Amateur Athletes Aren't Indentured Servants

At least a dozen times this past weekend during coverage of the National Football League draft, analysts referred to Reggie Bush as the Michael Jordan of football. The former University of Southern California running back is a game-breaker, a wondrous mixture of speed and compact explosiveness. Now he is a member of the New Orleans Saints -- a savior, if you will, for a town that desperately needs one.

But Bush will arrive with heavy baggage: Last week allegations surfaced that Bush's mother and stepfather, Denise and LaMar Griffin, lived rent-free in a $750,000 home owned by California businessman Michael Michaels, and that Michaels allegedly arranged to clear up the Griffins' $28,000 debt and pay for their trips to Bush's away games last year. Michaels also claims that, in exchange for this deal, Bush would sign with Michaels' firm and hire an agent of Michaels' choosing.

If all of this is true, of course, it would mean that Bush violated NCAA rules prohibiting a college athlete (and his family) from accepting anything that would jeopardize that player's amateur status. But Bush acknowledges no wrongdoing and denies involvement in this arrangement. The NFL Players Association and the PAC 10 Conference are investigating the charges.

Should the investigations find Bush guilty, then his 2005 Heisman Trophy could be stripped. The NCAA is very clear on its rules for amateur athletes, and the governing body of college athletics will not allow anyone, even someone of Bush's fame, to tarnish the dignity with which it conducts business.

But last season, while the USC Trojans attempted to win a third straight championship, Bush was featured on the cover of just about every major sports magazine. His No. 5 jersey was sold in bunches throughout Southern California, and in every other American town, for that matter. Life was good; at least it was for the people collecting the proceeds on that No. 5.

No one knows for sure how much money college athletes earn for their universities, but we do know for sure is that it's a considerable sum. Robert Brown, a professor of economics at Cal State-San Marcos, has tried for the past 15 years to calculate the financial impact an athlete has on his or her university.

Using direct revenues, such as ticket sales and television contract dollars, Brown compares the total team revenue to all of the revenue-making factors that contribute to it. He predicts a premium college football player is worth at least $500,000 to his university. Brown explained, "It's an estimate, an approximation. If you ask me where Bush fits in, I'd say he's worth quite a bit more than that amount. Reggie Bush isn't your typical premium player. He's the premium player."

Brown's method does not include indirect revenue, such as increased jersey and hot dog sales. But he admits that if he did, the projected value of Bush would climb considerably. Consider that during a two-day period prior to the Trojans' Rose Bowl meeting with the University of Texas, more than 1,000 No. 5 USC jerseys with a Rose Bowl emblem on them flew off the shelves at roughly $80 apiece. With a startling figure like that, it starts to make sense how having a Heisman Trophy winner might impact ticket sales and thus concession sales. How many more programs are bought as keepsakes? Just think about how many students might choose USC simply because it has the nation's best football program. The list goes on and on, and the only people keeping track are the ones who likely know little about football, only its economic value to educational institutions.

In short, college athletics generates a fat bottom line every year. And the labor is as cheap as it gets.

For a century the NCAA has paid its athletes slave wages because it has held firm to its stance on amateur status. But that policy does not hold up to today's supply and demand for sports entertainment, and amateur status is merely a hurdle for hordes of otherwise good kids in their attempts to collect on what's rightfully theirs anyway.