Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Day Care Workers Flex Their Muscle

By Amy DePaul, AlterNet. Posted May 15, 2006.


Unions are encouraging America's huge (and hugely underpaid) child-care work force to fight for a living wage.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Amy DePaul

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When her infant daughter's chronic ear infections made her miss too many days at work, Angenita Tanner of Chicago decided in 1996 to quit her job and work from home as a full-time babysitter.

Experienced in the field and equipped with an associate degree in early childhood education, she launched Grandma's House Child Care. Her first clients were low-income working mothers whose daycare expenses were paid by the state. Six months after Tanner's career change, she found herself on the brink of financial ruin. She had received no payment from the state for the eight children in her daily care.

"I was in business six months and not getting a paycheck. I was at the kitchen table with my assistant, a retired nurse, going over the bills. I'm feeding the kids, trying to pay my mortgage, trying to provide materials like books and toys, plus I haven't paid my assistant," she remembers. "Being in business for yourself in your own home, you have no one to go to. I'm sitting there, I'm stressed and the doorbell rings."

At the door, as if on cue, was a representative of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Tanner attended an SEIU organizing meeting that night, found herself giving an impassioned speech and joining the union. "At that point I realized I wasn't alone anymore," she recalls. Thus began her commitment to improve the working conditions of Illinois child-care providers who contract with the state.

This week, Tanner is expecting her paycheck to reflect the first rate increase she's gotten in nearly seven years, thanks to a new contract negotiated by child-care workers in SEIU. The contract will provide opportunities for professional training in year two and, by the third year, access to health care. It's the first time a union has successfully represented the home-based daycare work force.

Recruiting new union members

Around the country, unions are reaching out to America's daycare staffs, preschool teachers and full-time babysitters, using innovative approaches to recruit members of the poorly paid and largely female child-care work force, estimated at two million. Care of children is among the lowest-paid professions, averaging $8.68 hourly. Preschool teachers earn $11.81 hourly, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. (Both professions bring in less than a rock splitter at $13.66 an hour.)

Meanwhile, the ranks of union-represented child-care workers are growing. More than 350,000 child-care workers are affiliated with SEIU, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the United Child Care Union and its sponsor, AFSCME, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

"This is definitely a strong labor movement," says Melanie Rincon, a home-daycare provider for 21 years. Based in Santa Rosa, Calif., Rincon now works-full time as a campaign organizer for AFSCME.

"The majority of home providers don't have sick time or health insurance," she says, pointing out the easily overlooked -- yet entirely crucial -- relationship of child-care to economic productivity. "They enable California to keep working. Without child care, California would stop. The wheels would not turn if we did not provide the care."

Worthy wages

The nation's second-largest teachers' union, the AFT has focused largely on organizing among preschool teachers and the staffs of daycare centers. Earlier this month, the AFT petitioned members of Congress to support better pay on May 1, which they designated "Worthy Wage Day."

Low wages are widely believed to be the prime reason the child-care field is so unstable.

"There's approximately a 30 percent annual turnover in child-care settings," says Leslie Getzinger, spokesperson for the American Federation of Teachers, which counts 10,000 child-care workers among its 1.3 million membership. "You're dealing with a revolving-door staff. … The people who leave are often the best teachers."

The AFT is reaching out not only to preschool teachers but to directors and owners of private and not-for-profit centers. In many cases, employers simply don't have the resources to pay workers more, but would support AFT initiatives to secure state funds for advanced training and subsidies for worker raises that reward longevity on the job.

"There needs to be a public funding source, not just the parents paying tuition who are footing the bill," Getzinger says.

The cost of care

Depending on the age of a child and region of the country, full-time child care can cost anywhere from $4,000 to more than double that amount per child annually, which is a strain for many working parents. (Home-based care -- when the parents leave a child at the home of a regular full-time babysitter -- tends to be less expensive than tuition at an accredited preschool, and infant care is more expensive than care of a three- or four-year-old.) Child care is often the second-highest expense in a household, following rent or mortgage.


Digg!

Amy DePaul is a writer and college instructor who lives in Irvine, Calif. Her articles have appeared in the Washington Post and many other newspapers.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Time To Organize
Posted by: ZPaul on May 15, 2006 1:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article says to me, basically: Folks, it´s time for "Union" to stop being a dirty word in this country. Unite. Organize, and defend your rights. Unite and Organize, because the defense of basic rights is one of the basic pillars of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The First Step
Posted by: Annarisse on May 15, 2006 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This movement to unionize is the first step in achieving the goals of the Motherhood Manifesto to get accessible, affordable child care into places where it is needed. Parents are happier and more productive at work when they know their children are receiving good care.

As for California's preschool suggestion - that sounds a lot like the junior kindergarten program that Ontario has had for years. It runs half-time, either mornings or afternoons or in a few cases alternate days, and it's taught by certified elementary teachers in school settings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The First Step Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: The First Step Posted by: Annarisse
Then why are labor leaders supporting Melissa Bean who voted for CAFTA ?!?!?
Posted by: maxpayne on May 15, 2006 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why Organized Labor Should Stand Firm

And if the Democrats are the majority in Illinois, can't they fucking use their opportunity to clean up this mess or do they have to keep on imitating the fucking republicans? OH I forgot, Bill FUCKING Daley hates unions and decent wages/labor !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: maxpayne Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Quote from Dave's blog Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Ambiguous position Posted by: Lincoln fan
Why neither party supports labor (or liberals)
Posted by: Lincoln fan on May 15, 2006 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A click on opensecrets.org will show what is wrong with the relationship between labor and the Democratic Party. Briefly, it's this. From the election cycle of 2000 until the latest figures available labor has contributed over 273 million dollars to both parties about 95% of this has gone to the Democrats campaign after campaign. This overwhelming support has allowed the Democrats to take this money for granted. They know that labor won't suddenly start giving the Republicans strong support. And they know that labor won't stop spporting them because labor is afraid of the Republicans.

What is true of contributions is also true of votes. What is true of labor is also true of liberals. The Democrats have extorted us for our money and our votes. The fear of Republicans is what prevents us from forming a viable third party. The "hold your nose and pull the lever" vote is their trump card. That is why they can't win unless the Republicans become absolutely unbearable.

This desperate support of the Democrats has made the Republicans write us off. While the Democrats know that they don't have to do anything to win our support, the Republicans know that they can't do anything to win our support. We, the majority, have no power in elections.

What can we do to get power? We can use the power of our votes before the election. Once a vote is cast it has no power. How can we use this power? We can give both parties the opportunity to earn our votes. We can refuse to support any party or candidate that doesn't support our views. We can tell them now what we want and tell them that we will write in a protest vote for "Honest Abe" if neither party listens. How long will we remain powerless? Until we take control of both parties.

The above outlines the tactics of The Lincoln Initiative. We think it's time for a showdown. Our web page provides guidance and assistance. Click on Join us

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Note to LincolnFan Posted by: CatDad
former preschool teacher
Posted by: fungus on May 15, 2006 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is great. I was involved in an organizing campaign for preschool teachers years ago, I'm glad this is taking off.

One comment - many early childhood educators have strong backgrounds in educational theory and curriculum development. They consider themselves educators (I did)
rather than "babysitters". Please remember this when you wrtie about them and give your article a title.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a good living
Posted by: saramarie on May 15, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother was a home-based daycare provider for over twenty years, and for many years, she was operating in and licensed by New York.

The regulations are horrible. There is no way, technically, for a provider to use the bathroom... throughout the whole day! Other regs get into the business of what the provider's kids get to do in their own home, which used to drive me up the wall, especially by the time I was a teen.

Also, the parents hardly ever treated her fairly. They were all broke from buying big houses and SUVs, so they would try anything to get a break from my mom, who earns about the same wage with 50 hour weeks what I would earn with 40 hour weeks at a fast food joint... and that is if she gets enough kids at full-time! Also, when she would take on a fifth child, all of that money would go into taxes, the way the brackets worked. Plus, she hated that she had a college degree, but parents always treated her like the "babysitter".

Daycare providers have to give up their home to demanding regs, buy toys, buy books, buy and cook food, clean dishes, make lesson plans, and attend numerous expensive continuing ed classes (most of which made my mother think that maybe the state was afraid most providers were retards, the classes were that stupid), etc. etc. Paperwork upon paperwork. Housecleaning. Fifty hours a week, but she only made around 14k a year and was treated disrespectfully. No wonder she recently closed shop to become a nanny!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not a good living Posted by: tgillentine
Unions are not the answer
Posted by: TWilliams on May 15, 2006 3:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone here pay attention to history? The American Steel industry went bankrupt because of unions.

I think this is hilarious. The solution isn't a union. People should hire illegal immigrants to baby sit. They will work for less, they will not complain because of their fear of getting deported, the employer doesn't need to pay ANY taxes, and we will not have to worry about unions messing things up. Plus illegals do not need to worry about paying anything for health care. Just take them to the local hospital and have them give a fake name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unions are not the answer Posted by: Annarisse
» REYou get what you pay for Posted by: Gregor
it's systemic
Posted by: jeanie on May 15, 2006 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a preschool teacher with 16 years of teaching behind me. It is very hard work. Most of the children I teach between the ages of three and six can read by age four. They can do math with manipulatives and pay attention to the world that adults in our society barely have the time to see, let alone appreciate.
If I want consistent materials in the classroom it is usually up to me to spend the money I make on those materials. I could not do this job and afford to live in a modest two bedroom home were it not for the help of my husband. Parents seem to be paying our school a reasonable amount to put their children in a good place. I go to school on weekends to get ready for Monday. I worked for years without any health insurance. The turnover rate is
disheartening. It's true, most people can find employment that is easier elsewhere for more money.
I believe that there needs to be a preschool attached to the public kindergarten, and that children ages three through six can attend the same classroom, with a ceiling of 30 on the class, with three trained persons, two assistants and a head teacher. The personnel's benefits would then be covered under public education. A bill should go on every town and city's ballot to vote an increase in education. If everyone shared the load, there would be less expense in the long run.
I was educated in this manner as a teacher and I can honestly say it works more efficiently than any system I have witnessed. For too long, the intelligence of young children has been ignored. Now that current brain research is verifying this, maybe it's time we took care of our natural resources instead of penny pinching education.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]