Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Marine Who Saw Too Much

By Peter Laufer, AlterNet. Posted June 15, 2006.


A former lance corporal explains why he intentionally failed a drug test to avoid going back to war-torn Iraq.
mr_daniel
daniel

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Peter Laufer

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following text is an excerpt from Peter Laufer's new book, "Mission Rejected: U.S. Soldiers Who Say No to Iraq" (Chelsea Green, 2006).

Recruiters convinced a listless Californian named Daniel to join the Marines. On September 11, 2001, he was taking classes at a junior college near San Jose while holding down two jobs: managing a PurWater store and squeezing fruit at a Jamba Juice stand.

His patriotism combined with the recruiters' sales pitches convinced him to drop out of school two units short of his associate's degree. By the next summer he was in boot camp. When we meet, the 23 year-old ex-Marine asks me to restrict my identification of him to his first name; he's fighting the Veterans Administration for benefits and the Marines for an honorable discharge, and he fears publicity may hurt his case.

Daniel is slouched in his chair when we first start talking. He's wearing a camouflage baseball cap with the image of a Canada goose on its front. His black T-shirt carries the legend POW-MIA you are not forgotten. His forearms are covered with tattoos. His blue jeans are well faded and his black cowboy boots well worn.

"I decided my country needed me and I was pretty fit," he says about his decision to join the Marines after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. "I decided to go do my part. I wasn't sure what branch until I walked into the recruiting office and a Marine Corps office was before all the other ones. They kind of pulled me in, told me all their jarhead jargon, and filled my head with a whole bunch of good stuff. I was sold quickly."

Daniel speaks fast, with a slight twang and the hint of a stutter. He says his childhood stutter returned as a symptom of his combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder.

By February 2003, Daniel was trained as a radio operator and was the proud owner of a brand new Dodge Ram 1500 truck. A week after he bought the truck, he was told he was being deployed to the Middle East. "There goes my truck payments," he remembers thinking. But he parked the pickup and managed to keep the payments current while he saw the other side of the world. "It was a pretty scary time," Daniel says about his three months on a ship, patrolling Kuwaiti waters during the initial U.S. assault on Iraq.

Rotated back to the States, Daniel hopped back into the Dodge and unwound. "Came back over stateside, happy to be back. Spent all my money and had a good time. Early in 2004 we was back in the desert. This time I went directly into Iraq." He found himself on an assault boat, patrolling for "insurgents." His unit saw action in the toughest neighborhoods throughout much of 2004, often beaching the boat and joining forces with land-based troops in hot spots like Fallujah. "Pretty scary, that's all I've got to say about that," Daniel says regarding Fallujah, his speech turning percussive. "You never know when it's your time to go. Explosions from mortars going off all around you. Shots fired. You try to keep your head up. Trust the guy next to you. That's about it."

Fighting in the war flipped Daniel's political beliefs. "I came back very anti-Bush. I used to be a Republican before I joined the military. Not any more." His experiences on the ground, he says, convinced him he'd been lied to. The Iraqis "are a defeated people," he says, not a threat to America. "It's a third-world country. These people walk around with no shoes, nothing. These guys are working for a dollar a day. The military would pay the village people to come on base and build sandbags so that they can be more comfortable in their tents and pay them a dollar a day, and these guys will work making seven dollars a week just to feed their family."

Watching the construction of permanent barracks on bases in Iraq convinced Daniel that the real goal of the war was control. "Iraq is the center of the Middle East. If you control the center, you control the whole Middle East. You control all the profits that you get from there," he says about the oil reserves.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
unjust and criminal
Posted by: rsaxto on Jun 15, 2006 4:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When a war is as unjust and criminal as the US invasion/occupation of Iraq the deserters become the real heroes and the soldiers/marines who continue to kill become the bums and misfits who the commanders exploit to continue the horrors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: unjust and criminal Posted by: rbush16
» RE: unjust and criminal Posted by: lokster
» RE: unjust and criminal Posted by: DeeBlackthorne
» RE: unjust and criminal Posted by: woodford54
One screwed up system!
Posted by: kgs1947 on Jun 15, 2006 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This military system is so screwed up, it's ludicrous and pathetic. Shame on this Congress for doing nothing to stop the unethical behaviors and policies of our military establishment. Where are all the people who used to stand up for justice????? We have no elected officials doing it, that's for damn sure, and we have an alcoholic in the White House (aka drug addict) who is just as arrogant as ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One screwed up system! Posted by: willymack
F#CK YOU GEORGE BUSH!
Posted by: owlbear1 on Jun 15, 2006 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. 'War' President

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: F#CK YOU GEORGE BUSH! Posted by: willymack
No soldiers, no wars!
Posted by: johnecolby on Jun 15, 2006 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Without the hand that pulls the trigger, no bullets fly. Remove the soldiers, and Bush and his fuckups are revealed for what they truly are: nothings. empty world-filled idiots. When we take the guns out of our hands, we stop the system from doing what it was created to do.

To all who serve. Serve your humanity and stop killing. Boycott the war, and celebrate life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No soldiers, no wars! Posted by: woodford54
» RE: No soldiers, no wars! Posted by: automail
Just as a question of strategy ...
Posted by: just john on Jun 15, 2006 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... wouldn't it have been just as effective, with fewer civilian-world repercussions if he'd said he was gay?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old story . . .
Posted by: mysticalrae on Jun 15, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hurrah for this young man for standing up for his beleifs. When recruited most of these young people do not know what their beleifs are yet, because indeed, they are still children. By law in my state, a child yet under the age of 21 cannot be served an alcoholic drink; but can easily sign up to become a soldier.
Why do we continue to believe that the young can be subjected to such terror and come back to their civilian lives as though nothing has happened? The attrocities this young man participated in will continue to affect him, even if he is lucky enough to get his benefits and go for treatment, and will continue to affect all who he comes in contact with. How could it be otherwise? I don't understand how anyone could believe otherwise,especially in light of what we saw the Vietnam vets go through. Many of my friends perished in that war, the physical survivors dying a thousand deaths after returning home.
An earlier article this week explained how much money the military was paying out to the families of the civilians in Iraq who were murdered or maimed -- and the cost was quoted at $2500 per person. I was shocked by the piddling amount, and told my partner (a Viet vet), how I felt about it. His reply was that during the Viet war, if you killed a civilian you were fined $40, but if you killed a water buffalo, and any of the owner's family survived, you were fined $1000. I don't believe that any rational, intellegent individual could actually ever wrap their minds around that bizarre concept. The young people serving in this war will undoubtedly return damaged and some, unrepairable. Will those touting the little yellow "Support Our Troops" stickers be there to make sure they get fair treatment and the support they need. Probably not.
Too many people have been under the hypnotic beleif that their leader would not make decisions that were detrimental to the populace as a whole. My sense is that this denial is coming to an end, and the trust of the American people for its government officials is irrepairably broken. As it is written in the New Testament, "by their fruits shall they be revealed." And it is a bitter fruit indeed . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question (Not Flame Bait or Trolling)
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 15, 2006 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever became of the people who went to Canada seeking asylum? Were they granted status or forced to leave?

What about the EU? Do any EU countries offer asylum to these people?

What about Australia & New Zealand? Are they willing to grant these people refugee status or asylum?

The war is not these countries fault, but they should step up and offer these people asylum. The DoD is not following established policy with CO's according to many reports. This is just wrong. Not only is it unfair to the person seeking CO status, it endangers others in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I really fear the outcome of the next election. If the GOP retains control of Congress by whatever means I see a Draft coming. We have a very small military for what is demanded of it and the last 5 years have burned these people out. Even with stop-loss and lowered standards hey will quickly run out of bodies to fill slots.

If things don't change come November things could get very ugly before they get better. Given what happened in Ohio in 2004 I do not have confidence in this fall's elections. The whole thing pisses me off and creeps me out. It's really very sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support those that Resist!
Posted by: tomjoad on Jun 15, 2006 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a full list of publicly known military resisters, go to
tomjoad.org.

For organizing support for resisting military people, go to Courage to Resist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Support those that Resist! Posted by: resistance6
Bush is a traitor....
Posted by: tap17x on Jun 15, 2006 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....a traitor to the former ideals of the U.S., a traitor to the people, a traitor to our security. He is the most hateful, incompetent, stupid, hypocritical president in history. Jesus would shit on him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vets
Posted by: Gregor on Jun 15, 2006 10:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having been a vet a knowing vets, the only thing that kept them going was knowing when they could leave. We hated war, were abused by war and you end up emotionally crippled. These new soldiers are really getting the shaft.

War sucks. When are the leaders going to learn war sucks? We don't want to fight for their stupid money wars. They are a failure of leadership if they can't negotiate their way to peaceful solutions. We are a failed country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's War
Posted by: domenico234 on Jun 17, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate the comment from the young man who "joined up" from a sense of patriotic duty & was so sickened by what he saw going on in Iraq that he said "Enough!" It heartens me to know that there are still persons of that intelligence & courage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks to the neocons, Iraq is a NO-WIN war --just like Vietnam
Posted by: HughEScott on Jun 23, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On June 15, 2006, White House press secretary Tony Snow, Fox news commentator turned Bush propagandist (an obvious redundancy), said the deaths of 2,500 U.S. troops in Iraq weren't in vain.

Oh really, Mr. Smile? Tell that to 58,000 Americans who died in Southeast Asia four decades ago, only to have the Pentagon’s top neocon, Don “I’m right, you’re wrong” Rumsfeld, fly to Hanoi and kiss up to our new Commie “friends.”

And what about 40 years from now, when Iraq may well be an Islamic republic run by radical Shiites friendly to Iran with Red China buying all the oil? What will future neoconservatives say to the 2,500 dead GIs then? Oops?

Face it, folks. We the people -- Democrats, independents and Republicans, liberals, moderates and conservatives -- have been played for suckers by the rightwing GOP -- draft-dodging neocon cowards like Bush, Cheney and Karl Rove who split our nation apart for personal profit and political gain.

As I write this comment, Bush, Cheney and Rove are accusing the Democratic Party of "cut-and-running" on Iraq instead of "staying the course. That's one thing the White House gang knows about -- cut-and running. They did it during the Vietnam War and are doing it again now, by running away from their responsibility of being honest with their fellow Americans. Neoconservatives talk the talk, but when it comes to the walk, like all snake oil salesmen, they slither.

For the truth about the treasonous neocons, visit:
www.FreedomCentraUSA.com

Hugh E. Scott, author, investigative journalist, Vietnam veteran, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican and Goldwater conservative with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He volunteered! He signed the paper! He shunned his duty!
Posted by: Romanster on Jul 12, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had these guys in Iraq. The ones who wouldn't take the bad with the good, and do their job. He didn't stand up for what is right, he did something grossly illegal to get out of his responsibility and commitment to the United States. He is not a role model or someone to sympathize with, he did cocaine. The United States Marines has a strict policy on drugs. He deserves his punishment and he should stop whining.

If you read the end of his article, he touched on the good work being done in Iraq. My Marines in Fallujah did good things every day. They stuck it out, because it was their SWORN duty. Remember we as the United States have a VOLUNTEER military. It's not bum luck, it's responsibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]