Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Media Crimes Lead to War Crimes

By Danny Schechter, MediaChannel.org. Posted June 1, 2006.


The media's acceptance of the Haditha 'mistake' makes it an accessory to the crime.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Danny Schechter

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As events in Iraq continue to slip from bad to worse, the good news brigade is scrambling for new stories -- ("anything, give me anything") to shore up what's left of public support for a bloody war without end.

As some feared and many predicted, the war hovers over our politics and the president who "brought it on." He is, as the journalist Sid Blumenthal puts it, stuck in a "paradigm" of his own making. The operative word is the title and refrain of an early Springsteen song: "TRAPPED."

Another tipping point seems to have tipped.

Fear and exhaustion is evident in our TV newsrooms along with a continuing failure to recognize what is going on. The lack of insight is stunning; the quality of most of the news, pathetic. Even CBS's brave Kimberly Dozier -- may she fully recover -- was not only embedded in practice with the U.S. military when she was wounded, and her crew killed, but she seemed embedded mentally, seeking out a "feel good" story to cheer the home front that the Bush administration wants so badly to stay the course of his "long war." In an email sent to CBS, and only discovered after her misfortune, she described the story she was going to be doing before another IED did its awful damage.

Reported the Los Angeles Times:

When producers of the CBS Evening News arrived in the newsroom Monday morning, there was an email waiting from correspondent Kimberly Dozier.

In a note written Sunday night, she detailed a Memorial Day story she planned to do about a U.S. soldier wounded in Iraq who insisted on going back to the battlefield, a piece about "fighting on in memory of those who have fallen."

What a tragic loss -- TV journalists dying not in search of deeper truths but to send back another picture-rich but patriotically correct story along the same good news lines as one filed for 60 Minutes by CBS's now chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan. She glamorized the tactics of a brainy American colonel heroically stopping terrorists in the town of Tel Afar.

A Washington Post journalist, filing a report from the same town, debunked CBS's storyline. He found no terrorists killed in what was a sectarian and internal political fight.

Early Thursday morning, the CNN website carried a story by Arwa Damon, one of its Iraq reporters, who said she realized after the fact that she knew about the Marines at Haditha but did not report on them at the time:

It actually took me a while to put all the pieces together -- that I know these guys, the U.S. Marines at the heart of the alleged massacre of Iraqi civilians in Haditha.

When I went back to quote her more extensively a half-hour later, the story was off the website and its URL did not work, though I was able to find it through CNN's website archive.

It's a rare piece of media introspection.

I don't know why it didn't register with me until now. It was only after scrolling through the tapes that we shot in Haditha last fall, and I found footage of some of the officers that had been relieved of their command, that it hit me. I know the Marines that were operating in western al Anbar, from Husayba all the way to Haditha. I went on countless operations in 2005 up and down the Euphrates River Valley. I was pinned on rooftops with them in Ubeydi for hours taking incoming fire, and I've seen them not fire a shot back because they did not have positive identification on a target. (Watch a Marine's anguish over deaths -- 2:12) (Note: the anguish of the U.S. military still tends to get more airtime than the anguish of Iraqi civilians.)

Digg!

Danny Schechter writes a blog for MediaChannel.org. He is the author of "Embedded: Weapons of Mass Deception: How the Media Failed to Cover the War on Iraq" (Prometheus).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You said a nasty mouthful
Posted by: babs on Jun 1, 2006 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly my sentiments. The fact that the Pentagon was busily covering this story up when some courageous media outlet broke the story is very telling.

And the Times reported that there is shock and outrage/awe in Pendleton over allegations that any of America's Marines are killer cowboys who shoot small children and their mothers. Say it ain't so!

Well, it is so. Welcome to the new wars, folks. Where Geneva conventions are "quaint" and global laws and courts are for wimps (read: not Americans). And the murder of a few brown people somewhere over there must be justified by something - golly.

Ask Faux News. No doubt they reported that the six month old child was brandishing an M16 and the whole nest had to be sterilized. Praise be to god for collateral damage - it sounds so much better than genocide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cable news manipulation
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 1, 2006 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose by now it's pretty clear that the cable news networks are among the worst places to turn for factual information, and are also the most propaganda oriented members of the mainstream media. Just for fun, one could limit all of one's information about the world to cable news viewing for one month - then go back and see what you missed.

The Rendon Group likes this quite a bit - they call embedded reporting 'the new reality television' - That is, it appears real but is actually under almost complete external control. You can look at the Rendon Group's website: RENDON, then compare that to that excellent source, Sourcewatch on Rendon. If history is any judge, then Rendon is likely handling the 'haditha issue' for the Pentagon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yes, we need to see some of these media figures on trial for their lives
Posted by: cry0fan on Jun 1, 2006 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
after all, hasn't their complicity killed thousands of innocents? THen, they, along with all the politicians and consultants and lobbyists who facilitated this war, they should be indicted and tried in a court of law for murder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We have very few newsmen (or women)
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jun 1, 2006 4:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A better word might be "newsmodels". We have an entire network made up of newsmodels (Fox of course) speaking lies for this disgusting administration. I wrote letters to both of my local papers, asking them to publish body counts from Iraq. Both papers ignored me (Asbury Park Press and Newark Star Ledger, both in New Jersey). Is it any wonder that the only places I trust now for news are The Daily Show and Air America Radio? One of the goals of fascism is to keep the populace uninformed. Bushit and his conspirators have done that very well. THERE IS NO UNDERESTIMATING THE GENERAL INTELLIGENCE OR AWARENESS OF THE AMERICAN PUBLIC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Media covering up fact those killed knew about bomb
Posted by: jonwilson on Jun 1, 2006 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CNN has been airing a piece which includes an interview with a girl who survived the killings. She said she didn't go to school that day because she was waiting for the bomb to go off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Look amigo, bullsh** doesn't fly Posted by: thoughtcriminal
So much about this is so disturbing...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Jun 1, 2006 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know where to begin.

I can't add much to this chilling indictment of the insipid press. But let us not forget how the administration has failed time and again to realize they have a problem. They did not answer the wake up call of Abu Ghraib. They stuck to the company line that a few bad apples were responsible for the bad behavior.

And now once again Bush hides behind the "nobody told me excuse." It's sickening. Whatever happened to three strikes and you're out...if it's good enough for petty thieves it ought to be good enough for the leader of the free world.

New on EWM:
Contrition, Crawford Style

...Standing in front of the nation and beside what’s left of Tony Bair, Bush admitted that he’s just too damn manly. Bush says it was the “tough talk,” that stands out among mistakes. You know, the “bring it on,” “wanted dead or alive” crap.

The President let his inner cowboy out and he’s sorry for sending the “wrong signals.” Signals are important to this caballero. There’s no “Brokeback” in his Baghdad policy...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Haditha is old News
Posted by: Abushite on Jun 2, 2006 3:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about the 11 killings in Ishaqi which took place only 2 months ago - about the time that the militaries' big cheese found out about Haditha in Time Magazine - His Officers have kept
another dirty secret to themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cow now
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 2, 2006 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People should stop having a cow now and end the war now and end the Presidency very soon. Every day in Iraq means more atrocities committed by more Americans. Iraq is the systematic destruction of the American Dream and the systematic construction of American Crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jean Jearman
Posted by: Jean Jearman on Jun 2, 2006 7:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It became apparent during the first G. Bush campaign against A. Gore the media is no friend to democracy and truth. I watch the news in disgust every day due to lies and misrepresentation or I hear nothing of our government's desception and steps toward a police state. Even exposed, documented crimes are not covered by our media. Our best sources of news has been the variety of honest, investigative and complete coverage on the net, such as Alternet, Commondreams, Public Citizen, CommonCause, 9/11 Truth, MoveOn, BuzzFlash, and many more.
Still, we need to hold our media accountable for the harm it has done to our country, lives it has cost our soldiers and the many thousands of innocent lives the the citizens of Iraq. Also this madman in the White House is definately setting the path to drop nuclear bombs on Iran. Comparing himself to President Truman indicates to me that he plans to be the next president to drop a nuclear bomb. Is there a private law firm that can file suit against our media for not practicing the guidelines of their license to broadcast? Why do we the people of the U.S. allow this to continue? There are many more of us than them. A handfull of slimy criminals dystroying our environment beyond repair and our freedom and peace in the world! What the hell does that say about the citizens of America when it has gone on for over five years?! I want to throw up when I hear "home of the brave". We are either stupid, uninformed, heartless, arrogant, lazy, cowards or all the above. To save our country, we have to deal with the media first. I hope the great minds of the true patriots who oppose this Bush government step forward and find a way to give us new, honest and uncorrupted news media NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PAID-TRIOTS
Posted by: Roverton on Jun 2, 2006 9:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their opinions are purchased in advance.

Tele-Predators.

They dine on our fears.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Check your first assumption!
Posted by: zvirgil2 on Jun 8, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honestly speaking, do we really think and believe that combat troops are sane or saints during and after combat? Nothing about killing or being killed falls in the normal range of human activity. Yes, troops are trained for a few monthes to act according to the rules of war, but when the first bullet is shot and the guy next to is dead, all of the worlds efforts and monthes of training are not going to keep the troops from being terrified, traumtised and disfunctional.
Each troop who sees the results of war may come out of the experience talking like a pariot, but inside their being, they are busy being overwhelming by panic.
Get real folks, those youngests were ordered to Iraq. They are not the responsible ones. If you need to hang someone for the deaths, let it be the old men, the Masters of War, who sent them.
virgil

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
9
8
7
79
78
77
77
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
69
68
67
66
65
64
63
62
61
60
6

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
59
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
5
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
4
39
38
37
36
35
34

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

re
Posted by: oscarmil on Jan 10, 2007 1:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
33
32
31
30
3
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
2
0
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]