Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Enron Bosses--Guilty; George Bush--Guilty

By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted May 25, 2006.


The biggest Enron fraud is Bush's claim that he was not close to now-convicted Enron founder Ken Lay.
Advertisement

The man who paid many of the biggest bills for George Bush's political ascent, Enron founder Kenneth Lay, has been found guilty of conspiracy and fraud almost five years after his dirty dealings created the greatest corporate scandal in what will be remembered as an era of corporate crime.

On the sixth day of deliberations following the conclusion of a long-delayed federal trial, a Houston jury found Lay guilty on six counts of fraud and conspiracy. In a separate decision, US District Judge Sim Lake ruled that Lay was guilty of four counts of fraud and making false statements.

The same jury that convicted Lay found Enron's former chief executive, Jeffrey Skilling, guilty on 19 counts of fraud, conspiracy, making false statements and engaging in insider trading.

Lay, who President Bush affectionately referred to as "Kenny-boy" when the two forged an alliance in the 1990s to advance Bush's political ambitions and Lay's business prospects, contributed $122,500 to Bush's gubernatorial campaigns in Texas. Lay would later explain to a PBS "Frontline" interviewer that, though he had worked closely with former Texas Governor Ann Richards, the Democrat incumbent who Bush challenged in 1994, he backed the Republican because "I was very close to George W."

Needless to say, once Bush became governor, Lay got his phone calls returned. A report issued by Public Citizen in February 2001, months before the Enron scandal broke, identified Lay as "a long-time Bush family friend and an architect of Bush's policies on electricity deregulation, taxes and tort reform while Bush was Texas governor."

No wonder Lay had Enron give $50,000 to pay for Bush's second inaugural party in Austin in 1999 -- a showcase event that was organized by Karl Rove and others to help the Texas governor step onto the national political stage. After Bush gave Enron exactly what it wanted in 1999, by signing legislation that deregulated the state's electrical markets, Lay knew he had found his candidate for president.

When Bush opened his campaign, Lay opened the cash spiggots.

As a "Bush Pioneer" in the run-up to the 2000 presidential election, Lay was a key member of the Bush campaign's fund-raising inner circle. Under Lay's leadership, Enron ultimately gave Bush $550,025, making the corporation the Texan's No. 1 career patron at the time the 2000 election campaign began, according to the Center for Public Integrity. Lay personally pumped almost $400,000 into Republican hard- and soft-money funds, while Enron slipped another $1.5 million into the GOP's soft-money cesspool.

But that was just the beginning. Lay sent a letter to Enron executives urging them to contribute to Bush's campaign. More than 100 of them -- including Skilling, a major Bush giver since 1993, when he cut his first $5,000 check to GW's gubernatorial campaign -- did just that. Dozens of spouses wrote, including "homemaker" and frequent $10,000 donor Linda Lay, gave as well, making the Enron "family" a prime source of the money that gave Bush his early advantage over Republican rivals such as Arizona Senator John McCain.


Digg!

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Scandal fatigue
Posted by: Wesley69 on May 25, 2006 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During any other Presidential administration throughout the course of our democracy, this thinly veiled connection between our chief executive and a convicted criminal responsible for defrauding thousands of his own employees and an untold number of private investors, would be sufficient cause for vehement public outrage and the demand for a full Congressional investigation. But with scandals rolling out seemingly every other week, citizens have surrendered their sense of indignant contempt and outrage and have resigned themselves to blissful ignorance... What outrage they still possess is leveled at the media that have the audacity to report scandal... Americans have come to hate truth in the same way conservative Christians revile a fiction like the DaVinci Code... "Don't fuck with my delusions, they're all I have"...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scandal fatigue Posted by: outtolunch
» RE: Scandal fatigue Posted by: adp3d
» RE: Scandal fatigue Posted by: Buckaroo
The Big Question
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 25, 2006 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where was the oversight and enforcement before thing got totally out of hand? A whole list of agencies have regulatory/oversight responsibility relative to the MCI/Global Crossing/Enron/Arthur Andersen and other scandals. They were headed by people appointed by W.J. Clinton from 1993-early 2001.

Bush is a scalawag and has a lot to answer for, but most of the Enron misdeeds happened on Slick Willie's watch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Big Question Posted by: chica
» RE: The Big Question Posted by: Doubtom
» Oh my God!! Posted by: russianblue1
» RE: Oh my God!! Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Oh my God!! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Oh my God!! Posted by: babs
» RE: Oh my God!! Posted by: mkeeling@jam.rr.com
» RE: The Big Question Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: The Big Question Posted by: lindalee
In Defense Of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
Posted by: ws on May 25, 2006 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Defense Of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling
They Have Been Wrongly Accused and Convicted

I do not mean that Lay is innocent of the 6 counts on which he was convicted today or that Skilling is innocent of the 19 for which he was convicted. They are guilty as sin of those and more. No, I mean they have been wrongly accused of being a couple of rotten apples in the otherwise pure and pristine barrel of Corporate America. They are not the exception, they are the rule. There is something rotten in Wall Street, and it is not being directed by Heaven. Nay if we follow it, the stench, we find it to be Wall Street itself.

Wall Street and Corporate America have tried to hide behind a façade of amorality. They attempt to cover-up their misdeeds and illegalities by assigning them to a nebulous and ill-defined world of ‘business’. They are not accountable for their actions, “It’s only business,” magic words that relieve them of all responsibility. It is quite ironic that Big Business would adopt such an attitude after all the trouble it went through to get the government to declare that Corporations have the same rights as living breathing human beings. This the government finally did in 1886 when it was so decreed by the Supreme Court in its Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad decision. They want and have all the rights but none of the obligations. Thus it has been for the past 120 years, and the result is the devolution into Bush World.

David Sirota in his new book, Hostile Takeover, gives this warning from Thomas Jefferson,
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country."
Jefferson said this in 1816, almost 200 years ago. Like all aristocracies, corporate behavior has not improved with age. It has steadily declined. The trial is over and Corporate America has won, it is now the government.

Oh, its all been legal, bought and paid for on the open market. Greg Palast facetiously says we have “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.” Of course it is neither the best nor a democracy. It is Bush World 2006. It is the world of Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling.

The Bush Credo - No Sacrifice Is Too Great For Others To
Make.

Lay

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Well Do W´s Claims Jive With What Is Stated Here?
Posted by: ZPaul on May 25, 2006 2:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the official White House website:
(Jan. 10, 2002)
" I got to know Ken Lay when he was the head of the -- what they call the Governor's Business Council in Texas. He was a supporter of Ann Richards in my run in 1994. And she had named him the head of the Governor's Business Council. And I decided to leave him in place, just for the sake of continuity. And that's when I first got to know Ken, and worked with Ken, and he supported my candidacy. "

Who Lay actively supported, according to W, in 1994 seems to not coincide with what´s stated here. Correct me if I´m wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHERE DOES GOD LIVE ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 25, 2006 2:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So "Kenny Boy" isn't even in the slammer yet and he's already found God and religion. That's remarkable. We certainly live in interesting times. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHERE DOES GOD LIVE ?sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: WHERE DOES GOD LIVE ? Posted by: Abushite
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on May 25, 2006 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gingrich and the Rupugnantcies raised scandal fatigue to the max during the Clinton years so people are numb as well as dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on May 25, 2006 2:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only as long as it benefits Bush personally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps.....
Posted by: Elmowilcox on May 25, 2006 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if we got Simon Cowell to start an "America's next President" series, people might actually give a crap about anything that is written on here. Until then....we're all screwed and I give up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Campesino
Posted by: Campesino on May 25, 2006 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the things these guys are going to jail for happened before Bush came into office. A fat lot of good their contributions to Republicans did for them. When the wheels came off in 2001 the government did nothing to try to save the company. In fact Enron hired Robert Rubin, former Clinton Sec. Treasury to try to get the Bush administration to help.

These guys have all been prosecuted and sentenced to jail under the watch of the guys you say were totally influenced by them. The facts undercut your argument.

If you could say that Lay et al. were not prosecuted or were pardoned because they gave money to Bush and the Republicans you might have a point. But you can't do you don't

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lookitme!!!! My name in lights!!! Posted by: Father Paul
» Crooks ! Posted by: ShoShenQ
» RE: Campesino Posted by: Doubtom
Nation Magazine Now = Demo Party B.S.?
Posted by: fairleft on May 25, 2006 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was the Nation magazine _always_ this blatantly, partisanly bad? The 'biggest' Enron fraud was denial of the Bush connection? Is that what needs to be fronted in a story like this? The "your party is dirtier than mine" message?

The Enron scandal, one of many go-go '90s scandals (was Bush President back then?), was most specifically aided by scandalous NONrevisions of accounting laws, that would have kept the big accounting firms out of business consulting. (Accounting firms, to get that business, were fatally tempted to make annual and quarterly reports into a pack of lies.) The revision was strongly recommended by the technocrats and more strongly opposed by the accounting industry... Who's Senatorial heavy lifter was, I believe, Corporate Demo Numero Uno Joseph Lieberman. Of course, B. Clinton didn't do a thing to get the important and right thing done in this little-noticed policy area.

Our country is in deep doo doo on many fronts. But a sure sign on this particular front is that nothing has been done about the scandal of accounting firms selling out their integrity to get those business consulting deals. Still happens, still messes up the books incredibly I'm sure...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right now
Posted by: rsaxto on May 26, 2006 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have all the information we need right now to impeach many of the Bushies for the Enron crimes and numerous other crimes. The reason this isn't happening is quite simple: Washington DC is so clogged with corrupt criminals that the few honest reps and senators can't get it done because the many crooks are shaking in their boots for fear they will be next. Clear out the crooks and impeachment would be a slam dunk. We must demand it for the Bushies worst, unfortunately, is soon to come and the whole world will end up weeping if we don't do the right thing and throw most of the bums out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: right now Posted by: dougii
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on May 26, 2006 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is quoted as calling the Constitution a "goddamed piece of paper". Somewhere along the way I got the idea the Constitution is written on parchment

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: montims
ok, so let's really prove this Lay-Bush connection via a response team capable of proving such
Posted by: concerned Canadian on May 26, 2006 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't believe so many , so so many Americans believe they are powerless, disenfranchised people whose leaders have them by the you know whats. No wonder they have been able to do this to you. When is the response team coming to play?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE FACTS. Well at least my opinion
Posted by: Lincoln fan on May 26, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is sad to see working class people arguing not about which party is better but about which party is worse. We just accept the fact that both are evil. That is why working class people, both Republicans and Democrats, can be hoodwinked election after election into voting for the lesser of the evils. This in spite of the knowledge that the corporate establishment is in control of both parties. And that a vote for either party is a vote against our interests.

There are people who think that the evil could be eliminated by campaign financing and lobbying law reform. It could. But we won't get effective reforms because neither the corporate establishment nor either political party wants them.

There are people who believe that a "good" candidate could eliminate the evil. He/she could. But neither party will back a candidate who will buck the system and risk losing their share of campaign funds.

There are people who believe putting a third party in power could purify our corrupt system. It could. But a third party has almost no chance of winning on a national level. The fear that the "greater evil party" will win makes us vote for the "lesser evil party".

Their are people who belive that winning local elections will gradually affect national politics. It could. But it won't. The corporatocracy is mainly interested in national and international issue and don't fight hard on local issues. Local politicians below the rank of governor are usually unknown outside their locality so they need party backing. Neither party will back a cabdidate who will rock the boat.

We know that the corporations are the enemy and that they are abetted by both parties; it's logical to take control of the leadership of both parties. If the parties won't back candidates who support our issues it's logical to take control of both parties' platforms.

Join the Lincoln Initiative. Make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Click on Do it Now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]