Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Are You Ready for the Energy Crash?

By Jan Frel, AlterNet. Posted May 10, 2006.


The biggest obstacle to getting our petro-dependent society to change its wasteful ways is collective insanity.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jan Frel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

While most of us are preoccupied with the astronomical price of gasoline, a far bigger energy catastrophe is brewing that will make pricey gas seem like a walk in the park. It's "peak oil" -- the term for the period after which global oil and natural gas demand outstrips supply and the prices for these commodities become too volatile for modern society to function. (For a primer on the topic, a good place to start is Hubbert's peak oil theory.)

One writer, James Howard Kunstler, has been particularly passionate -- some might say over-the-top -- about peak oil. In his latest book, "The Long Emergency," Kunstler addresses our stark looming reality square in the face and analyzes the consequences. While many of the scenarios he describes -- the prospect of millions of Americans stranded in suburbia forced to preside over their economic decline as their once normal auto-dependent lives become unattainable luxuries -- are no doubt valid, his tone has struck me as overly apocalyptic, verging on some kind of fetish for him; that the content of what he was writing about mattered only as much as it offered Kunstler the opportunity to prophesize The End, pleasing himself as he killed the hopes of his audience.

So I was curious to hear what Kunstler would say at the Local Energy Solutions conference in New York City last month. Aside from Kunstler, I knew what to expect from the rest of the speakers at the conference -- ideas and information about how we can best cope after the energy crash.

Perhaps what was so striking about the speakers and attendants at the conference was their almost angelic goodness and optimism -- even though by all rights they are among the most knowledgeable about the scale of the challenge facing our petro-dependent society, and would have the most cause to make a run for all those abandoned cabins constructed in the Yukon after the Y2K nonapocalyptic anticlimax.

There was Julian Darley, director of the Post-Carbon Institute speaking as softly as a kindergarten teacher about the need to develop currencies based on locally produced energy and decrease our reliance on our society's "flesh-based" diet.

There was Henry Gifford, an expert on "boiler, steam, and hydronic heating systems, water pressure boosting systems, and ventilation systems," calmly discussing how the office buildings and homes we use today are pissing away our natural resources at a rate that left me reeling.

Yet while I can't dispute the need for massive improvements in the energy efficiency of our buildings and the necessity to localize food production to deal with our coming energy crisis, the biggest obstacle to change seems to be cultural inertia. Most of us are zooming along blissfully in exactly the wrong direction: building more freeways, more malls, more auto-dependent housing developments, increasingly grotesque and demeaning commercial enterprises sucking the meaning out of our lives and American society as a whole. It's the collective insanity of our society that makes it possible for us to drive, consume and build freeways as though we could go on forever.

It was on that topic that Kunstler delivered his lecture, on what he called the "psychological dimension" of what's needed to get things going on the right track, which he said is "as important as the geological dimension."

I half expected Kunstler to say that the conference was pointless, that there was no hope for a society that needed to change its energy consumption if it were to survive. But while he was merciless in his critique of American society, I left the conference believing he was as optimistic as the rest.

Kunstler's rage and disdain was righteous and unsparing. He was pissed and he was eloquent: "We've turned into this nation of overfed clowns, riding around in clown cars, eating clown food, watching clown shows," he said. We're "a nation of cringing, craven fuckups."

Kunstler singled out one element of the psychological dimension in American life: "The idea that when you wish upon a star, your dreams come true. It's not a good thing for adults to wish upon a star. Right now, this is a normative belief -- that you can wish for things, and you'll get them."

He said that the nation's leading religion has become the "worship of unearned riches, which is based on a very stark idea, the idea that you can get something for nothing."

If that was the religion, Kunstler said, then the city of Las Vegas is its temple. Why this matters, he argued, is that when we talk about the problems facing our oil-dependent society, the dominant frame of mind is one of pure fantasy -- that years of predominance on the international stage has left America smug in the belief that it need only wish to have its problems solved, and that it doesn't have to face challenges that might require a massive change in all aspects of American life.


Digg!

Jan Frel is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Interesting article. But what about short-term?
Posted by: nbrown on May 10, 2006 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that peak-oil is a serious problem that isn't going to go away. And I agree that, if ignored, it could be a catastrophic downward tumble.

That said, what can people do about gas prices in the short term? I wrote a few things anyone can do to regain some of that lost disposable income. Forgive the locality, but the basic principles will apply in lots of areas.

For anyone who hasn't lived in a country other than the USA... it just might open your eyes to spend a couple months somewhere else.

Jan Frel is exactly right: there's a collective insanity about the way people in the US use energy. It's shameful, really, but I believe people can improve if they are made conscious of their behavior.

Small changes can have noticeable impacts. And such changes can succeed on the individual level without cooperation from the entire planet.

Since we're only responsible for our own actions, I think that's the most logical step to changing the world, if that is one's wish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One big problem Posted by: medstudgeek
» RE: One big problem Posted by: JimTheAnarchist
» RE: One big problem Posted by: hms2004
» Been there, done that. Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: One big problem Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: One big problem Posted by: redjenny
» RE: One big problem Posted by: jwg
» RE: followers need leaders Posted by: ScottP
Aww. Did the bad man use a bad word and call us a bad name. Aww.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 10, 2006 1:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd use "horse's ass" myself, since our pattern is to wait until the bridges collapse, the rivers flood, and the levies break. That is, we don't close the barn door until the horses are gone. And then we move right back in and wait for the next predictable catastrophe.

Americans won't listen to bad news until after it has happened. Take global warming, for instance. Now where we gonna run to? 'Nuf said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consumers aren't the problem
Posted by: n7ekg on May 10, 2006 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In your column, you write that "The biggest obstacle to getting our petro-dependent society to change its wasteful ways is collective insanity."

With all due respect, this is a minor issue. The real obstacle is the Bush administration and their big oil cronies, who fight tooth-and-nail every conservation attempt, every attempt at developing more fuel-efficient vehicles, and every attempt at developing alternate sources of energy.

Consumers aren't the real problem, and your disdain for consumers, however well-meaning, is woefully misplaced. If Madison Ave., in collusion with big oil and big business, hadn't brainwashed the American public for 40+ years that "bigger is better" we wouldn't be in this situation, would we? Even those who come to an awareness of the problem find it harder and much more expensive to "go green". Why are fuel-efficient cars like the Toyota Prius and Ford Escape so much more expensive then their less-efficient counterparts? Why do we have vehicles that only get 50 or 60 MPG at best? And why do we have vehicles that run on petrochemicals at all? Why do we have a 54 cent tariff on imported ethanol while at the same time encouraging generating ethanol from corn, a very inefficient process but which creates a market for corn grown here? Why do we have lithium ion and polymer batteries that are so much more expensive than their much heavier lead counterparts? Why are solar cells still so expensive, even after manufacturing costs falling 10-fold in the last 20 years?

If we were truly interested in conservation, we would make it more affordable, more convenient, and more socially acceptable. But, as it has for the last 60 years, big business and big oil has dominated both the political landscape and the lawmaking process in this country, and so we still have passenger cars on the road that are touted as "fuel efficient" while getting a mere 30 miles per gallon, we still have gasoline at artificially inflated prices, and we still discourage developing alternative sources of energy, both as a matter of national policy and as a matter of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» High gas prices Posted by: medstudgeek
» agree/disagree Posted by: brasilaron
Lunar Energy
Posted by: solrev on May 10, 2006 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The future energy source for this planet is the moon. Create the energy using nuclear fusion and microwave it back. The cost of developing low cost polution free energy is less than the 8 billion plus that we will spend on the war in Iraq. "One small step for man one giant leap for mankind" then we quit. Fortunately China will do just that for the human beings living on this planet. Unfortunately China just doesn't have the right greedy profit motive. So will just have to nuke them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Step away from the moon... Posted by: greentime
» Aaaarggh. Posted by: nickptar
» RE: Aaaarggh. Posted by: Samantha Vimes
» Not fusion, solar Posted by: nickptar
» Oh, sorry, it was fusion! Posted by: nickptar
» RE: "Dude, we've got technology." Posted by: janakiblum
cliff of disaster
Posted by: rsaxto on May 10, 2006 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It clear that we are headed for the cliff of environmental disaster caused by corporate and governmental self-pigishness. We need to replace the stupid grunting pigs in power with people who have a decent attitude toward the necessary survival of the environment and peace and health. Instead of terrorist bombings of terrorist individuals we need intelligent struggle for the survival of a decent government with decent leadership.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DECENT LEADERSHIP?! Posted by: BJT
Craven Clown Princes
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 10, 2006 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How would I react if someone called me a "craven fuck" to my face? That would depend on the source of the insult. Were that person to be someone who seems to know what the heck he's talkin about, Mr. Kunstler, for instance, I might take pause and look inward. This is probably the best piece I've read in my year of reading AlterNet.

"A nation of clowns, eating clown food, watching clown shows" Wow. Wish I'd said that!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't repeat it Posted by: greentime
» slightly off topic Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Semi-counterpoint
Posted by: nickptar on May 10, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peak Oil Debunked - effectively saying "We have the technology, but we still need to change our lifestyle."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Semi-counterpoint Posted by: MT512
» RE: Semi-counterpoint Posted by: nickptar
Oh good, more bullying...
Posted by: greentime on May 10, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like very much for Kunstler and others who intend to yell at us until we submit to listening to them to just stop. They are behaving in some of the very ways we need to evolve away from in order to renew our world. Even if their message is true, by using those tactics, they become just one more screaming message to mute with the remote.
Dominating a conversation, or anything, seems to me to be the problem.

There are reasons people are discussing these issues purposefully and quietly. It is part of a new way we must behave as human beings in order to make the changes we seek and to include each other in the dialog. Screaming and yelling are so... old technology. ;-)

We are not just clowns or fools or worse. We may be somewhat lost, we may have been thoughtless because of our previous beliefs, but we do think new thoughts, recognize mistakes and we can and do change. It is called evolution.

Jimmy, all the while you have been yelling, many people have been busy building more efficient houses and "cars", improving efficiencies in technolgy and planning the next steps toward energy independence. Millions of us have supported their efforts, quietly, so I guess you thought we were all clowning around or something.

Why not simmer down and when you are calm, join us! There is a lot to write about.

And on a personal note: Saratoga The Magazine
You didn't listen then either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh good, more bullying... Posted by: antoniomo
Yes, we are stupid but...
Posted by: O.B.Server on May 10, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate to admit it but we are products of our environment and government. The reason we act like clowns is because "clown teaching" has been incideously inserted into our basic nature by the schools, churches (yes), media etc. Calling someone stupid (even if its true) is rarely going to produce much except anger. The best and most effective way to counteract this ambient stupidity is through education(one way or the other) which plays to a person's intellegence. The hugh problem is that the usual sources of US education are severely contaminated. I have lived outside of the US for 14 years and I'm still becoming aware of the subtle and not so subtle ways that US citizens are turned into corporate automatons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BOMB IRAN!!!
Posted by: williameon on May 10, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb Iran
As
Fast as you can!

Bomb Iran
Be a man

They’ll be Nuke-en and a Steal-en
Torture and Treason
In Iran

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb Iran!
As
Fast as you can!

Bush’s Poll #’s are a falling
Carle Rove is a calling
Better Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb Iran
as
Fast as you can

Call the NSA
Spy on them today

Exxon is calling!
There’s oil in those dunes!
Tex-ass Tea!
Black Gold!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

Bomb, Bomb, Bomb,
Bomb Iran!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a matter of definitions
Posted by: Bruuks on May 10, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the first paragraph, the following definition is given:
"It's "peak oil" -- the term for the period after which global oil and natural gas demand outstrips supply and the prices for these commodities become too volatile for modern society to function."
Strictly speaking 'peak oil' is the period during which worldwide oil 'production' is at the highest it will ever be, before beginning to decline. Supply and demand do come into play, but not necessarily at 'peak'. Demand can quite easily exceed supply long before peak. However, most certainly, supply will not be able to keep up with demand post-peak.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jevonism
Posted by: JimTheAnarchist on May 10, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the people in the mainstream peak oil movement, including many of the organizers of the Peak Oil conference, are Jevonists. They have taken the ideas of a 19th-century economist named William Jevons which dealt with the increase in coal consumption when more efficient means of using it were developed and used them to justify their own refusal to decrease their own oil consumption now. I don't see how Jevons' ideas apply to peak oil. There was no reason to conserve coal in the 1850s. It wasn't running out and its environmental effects would not become apparent for decades. Modern Jevonism is just taking a lack of faith in humanity and making it a principle to base your behavior on.

Kunstler is a good example. He flaunts his own oil consumption, mentioning his frequent flying in his blog posts even when it is not necessary to make his point. To a Jevonist people who get rid of their cars are chumps, since according to them, someone else will just consume what they conserve. Therefore, peak oil types often brag about not conserving. I've seen several suggestions in Kunstler's blog (not by Kunstler but by his accolytes) to the effect that "If there's somewhere you've always wanted to go you'd better go now before the price of jet fuel goes up."

The peak oil movement is all about how to deal with the breakdown of civilization after the oil is gone and not about how to do anything to prevent the breakdown. They fly and drive all over attending conferences, watching peak oil movies, raising awareness and acquiring the skills they think they will need post-apocalypse. The organizers of the conference claim that their goal is to make more people aware of peak oil. Considering that these people have significantly increased their own oil consumption since becoming aware, I wonder if this is such a good thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jevonism Posted by: mogwai
Any ideas on how to survive?
Posted by: Jasonix on May 10, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I take public transportation to work, eat mostly unprocessed foods, turn my thermostat down to 55, and with the recent prices of gas, have taken to using my bike when possible. But our society is structured in such a way that it's hard to do more than that. I live two hours from my job, and it's impossible to get any closer because of sprawl and the price of real estate - meaning that I'm stuck sitting on a condo in a bedroom community that'll collapse when it becomes too expensive to commute to the city. I owe $145,000 on my mortgage (which in my neck of the woods is a sweet-heart deal, believe me), and I have no credit card debt, but I still worry that I'm going to be destroyed financially when it all hits the fan, because no 1,300-sq.ft. condo two hours from a city is going to be worth $145,000 when the real estate market crashes. Does anyone have any advice for surviving the imminent melt-down? Most people I know are in much, much worse shape than me, and I can't imagine what's going to happen when it all goes south.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Any ideas on how to survive? Posted by: purplehawk
Eco-Freaks or Life-Style Pioneers?
Posted by: gar on May 10, 2006 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years, people who have aspired to an ecological lifestyle in this country have been ridiculed in the press and by the public in general as tree-huggers, nature worshippers, and even "pinko commies." The reason for that last aspersion always escaped me but be that as it may...

Now we have a man who comes along and calls the general public "fuckups" and "clowns" because they don't follow an ecological lifestyle. Well, maybe it will be good for some shock value to wake some people up who need a little jog but I think overall, it will have a negative effect.

As they have been saying in politics for the last few years, perhaps what is needed is a new frame; a new way of expressing the values and the ways of living that could go a long way towards saving our planet. For instance, people who attempt to live in a self-sufficient manner with the earth are not "eco-freaks," they are "life-style pioneers."

Here are two more view changing frames. Instead of labeling food grown without the use of chemicals as "organic," change the law to where foods that are grown using chemicals are labeled "non-organic" with a list of the chemicals used in their production. Another good one would be to force the labeling of food grown more than 200 miles away with a label giving the distance it was shipped.

These are only presented as illustrations of the types of things that could be done to change the public attitude. As Rumsfield (excuse me please) might say, "We've got to win their hearts and minds." We won't do that by calling them "fucked up clowns."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good suggestions! Posted by: sln70
wishful thinking
Posted by: purplehawk on May 10, 2006 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far, most of these comments seem to dwell on technological fixes and emotional reactions to Kunstler's loaded language. But where are the reactions to the idea that our culture is a wishful thinking culture? That somehow, somewhere, a solution will be found to keep us all enjoying the only way of life that seems good to us, but that is nevertheless, a way of life that just keeps on destroying life on the planet. Even if we could find another source of cheap, non-polluting energy, it would just keep us running the same old rat race that isn't making anyone any happier. Cheap fuel is the star we've all been wishing on, and we want it to keep shining. But it's time to grow up and stop wishing and start working to create a new way of living that is more in harmony with the way the planet really works. This doesn't have to mean poverty and misery. Permaculture offers a whole new way of looking at how to live in harmony with nature's systems instead of fighting them. Ecovillages are modeling new ways of living and working together as a social solution to social ills. We can turn to plant medicine and healthier lifestyles instead of wishing and hoping for technological medicine to cure us of diseases caused by bad food and stress and pollution. We need a new collective vision, and not this continued dependence on technology and government to somehow save us and keep our artificial lifestyles going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wishful thinking Posted by: LeonDion
» RE: wishful thinking Posted by: nickptar
» RE: wishful thinking Posted by: LeonDion
» RE: wishful thinking Posted by: nickptar
» Similarly... Posted by: nickptar
We are all in this together
Posted by: DaveB on May 10, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peak oil is a serious issue. I view it as one of a constellation of issues (over-population, over-consumption, resource depletion, environmnetal degradation), which taken together suggest that the way we have been living for the last 50 or 500 years will not work for the next 100 years. Call this the sustainability challenge.

Understanding the sustainability challenge, and appropriate responses to it, should be at the foundation of progressive thinking. Massive economic changes will occur. We can either watch them happen to us, or attempt to guide them in a strategic way.

Commitment to a social safety net is essential under the circumstances. Failure to make such a commitment will result in a psychology of desperation and panic, which will make an already challenging situation much, much worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some ideas on how to survive the crash
Posted by: Ricki on May 10, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The worst part of what is coming is that our food system is so petro dependant. Many will starve if they don't figure it out. We have been working towards self-sufficiency for a while now. We live on a small farm, but some of what we do would apply to urban dwellers as well. Grow your own veggies. Even if you have to use containers. Learn how to save seeds for the next years crop. Learn how to put up food for a year without refridgeration - dehydration, lactic fermentation, etc. If you live in an area that permits it, grow some meat. If you don't live in an area zoned for it, find a local farmer to buy meat from. Work into it gradually. Get up off your ass from the TV and other distractions and learn how to feed yourself. You'll be suprised how good it feels to disconnect from the sickening corporate food system and feed yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Managing Temper Tantrums
Posted by: maddy on May 10, 2006 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya know, I am currently living in a rural area where, to my shock, residents attempted a (failed) boycott of a local gas station in outrage over gas prices. What struck me about it was how childish the participants sounded. I couldn't shake the image of a baby's tantrum. The outrage sounded so...strangely enough...misinformed.

In fact, I wanted to shout at some of these folks--"Didn't you see this coming?" "Did you think we could continue sucking this planet dead without any consequences?" "Do you really think your convenience is a birthright?"

I think this piece is right, though, that you don't inspire people by telling them they're ignorant and spoiled.

It seems to me that the solution is indeed, a difficult one--I think you have to dig in and start having real conversations with people about what they "lose" by participating in American sprawl and a life made dead by both careerism and consumerism.

The good news, believe it or not, can be found in the rise of evangelicalism. While I loathe everything about it's belief system, I think it's addressing a widespread American malaise--it's giving people purpose in their lives, a sense of existence deeper than Starbucks and SUVs.

That is the challenge. Tap into that search for meaning. And I think the way to do that is by generating local groups who work on simple solutions. Bringing people together for small tasks will empower them... which is key.

Imagine, instead, if the folks around me started organizing local carpools, or, off the top of my head, cooperative gardening projects? If folks pledged to...I dunno...turn off their TVs and gather outdoors?

The possibility and hope is there, and I'll find it once I get over my urge to scream at the whining folks around me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree
Posted by: LMNOP on May 10, 2006 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Managing Temper Tantrums. Screw the American people (my people too, in case you're wondering) for their selfishness, wastefulness, arrogance, and ignorance. They deserve a major spanking from privence, and you can be certain that one is in the offing soon, whether it be due to shortsightedness in this area or any other one amongst a dozen or so. It would not be just if America's behavior was not severely punished.

Those that have a neuron or two will figure this out and begin becoming personally less dependent on fossil fuel. The rest, people who mock the rest of us for concern in this matter, will bleed. Too f-ing bad!

America needs to hope for mercy because it couldn't survive justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insanity and Materialism
Posted by: VoteHope on May 10, 2006 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every wonder why more stress and working harder to make ends meet is justified? How much is enough?

Questions or philosophy? I live as if it is a philosophy. I have quit the corporate mindset of collective work for huge profits to the wealthy owners: feudalism.

I am trapped by the energy crisis that oil brings to the planet and see profit as the motive to continue using fossil fuels. Contamination, global warming, and plutocratic rule are the real by-products of using oil.

One person can not change the "geological clock" that started with the automobile and the huge consumption of oil the dominant species seems to need to function, but I can get out of the rat race and stop being one person in "a nation of cringing, craven fuckups," whenever and however I can.

Decide what you need to live and quit doing what seems to be a large advantage to the rich and power owners of the company you work for and start working for your own life.

Psychologically, what makes you secure and happy is health and shelter for yourself and those you love. Nothing is more important. Not boats, second homes, wealth, or power is as important as our relationships.

Materialism is a disease for modern culture and Corporate America is the pathological leader of the world. We are not in touch with reality and insanity, fascism, and greed are our cultural crisis qualities, at the same time this crisis will eventually unite the world against Corporate Plutocrats and their fascism.

Human rights begin with you giving yourself the right to be who you are, not what you have been taught from the Corporate American education model to compete and be the best so they can profit from your talents, but the just to do what you want and be with the people you love.

Oil and energy are the asteroid hitting the earth and it feels like we could become extinct, or at least the lifestyle we have come to know, but it can also be the crisis that leads to an opportunity to become more human and less material based. Non polluting and environmentally friendly energy sources are available and would become more productive and efficient if industry was producing and refining the technology, but oil based economics is too powerful.

The oil infrastructure is the corporate model for corruption in our government and this fascism and plutocracy needs to be resolved on a governmental level if we are going to change what industry/corporations focus on and produce for people to use. No change is possible if the status quo runs the government and makes huge profits; there isn’t any incentive to change. Even with war, global warming, and looming apocalyptic predictions, change isn’t the goal for Corporate America, and neither is the best interest of the people in the U.S. or the world. Americans have their head in the sand, a very comfortable head hole, but they deny there is a need to get Corporate America out of our government to have a real democracy. We don’t have elections or a democracy in the U.S., just Corporate appointments. We could vote to change things with no big $ in power, but that would mean we learned from history and stopped denying and lying to ourselves to not make waves and make the big $ bosses happy that in turn own you too when you can’t walk away.

Start a career that you can make by applying your own talents and make enough to live. Buy small used cars and save you money for solar cells, wind turbines, voltage regulators, and batteries... Get off the grid and live free as you can. Stop working for "the man" and work for yourself. Survive and work to be with the ones you love.

Cottage industry and democracy were born together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Technology . . .
Posted by: Baranga on May 10, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until people of the world realize that technology is not the cure-all for what ails us then we will continue burning oil like it's going out of style, or more to the point - going, going, gone.

It's just below the surface but if you were to take a sampling of opinions in "mainstream" America, the generic, misinformed response would be that "technology" is going to make it all right. "Scientists over at the National Energy Technology Labs are working on ways to convert orange peels into jet fuel as we speak." This kind of thinking diverts attention from what the author pointed out: we need to collectively overhaul our consumption patterns but as we all very well know, that won't change until pumps are bone dry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Airconditioned Nightmare"
Posted by: albiegf13 on May 10, 2006 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an observer, I find it all very amusing and comical. This society is living in a state of anxiety, caused by the uncertainty that is created when the illusions clash with reality. Its' going to be too bad for those that can't cope and it will all be for the best... Think of streets filled with pedestrians and bikes. Think of families sitting down to dinner for a home cooked meal, a cool evening breeze blowing throught the open windows. You can get used to the heat, even here in South Florida. It's not that big of a deal, really, the sooner the better. One of my mentors defines humanity as the AIDs virus of Mother Earth. I believe this comparison to be true... I wholeheartedly cooperate with the inevitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're ready Posted by: LeonDion
Peak Oil Awareness Needed
Posted by: MonkeyBoy on May 10, 2006 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It you want to get a glimpse of the future, that is, post-oil-crash, take a gander at this website:

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/

and

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/SecondPage.html

It's a wealth of information that will quickly bring you up to speed on the subject of "Peak oil".

Even if we haven't reached a peak yet, we will soon be in a state where demand from rapidly growing industrial economies like China and India will far exceed the worldwide supply of oil and gas.

Be forewarned, you won't be the same after you visit this site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blooming humanity
Posted by: wildrehab on May 10, 2006 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe peak oil and all the parallel looming disasters are merely the way our civilization is ending its short reign.
Perhaps the point isn't to figure out how to prevent it, but rather to face the inevitable end of this bloom of humanity that's been happening for several thousand years. No biological bloom ever happens without it's subsequent crash. Why would our species be different?

As a result of our incredible bloom, there are more humans alive than the habitat can sustain. We won't limit our own bloom---- which may not be a matter of stupidity or self-delusion, but merely the way species behave. We'll push our expansion of numbers and power as far as we can, and then crash. From our point of view, that's a huge looming disaster. From Ma Nature's point of view, just business as usual. And it'd be a little silly to think She'll make some kind of exception for homo sapeins.

Sad from our personal viewpoint, but then we're each going to die someday anyway, so maybe it's not that big a deal exactly how it happens, en masse or individually. Like an individual with a terminal diagnosis, we have choices in how to respond:
freak out? Moan and groan? Or maybe just celebrate our amazing and interesting tenure and enjoy each moment we have remaining on this beautiful planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Blooming humanity Posted by: anniedine
Materialism
Posted by: mdf1960 on May 10, 2006 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not possible to NOT be a materialist---we need to consume resources to survive and we need energy to maintain a good standard of living. The pre-industrial age was an age when 99% of the population was poor, lifespan was short and work weeks were long.

I think people need to consume wisely, however. Take a look at your lifeastyle and decide where you can cut back and not decrease your overall quality of your life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Materialism Posted by: redjenny
Read "Parable of the Sower" by Butler
Posted by: anniedine on May 10, 2006 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us "clowns" will survive the coming catastrophe. Some by luck, some by violence, some through deceipt and manipulation, some by intelligence and planning, and some through wealth and power (those 2%-ers Bush loves so will certainly be able to buy their way to safety, if not total comfort). Many clowns will not survive and many of those will go down claiming that everything is going to be fine.

Some people you can reach, some people you can't. Some people need to be yelled at and called names, some need a soft touch, some people have enough critical thinking skills to see the truth for themselves.

Those with wealth and power in our world have ensured that the crash is coming. It may be related to finite resources (water, land, oil, etc.), it may be a nuclear holocaust, it may be a collapse of monetary systems, it may be marshall law and an end of the US Constitutional protections for citizens, it may be a flu pandemic - it will probably be a combination of many of these. The U.S.'s fragile safety nets have been cut away while we were childishly dreaming of being saved from our selfishness, greed, and laziness.

Enough smart people have warned us. Octavia Butler has laid out in beautiful storytelling what a future scenario could be. But many clowns will continue ignoring all of this and go merrily along (there were people on the Titanic who insisted to the very end that help would arrive). Regardless, the time is coming when we won't be protected from the realities of nature (including our own) by our technologies and our hubris.

In any case, it will be a fine day when there are fewer human clowns destroying mother earth. May she, at least, survive the coming crash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Psychological Dimension
Posted by: schmitta1573 on May 10, 2006 11:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that is the main point of Kunstler's somewhat ranting message. How do you we get people to change the way they think? The rest are just details that will never be implemented if we don’t change how we view living. If we don’t change our awareness then it will come down to change via painful necessity. The part about the clowns, beyond being slightly amusing, is sadly true for a large segment of America despite the belief that we have “evolved.” I like Einstein’s quote: “Technological change is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal.” Right now many in society are acting like pathological criminals. Thus, the jury is still out on the evolution of thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Already Too Late
Posted by: worksg on May 10, 2006 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's already too late to save the 'American way of life'. The rising price