Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Getting Past the Watergate Fixation

By Russ Baker, TomPaine.com. Posted May 11, 2006.


The ongoing GOP corruption scandals are just the tip of the iceberg. The real problem is how business is done every day in Washington.
Advertisement

We knew this was big back in March, when a court sent ex-Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Calif. -- convicted of taking $2.4 million in bribes from military contractors -- off to serve eight years in prison, the most severe sentence ever handed out to a member of Congress. From then on, the sleaze chain has been metastasizing. More members of the House might be implicated -- and even top CIA officials. Now it is being described as the largest federal corruption scandal in a century. With stories of prostitutes and all-night poker games at the Watergate hotel, it is one scandal that truly is deserving of the "-gate" suffix that has become such a dreary journalistic cliché.

No matter how big the affair grows, though, it is likely to follow in the path of so many of its predecessors -- distracting public attention from a larger and more important reality: Today, "the largest corruption scandal in a century" is not WatergateGate -- it is the everyday performance of the U.S. government. The worst sleaze in Washington is mainly legal, as the old saying goes; and that includes the sorry state of the entire intelligence apparatus -- beyond whether the #3 CIA official improperly participated in those late-night, high-stakes card games.

Too many in the media treat a juicy mess like the Cunningham Affair as a shocking aberration. Consider the wording in a New York Times article on Sunday, which described "a growing suspicion among some lawmakers that corrupt practices may have influenced decision-making in Congress and at executive-branch agencies."

Who would have thought? Don't the editors read their own paper? It's been clear for some time that corruption in the Bush administration has exceeded a Washington standard that already was pretty tawdry. Some of the stories are known already, especially to TomPaine.com readers: White House procurement chief taken out in handcuffs in connection with a sprawling lobbying corruption investigation; the vice president's chief of staff indicted for perjury; the unseemly setup between Bush's first FEMA director and Brownie, the incompetent neophyte who replaced him.

But many of the larger misdeeds have gone unreported, in part because -- technically illegal or not -- they represent business as usual in Republican Washington today. Virtually every federal agency is now captive to the corporate interests it is supposed to regulate. The reach of corporate influence has even compromised the science agencies on whose fact-finding and truth-telling crucial questions of national safety and even survival depend.


Digg!

Russ Baker is a freelance journalist and essayist. His web site is www.russbaker.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As Long as they Control the Purse Strings
Posted by: nobuko on May 11, 2006 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Satanist Religious Right will accept Prostitution, child labor, or whatever sinful deeds this administration is pushing. Why? Think about it, what are these large LYING Religious Organizations about? GETTING Good Americans to contribute their hard earned dollars to their Organizations, claiming they are spreading the word, and saving poor people, and 3rd World countries lives! Fact is, the only thing they are doing is living life like the Lying King Pins they are on Good People beliefs that they are doing Good with their donations.

Now the Bush Administration has stepped in, and is now POURING MILLIONS of our Tax dollars into these so-called Faith Base organizations, to get their votes.

Fool me once, is acceptable, but for the Faith Based Organizations to go out and vote for bush in 2004, in my eyes, is UNFORGIVABLE!

These Organizations have me so turned off that I wonder how they retain as many members as they do, or are they retaining their base? Time will tell, I hope!

It hurts my heart and soul that they have used God to do EVIL and UGLY to others, when the average person knows, this is NOT what God is all about!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Never underestimate Posted by: peritonlogon
Truth
Posted by: rsaxto on May 11, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Truth is now flowing from so many sources that we are approaching the critical mass of dumping the entire glop of Bushies out of office and some into jail. You do the crimes and you do the times and all these criminal perps will feel the stings of the truth-telling bees of justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth Posted by: taxon
The Democrats have been drowning since Nixon took office thanks to
Posted by: maxpayne on May 11, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SCHADENFREUDE. Just ask R.J. Eskow - Why Schadenfreude is BAD for Democrats

And here's another one:

Two Addictions that Cripple the Left

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reform Package
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 11, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Require that all elected and appointed Members of Congress & their non-administrative staff sign a legal document where they agree to the following for 5 years beyond the termination of their service:

1-They cannot serve in any paid capacity for any for-profit entity that does business directly or via sub-contravting with the United States Government. This would include payment-in-kind via stock options or other considerations and benefits.

2-They cannot serve in any paid capacity for any for-profit entity that does business with any state, county or local Government that receives more than 25% of it's funding from Federal funds.

3-They cannot be appointed to any Federal, State or Local regulatory body that has oversight of any business that is regulated or has policy determined by any committee or sub-sommittee that they have served as a member of.

4-They cannot serve as a lobbyist or agent for any foreign Government or any corporate entity owned in total or in part by any foreign government.

5-They cannot serve as a lobbyist or advisor for any trade association or interest group that derives more than 25% of it's business from the Federal Government or local programs funded by Federal money.

6-They cannot serve in any paid capacity at any entity, for-profit or not-for profit, that their committee and sub-sommittee service has put them in a direct policy or oversight role.

Violation of the statutes will incur the following penalties:

1-A mandatory forfeiture of all pay, benefits and funds accrued from Federal elected or appointed service.

2-A mandatory forfeiture of all pay, benefits and funds accrued from employment that violated their advance agreement.

3-A 120% penalty on all pre-tax financial gains received as a result of actions that violate these regulations.

4-2 to 5 years PER CHARGE of confinement in Federal Prison per charge in violation of these restrictions.

5- A lifetime ban on any future appointed, direct-hire or contracted government service. This applies to any Federal or other project funded with Federal funds.

The only way to reform this mess is to take the money out of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dump 'em all!
Posted by: monkeywrench on May 11, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"That outfits like Halliburton can survive a never-ending series of contracting horror shows with their federal contacts intact says a lot about Congress's willful abrogation of fiduciary duty on behalf of the taxpayer."

O.K., then, maybe it's time for a taxpayer revolt, or a "vote all the bums out," or ??? SOMETHNG's got to happen to put the fear of God back in these arrogant a**holes; otherwise, look for things to get a lot worse.

We seem to have forgotten that for most of these so-called "representatives," the Gravy Train would crash to a stop if they were no longer in office (hint, hint for the 2006 mid-terms...and 2008).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I remember when congressional pay raises were what got people outraged
Posted by: peritonlogon on May 11, 2006 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like they showed us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bait and switch 'em! There ya go! Tease the Big Pic and deliver on demonizing GOPers
Posted by: cry0fan on May 11, 2006 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pretend you are going to take on the establishment, and then slip and slide and take on Bushco instead.

masterful! You have learned from those at the top.

Ignore the fact that this GOP admin is just as corrupt as any other admin, given that they have the wtc 911 to justify their actions. ClintonCo would have been just as avaricious had they had wtc 911 to wave as cover.

THe fact is that Washington DC is a cancer on this country and the world, and we should starve it to death by eliminating the IRS and other national taxation. Give the power back to the states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Step back: the relationship of government to people
Posted by: pgj on May 18, 2006 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although the Constitution was changed so that slaves are no longer counted as 3/5s of a person, the essence of government's current corruption is that non-wealthy entities have a fraction of the political power of a full (i.e., wealthy) "person" or corporation. What is needed under this circumstance is not so much 'reform' as it is a restructing of government's relation to the governed. We don't need new rules as much as we need to renew our consensus regarding government's relationship to the People.
We need to consider again those issues that folks grappled with long ago during the Constitutional convention. What is the proper relationship of representatives to the electorate? Should differences in wealth within the population be reflected by differences in political control of and representation in government (and should corporate individuals continue to have the same civil rights as corporeal individuals?)?
What, indeed, is the basic purpose of government in a democracy?
The answers to questions like these would point the way to a corrective restructuring of government.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]