligion = madness Posted by: threedfm
» RE: eligion = madness Posted by: tfortner
» RE: eligion = madness Posted by: Gma1
» RE: eligion = madness Posted by: Stevo
Two thoughts
Posted by: HeroesAll on Jun 13, 2006 2:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just off the top of my head. If abstinence is '100% effective' in preventing HPV infections, that means there's no rape, right? How many women get raped per year? Hmmm. Maybe the Abstainers can wear a little ribbon or something to show rapists that they're abstaining, so they go rape someone else.

Second thought: did these wacky Christians feverishly fight against introduction of viagra too? Because that encourages sex, and doesn't have any beneficial medical effects whatsoever. I don't recall hearing any of their protests, though perhaps I wasn't paying attention. After all, surely their wails of outrage would have been far greater for something like Viagra than for a vaccine that prevents one of the most common female cancers...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: mokidugway
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: sapatatanka
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: mokidugway
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: Xanzyl
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: mediadiva
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: threedfm
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: RON_KING
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: gigospam
» RE: Two thoughts Posted by: tfortner
Ban Christianity
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jun 13, 2006 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It promotes stupidity, ignorance, intolerance, war and disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: BlueStateBitch
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: axandrade
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: LPB
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: LPB
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: LPB
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Ban Christianity Posted by: wb1977
Fomenting Fear - Is This The "Culture Of Life"?
Posted by: ZPaul on Jun 13, 2006 3:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It certainly looks to me like, although Focus on the Family et al are covering their back by saying they promote the vaccine´s availability, they are promoting fear of allowing it to be used for adolescents(a parent that does not allow their child this vaccine when it can literally make the difference between life and death, IMO, has a lot to answer for). If they fear that putting this vaccine in the same category as other vaccines is going to, in itself, foment premarital sex, they are out of contact with reality. And most importantly, this vaccine can save their child´s life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why be upset about their stance on this?
Posted by: Starcatcher on Jun 13, 2006 3:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Survival of the fittest means that the ignorant who don't let their kids get vaccines will have to suffer their children dying from it. After all, isn't suffering what they think life is all about?
Sure it is hard on the kids, but just being raised by people that ignorant is a suffering in itself. Take it from someone who was.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hate
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 13, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Conservative religious groups hate freedom for women, for life, for reality and for scientists because they have been brainwashed to believe completely absurd dogmas and fictions. The result of this is completely heinous and immoral activity by human believers who are losing thier humanity by living in a fog of stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But mostly for WOMEN (nt) Posted by: Allison
A scenario or two
Posted by: Annarisse on Jun 13, 2006 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So you want to encourage your daughter to remain pure until marriage? Let's suppose for a moment that she buys into that and doesn't rebel.

In college, she meets a nice young man. He attends church every week, plays football, and when he proposes, the girl's family is thrilled to acknowledge him as son-in-law. However, he's not completely open with them about his past. The daughter is not the first woman he's slept with. Unbeknownst to any of them, he's brought HPV into the marriage, compromising the health of his wife who did nothing wrong.

Then there's cases of rape. How many women fail to report rape because they're ashamed at the loss of their virginity, even though it wasn't their choice? How many will fail to get screened because they don't want to admit there's any chance of being positive?

Then there's the prodigal daughter - the one who strays from the fold. You're prepared to let her die because she didn't adhere to your moral code?

I'm a Christian. I will teach my daughters that abstinence is the best course. I will also get them this vaccine, and teach them about birth control. I don't believe in protecting them through fear and ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: resistance6
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: fork
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: Xanzyl
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: Waterflake
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: Joycelyn
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: resistance6
» RE: A scenario or two Posted by: Ratskii
» forniwhat? promiscuwhat? Posted by: Wish
» The word is F-O-R-N-I-C-A-T-I-O-N. Posted by: resistance6
When will people learn?
Posted by: cordas on Jun 13, 2006 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Jesus died for our sins, yes thats right Jesus DIED for our sins!!

So let us make that death worth while by stopping the punishment of others for their sins (if they are sins at all). This vacination is NOT going to premote liberal sexualisation of the young, all it will do is protect about 50% of the population from the horrors that cancer brings not just to the victims but to their friends and familes, oh and the cost to business when workers become ill and have leave their jobs.

To me as an athiest I find it imoral to ban such a vaccine, and I find it impossible to comprehend how the morraly correct christians can even consider fighting against this issue. If they had any christianity at all they should be demanding that this vaccine is to be issued globably to young women in order to reduce the chances of them and their loved ones suffering.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Learn what? Posted by: ssegallmd
» RE: Learn what? Posted by: Aim
» RE: Learn what? Posted by: mkeeling@jam.rr.com
Here we go again
Posted by: sageivyberyl on Jun 13, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again these groups have proven their disdain for females. They are willing to let 4,000 women die a year rather then make this vaccination readily available. They want their daughters to abstain from sex until marriage or die. Would they do the same with their sons? As usual a cure/preventative for women is fought against while viagra is still the top selling med out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Again, this is a war
Posted by: terradea on Jun 13, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former born-again fundamentalist pentecostal "christian" I sat through many sermons demanding that christians "take up their swords and shields" to fight satan (aka secular humanists). It was "onward christian soldiers" every Sunday, with calls to "eliminate sin" in the name of god. There were thousands in attendance every week, crying, rolling in the aisles and speaking in tongues. THOUSANDS, in my one single megachurch, many fringe lunatics who were accepted there but no where else.

Please take these zealots seriously. They are "filled with the holy spirit," shun education & medicine, and will do whatever the holy spirit (aka Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, GWBush) tells them to do. These spirit-filled hate-mongers use the right code words (purity, "wonder working power," etc.) to gather the forces against evil, subjectively defining evil as they deem necessary.

Our only hope is to make non-zealots aware of the danger and to neutralize the impact of this christian army. How? Stop being polite. Stop accepting "praise jesus" or "god bless" as common benign pleasantries. Stop accepting or respecting this religious movement. These people are terrorists and will not hesitate to kill you and your sinful children in the name of the lord, any way they can. I've seen it in action and I am scared to death of these wolves in sheeple clothing. You all should be too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Again, this is a war Posted by: wwarner
» RE: Again, this is a war Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Again, this is a war Posted by: Angie
THIS ARTICLE IS PURE BIGOTRY AND LIES
Posted by: resistance6 on Jun 13, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I know about all vaccines, I would discourage anyone from getting this vaccine. Why? Because of the mercury and the nasty things in the vaccines. I just don't believe these vaccines do anything but make people sick. We know one out of 160 children now is autistic thanks to vaccines. Who wants a virus deliberately injected into their body to set up housekeeping in their cells, viruses and other nasty things, floating in a solution of mercury, to be injected into the bloodstream? These horrid vaccines are cultured in the cells of human babies who have been aborted. Who knows what other viruses and germs these children harbor from their mothers? It's a witches brew if ever there was one.

This is insanity. It's a lie that these vaccines do any good. Rather, they just make healthy peole sick, and sick people sicker.

I doubt seriously that any "conservative" or "Christian" parent opposes the vaccine for the reasons enumerated in the article. It just sounds to me like more hatred and bigotry being leveled against Christians. Pretty sick article, actually.

Rather, Conservative Christians probably oppose the vaccine because:

There's really no way to know that it's the miracle maker the drug merchandisers like Merck make it out to be. We've heard that story before on other so-called "miracle drugs" like Vioxx and the ERT drugs. Big Pharma produces no real healing drugs nowadays. Pretty much all their drugs do more harm than good, and the side effects are usually much worse than the condition they are supposed to be ameliorating.

Nobody wants to stand in the way of good health.

It's the FDA and Big Pharma that are causing sickness, misery and death with their hideous drugs and their stranglehold of the Food and Drug Administration, which serves only to act as a monopoly enforcer to Big Pharma against anyone who would produce true healing and health for anyone.

I don't want any of Merck's pills. None of them. I take vitamins and supplements and try to eat right (ie avoid processed foods). If you haven't figured out by now that Big Pharma is just a racket to make money, to promote and exploit human illness -- it's time to wake up.

This cartoon, Town of Alopath , dramatizes the point I'm making here very well. This little cartoon has caused more angst among Big Medicine and Big Pharma than anything.

CLICK HERE FOR TOWN OF ALOPATH CARTOON

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Learn Posted by: YogiBear
ON CHRISTIANS WANTING TO KILL YOUR CHILDREN, ETCETERA
Posted by: resistance6 on Jun 13, 2006 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terradea -- What rubbish you speak. Pure lies. Christians are terrorists? You sound like FEMA. You are the terrorist when you speak this way. You try to incite fear and hatred against Christians, saying we want to kill people's children. If this is not terrorism, I don't know what is.

You should be ashamed!

Let's have some more blood letting against Christians! (as if we haven't had enough already!)

The concentration camps are being built and readied for tens of millions of people in America. I guess we know who's going to get hauled off, don't we? The Christians.

Who will be blamed for George Bush and the Monster NeoCONs? Why, Christians of course!

Even though Bush is no more a Christian than Adolph Hitler was.

What a thing to wake up to -- postings like this. If this isn't hate speech, I don't know what is!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typical rightwing bs Posted by: NDnative
» RE: yeah, you're so persecuted. Posted by: WyrdSister
» Christian identity movement Posted by: mokidugway
» onawrd christians Posted by: robmikejas
» Really? Then What About Eric Rudolph?! Posted by: Againstthewindwalking
Beyond the Bible
Posted by: Riverside on Jun 13, 2006 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is so painful in all of this is that religious zealots have captured the Christian designation without realizing that the real story is the Jesus was betrayed and killed because he was THE ultimate liberal.

Just look at His humanity, His love for all people, His teaching about equality and justice, His teaching about family and morals, but with a forgiving heart for those who trangressed. How on earth can we continue to let these people steal the real role model for a progressive, loving world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are right! Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» RE: Beyond the Bible Posted by: kittynboi
» Uh, Jesus WAS "some kind of socialist"! Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
This is getting rediculous.
Posted by: Xanzyl on Jun 13, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, first thing's first. Even if a woman stays abstinent from sex until marriage (which is becoming more and more rare), who's to say that her partner has? Men wouldn't show signs of the virus, and whose to say he wouldn't lie about his past sexual history? On top of that, what if that spouse cheats on the woman later in life and contracts and then passes on that virus?
So past that, let's think logically for a moment. If this vaccine is suppost to prompt premarrital sex, then we also need to get rid of condoms, birth control, the 'pull out' method (pft, like it even works, but let's just be thorogh), and while we're at it, porn, most prime time television, nearly all commercials, most movies, breast augmentation, vibraters/dildos, our eyesight (while we're at it). Sex is EVERYWHERE in our culture and yet it is still such a taboo. It is human nature, and it's going to happen.
We need to be realistic about sex, and not let a minority of our population decide what to do with our bodies. Sure, it's a great idea to promote abstinance, but that isn't going to be everyone's choice and we have to realize that. I find it amazing the advances we are making in reguards to viral infections. A vaccine that can prevent the second most killing cancer among women is a miracle, not immoral.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is getting rediculous. Posted by: dangerouslysane
Living by dogma and the law is more important than their faith.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Jun 13, 2006 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people are following the letter of old testament law and do not live in the spirit of what their faith was intended. They don't even know their own faith as they have denied their own savior in continuing the laws of which all have fallen short of and cannot keep. Dominionists are people of hate and have contempt of people that don't believe as they do. They are part of the fornication and adultry nation. "What God has joined together, no man may put assunder" does not register in their small minded minds. Saved by faith doesn't register either as the "know" their future after death.

These people cannot be talked to about their hypocrisy of their own beliefs. In truth, they act as if their Savior is a probem since they never needed one as they put him up on the cross daily as they condemn others not acknowledging that they are no better. Their faith is dead as they have no need of it as they have knowledge which is far better than faith!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worse than money changers.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Jun 13, 2006 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people of hate and contempt of man and their own professed belief have consistently shown themselves by their works, that their faith is dead and the only real god they have is of money and power.

I highly recommend reading http://theocracywatch.org to learn more about this group of people and how they think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Step Backward
Posted by: Animal on Jun 13, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the Jesus freaks take us another step backward while China, Europe, Canada, and nearly everyone else except the Middle East moves forward. Maybe that's why El Chimpo Bush and the Biblebangers are so preoccupied with the Middle East- they want us to be just like them! A few more years of being run by these wingnuts and we'll be back in the Dark Ages- YAY SUPERSTITUTION!!!! Every time I read shit like this, it just me wonder why the Romans stopped feeding Christians to the lions- too many Christians, too few lions!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Step Backward Posted by: Xanzyl
» RE: Another Step Backward Posted by: RosieRivetor
» RE: Another Step Backward Posted by: aonghus36
saint
Posted by: b4upoo on Jun 13, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush and his ilk do not represent Christianity in any way. As a matter of fact they seem to be better representatives for Satan than for Christ.
The notion that a person should suffer from cancer because they had sex with another person is absurd and the work of demented minds. We can easily point out cases where prominent ministers have had odd affairs with hookers and can easily bring disease home to their marriage partner. We need to shout down the nuts who carry these types of opinions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: saint Posted by: dangerouslysane
They Hate Women Don't They
Posted by: WyrdSister on Jun 13, 2006 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lost my uterus due to this virus and had someone told me in the beginning that it could cause cancer, I would have been more diligent in my yearly pap tests. I for one am glad people are talking about this. The information needs to get to every woman.

I just cannot EVEN BELIEVE that ANYONE would wish cancer on anyone else just because it happens to come from a STI.

Getting this vaccine is NOT going to make anyone promiscuous. That is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They Hate Women Don't They Posted by: the poet
VACCINES KILL
Posted by: resistance6 on Jun 13, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The National Vaccine Information Center in Vienna Virginia, www.NVIC.org, has operated a Vaccine Reaction Registry since founded in 1982. It receives more than 200 calls each month from parents requesting information on 50 vaccine reaction reports ranging from parents calling to talk about how their infants suddenly died after getting BTaP, HIB, pneumococcal, polio and hepatitis B vaccines all on the same day. Some are charged with murder because of bleeding in the brain that doctors insist is a result of shaking the baby, even though there are no other signs of physical trauma.

Nursing students and adult healthcare professionals continue to report joint and muscle pain and weakness, coronic fatigue and inability to think clearly after hepatitis B vaccination.

Since 2000 NVIC has reported an increase in reports of young infants dying after vaccination; toddlers regressing into autism after receiving multiple vaccinations; onset of seizures in 4 to 6-year-olds and an increase in reports of adults having reactions after hep B and A vaccines, tetanus boosters and flu vaccinations.

The human genome is altered by vaccines. By injecting foreign RNA and DNA, toxic metals and poisonous chemicals into our bloodsream, our own genetic structure is changed, allfecting all generations to follow.

Vaccines cause significant numbers of SIDS, learning disabilities, chronic autoimmune diseases, autism. The extent of declining health of our nation caused by medical experimentation by vaccines is iatrogenocide or medically-induced mass murder.

It is impossible to build vital cell structure and a strong immune system by injecting known carcinogens and foreign proteins containing genetic material from other species into our bodies. Viruses and bacteria area cultured from either aborted babies or various animal organs.

IPOL, inactivated polio vaccine, contains three strains of poliovirus grown in vero cels (monkey kidney cells). Newer vaccines such as Hep A, varicella and rubella are cultured in the cells of aborted human babies (i.e read "human diploid cells."

The vaccine preservatives are thimerosal (ethyl mercury), formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, formalin, monosodium glutamate (msg), phenoxyetanol (antifreeze), neomycin (antibiotic), carbolic acid and ammonium sulfate.

Antibodies to vaccine ingredients unbalance the ratio of immune killer cells to immune memory cells confirming that vaccines do indeed harm the immune system. Licensing is ased on the manufacturer demonstrating production of specific antibodies. Effectiveness and longterm safety are ignored.

When unvaccinated children are compared to the vaccinated (ie Hopewood children of Australia) the unvaccinated children are healthier than the vaccinated.

It's been said that the shots and vaccines our soldiers are given kill more of them than the bullets and bombs. Remember the mass refusal by military personnel to receive the anthrax vaccine?

For people who claim to be antiestablishment and distrustful of Big Pharma and the Multinationals, you all seem like lemmings tripping over yourself to get their latest witch's brew, all the while hurling curses at Christians.