Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Global Warming Matters

By Blair Golson, Truthdig. Posted June 9, 2006.


The producer of Al Gore's hit documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth' explains why Americans need to start getting serious about the ways that we're destroying the planet -- before it's too late.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Blair Golson

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Editor's Note: The following is an edited conversation between Truthdig managing editor Blair Golson and Lawrence Bender, the producer of the Al Gore global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," which opened in Los Angeles and New York on Wednesday, May 24.

Several years ago, the idea of making a wide-release movie out of Al Gore delivering an hour-and-a-half lecture might have struck some people as slightly batty. After all, the nickname he earned during the 2000 presidential campaign was "The Robot"--hardly a selling point for a guy whose rhetoric would have to carry an entire movie.

Nonetheless, there he was recently at the Cannes Film Festival, posing for pictures on the red carpet in support of "An Inconvenient Truth"--a film cut almost entirely from the footage of Gore's lecture on the dangers of global warming.

The presentation is one that the former vice president has given around 1,000 times since the late 1980s, but it wasn't until early 2005 that it caught the attention of a Hollywood producer who glimpsed the cinematic potential of Gore's traveling show.

That producer, Lawrence Bender, had exploded onto the Hollywood scene in 1992 as the producer of Quentin Tarantino's first film, "Reservoir Dogs," and produced every Tarantino film since--including "Pulp Fiction" and the two "Kill Bill" movies. And although gory violence is indeed one of his hallmarks, he has also made a career of tackling projects with more social conscience: "Good Will Hunting," "White Man's Burden" and "Voces Innocentes" ("Innocent Voices").

More recently, he was one of the driving forces behind "The Detroit Project" TV ads, which drew attention to the foreign policy ramifications of driving gas-guzzling SUVs.

With "An Inconvenient Truth," Bender tackles an issue of, well, earth-shattering importance: global warming. And whereas the makers of "The Day After Tomorrow" pumped a reported $175 million into that depiction of catastrophic climate change, Bender's version is somewhat more stripped down.

The majority of the movie exhibits Gore delivering his lecture to an audience at a relatively small theater in Los Angeles. But the message is no less startling than that of the fictional movie--it's more, because it derives from essentially uncontested scientific fact.

With the aid of a 70-foot digital screen that Bender commissioned specifically for the movie, Gore displays a dizzying array of graphs, facts, figures and slideshows that leave little doubt of the calamity facing our planet due to the stratospheric levels of heat-trapping carbon dioxide in our atmosphere.

But lest Bender allow the entire film to rest upon Gore's delivery, the producer also sprinkles the film with narrative dramas from the former presidential candidate's life--such as the death of his sister Nancy to lung cancer, which Gore ties into the film's message by highlighting the disingenuous marketing strategies of industries like tobacco and coal.

Bender and his production team have orchestrated a grass-roots marketing campaign that relies heavily on small informal screenings for influential groups and individuals. The movie's almost uniformly positive buzz and advance press have stoked enormous amounts of "will he or won't he" speculation about a possible 2008 White House run by Gore. But the man who says during the film that he "used to be the next president of the United States," has repeatedly said he isn't running.

Blair Golson spoke to Lawrence Bender in Los Angeles on the eve of his trip to Cannes. Bender discussed how he became convinced that Gore would make a compelling documentary subject; the reasons why Gore didn't capitalize on this issue when he was in office; and the sad fact that despite all of Gore's efforts, pollsters still finds that global warming barely registers on most voters' minds.

Blair Golson: How did this project come about?

Lawrence Bender: Basically what happened is that [environmental activist] Laurie David brought Gore here to do his presentation in L.A. I hadn't seen it, and when you see him do it, it's so definitive on global warming that it makes you want to take action. Everyone comes out saying, "What can I do?" I'm a filmmaker, obviously, and I immediately felt that this presentation could be made into a movie. And I think a light bulb went off in my head. I thought it could be made much more visual--instead of thousands of people seeing this, millions of people could see this; and we could create a tipping point if we created a movie out of this.


Digg!

Blair Golson is the managing editor of Truthdig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's only bad, because it hurts us. The earth as a whole doesn't care.
Posted by: GoodByeToAmerica on Jun 9, 2006 2:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good that Man is trying to take resonsibility. But in the end, the only ones hurt by Global warming are us, people, the human race. We are the only ones who are even conscious of the possibilities. The rest of Nature will adapt, new species evolve, old ones die out. This is not tragic, this is the way of the World. Nice to see concern for wildlife and environments, but new ones will ensue. People who get upset about global warming are really just upset because it may hurt them, and they feel they are important, and we should do something to help save them.
Let the changes come, it merely gives us a new environment to live in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gore's Global Warming Posted by: derfb1
» Everyone's Global Warming Posted by: JessB
Don't fall for this overclass issue. They are trying to scare you into voting for them
Posted by: cry0fan on Jun 9, 2006 3:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming is the dems version of the GOP issue of terrorism. It is a scare tactic to rally political support, yet it is a bogus issue that we can really do little about, or at least the plans they will offer us will have little effect.

The GOP uses terrorism to scare voters into voting for them. Terrorism is an issue that the GOP knows is a WIN WIN issue for the big money players. Doing things about terrorism will not hurt the wealthy overclass members, and it will help corporate profits.

Now the Dems are trying to scare you with global warming.

Refuse to be manipulated!

The global warming issue is a bogus issue. The earth temperature is very hard to measure, and the temperature varies substantially over any century. We can tell this from looking at the natural temperature records. In fact, if the temperature did NOT vary up and down THAT would be abnormal.

We should lessen pollution and we have. But this global warming is a distraction boogeyman that the overclass is using to keep the Democrat base away from the real issues like progressive taxation, universal healthcare and the depression of wages from mass immigration.

These real issues hurt the fat overclass wallets, so the Dem politicians are staying away from real issues because they know that any dem politician who strikes out and draws attention to these real issues would be isolated and attacked by big money. Once out of office, such a Dem politician would not be likely to be taken in as a lobbyist etc, in the big money machine, because he had turned his back on the overclass.

If you really want to lessen hydrocarbon emissions, then lower mass immigration into America and Europe. But doing this you lower hydrocarbon emissions. Lower future first world population by cutting immigration and that added time will allow the development of new, less polluting technologies.

But these news stories about ice caps are really meaningless. Ice Caps melt all the time. It is just that it occurs on a time span of centuries. Don't mistake your time scale for that of nature's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Global warming is our cue to evolve
Posted by: greentime on Jun 9, 2006 4:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global warming is real. It has been and will continue to change life on this planet. It is not a fake scare as some would claim. It may be part of existing ancient natural cycles but we have, in fact, made our collective contribution towards these changes in ways unmatched by other species.

What many believe as the story of the human species, the mythical survival of the "fittest" as strongest, is incorrect. The human survival story is one of adaptation. Change, as it turns out, is good. While we are a successful breeder and survivor, we are fast reaching our limits. Many studies show we have already exceeded our limits.

Everyday, some beliefs and scientific "facts" we once held as truth are being shown to have been half-truths at best. This includes what we know about other species and their intelligence and capacity to communicate, feel, plan, adapt, and have other capabilities we regard as being only in ourselves and indicators of our "god-given" human superiority. Well, not so fast.

While other species may not be like us, there is no guarantee we will be the ones to survive the ongoing climate changes. We are a very high-maintenance species. We have not yet understood our true place in the biosphere and web-of-life. If we want to continue as a successful species, we will have to change our ways and beliefs out of the neccessity to survive.

While this may scare those who are entrenched in their own self-appointed superiority, it doesn't scare those of us who love and genuinely accept being part of nature. We see this climate crisis as an opportunity to better understand the great concepts of sustainability and interdependence. We know that science and spirit need to coexist more peacefully.

Nature can be violent, yes. Nature can also thrive and be healthy when it is nurtured and in balance. We are destined to be gardeners, not destroyers... careful participants, not greedy consumers of everything in our path. What a great gift this warning of change can be - and what great changes can occur if we listen to what is being asked, or rather required of us, if we want to continue our species on earth.

Love>Fear
Time to EVOLVE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» End Time Posted by: YogiBear
Learn about the solutions
Posted by: Must have been the Roses on Jun 9, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The film was really terse with it's talk about solutions. I suggest reading Plan B 2.0 by Lester Brown, available free on the internet at http://www.earth-policy.org.

If you find yourself overwhelmed and in despair about global warming, read this book. While he numbingly goes over the painful details of the food, water, energy, and climate problems, 2/3 of the book is about the solutions. And guess what? The solutions already exist, we just have to fund them, at wartime speed, and we can do it for a fraction of the combined military budgets of the world. We did it for WWII, converting all our industrial strength to win. Imagine gun and auto factories pumping out wind mills, one every 3 mintues. Wow! That's a world I want my kids to grow up in.

The great thing is that solving the climate problems will solve all the other problems too. They are all related.

Despair is not an option.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He was your hero Posted by: JessB
» And your hero is...? Posted by: YogiBear
Global Warming........
Posted by: sidewinder on Jun 9, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who would like to see algore as president really does have their head up their ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Al Z's Posted by: feller
MIKE THOMAS - FUTURE IN OUR HANDS
Posted by: mikethomasfioh on Jun 9, 2006 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely there cant be people denying that global warming exists!! What the devil is the 'Overclass' anyway? The people I know who accept that global warming is real are drawn from all 'classes'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mantra Posted by: YogiBear
» Global Warming happens Posted by: YogiBear
Ummm.. The United States Goverment admits Global Warming
Posted by: Shallow_Vain on Jun 9, 2006 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just not the executive branch
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Read it.. be afraid be very afraid. No one is scared that the whole planet is going to just catch fire one day. What is scary is that sea level around the earth are rising.. quickly. Its estimated that sea levels may rise by as much as 20 feet.. not a wave 20 feet high.. the entire level of the ocean. Take a quick look at the sea levels of most of our huge coastal communities... take a look at how high their sea walls are.
Think New Orleans EVERYWHERE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Twice as necessary Posted by: JessB
» RE: Twice as necessary Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Disrespectful Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Disrespectful Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Twice as necessary Posted by: JessB
» RE: Debate Posted by: JessB
Too little too late?
Posted by: Gregor on Jun 9, 2006 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether we are causing massive global warming or the Earth is working on healing herself really doesn't matter. It matters if we as a species learn to heal ourselves, and live in balance with the Earth. The Earth has gone through major changes in the past, she got rid of the dinosaurs didn't she? She has shifted on her axis and probably will do so again. The Universe is much more dynamic than we in our puny understanding of science know. It wasn't too long ago we thought the Earth was flat and yet we still practiced self-destructive behavior then too. The key to our own survival is our own self-destructive behavior and lack of compassion for ourselves, each other and our planet.

We don't really know what our destiny is though. We could just as easily be wiped out by an asteroid. So why not learn to care about each other?

If an autistic boy can realize things such as " Judging others mean you judge God." How pathetic are we who think we are much more special than our special needs children?

So learn compassion. Learn the tools to really communicate safely with each other. All our problems in life really come from inability to really understand and communicate with each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thanks Gregor! Posted by: greentime
» Floor It Posted by: feller
» Hand Me the Raid Posted by: feller
What adult can look a child in the eye nowadays . . .
Posted by: cthelyt on Jun 9, 2006 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and honestly, confidently say that he or she will inherit a better world than we had? I can't.

On so many issues--environmental, political, economic, cultural, religious--it has become a meaner, crueler place. Wars for scarce resources, which themselves were in thankfully short supply for the past half-century, have returned on a global scale. Consumption of those resources, though prized and killed for, will accelerate massive climate changes that will only make human life more difficult, if not impossible. Al Gore notes in the movie that scientists have already had to shorten the time frame we have to change our behavior before the runaway greenhouse effect raises ocean levels by 20 feet and changes ocean currents--who can say that the present time frame is any less optimistic than the one it replaced? I fear that it may already be too late, and the state of perpetual war coupled with ever-increasing surveillance, imprisonment, and curtailment of civil rights constitutes our initiation into an awful new era.

The only hope I have is that I am proved wrong. I certainly don't want to be right, but there is no convincing evidence to the contrary. Not for the first time, the young ones among us will have to show the grown-ups a few things.

I was particularly troubled by the final credits of the movie, which detail things we all can do to reduce our carbon footprint. I already do many of those things: I never owned a car, I nearly always use mass transit or walk, I replaced all incandescent bulbs with energy-efficient fluorescents, I always recycle. I know that I'm hardly the only one doing this. Will enough others make enough of a difference to reverse the warming trend in time?

Will politicians stop taking money from anti-warming lobbyists in time? Will scientists be free from government interference to publish their reports in their entirety? We had to answer yes to these questions, IMO, 20 years ago. But Ronbo told us then that trees were the culprit and ketchup was a vegetable, and we gave him a sendoff that even George Washington didn't get. The only good news is that his crypt will be in Davy Jones' locker before long. My apologies to the bottom feeders.

So, all you young'uns, the grown-ups who grew up not trusting anyone over 30 because they messed up the world are leaving you guys a world even more messed up than before. Stop being so obedient. Get angry, get active, and do something before you too have too much at stake to dare to try.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Only Solution
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Jun 10, 2006 5:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fact 1: Greenhouse gas caps are not the solution to global warming.

a. Because countries that committed to caps have continued to increase their emissions.

b. Because the earth will soon start to emit much more than humans.

Fact 2: Global warming is a catastrophic problem that must be solved.

Conclusion: The only solution is to remove the greenhouse gas from the environment after it is emitted.

Analysis: Since mechanical sequestration is impractical due to the volume of greenhouse gas that would have to be sequestered, biological sequestration is the best choice.

My suggestion is to construct a genetically modified organism to seed into the oceans that will "fix" carbon at a rate much faster than nature can. I can be much more specific upon request.

This idea is risky, but it must be weighed against the risk of leaving the greenhouse gas in the environment.

By the way, I have solicited many experts, and the objections I have received have been risk based in nature, not technically grounded.

Presently only caps are entertained as the remedy to global warming, so it appears that they will have to fail before other solutions are seriously considered.

If the two facts stated in the above argument are true, then I predict reluctance to my solution will be overcome over time.

dobermantmacleod@aol.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Methane will soon flood the air
Posted by: dobermanmacleod on Jun 10, 2006 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• There is an estimated 400 billion tons of methane trapped in permafrost ice.

• An estimated 50% of surface permafrost will melt by 2050, and 90% by 2100.

• Methane is more than 20 times as strong a greenhouse gas as CO2-the sudden release of just 35 billion tons of methane would be like doubling the CO2 in the air.

Massive amounts of methane from melting permafrost ice will soon flood the air-far outpacing human greenhouse gas pollution.

• The effect of methane flooding the air is runaway global warming-this disastrous positive feedback loop has occurred before.

• Ocean bottom ice will start to melt-releasing some of the estimated 10,000 billion tons of methane trapped in it.

• A potential bottleneck for mankind-an existential threat to nations.

• The only solution is biological sequestration-removing the CO2 from the air after it is emitted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help Bush Kick America's Gas, er, rOILty Habit
Posted by: rknox on Jun 15, 2006 7:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most automobiles are at least 25% less efficient then five to ten year old technologies should have given us if the auto industry had lived up to their claims of customer service... perhaps the good thing is that higher gas prices will result in less consumption... Unfortunately, less than cost-optimally efficienty vehicles unnecessarily make the greenhouse gas, environmental and public health issues worse, and reduce the conservation efforts of those who go carfee or carless...

Urge the auto industry to make cleaner air, more fuel efficient and safer vehicles: http://www.autobuyology.org/tellcarmakerstocleantheair.pdf

Wih the real cost of subsidized gasoline now well above $10 a gallon (http://www.icta.org/press/release.cfm?news_id=12), and with 'average' automobile ownership and operation costs over a lifetime now zoom-zooming past $500,000 (half a million dollars -- you do the math), a few auto related conservation reminders may be helpful: Go carfree (see savings above); go carless; buy smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles and rent up or larger as needed; drive less; ride-share; trip-link or group errands; negotiate a fuel inefficiency retail price reduction for less than cost-optimally fuel-efficient vehicles; urge the auto industry to stop fighting conservative and reasonable fuel efficiency and green-house gas emission standards, and to adopt long-proven, cost-effective fuel efficiency tenchologies for new vehicles; get-SMART and support comprehensive public transportation and auto-alternative programs, for others, if not for oneself; And etc., add your energy conservation choices to this list. Keep it handy, and share it.


http://www.autobuyology.org/thankyouforteaching.pdf



Rand
Carlessnesshood 101
If there is one thing worse then having to buy an automobile, it's paying to much for one... "1st law of thermo-economical-dynamics"
http://www.autobyology.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]