Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How Bush Destroyed the CIA

By Sidney Blumenthal, AlterNet. Posted May 19, 2006.


In Porter Goss, the Bush administration found the perfect hatchet man to drive the CIA into the ground. Hayden, the former NSA chief, may oversee its liquidation.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

America's Frightening Alzheimer's Epidemic
Rebecca Hyman, AlterNet

CNN's Lou Dobbs Is Clueless When It Comes to the Drug War
Tony Newman, AlterNet

U.S. Sergeant Refuses to Go to Iraq: "This Occupation is Unconstitutional and Illegal"
Karin Zeitvogel, Middle East Online

Election 08: Misogyny I Will Not Miss
Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group

Dire Consequences with a McCain Supreme Court?
Robert Parry, Consortium News

California Gay Marriage Ban Overturned
Huffington Post

Three Things That Won't Help End the Foreclosure Crisis
Dean Baker, Liz Chimienti, Center for Economic and Policy Research

More stories by Sidney Blumenthal

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The moment that the destruction of the Central Intelligence Agency began can be pinpointed to a time, a place and even a memo. On Aug. 6, 2001, CIA director George Tenet presented to President Bush his presidential daily briefing, a startling document titled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." Bush did nothing, asked for no further briefings on the issue, and returned to cutting brush at his Crawford, Texas, compound.

In Bush's denial of responsibility after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the search for scapegoats inevitably focused on the lapse in intelligence and therefore on the CIA, though it was the FBI whose egregious incompetence permitted the plotters to escape apprehension. Bush's intent to invade Iraq set up the battle royal that followed.

Tenet, an inveterate staff careerist held over from the Clinton administration, had ingratiated himself with the new White House tenant with salty stories, but it was in his eagerness to please Bush on Iraq that he ensured his tenure and made himself indispensable. At first, Tenet opposed including in the president's speech of October 2002 the disinformation that Iraq was seeking to build nuclear weaponry using yellowcake uranium Saddam Hussein supposedly sought to purchase in Niger, and the reference was knocked out. Yet, having already been discredited, the falsehood was inserted into the president's State of the Union address of January 2003, becoming the now infamous 16 words.

Tenet reassured Bush that the case for Saddam's possession of WMD was a "slam-dunk." At CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., Tenet promised then Secretary of State Colin Powell that for Powell's Feb. 5, 2003, speech before the U.N. Security Council, the information that would be used to prove Saddam had WMD was ironclad. Powell insisted that Tenet be seated behind him while he spoke as visual reinforcement of his statement's unimpeachable character. Yet every piece of it was false, and the humiliated Powell later said he had been "deceived." Tenet resigned on June 4, 2004, and shortly thereafter was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

After the brief interim appointment of CIA professional John McLaughlin, on Aug. 10, 2004, almost three years to the day after the Aug. 6 presidential daily briefing on bin Laden, Bush named Porter Goss the new director of Central Intelligence. The president was looking for someone to rid him of the troublesome agency. In Goss, he thought he had discovered the perfect man for the bloody job, but the nature of the task undid Goss, and in his unraveling another scandal unfolded.

In the absence of any reliable evidence, CIA analysts had refused to put their stamp of approval on the administration's reasons for the Iraq war. Vice President Dick Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, personally came to Langley to intimidate analysts on several occasions. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his then deputy secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, constructed their own intelligence bureau, called the Office of Special Plans, to sidestep the CIA and shunt disinformation corroborating the administration's arguments directly to the White House.

"The administration used intelligence not to inform decision-making, but to justify a decision already made," Paul Pillar, then the chief Middle East analyst for the CIA, writes in the March-April issue of Foreign Affairs. "The process did not involve intelligence work designed to find dangers not yet discovered or to inform decisions not yet made. Instead, it involved research to find evidence in support of a specific line of argument -- that Saddam was cooperating with al Qaeda -- which in turn was being used to justify a specific policy decision."

But despite urgent pressures to report to the contrary, the CIA never reported that Saddam presented an imminent national security threat to the United States, that he was near to developing nuclear weapons, or that he had any ties to al-Qaida. Moreover, analysts predicted a protracted insurgency after an invasion of Iraq. Tenet, despite the lack of cooperation from the CIA's Directorate of Intelligence, acted as backslapper for the administration's policy.

The White House was in a fury. The CIA's professionalism was perceived as political warfare, and the agency apparently was seen as the center of a conspiracy to overthrow the administration. Inside the offices of the president, the vice president and the secretary of defense, the CIA was referred to as a treasonous enemy. "If we lived in a primitive age, the ground at Langley would be laid waste and salted, and there would be heads on spikes," wrote neoconservative columnist David Brooks in the New York Times on Nov. 13, 2004, citing White House officials and "members of the executive branch" as his sources. Reflecting their rage, he called on Bush to "punish the mutineers ... If the C.I.A. pays no price for its behavior, no one will pay a price for anything, and everything is permitted. That, Mr. President, is a slam-dunk."


Digg!

Sidney Blumenthal, author of "The Clinton Wars," writes a column for Salon and the London Guardian.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The CIA *SHOULD* be destroyed
Posted by: nbrown on May 19, 2006 12:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's with this conservative stuff?

The CIA is the central organ of US-led coups. They overthrow secular, elected governments, replacing them with far-right totalitarians. They sell drugs. They kill people.

Why is alternet defending the CIA? It's a terrorist organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The CIA *SHOULD* be destroyed Posted by: American Reflections
» Excellent point! Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: xcellent point! Posted by: kabac55
IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH
Posted by: thinkverybig on May 19, 2006 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUSH is destroying more than the CIA... he's destroying the United States and eventually the world. We must IMPEACH and JAIL this idiot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hear - Hear Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: IMPEACH and JAIL BUSH Posted by: jobeob
FROM BAD TO WORSE
Posted by: rsaxto on May 19, 2006 3:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the Bushies for you: replacing an intelligence agency with a few good points with an intelligence apparatus that has no good points at all and whose only function will be to help lead the world toward a fascist world order created by USA criminals. Isn't it clear that we have to junk the Bushies ASAP?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On Goslings
Posted by: tofocsend on May 19, 2006 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author writes that the term Gosslings refers to "quislings.

I always took it to be a pun on goslings - baby geese who imprint on their mother, follow her around, and faithfully imitate her. My dictionary also lists "inexperienced," "foolish," and "callow" as further connotations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political maneuvering in the totalitarian state.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 19, 2006 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the Soviet and Nazi totalitarian regimes there was a constant struggle for power within branches of government - th.e KGB vs. the Army, the SS vs. the High Command, etc. If the US government is tilting toward a totalitarian state, then the infighting is to be expected - Rumsfeld's Pentagon-based intelligence operation, run by Stephen Cambone, vs. Negroponte, perhaps. Cambone is the one who deserves to be in the hot seat (but imagine if Cambone had been named as the CIA director). The important point is that this kind of behavior is typical of a corrupt totalitarian system. The whole thing needs to be exposed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 19, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first Bush (or second if you consider Prescott the first), did more damage to the CIA than our current chimp-in-chief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sixteen words trump 18 1/2 minutes – but we're the chumps.
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 19, 2006 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Tenet's Presidential Metal of Freedom should have been renamed the Presidential Metal of Hari Kiri, in honor of Mr. Tenet falling on his sword to maintain the lie that covered up the bigger lie concerning WMD and nuclear weapons programs in Iraq.

Back in the 1970's – when the citizenry cared more about their government than TV shows and demonstrated to prove it – President Nixon's infamous missing 18 1/2 minutes of Oval Office tape recording was nothing compared to the 16 words (about 10 seconds) that Bush included in his State of the Union speech – words that gift-wrapped a pack of lies that helped launch a deadly war, decimate a sovereign nation, and destroy America's credibility with the rest of the world for years to come.

After his missing 18 1/2 minutes of who-knows-what, Nixon was nearly impeached and left the presidency in shame; after his 16 words of world-churning deception, Bush remains in office and, thanks to public inaction, continues to strut around like some barnyard cock rooster. Much has changed in american society in 30-odd years, and certainly not for the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmm...
Posted by: elbow on May 19, 2006 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush should just go out and get a blowjob so he can cap off the patheticness of his second term.
P.S. (I know patheticness is not considered a word, yet)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmm... Posted by: monkeywrench
» RE: Hmm... Posted by: elbow
JFK killed because of CIA?
Posted by: oldsmobile on May 19, 2006 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many conspiracy theorists into the JFK murder claim (not that I believe any of it, but thought I'd mention it anyway) that the reason JFK was kille was because he tried to shut down the CIA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JFK killed because of CIA? Posted by: IntnsRed
Not Quislings
Posted by: Byronik on May 19, 2006 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Quisling would be a figure in a position of high responsibility who became a traitor to the point of collaborating with the invading Nazis. I don't think the term Gossling is intended to convey that meaning.

First of all, nobody alive in the USA has any idea who Vidkun Abraham Lauritz Jonssøn Quisling was. And secondly, the amusing image of Goss being followed around by a gaggle of little gossling yes men is more likely to carry some element of truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hayden mission - to destroy or transform?
Posted by: maturin42 on May 19, 2006 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given Hayden's rather cavalier attitude toward the Constitution and ambitions regarding CIA turf and power, rather than destroying the CIA, it sounds like he wants to turn it into an American KGB - an instrument of oppression and operations against domestic adversaries of this fascistic regime.

There is absolutely NOTHING I would put past this reckless gang of thugs. After letting 9/11 happen, they apparently will shrink at nothing to hold onto power. The liberal community holds a lot of hope that the 2006 elections will overturn the power base of the right, but with Diebold and ES&S counting the vote, I would not give you a dime for our chances.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: V for Vendetta Posted by: acidrain69
» RE: V for Vendetta Posted by: zvirgil2
Well..... Ya Gotta Hand It To Him
Posted by: jeanette3654 on May 19, 2006 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sonfoabitch manged to do something that got JKF killed! I say however, good riddance. The CIA is responsible for, bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Hilliary Clinton ad nauseum. As well as uncounted numbers of dead people throughout the world.
Kharmicaly speaking, the US has much to answer for

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh?
Posted by: heech on May 19, 2006 5:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CIA has, and has always had, a single mission: Defend and broaden American business interests through the subversion of laws of domestic and foreign governments and through social engineering whose only goal is to manipulate public opinion to further the ends it is tasked with.

The CIA has, and has always had, a very useful and effective method of dismissing their complicity in domestic and international criminal behavior when performing this duty: when caught: deny, deny, deny; when public pressure becomes overwhelming: 1) call whistle blowers "lunatics," 2) admit that, "... mistakes were made ..."; when further information disclosure presses the agency against the wall of tighter scrutiny or oversight: claim "incompetence", announce "reform" and assure the unwitting that it "... will never happen on my watch." It is its own scapegoat and very often the scapegoat of American government wrongdoing at any level that might threaten to unsettle the corporate forces that dominate our political/economic federation.

So the question I would ask, is: How can we believe this? How can we know what information about this agency is true and what isn't? Only select members of congress get briefed on so-called National Security Issues. And what are they told? Honestly how much of the truth of any operation do we assume is honestly briefed to the oversight committees?

Lets say that there has been a purge of political unfriendlies at the CIA. Okay. Wow. How does this change the foreign policy goals the agency is tasked with performing, the foreign policy goals it has always been tasked with performing? Is the CIA going to be more or less nice when subverting South American democracies? Shall it now be more or less nice when overthrowing states in the middle east? Will it be more or less nice when it compiles information on god knows what on god knows whom for faceless corporations?

It seems to be another pointless sideshow, distracting us from real issues and real problems, one being the prudence of allowing our country and foreign policy to be run, in part, by agencies of this kind, whose roots go back to inception of the military industrial complex created during WWII, whose mindset still reaches into those murky "at all costs" depths, who are in no way accountable for their actions and whose primary concern, as admitted by the agency itself at the end of the so-called Cold War, is the furthering of American corporate business interests at home and abroad (even though that was the case all along).

Does it bother anyone else that George Bush Sr. was the head of the agency? That the Langley Virginia headquarters is named after him? That the President's grandparents were at the forefront of the agency's creation? Of course this is evidence of nothing other than a long and loving affinity between the Bush family and the agency they are supposedly at war with but still, when in recent history has this agency not been playing ball with these guys?

Honestly, if all of this is to secure leaks or to purge unfriendlies it seems a bit out of proportion since the agency was crucial in assisting the administration's plans for Iraq (not to forget bringing Saddam to power, feeding him weapons of mass destruction, training and arming Al Queda, etc.), the coup in Haiti, the Iran/Contra scandal, the war still being fought in Afganistan ... read the list, it's long and peppered with this sort of public scandal and private resilience.

One of the CIA's greatest assets is the news media; always has been and always will be. They are masters of misdirection, as I'd be, if I was them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Long, long overdue
Posted by: DJPsychomike on May 19, 2006 7:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the CIA released the files on the McCarthy era, they didn't just turn upside down the entire history of the period- they revealed that from inception, the CIA had broken its charter and had meddled in our nations affairs.

The CIA, once it realized what had been released, has now tried to re-classify the material. But the facts are now out there:
CIA PLOT ADMITTED!

Yep. They admit they framed Joe McCarthy.

And created the spin we now know as the McCarthy era.

Oddly, this has received very little press.

In fact, none.

So the CIA hid nazi war criminals within its group without Truman's knowledge, they destroyed a politician in this country because he had discovered that spies had been identified by name by a upper level KGB turncoat. From 1942 on! And no one did anything!

So you don't have to look abroad for abuse.

Civilian spy agencies run by the government don't work. You need people on the ground, military run agencies that don't put politics ahead of the mission. A general would be in deep you know what if he had acted like the monkey on a string Tenet was. Tell the politicians the military side and let them do the politics. Don't play up to the politics for a job at the risk of national defense!

I have strong feelings about why it turned out to be good we had the Shah in the region once, and I support breaking Iraq into different nations with our presence to control the flow of oil to those "acting up". I am not a left wing conspiracy kind of guy.

But when the CIA admits it hid the presence of spies in our nations government, and ruined the whistle blower who was about to expose them- I say: shut it down.

No other reasons are necessary. They broke their own charter day one! And they have no right to change and distort our history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gotta think this through...
Posted by: talkville on May 20, 2006 2:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CIA has a prime-player history in our activities throughout this "playground" we call the world. One must wonder at the fact that the 'destruction' of the CIA is being carried out; what could possibly be the motive for such an action in this new Project for the New American Century?? This seems to be the complete re-structuring of our government in the assignment of Civil and Military functions performed by it. Moving the CIA lock stock and barrel full of dirty tragic tricks into the Pentagon is an ominous move. We better think these little things through as the rulers construct what can only be seen as a supra-national envelope over our globe in the matters of security and, oh yes!, control and management of the class they so despise! Make no mistake, these folks are most definitely not 'incompetent' -- very far from it; the agenda has deep historical roots. They seem to be fascinated by the many ideas, mainly of the fascist variety, that blossomed during capital's last desperate crisis - which spanned 2 wars and lots of mini-wars during the tortuous climb from then to now! I believe it was Reagan during the Reagan-Thatcher launch of a class offensive who likened government to business. Ominous times we live in- the more so when capital runs desperate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keep in mind
Posted by: DJPsychomike on May 20, 2006 5:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While many look at the CIA and see an all powerful organization I see a bunch of techie nerds and lawyers.

And a bureaucracy that does nothing close to aiding the President.

Over the last few years the best agents wanting to actually do something about terror have left the company. Corporate intel groups may be one of the most under-covered fields in the business world today.

The collapse of CIA actually began when agents watched the biggest intel failure since Pearl Harbor occur. And they knew they could accomplish nothing as they quilted their "sensitivity quilts", looked at satellite photos and wondered about the blonde in the cageteria whose name they'll never know.

Woop dee do. OSS was military. This isn't a big deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, but wait a moment.
Posted by: zvirgil2 on May 20, 2006 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The harsh tone and ugle words do not accomplish anything, except turn-off the middle class and lose the next election. We have to learn to fight the fight without the ugle words.

zvirgil2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lose the next election? Posted by: IntnsRed
Raiders of the lost freedoms
Posted by: jobeob on May 21, 2006 8:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gen. Michael Hayden looks like the evil Nazi in Raiders of the Lost Ark and Bush is his fuehrer. I can Imagine it now "Let me zee your papers ".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA agent Mary McCarthy
Posted by: jobeob on May 21, 2006 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CIA agent, Mary McCarthy, is a patriot of the highest order. She is a woman that knows what the checks and balances in the Constitution are for and the the ideals written of there are for all people. More of us need to be willing to loose our jobs for the cause of truth and freedom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeping it local, medical mj, Contra Costa County
Posted by: Lauren on May 22, 2006 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are a Contra Costa County resident, this is for you.
Comments for the Board of Supervisors' consideration may be sent via electronic mail by using the form below.
http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/

Comments received by 8:00 a.m. tomorrow will be distributed to Board members, made part of the official public record for that meeting, and maintained on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board for public inspection.

Comments received after 8:00 a.m. will not be made part of the official record for the Board's agenda.

Help! This is the issue that seperates us most clearly. Either you have heart and support dispensaries as a State's rights issue. Or, you are part of the vast right wing conspiricy. So, all you local folks, please write a letter to the supervisiors in favor of fair dispensary zoning for cannabis compared to alcohol in Contra Coust County, Calif.

Save our children from drunks. Potheads are better. It is time for freedom from these onerous laws. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quisling: definition
Posted by: g randy primm on May 23, 2006 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From dictionary.com:

A traitor who serves as the puppet of the enemy occupying his or her country.

[After VidkunQuisling (1887-1945), head of Norway's government during the Nazi occupation (1940-1945).]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

df
Posted by: aser on Sep 29, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
computers archive - computers archive , pc archive blog-pc archive blog ,lan news blog- lan news blog ,laptop blogger info- laptop blogger info ,hardware archive information- hardware archive information ,music blog- music blog ,sound archive news- sound archive news ,stars life blogger news- stars life blogger news ,jazz music blog- jazz music blog ,pop news- pop news ,auto info blog- auto info blog ,cars info provider- cars info provider ,tunning cars fan club- tunning cars fan club ,crash news history- crash news history ,traffic info news- traffic info news ,war location stats- war location stats ,iraq millytary news- iraq millytary news ,iran chemical status- iran chemical status ,hot soldier- hot soldier ,weapon research- weapon research ,continent geography- continent geography ,country finance status- country finance status ,usa location info- usa location info ,uk politics in world- uk politics in world ,mild all about blog- mild all about blog

softlirt-softlirt freware global information ,soft murt- soft murt all soft downloads ,soft odin- soft odin Shareware links ,soft gilt- soft gilt best directory of new Soft ,softer all- softer all os software list

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sd
Posted by: aser on Sep 29, 2006 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arts definations-Arts definations firm ,Home dictionary- Home dictionary from loter ,Science dictionary- Science dictionary miscs ,Computer dictionary- Computer dictionary usa ,news dictionary- news dictionary by mark , Shoping dictionary- Shoping dictionary form, Games dictionary- Games dictionary find, Recreation dictionary- Recreation dictionary info, Society dictionary- Society dictionary load, Health dictionary- Health dictionary local, Reference dictionary- Reference dictionary glob, Sport dictionary- Sport dictionary in use, World definations- World definations archive, Psychology definations- Psychology definations list, Biotechnology definations- Biotechnology definations joke, Agriculture definations- Agriculture definations status

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

forced sex
Posted by: someanna on Nov 22, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
forced sex
Posted by: someanna on Nov 22, 2006 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
incest
Posted by: someanna on Nov 26, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
incest
Posted by: someanna on Nov 26, 2006 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
incest
Posted by: someanna on Nov 26, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rape sex
Posted by: someanna on Dec 2, 2006 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rape
Posted by: someanna on Dec 2, 2006 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rape
Posted by: someanna on Dec 4, 2006 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
forced sex
Posted by: someanna on Dec 4, 2006 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]