Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Don't Like Bush? Lose Government Contract

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted May 11, 2006.


A vendor who voiced criticisms of Bush lost a lucrative government contract. And that's just the latest procurement scandal to surface on Bush's watch.
Advertisement

Last month, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson told a minority business group in Texas that he had retracted a HUD contract after learning it had been awarded to a qualified vendor who happened to be critical of the Bush administration.

"He had made every effort to get a contract with HUD for 10 years," Jackson said, according to the Dallas Business Journal. "He made a heck of a proposal … so we selected him." Later, Jackson recounted, "he came to see me and thank me for selecting him. Then he said … 'I have a problem with your president.'"

Apparently, that's all it takes to make the Bush administration's enemy's list. The contract was retracted. "Why should I reward someone who doesn't like the president?" Jackson said.

Rewarding one's political allies is nothing new in Washington, but it is illegal to discriminate based on politics. Admitting such an act to a crowd -- with reporters present -- shows how deeply ingrained the Republicans' sense of entitlement is. As blogger Duncan Black commented, "Jackson boasted that he ran HUD like the worst of city patronage machines."

Reps. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Barney Frank, D-Mass., called for an investigation into Jackson, and Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., asked for his resignation. Now Jackson is backpedaling furiously; according to ThinkProgress, the secretary's press flack first confirmed the story and said that Jackson had been referring to "an advertising contract with a minority publication." Later, that same spokesperson denied the story altogether, saying that Jackson had made the whole thing up.

Jackson's office is already taking heat for awarding a recent HUD contract to Shirlington Limousine, the shady company that defense contractor Brent Wilkes --embroiled in the Duke Cunningham case -- used to "transport congressmen, CIA officials and perhaps prostitutes to his Washington parties," according to Harpers. ThinkProgress reports that Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., has requested copies of all records pertaining to the contract and may push for an investigation.

Jackson, a former president of the Austin-based American Electric Power Co., is another in a long line of Bush cronies. Then-Governor Bush first appointed Jackson to the Texas Southern University Board of Regents. He joined HUD in 2001 as deputy secretary and got the top job months after the San Francisco Chronicle reported that Jackson had fired a HUD whistleblower, Richard Mallory, who had gone public with his accusations of "a 'coverup' of fiscal improprieties that was allegedly engineered by a powerful Republican official in Washington, D.C."

There's a pattern here; Mallory replaced another senior HUD official, John Phillips, who was himself demoted "after he complained that his agency was being lax on corruption and mismanagement in the San Francisco Housing Authority," according to the San Francisco Chronicle. Phillips had criticized the agency in a letter to then-Deputy Secretary Alphonso Jackson.


Digg!

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A long list of corruption
Posted by: Capybara on May 11, 2006 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is staggering how many scandals the Bush administration has racked up in their time in office - especially if this is just the stuff they get CAUGHT doing.

This is a great overview of some of the highlights, showing how deep the culture of corruption has spread. Hopefully this will make people more aware of the change needed come elections...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» but a short list of readers Posted by: brasilaron
Pissants.
Posted by: Longdream on May 11, 2006 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a nice, clear federal law against what this little petty despot did, and I hope he gets sent up for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bechtel, Halliburton, and the contractors who got screwed
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 11, 2006 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are a number of corporations and individuals who could actually have rebuilt Iraq. They include smaller firms and Iraqi engineers and associated firms - but instead, all the cash was flowed out to Bush cronies, like Goerge Schultz of Bechtel, and Cheney of Halliburton. What we see is corruption on a grand scale - such a grand scale that the US media outlets categorically refuse to cover the issue. Bechtel and Halliburton are mafia-style organizations - all the signs are there. The mafia has died, they say, but it has been re-introduced in the world of global corporate finance.

There are a lot of companies that could have rebuilt Iraq- but that wasn't the plan. The plan was to give the money to the wealthy allies of the neocon movement - mafiosis, all the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FANTASTIC!
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 12, 2006 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is great! As interesting as Watergate was, it was mainly confined to a few people within the Nixon White House. BUT TODAY THE CORRUPTION IS FUCKING EVERYWHERE!!!! Ay Coumba, it's going to be an interesting couple of years! For Someone like me, who get's absolutely giddy watching genuinely disgusting, dispicable people fall of their own weight, flat on their hideous faces, the entire political climate in Washington today is the gift that just keeps giving!

I'm loving this!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I am not amused. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I am not amused. Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: I am not amused. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: I am not amused. Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: I am not amused. Posted by: Lincoln fan
dare
Posted by: rsaxto on May 12, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How dare anyone criticize Bush? Don't people realize that Bush doesn't just talk to God. HE IS GOD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

boo hoo
Posted by: BJT on May 12, 2006 4:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Developer who begs for scraps from the government gets turned down when government finds out he doesn't like its current figurehead. They're allowed to do that, and this guy is allowed to whine and moan about it too. This is not a scandal. But it does expose people's ridiculous expectation that it's the government's job to administer development projects. That's statism, people. Collectivism. And we all saw how prosperous the Russians were when they tried that scam.

Malinvestments bear certain consequences. "Investment" through government is the most corrupt form of malinvestment, because when it fails, the taxpayers take the fall rather than the investor.

Imagine what developers and communities would be able to do on their own without wasting time and energy begging permission from the government to do anything. Ask yourself: why is our "government" overflowing with executive-branch "departments" that lord over ever aspect of our lives? Could *this* be the reason for our economic troubles?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: boo hoo Posted by: Mystic Tear
» RE: boo hoo Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: boo hoo Posted by: caitlin
Laws don't mean anything if not enforced
Posted by: Mystic Tear on May 12, 2006 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see all the scandals popping up, yet they get brushed off either by the laws already in place not being enforced or by "being a threat to national security". POPPYCOCK! Bush and his cronies need to have a good public square beating for their misbehavior. It's disgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another idiot businessman...
Posted by: caitlin on May 12, 2006 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why should I reward someone who doesn't like the president?" Jackson said.

Durrr, maybe it's because he has the right to disagree with the president? Last I checked, there was no law on the books stating that one had to like the president. However, there is this little thing called a constitutional amendment - particularly the First Amendment - that Jackson might want to look into.

Stories like this remind me that you don't have to be intelligent - or even within the same neighborhood as intelligence - to succeed in US business today. You just have to kiss the right ass, spread some money around and be willing to ignore your conscience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US needs a Constitutional Convention
Posted by: jreinhart1 on May 12, 2006 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The government of our; elected officials, their links to the NSA, (which should not even exist - look up National Security Act of 1947 and shadow government), our banking system, predatory multinational industries, and military are in need of a complete overhaul. Jefferson warned us that these times would be necessary to keep we, the people and our nation, a free country. A complete revamp of election laws (fixed, publicly financed amounts + COLA) and transparency of connections to K street interests would be a start.

The US is a militaristic plutocracy building an empire. That has to change back to being a republic based upon democratic values with a renewl to a system of checks and balances.

War should never be an option unless attacked. While our military should be strong enough to make this option a devistating one for any country that dares, military expenditures such as what we have seen since the end of WW II must be curtailed. Shock and Awe are a page out of the Nazi book on war to terrorize people into submission and is purely an offensive move. A defensive move for the preservation of the republic would be more direct and overwhelming.

Pre-emptive war has been shown to be create fabrications for land and power grabs since 1846. Empire building should cease. Money saved could be re-routed to build the common good of our nation and make it a beacon of freedom and liberty that it stand for, not just a slogan or cliche that it has really been for over the last 100+ years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

true story?
Posted by: Boctaoe on May 12, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On "Countdown" last night, Keith reported that this story was not true according to a representative from that office. We will never know for sure.
Boctaoe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: true story? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: true story? Posted by: Joshua Holland
Next...
Posted by: mistery509 on May 12, 2006 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brother Jed Bush is being groomed to be the next president.

Is the American public going to take the bait?

He is a good man, his brother says.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]