Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Freaks of Father's Day

By Jeremy Adam Smith, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2006.


Feminism has given women more freedom and men the opportunity to be stay-at-home dads. But just how many Mr. Moms are out there?
061606_story
Mr Mom

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jeremy Adam Smith

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The day started ordinarily enough. I came home from my office at noon. My wife Shelly went to work. I took our toddler Liko to a cafe for lunch and then we strollered to the playground.

From noon until 7 most weekdays, I'm a Mr. Mom -- a term that bothers some stay-at-home dads as a knock on their masculinity. Personally, it doesn't bother me. The reader will not be surprised to hear that I'm usually the only dad I see at Liko's swim and music classes. I don't mind that, either. After a hard period of adjustment, I came to accept the relative isolation that goes along with my role.

But on the day in question we stepped through the playground gate into a parallel universe where the laws of gender bent and vanished (cue Twilight Zone theme): Liko and I found ourselves surrounded by … men. Three men playing with three toddlers. No women in sight.

One dad left, but another arrived. At 1 p.m., it was still only dads and kids. Naturally, we dads compared notes about the unprecedented situation in which we found ourselves. It emerged that one of us was a full-time stay-at-home dad but looking for a job; two of us had quit careers to take care of our kids, but still, out of necessity, worked part-time as freelancers; the fourth was finishing a Ph.D. All four of our wives worked more hours than we did.

This was the second time around for the Ph.D., Nick Chapin; he has a 2-year-old and a 7-year-old. "There are definitely more dads on the playgrounds now than there were five years ago," Nick said.

At about 1:30, the first mom arrived with her baby. Liko and I went home for a nap. This incident raised the question: How many of us -- and by "us" I mean men who are primary caregivers -- are out there?

The 2004 census says that there are 143,000 stay-at-home-dads caring for 245,000 kids under 15. That's about 1.7 percent of all U.S. parents who are taking care of children, a pretty marginal group, but it's also double the number who stayed home in 1995, which suggests a trend. And the Bureau of Labor Statistics says that about 2 million dads work part-time for "non-economic reasons" that include child care, a category into which I fit.

So what? Those numbers are small, and it's still mostly women taking care of children, often pulling double shifts as workers and mommies. If there is a trend toward more paternal involvement in child rearing -- and there is, no question, and that's a good thing -- we should still keep it in perspective.

On Father's Day, we stay-at-home dads are the freaks. I'm happy to fly my freak flag, while acknowledging that today it's hard for any parent, male or female, to find enough time for their children. In her report, "One Sick Child Away From Being Fired: When Opting Out is Not an Option," U.C. law professor Joan C. Williams found that only 16 percent of working-class families enjoy the luxury of having one stay-at-home parent.

Williams discovered many, many examples of blue-collar workers (mostly women, but some men) who were fired for offenses like being three minutes late because of a child's asthma attack. For many moms and dads, staying home is not an option, and a "balance" between work and family is not possible. What white-collar workers gain in flexibility, they often lose in boundaries: How many of us have spent evenings and weekends massaging PowerPoints and spreadsheets?

Most stay-at-home dads I've met are relatively privileged, creative guys doing what they want to do, and they're happy doing it.

"None of us at-home fathers go into it in order to be some sort of social role model," says Stephen de las Heras, 38, a digital artist who lives in Manhattan and is the primary caregiver to his 4-year-old son. "We don't deserve medals. At least not for that. If anything, the correct response from people would be a completely neutral one. But we do have to put up with some shit from the less enlightened crowd, and face some additional obstacles in a mom-centric world. For that, a pat on the back once in a while can be nice, but is not required."


Digg!

Jeremy Adam Smith lives in San Francisco. His articles have appeared in The Nation, San Francisco Chronicle, Wired and other periodicals. He writes a blog about the politics of parenting.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
progress
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 16, 2006 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good that guys can do "women's work" and women can do "guy's work". This is progress and we sure need progress away from the Bushie freaks on all fronts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need more of these guys
Posted by: fork on Jun 16, 2006 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good to see that the numbers of stay-at-home-dads are increasing.

Good to have some stats (1.7%, 143,000) and some "perspective" next time someone gives equal billing to SAHDs in a discussion of work and childcare.

I notice from the article that the guys seem reluctant to fully embrace their role though. They still define themselves primarily by their careers first: "Stephen de las Heras,. . . 38, a digital artist who lives in Manhattan and is the primary caregiver to his 4-year-old son", or are quick to point out that they also freelance or are looking for work. It doesn't seem acceptable to say, I am a stay at home dad, full stop. Most women I know will say they are stay at home moms, nothing else required, even though they work part-time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We need more of these guys Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith
» RE: We need more of these guys Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith
An article about me.
Posted by: warpspasm on Jun 16, 2006 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been at home with my son for 11 years. It's always good to see an article about our life. By staying home we've been able to avoid public, or private, mass education and my son is a pretty unique kid as a result. Being with a child so much creates a bond that is deep and strong. I've been blessed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another reason for the low # of 1.7% . .
Posted by: slowerpez on Jun 16, 2006 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
might have to do with the fact that women still get paid less than men for the same jobs, and they don't get promoted as often. So discrimination, in combination with the economics of discrimination, surely keep the number of stay at home dads pretty low among the hetero white collar bunch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

housewife dad
Posted by: janusville on Jun 16, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I justed wanted to mention an amusing anecdote. I was filling out a form for a new bank account recently, and the only option that applied to me under employment was housewife. So, according to the bank, that's what I am. That's fine with me, but my son and I listened to some metal after having to do that, so that we could feel manly. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: housewife dad Posted by: popsicle67
veronicasdad
Posted by: meadowlake59 on Jun 16, 2006 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was blessed enough to be my daughter's daytime caregiver for the first eighteen months (other than the obligatory first seven weeks). Coincidentally, her mother and I seperated at that point and the routine changed dramatically. But because of the time spent together at the beginning, I am closer to and more involved in my child's life than most divorced fathers. With the high rate of divorce, the opportunity to play a more influential role in the earliest stages of development is critical to fostering the relationship between a child and an estranged father.

For good or bad, my daughter is much more in character like her father (drives her mom nuts) and like her liberally-minded father, she leans well to the left rather than her narrow-minded (Ayn Rand would say "inactive-minded") conservative-thinking mother. I believe that it is never too early to teach your children to think critically. Voltaire wrote some 250 years ago: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" and it is a parent's responsibility to indoctrine a child in the affairs of politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: veronicasdad Posted by: popsicle67
One Good Thing
Posted by: Conservativation on Jun 16, 2006 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A disjointed post.
I work from home so I am around the kids and involved much more then the typical 9 to 5 dad. And we homeschooled (gasp, I must have toothless kids with eyes on the sides of their heads right, we must be Bible thumping bigots and wear white hoods and robes around the house, right? Not really...its an educational choice though likely to be the focus of any replies here)
The man mom is a recognizable trend to be sure, and performing the tasks that make a home operate is important for perspective for anyone. There is nothing unmanly about doing laundry or dishes, or changing diapers or bathing a child. The bond with the kids is far stronger, and it is more sustainable into teen years because many dads grow to barely know their kids by that time.
It is a conundrum for feminism though. To want everything AND to be favored in divorce court would be the goal. With men trending this way, the notion of equal parenting is catching on, and women may face a 50/50 split of kids time if they divorce, I guess thats bad from the womans point of view.
One important thing I have learned here as we approach Fathers Day is that we dads are always being admonished on our day while moms are gushed over on their day. Cliches about women work never ending abound. But there is a difference, and strangely Chris Rock captures it in a routine. If the parent working outside the home doesnt do the work at the job, there are severe consequences. The work in the home can be put off and the consequence is dirty laundry or such. There is a difference, and women and men who are involved in careers know exactly what I'm talking about.

One post decried that men seem to need to identify themselves by their jobs, and it seemed as if that is bad from the posters perspective. I can't understand why a fundamental male trait need be changed to make men and women more alike. Would it not be equally reasonable to suggest women start indentifying themselves with their work? Why must it be "bad men" doing the accomodating always?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: medstudgeek
» as a mom and a feminist Posted by: sln70
» Response to Chris Rock comment Posted by: scryberwitch
» RE: esponse to Chris Rock comment Posted by: FauxPorteno
» RE: esponse to Chris Rock comment Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: fork
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: fork
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: fork
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: Conservativation
» Sports? Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: Sports? Posted by: fork
» A Bit Forked Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: Ivan_K
» RE: One Good Thing Posted by: Conservativation
» laughable . . . reallly Posted by: FauxPorteno
Thanks
Posted by: MZ on Jun 16, 2006 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My husband stays home with our boys (2 and 7 months) and I am so thankful that they have this time to spend with him (while mommy goes to work and reads AlterNet!). The importance of role modeling for children cannot be underestimated and my guys are growing up with the best. Thanks to all you daddies out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SHHHHH-QUUUUU SHHHHHH-QUUUUU SHHHHHH-QUUUUUUU
Posted by: AlienSlave on Jun 16, 2006 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am your father get me something good for father’s day!

MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU ! AND PASS THE DIAPER POWDER.

DARTH DADDY

ALIENSLAVE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about a plug for childcare grandparents?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 16, 2006 9:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am ready to help my single daughter with childcare, and being a male does not change that one bit. From my participation in her rearing, she knows that I know my way around infants on up.

The statistics about Mr. Moms ought to expand to inquiries about grandfathers as well. I have dozens of friends my age who participate in rearing their grandchildren because of the failure of a marriage, or a career and economic demands, etc.

My anecdotal evidence is noticing how men today are not even noticed in supermarkets. When I was doing childrearing, early on I felt like an invader of the females' world. Today I also notice how many women can be found shopping in the hardware store. Something is changing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PS to AS Posted by: Sojourner
Great article
Posted by: bugs on Jun 16, 2006 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nuanced and well-written - thanks!

What I'm wondering is - where is our beloved troll cry0fan to yell and scream about this article being "divisive" because it's about gender?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The private is public
Posted by: marcos on Jun 16, 2006 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to read stories like this one and all the comments. I'ma a Dad, I work and I try to do a lot more than my Dad did with me.

More power to all you Mr. Mom guys!!! Great labor of love, it really is. We really need more guys like this. Granpa included

The fact that the private sphere, family/home, can be part of changes in the public/politcal sphere is vital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men Need To
Posted by: Conservativation on Jun 16, 2006 3:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is sad that men don't generally just naturally gravitate towards helping with child rearing. It is admirable, rewarding, and the child will benefit exponentially from it.
It is the one way that the men's movement can actually create change in the divorce industry. I do not suggest that most men do it for that reason, but you can bet it has played a part. If men wish to not have it assumed that they are the inferior caregiver then it is obvious they must step up, do it, and prove it, and they are.
More importantly would be to slow the divorce industry and keep marriages together in the first place, because divorce hurts kids, no matter how amicable, no matter the circumstances (I am excluding violence and addictions and abuse etc., and focusing on the "fallen out of love" crowd).
Kids are tough but divorce may be one of the only things that we do that knowingly harms kids and we excuse it away by simply saying they can take it.
This trend I hope continues. I hope more and more dads become Mr Moms. If it does impact custodial statistics in a significant way, the divorce rate will plummet. An assumption of equal parenting, w/ at least a 50/50 shot at being the primary when there is dispute would stop those who whimsically file divorce in their tracks as they ponder losing some contact with their kids. That is all a very good thing.
One of the best ways to keep a marriage together is to step up, as a man, and do all this housework and child rearing. It completely removes that topic from the argument radar screen, and it returns benefits to everyone in that home. Add to that a prenuptial agreement that presumes equal parenting in case of divorce (except abuse etc.) and you will actually create a binding contract instead of the wink and nudge we call marriage today.
If we could sort out the divorce epidemic, I believe much would fall into place. Kids clearly benefit, and the whole debate about same sex marriage would go away as people stayed out of other peoples business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I appreciate what you say Posted by: Conservativation
DAd's
Posted by: Gregor on Jun 16, 2006 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work for a Teen Parent Program. I see a huge difference in kids that have their dads, especially the boys. They are more serene, composed, less fearful and nervous. Whenever there is a dad who volunteers with us, all the little boys gravitate towards him. Dad's are special, unique and provide tools for children to navigate the outside world. Mom's are special too, but Dad's need to realize how incredibly needed they are! Bring Dad's back into family life!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DAd's Posted by: AlienSlave
» stop no fault divorce Posted by: Conservativation
ricksahm
Posted by: ricksahm on Jun 16, 2006 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was bewildered by the author's use of the word "us." I was a stay-at-home parent for fifteen years, and it never occurred to me to feel out of place, or alone, as a result of being the only male parent in a group. I was a stay-at-home parent, not a Mr. Mom. (Do we say "Ms. Mom" or "Mrs. Mom?") Being a mom means doing the activities, chores and nurturing that are part of taking care of children and the household. My wife and I decided, while awaiting the birth of our first child, that I would stay home. I continued to practice law for awhile, part-time, but, after our second child was born, I stopped working for money. I loved being home and volunteering in school, and would have done it forever, if we had had more kids.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ricksahm Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith
Dads or Moms
Posted by: skewitall on Jun 16, 2006 10:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Flip side, Dads staying home with the children are treated as special. For eighteen years, I have spent the majority of my time raising children. I always feel obligated to mention that I have gained some work experience, and pursued a degree during that time. I feel that way because others make me feel that way, I must have been doing something else besides raising children. There are often conflicting reasons why our society demeans the stay at home parent. Personally, I feel it all bowls down to pursuing the almighty dollar so we can consume even more, the standard for our culture today. Success equals how much you can consume. The moneyed produce more powerful moneyed and the rest produce more workers. Worker ants, ohh not my kids!

Stay at home Dads are given respect when stay at home Moms are, that would be nice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Within Yourself Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: Dads or Moms Posted by: fork
My husband has been at home with our son for 11 yrs
Posted by: rosesaylavee on Jun 17, 2006 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I believe that their relationship is deeper because of the time they have spent together over this time. I started working outside the house so my husband could make his art full time in 1995 when our son was entering first grade. He has been there when our son gets home from school, did some time as the 'Picture Lady' for his class art program (caused them to rethink that designation too) and hey, we live in suburbia so there are fewer stay-at-home dads here than in the city. I love my son and of course would have liked to play this role myself... but wouldn't begrudge either of them this time together . They are very close and I think our son is all the more comfortable in being himself as he hasn't been exposed to the breast-beating masculinity thing... at least not at home. Way to go all you stay-at-home dads! Happy Father's Day!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feminism's Relevance to Men
Posted by: chicagoguy on Jun 17, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A previous poster lamented that there is no men's liberation movement. But as this article alludes to, there is a vibrant, effective, world-wide movement leading the liberation of men from unhelpful gender stereotypes. You may have heard of this movement -- It's called Feminism.

This article's author alludes to feminism's relevance to men when he writes:
Thanks to feminism . . . women now have more choices. So do men.

This is a great article. Not just on the particular subject of stay-at-home dads. I also add this to my too-brief collection of articles on the relevance of Feminism to men.

As a man I've always found it unfortunate that so many attempts at a "men's movement" have been reactive against feminism, rather than recognizing that feminism is essentially a "gender liberation" movement that, while understandably starting with and primarly focused on women, has much to offer men. The popular stereotype of feminism as "anti-men" (echoed here in an early post by "eocilian," who in 2006 still characterizes feminism as mainly being about not wearing bras) is unfortunate and unwarranted. I've been reading Ms. magazine since I first moved in with a subscriber 13 years ago (and to whom I've been married for the past 7). Not only have I never seen anything in Ms. about wearing or not wearing a bra, I have always found the content to be extremely liberating to me. How is it that so many men fail to see, in women's liberation from confining gender roles, their own liberation as well?

If more men see feminism as relevant to their lives, then hopefully we can then begin, as men, to make contributions to the movement. And a couple of previous posters here have provided a great example of a specific contribution men can make to feminism as they take on more parenting responsibilities (whether as stay-at-homes or not):

"Fork" comments early on that SAHDs "seem reluctant to fully embrace their role" as primary caregivers because the article lists their dollar-earning occupation first and their caregiving role second, as in "a digital artist who lives in Manhattan and is the primary caregiver to ... "

"Conservation" later questions if this is necessarily a bad thing. Which was my thought exactly. In particular, I was thinking of a married het female friend of mine, who is a writer and SAHM. Because she's female, it's a concern that she is seen by society primarily as a mom and that her writing is considered unimportant and maybe even something she will eventually give up. It may be particularly helpful to her that as more men balance their professional / political / creative lives with primary caregiving that we will all begin to see all people, male and female, as multifaceted and not assume that parenting cuts a person off from the world outside the home or that maintaining a presence in that outside world necessarily decreases the quality of one's parenting. So men's lack of comfort with being identified solely as a parent can be a good thing for all parents. Why should anyone be seen as "only a parent" ?

Men's Liberation. Women's Liberation. They go together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Feminism's Relevance to Men Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith
» If Women Ruled the World Posted by: Conservativation
» RE: Feminism's Relevance to Men Posted by: Conservativation
Fulltime Mr. Mom
Posted by: popsicle67 on Jun 17, 2006 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I care for my daughters while my ex goes to school or work or whatever. We decided that it was cheaper for me to do this than work and send child support because she still had to cover some of the childcare costs. It really has strengthened my relationships with my daughters(yes they are two separate
relationships) and my ex too. We are much better at being a family now than when we were married and I was working. The only rough spot has been her sexism. Funny as it sounds she has this notion that while men demanding a clean house and food on the table when they get home is abusive, Her lamentations in the same vein are not. I find it funny after the
whole reversal that similar bad attitudes develop. Have any other Mr. Moms run into this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fulltime Mr. Mom Posted by: DaBear
Red State / Blue State?
Posted by: SufiLizard on Jun 17, 2006 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, the thing that really struck me about this article is how unusual the writer felt his situation is even in a liberal city like San Fran.

I'm in a very similar situation (work part-time from home and the primary caregiver to my three kids) and I live in a rural area of a red state.

I haven't encountered ANY of the bigotted remarks about women staying home or not being manly. Everybody I encounter seems genuinely fine with our choice. I haven't noticed even a quietly raised eyebrow from the most stereotypical redneck red stater around here.

I just find that curious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ed State / Blue State? Posted by: DaBear
The "Mr. Mom" moniker still bugs me
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 17, 2006 4:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've met a lot of colleague-SAHD's that claim the Mr. Mom moniker doesn't bother them, their isolation doesn't bother them. It strikes me as such a fake sentiment. Come on, being demeaned sucks no matter from where or for what reason it occurs. I just don't believe my brothers when they say it doesn't bug them. I will admit it bugs the crap outta me. There's something perverse about gender constructs that see parenting as a gender-biased "mothering." I revere good moms and good dads, but as similar as the job parenting it, there is something distinct about mothering and fathering equally. If this wasn't true, boys wouldn't flock to the guy teacher or the Dad that shows up on the playground. We're not better than moms just different and that difference is a good thing, something to be proud of even as we realize that it really isn't that big of a deal. I know why guys eschew the difference however; because our experience is that if we draw attention to ourselves or try to verbalize what we all know to be true about ourselves as fathers, we're bound to be excoriated for it, from both genders. SO we pretend the Mr. Mom moniker and the feminization of parenthood is just fine with us. I guess the bottom line is that it doesn't matter but I have to say I'm tired of being the freak sometimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The "Mr. Mom" moniker still bugs me Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith
i'm almost a houseDad
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Jun 18, 2006 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the wifeUnit makes more than me. always has. the sad fact is there's still a pay discrimination against women; she needs to nail the next level so i can stay home. shes' almost there. we can't wait. i'm so stoked to 'retire' and do double-diaper duty (we've got a newborn and 2 year old).

to all you guys out there doing it: you're my heroes. HAPPY FATHER'S DAY!

see you at the park....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thieflord
Posted by: thieflord on Jun 20, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a single mother, I would give my right arm to be a stay at home caregiver. I'm a full time professional AND a full time mom and i find it very difficult. What bothers me about so many stay at home dads (and many moms too) is that their definition of caregiver often leaves at lot to be desired. I see men who are supposedly careing for thier kids while the dads sit there and read and the kids play. I see dads grocery shopping "to help out" picking up a few things for dinner never a whole week's worth of food and supplies. Some dads idea of caregiving is to keep the kid quiet. That's it. Many don't seem to realize that careing for a child takes sacrafice. I know one dad who told his little girl that the TV at his house did not get anything but sports so that he wouldn't have to put up with cartoons or disney movies. I don't know a single stay at home dad who planned a birthday party (even an easy outside the home party) let alone baked the cake in the shape of a Hogwarts and dressed up like a wizard to facilitate the party at home. Stay at home dads (and as i said many stay at moms) need to learn that, while childrearing and homemaking are personal, some commonly accepted functions need to be incorporated into the definition of "stay at home" anyone. One of those tenants needs to be that the wellbeing and happiness of the child come first, not your golf game. Another is that childcare very much involve "homemaking." Some stay at homes seem to think that cleaning, laundry, grocery shopping and cooking don't directly involve the child so they don't come under the heading "stay at home" caregiver. I know there must be some men out there who do a great job and I've witnessed many stay at moms who think the name of the game is "how can I do the minimum amount of work with the least amount of effort." I just don't like it. Just wanted to get this off my chest. Now i have to write a brief for this case I'm working on and then try to design this year's birthday cake during lunch at my desk. I think she wants to go with an iceskate this time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Context is everything Posted by: Jeremy Adam Smith