Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

White House Blocks Investigations Into Spying

By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted May 15, 2006.


The Justice Department claims that its attempt to investigate Bush's eavesdropping programs has gone nowhere because its staff was denied security clearance.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Nichols

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

With news reports exposing the National Security Agency's previously secret spying on the phone conversations of tens of millions of Americans, what is the status of the U.S. Department of Justice probe of the Bush administration's authorization of a warrantless domestic wiretapping program?

The investigation has been closed.

That's right. Even as it is being revealed that the president's controversial eavesdropping program is dramatically more extensive -- and Constitutionally dubious -- than had been previously known, the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has informed Representative Maurice Hinchey that its attempt to determine which administration officials authorized, approved and audited NSA surveillance activities is over.

Why?

In a letter to Hinchey, the New York Democrat who has been the most dogged Congressional advocate for investigation of the spying program, OPR Counsel H. Marshall Jarrett explained that he had closed the Justice Department probe on Tuesday, May 9, because his office's requests for security clearances to conduct the investigation had been denied.

"I am writing to inform you that we have been unable to make any meaningful progress in our investigation because OPR has been denied security clearances for access to information about the NSA program," Jarrett explained in his letter to Hinchey. "Beginning in January 2006, this Office made a series of requests for the necessary clearances. On May 9, 2006, we were informed that our requests had been denied. Without these clearances, we cannot investigate this matter and therefore have closed our investigation."

Who blocked the request? The obstruction has come from the very administration that the president asserts is operating "within the laws of our country" and cooperating with appropriate investigations.

The security clearances were blocked by the NSA, which has taken its direction on the spying program from the White House.

Hinchey, who along with Representatives John Lewis of Georgia, and Henry Waxman and Lynn Woolsey of California, requested the Justice Department inquiry in January, following initial reports regarding the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program, is furious.

"It is outrageous that people within the Bush administration have blocked an investigation into the role that members of the Justice Department played in establishing and executing this secret domestic spy program," says the New York Democrat. "We must get to the bottom of this and reveal who has stifled this investigation. The Bush administration cannot simply create a Big Brother program and then refuse to answer any questions on how it came about and what it entails. We are not asking for top secret information. We simply want to know how the domestic spy initiative evolved and who is behind what many legal scholars believe is an unconstitutional surveillance program. If the administration believes the program is legal then it should have no problem being forthright with Justice Department investigators as to how it was initiated and is being carried out."


Digg!

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Dems and PseudoLeft use "NSA spying" rather than "lack of universal healthcare" to scare voters
Posted by: cry0fan on May 15, 2006 3:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice how there seems to be a coordinated campaign among the overclass at the top of the PseudoLiberal hierarchy to use the NSA spying as a scare ploy to get the Dems elected. Of course they COULD HAVE instead used the lack of universal healthcare issue. Not a week ago a report came out about how America was far below all the other western nations in infant mortality. But did the PseudoLiberals and Dems overclass jump all over THAT issue and use it, and compare the healthcare systems of Europe to our system and scare the voters that way?

NO!

The politicians of the Dem overclass wouldn't want to do that. All the Dem overclass care about is getting elected, and if they attacked our healthcare extortion system that is killing 18000 a year, the healthcare cartel would come after any politician who did that, target them, and get them kicked out of office. So the Demoverclass look after themselves rather than fight for universal healthcare for all Americans, like every other western nation has.

And what is really disgusting is the so called Leftist/Liberal activists, the religious zealots. These hideous beasts are just as bad as any Freepers. Wound up with hate-propaganda from their masters, they are unthinking war machines, doing whatever those at the top of the hierarchy want. This is old stuff, animal stuff, tribal stuff. THe overclass parasitizes us, and the religious zealots of the right and left do whatever the propaganda tells them to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sit down, man Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: sit down, man Posted by: woodford54
sickofsleaze
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on May 15, 2006 3:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dictator in Chief and liar in thief has taken us to another step on the way to total control. While preaching "Democracy"out of one side of his mouth he is practising dictatorship out of the other. Achtung ! Erwache! as they said in Germany in the 1930s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: concerned Canadian
» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: woodford54
» RE: sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
a concerned North American
Posted by: concerned Canadian on May 15, 2006 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems all you politically partisan Americans are so so caught up in the name of the party you say you would in fact give your all to that you are missing the fact that that is exactly what you are doing regardless of which party you elect. But you get nothing for your sputtering about the worth of your party and the worthlessness of the other party. The real people who run your country have no party affiliation. They keep you guys so busy haggling that noone notices their missile-like thrust to the top of the power struggle over the past 40 plus years. Of course when you stop your infighting you might just realize how poor you are in terms of what counts: your national debt, your depleting middle class, your lack of medical care (not unlike some developing countries), your lack of a free press (not unlike some autocratic countries), your stolen farmland by federal policies which resulted in farmers losing the only thing that is no longer being made - land and to which financial institutions? , and the disappearance of your manufacturing jobs .........and the list goes on. When you wake up you will notice that your government does not even work for you anymore either. So somehow you have lost a lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh?
Posted by: heech on May 15, 2006 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The Bush administration cannot simply create a Big Brother program and then refuse to answer any questions on how it came about and what it entails."

Of course they can and are doing so. How about stopping it instead of asking for it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huh? Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: Huh? Posted by: sekitadel
Holy crap...have you heard the latest?
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on May 15, 2006 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has gotten completely out of hand.

Mother’s Day Calls Prompt NSA Alert

EWM- (May 15, 2006) Lights were burning into the wee hours at the National Security Agency last night as spooks and spies monitored a deluge of domestic phone calls occurring throughout Sunday. An unofficial tally put the call spike in the “tens of millions.”

“The chatter was off the charts,” said NSA terror-call cartographer Alex Ghrambell. “It can only mean one thing. Get out the duct tape, we are doomed.”

Bush Administration officials were frantically reconnoitering this morning trying to determine whether to put the nation on a higher threat alert status, have the President declare marshal law, or propose another tax cut. Others were not so sure...

Editor’s Note: Please excuse the Muse for reporting fantasy. As a Fairly Unbalanced Journalist, it’s his calling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Coverup Continues...
Posted by: aussidawg on May 15, 2006 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and will do so until Bushco is FORCED to open its records by court order. Actually, if this ever actually happens, under Mr. Bush's interpretation of his constitutional powers, he will probably still refuse to cooperate, once again citing his powers as a "wartime" president and in the interest of "national security", but at least if he does refuse, we can jail him for contempt and obstructing justice. Face it, Bush would make Nixon green with envy with all of the crap he has gotten away with under the guise of protecting our "security". The terrifying thing is that so many people are still hiding under their beds, trying to be safe from the big bad terrorists, they cannot see their true security and liberties being taken away from them right under their noses. Look folks, if we lose our freedoms and compromise the principles that are the foundation of what makes this country great, the "terrorists", be they Islamic fanatics or corrupt Christian fanatics, have won the battle. You lose, they win, simple as that. Although I loathe BOTH the Republicans and Democrats, we must restore some balance in Congress this fall by getting a better balance between the two parties in order for there to be any chance of getting the subpoena power to put teeth in the requests for Bushco's testimony under oath and the complete records of his/their many scandelous endeavors. We all know that once the beast is exposed, impeachment is the next step. This isn't something that is just really nice to think about, it is imperative that it happens, otherwise, we the people of the United States of America, will be nothing more than a distant memory. There are four steps...(1) EXPOSE, (2) IMPEACH, (3) TRIAL IN A COURT OF LAW, and last but not least, (4) PUNISH TO THE FULL EXTENT OF THE LAW. It will be after these four steps are completed that we can began to make some basic but very necessary changes to our government so they once again work for us, We the People, as they are meant to do in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big surprise
Posted by: Pseudo Morals on May 15, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just when you think it can't get worse, it does. I feel numb to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Big surprise Posted by: opensaysamy
» RE: Big surprise Posted by: peacefulaim
Democracy of The Black Nobility:
Posted by: mite on May 15, 2006 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress fails us everyday. Mark Twain said in 1885," It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress"
According to William Coopers' book `Behold A Pale Horse' Chapter 5, pp110-111 he explains how our Senate made it easy for the President to subvert our Constitution.
On Saturday August 4, 1990 at 03:30hrs, a minority of U.S. Senators, maybe ten at most, passed Senate Intelligence AuthorityAct for Fisical Year 1991 (S.B.2834).
It gives the president (Bush Sr) at that time the power to initiate covert actions and prevents Congress from stopping these actions. Gives the president power to use any federal "departments, agencies, or entities" to operate or finance a covert operation; empowers the President to use any nation or private contractor or person to fund or operate a covert action. This act redefines covert actions as operations
"necessary to support foreign policy objectives of the U.S. In other words to secretly interfere in the internal "political, economic, or military affairs" of other countries in direct and flagrant violation of international law. It allows the President to omit "extremely sensitive matters" from Congress and authorizes the President to claim executive priviledge if Congress asks to many questions.
This law of 1991 by President Bush Sr. administration and Senator Sam Nunn gives the president now and in the future the power of any king. It has handed the powers of all 3 branches of government over to the President. This will be done using National Security directives.
Is there a plan within the volumes of Executive Orders and NSD directives to suspend the Constitution of The United States of America? Or has it been done already and all we see and read is nothing but a media event?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this a story?
Posted by: LMNOP on May 15, 2006 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How could it possibly be any other way? If the fasicts *didn't* obstruct the investigation, then *that* would be news! Remember, dog bites man is not news, whereas man bites dog is. Likewise, Republican lies, steals or breaks the law is not news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Delta9er
Posted by: chemtrailkid on May 15, 2006 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons just have to change the subject to healthcare ? because this is the most serious moral and legal issue faced by a democratic society since the days of Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia. Oh I guess there is nothing to worry about because the Bush regime's secret police have it all figured out.
This is very scary as we witness the Bush team resurrect the KGB and the Gestapo and this nut wants to cry about healthcare now. The real over-class or should I say overlords are occupying the white House.
Haliburton is busy building concentration camps to fill with political prisoners caught up in this new drag-net by the NSA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS A SLOW BUT SURE COUP D'ETAT
Posted by: TheStranger on May 15, 2006 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ABC learned its phone logs are monitored. This would have been hard to predict in 2000, still not easy in 2004. But by now no prediction of what these folks will do is too crazy or scary. If we don't get off our ass, we've had our last free election. I think it was in 1996.

TheStranger
http://ivangoldman.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Proof
Posted by: yellow on May 15, 2006 5:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am no constitutional scholar but I know the fourth amendment protects against illegal searches and siezures and is one of several amendments from which the penumbral or emanating right of privacy derives. Bush is clearly in violation of the law. He wiretaps millions of innocent people illegally while doing nothing about the real terror under which millions of Americans live everyday-urban. This is because solving the latter problem actually would involve concern about American cities and communities which, due to his performance following Hurricaine Katrina, we know he lacks. He also would have to spend money to solve the urban crime problem which conflicts with returning trillions in tax revenue to the super rich. American society doesn't matter to these people. They make their money elsewhere. The globe, not a stable and healthy US society, is essential to their enrichment. Repressing the majority whose interests have nothing to do with those of the top 1%, ie. Bush's real constituency, is what the wiretapping is all about! If the picture which is now coming together before the nation's eyes, including the illegal Iraq War and the warrentless wiretapping, isn't proof that 9/11 was planned in order to allow for the feasibility Bush's violent globalization agenda at home and abroad than what is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

clinker
Posted by: cottontail on May 15, 2006 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too late to go into a long tirade, but the reality is IT'S OVER!
Just who in hell is going to stop this criminal regime?
Please, someone tell me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sallow US media shows some nerve, but not enough
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 15, 2006 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why haven't the US media run headlines in bold type stating "Bush Lied to the American People!"? During the Monica Lewinsky blowjob scandal the press was running the lastest Ken Starr innuendo in bold type on a daily basis - day in , day out. Here we have a President and an administration that is still being treated far more gently then Clinton ever was, when their crimes are far more serious - as the bumper sticker says, NOONE DIED WHEN CLINTON LIED.

Why the kid glove treatment? The presidential spinmeisters would have us believe that 9/11 changed the world to such an extent that we now have to morph into the old USSR for our own safety. Consider that 10,000 people a year die by gunshot wounds in the US alone, and over 100,000 have died in Iraq - that works out to one 9/11 event every week for about a year. 9/11 was a symbolic act carried out by 19 individuals - do you want those 19 people to run your reactions for the rest of your life?

Bush did ride 9/11 (and those mysterious anthrax attacks, which were apparently sourced out of Fort Detrick, and which noone seems to want to remember) for all it was worth. He didn't exactly go out of his way to prevent it either - ignoring the FBI and CIA reports of imminent Bin Ladin strikes is criminal negligence. It is also pretty clear that the Bush foreign policy in the first nine months of his reign was focussed on destabilizing the Middle East and thereby creating the tinderbox conditions for war. Ariel Sharon's inflammatory actions in Jeruslaem were a big help. I recall apologizing to some foreign travellers in the US in May 2001, and I explained to them that all Bush wanted was to start wars all over the world, and that he had stolen the election, and that I was very sorry.

Now this criminal is spying on the US people and has created something (run by Rumsfeld and Cambone, apparently) that looks a lot to me like the East German Stasi - a secret military associated spy service whose aim is to eliminate dissent among the population through a mixture of intimidation, infiltration and disinformation. Take a look at this BBC report on a currently running German film about the Stasi, "The Life of The Others".

Oddly enough, not a single US media outlet has decided that a review of this film is a worthwhile endeavor. What - does it hit a bit too close to home?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]