Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

An Excellent Reason Not to Join the Military

By Aimee Allison, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2006.


I was shocked to discover the realities of being a female minority in uniform.
10excellentreasons
10 Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Aimee Allison

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from the forthcoming book, 10 Excellent Reasons Not to Join the Military to be published on May 18, 2006 by The New Press.

Aimee Allison served as a medic in the Army Reserves and received an honorable discharge as a conscientious objector during the Persian Gulf War.

I desperately wanted out of my small-minded hometown of Antioch, California, and the military recruiter on my high school campus promised me an escape hatch. The family that my white mother and African American father created was based on the belief that the hard work and democratic values of 1960s activists made equality my birthright.

But my day-to-day experience was full of evidence that racism was alive and well. High school classmates would chant the n-word when our team played its biggest rival the next town over. Slurs against gay people were so accepted that teachers used them without thought. And after winning a local Junior Miss competition, a first for a black contestant, I was excluded from the local news and town parade. When I brought my Ivy League college acceptance letter into the career center, a counselor suggested that I got in because of my race.

So I rushed to sign up for the Army Reserves, in part because it was the only place I knew of that promised I wouldn't be judged or limited by my race or gender. We women, people of color, and immigrants are especially attracted by the idea that we could live our lives on equal footing with other Americans. But the military isn't the egalitarian nirvana that its multi-billion dollar advertising blitz -- with a budget of almost $4 billion in 2003 -- claims.

Like most female soldiers, I learned the hard way that men dominate military culture. We are stuck in a system that makes it difficult to report abuse because of fear of reprisal. Even the military itself admitted in a June 2005 report by the Defense Task Force on Sexual Harassment and Violence at the Military Service Academies, "harassment is the more prevalent and corrosive problem, creating an environment in which sexual assault is more likely to occur."

Just ask any woman in uniform -- sexual harassment is a common experience on base. I remember on the day of boot camp graduation, the same drill sergeant who had threatened to "rip off my head and shit in my neck" for a minor infraction during training grabbed my arm in the on-base store and pressured me for a date. This was a man that had exercised incredible power over me and my unit for twelve weeks, and through my fear I mumbled, "Drill sergeant, no" three times before he let me go. I didn't know at the time that about 60 percent of women who have served in the National Guard and reserves said they were sexually harassed or assaulted, but less than one-quarter reported it. Many who did complain were encouraged to drop their complaints.

When I first joined the military at age seventeen, a military doctor administered a demeaning and uncomfortable pelvic exam during my induction physical. He didn't wear gloves. It turns out that my experience wasn't unusual.

At last year's National Summit of Women Veterans Issues in Washington, D.C., former Air Force officer Dorothy Mackey told of several instances of abuse during OB-GYN exams. "He sodomized me," she said. "I started looking into what happens in a normal OB-GYN examination, and that is definitely not supposed to be part of it."

Nine out of ten women under fifty who had served in the U.S. military and had responded to a survey reported being sexually harassed while in the service. In an episode of "60 Minutes," New Jersey National Guard Lieutenant Jennifer Dyer revealed that she was treated like a criminal after accusing a fellow officer of rape in early 2004. She reported the rape immediately to the military criminal investigation division (CID), who took her to a civilian hospital for a rape kit -- then held her in seclusion for the next three days with no counseling and no medical treatment. The CID agent advised her of her Miranda rights and threatened to prosecute her for filing a false report. Her command announced her rape and accusation to the entire unit. By the time she returned to her unit after a two-week leave, she was "fearful for [her] health, safety, and sanity." Her assailant was roaming free on base and was later acquitted of any crime.

All the bad press about rape in the military has led to congressional demands for reform. For the eighteenth time in sixteen years, the Pentagon has studied the problem and proposed changes, including designated victim advocates in every command and a promise of confidentiality, according to "60 Minutes."


Digg!

Aimee Allison is a community activist and organizational consultant. She counsels military members seeking CO discharges, and is a leader in the counter-recruitment movement.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is an ugly picture.
Posted by: churchofone on May 5, 2006 4:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd always suspected the military of leaning heavily on ethnic/gender/sexuality type of slurs and insults as a "motivator" and this confirms it.

I know a female member of the military who has had to take on a harrassment suit. It was strongly discouraged, but she's not letting it go. Talk about tough!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

West Point wanted me.
Posted by: bettsoff on May 5, 2006 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boy am I glad I turned them down. It's amazing that I know so many liberal, sensible, tolerant vets if conditions are truly like this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh boy, women in my state of SD sure won't be any happier in the military
Posted by: SDres11 on May 5, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At home, women's control of their own body is outlawed but thanks for pointing out the worst of it in the military. Like the military though, our legislature is already writing legislation to give more immunity to rapists ! At this rate, the rapists from the Bronx and the rest of the urban/suburban sprawl can invade South Dakota and out-rape it if the business muggers hadn't done enough damage already !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sick
Posted by: andrushka on May 5, 2006 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their is not other word or comment than calling this behaviour
Sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How true
Posted by: justbach on May 5, 2006 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When recently deployed in a non-military capacity I tried to help a female soldier who told me in confidentiality that she was sexually assaulted. I first reported it to a sergeant who I thought was a friend of mine. The events that followed shocked even me, a former 15-year law enforcement officer and a ex-Marine. Not only was the female soldier in big trouble for going outside her "chain of command" with an issue that should have stayed "strictly Army business" but I was in big trouble facing possible loss of my job for going to the Army "which is against company policy". I really could related to this young lady's story. I really felt bad for the soldier I tried to help because she reminded me so much of my own daughter and Thank God I didn't allow her to enter the military. I made sure my daughter went to college first and then recommended she forgo the military. The ultimate result of my actions eventually persuaded me to quit and come back to the states. Hell, I had already been in Iraq for 2 years and I figured I already "raped" the American citizen of enough of their tax dollars anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Women in the Military and MST Posted by: MSTResources
This is half true
Posted by: felipe on May 5, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being male, I cannot comment on the gender discrimination aspect of this article. However, I can say this about the military when it comes to internal racism or race based harrassment, especially during basic training.

In a nutshell, basic training is like the Simpsons, in that EVERYBODY is fair game. White, black, overweight, whatever is subject to punishment, ridicule and humiliation. That is part of the deal. The goal is to break an individual down and rebuild them. There is nothing personal about it.

I (a white male) was told my italian last name sounded fag(gy) by a hispanic drill Sgt.,(though my father is a highly decorated combat officer). He was not my drill Sgt. and he know absolutely nothing about me. Was I being discriminated against because of my italian background? Was it because I'm white and he was hispanic? My skin was darker than his. No, he was f'ing with me, pushing my buttons, just like they f--- with everybody. This is just one of countless times I subjected to "harrassing" behavior

A white recruit shared the same last name of a black drill Sgt., and they happened to have the same home town of Birmingham, AL. The running joke (whoops, I mean harrassment) became "your grandaddy owned my grandaddy and now I'm going to kick your ass"

So when the the drill Sgt pulled this writer out of formation and called her stupid etc.. in front of everybody, he did it because she, by her own admission, turned her head while standing at attention. She fucked up, she showed a lack of disipline, and she paid for it. I am willing to bet she never did it again. That was the point.

"...he looked at my dark skin and didn't know or care that I was an excellent student on my way to the university".

She's right, this guy did not give a shit about her, he does not think she is "special", like she obviously thinks of herself. What she fails to understand is that it was NOT personal. In his eyes she is nothing special (no recruit is). Unfortunately she can't accept that. She personalizes it and it becomes harrassment in her eyes. Get over yourself, you had your buttons pushed like every other recruit that goes through basic training. You are nothing special.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is half true Posted by: Gisele
» Context dear Posted by: felipe
» RE: Context dear Posted by: Elmowilcox
» RE: Context dear Posted by: YogiBear
» GI(s) pay taxes too! Posted by: felipe
» RE: GI(s) pay taxes too! Posted by: Elmowilcox
» RE: GI(s) pay taxes too! Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: This is half true Posted by: davidt
» Wrong Again Einstein Posted by: felipe
» get over yourself Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: get over yourself Posted by: felipe
» RE: get over yourself Posted by: YogiBear
» Thank you! Posted by: felipe
» YOU ARE WRONG Posted by: Scientz
» RE: YOU ARE WRONG Posted by: felipe
» RE: This is half true Posted by: ezilla
» RE: This is half true Posted by: felipe
» RE: This is half true Posted by: YogiBear
» you are really... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: you are really... Posted by: felipe
» RE: you are really... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: you are really... Posted by: felipe
Not My Experience
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 5, 2006 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent 8 years in the United States Army with a job (84B) that put me in contact with everyone from Privates to Generals from HQ to the grunts in the field units. An 84B was (the MOS no longer exists) a still photographer working in official capacity, from Military Police & CID Investigations, training material, engineering photography, aircraft accidents, medical photography, field deployment documentation, stock photo work, unit and youth sports to classified briefings (this was before Power Point). Everything that needed photographic support, slides or AV went through our hands. Later I worked in the Medical Corps on a TRADOC (primary training) installation and have seen plenty during that time.

Being assigned to a Headquarters Company the unit I belonged to was also, by Army standards, heavily female. I even served under a female unit commander for about 2 years. My Basic Training was during the time men and women were trained together (1982). Male Drill Instructors were not allowed to be in the female barracks without a Female DI present and never allowed to be alone with a female recruit. This was not a guideline-- it was gospel. Unless things have changed drastically, the charges leveled here are either uncharacteristic or embellished greatly. If it's true it should not be tolerated and those involved should be court-martialled.

The Army and the other services are generally representative of our country and almost any condition or problem present in the society can be found in the services. During my time in the Army, EO was pushed harder than any place I know of in the civilian world and was taken in a deadly serious manner. Racial slurs and sexual harassment were simply not tolerated. I find it hard to believe that things have changed that drastically in the time since I have been out.

I do not intend to be or sound like an apologist, but some of what is described here could be a great misinterpretation of what passes for humor in some corners of the military. The service is a sub-culture all it's own with it's own folkways and norms, probably not well understood by a basic trainee. Drill Sergeants deride, tease and taunt most every recruit during the course of Basic Training. It's nothing new and is considered by many a rite of passage. If you are called whatever derogatory name that applies to you it is not usually not racially or ethnically motivated. Everybody gets their turn, and I mean everybody. I do not defend it, but it's well-known. They 'motivate' slackers by 'tearing them down to build them up'. This technique is widely used in sports coaching. Again, I do not defend it, but know it first-hand. Watch R. Lee Ermey in Full Metal Jacket and you will get an idea of what it is like. He was great in the role because he was a Marine and knew it first hand.

If the charges are true there needs to be a huge house cleaning in TRADOC (Training & Doctrine Command), the command that runs all basic and advanced training in the Army. Nobody should be sexually, racially or ethnically harassed. I still find it hard to accept because it is the farthest thing from what I experienced during my time in the service. I hope it isn't so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A "cult" Posted by: henderson
» RE: A "cult" Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: davidt
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: felipe
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: fork
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: fork
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: felipe
» RE: Not My Experience Posted by: felipe
camping with boys
Posted by: Gregor on May 5, 2006 4:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone ever been on camping trips with guys knows what an all male culture is like--and it isn't pretty or sensitive. Although if we want to raise our communication skills and ultimately our society to a hire level, we don't need to communicate with slurs, insults, taunts or teasing. We can learn to be less judgemental. Those that find hurting others fun and entertaining really should be brought face to face with the pain they cause and apologize. Obviously may not happen readily in the military where they do their best to desensitize you. After all, just how are you going to kill someone if all your emotions are in the right place?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The old Army
Posted by: mishanti2 on May 5, 2006 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the 60's and 70's when I was in the Army were so differant. We had only female drill sargents and female officers. We were only treated with respect and dignity. My only problem in Basic Training was the heat and humidity in Alabama in the summer. When I was in it was the Womens Army Corps and it was so differant than it is now. There were both gay men and women in the Army then and nothing was ever done about it...no comments at all. As long as you were doing your job competently you were left alone once out in the real Army(out of training). This of course was before the "All Volunteer Army. I really feel that if you haven't been in the military you can't understand it completely. There is never an excuse for the rapes ever. And there is never an excuse for the leaders to not investigate and put an end to these rapes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ONLY A TOOL:
Posted by: mite on May 6, 2006 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The military is only a tool for the blue-bloods and Secret Societies of the world. Soldiers die, are disabled, so that the military complex and world corporations can make money. If we were to spend the trillions of dollars over the centries on peace instead of the war machine this world would be different. But our fears are conditioned every day by media conditioning.
Check out the following web site: there is a good paper by Steve Kangas `The Origins of the Overclass'. Also a couple books- `Behold A Pale Horse' by William Cooper and`Rule by Secrecy' by Jim Marrs. They both run down some very unbelievable issues but people did not believe "Orwell. 1984' either. Also check out `Confessions of An Economic Hit Man' by John Perkins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For Anniedine
Posted by: felipe on May 6, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the matter, can't you back up your posts in an intelligent manner? I guess that making irrelevant, snide and baseless comments all that you are intellectually capable of.

Just as well, it's no fun engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» are you claiming Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: are you claiming Posted by: felipe
» RE: are you claiming Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: are you claiming Posted by: felipe
How to beat the Military's Stop Loss program
Posted by: Jersey Devil on May 6, 2006 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the many soldiers and marines who are on their second, third, or more tours in Iraq - This article gives them an Honorable way out, - Tell everyone you are gay, kiss your commanding officer etc. heck it is a quick ticket home and out of the human meat grinder called Iraq. So make the slogan - Don't Stay, Go Gay! and get home safe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Military Contract is....
Posted by: rdsanchez1966 on May 6, 2006 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one in which one party is bound by the terms of the contract (you) and the other can change the terms and consitions at will (the military). Putting aside issues of race, class and gender for a while, would you enter into this kind of contract? Would you sign a contract with a business partner, a bank, a spouse, an contractor, etc. with such lop sided terms. Read the book.

I knew that recruiters often made over blown and out right false promises to intice young men and women to join the military, but I didn't know that they could contracturally be allowed to break the implicit (verbal) and explicit (written) promises they made. I'm not here to tell anyone to join or not join the military but all young potenital recruits need to be aware of this fact. READ THE SMALL PRINT (it usually deletes what was written in large print).

A good reason number eleven that they did't mention but should have is the fact that the government can call you back for service many years after you are discharged disrupting your presonal and professional lives. We have stories in the media of Vietnam Vets receiving letters asking them to report for duty! Young potnetial recruits beware!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Love Letter for Brasilaron
Posted by: felipe on May 7, 2006 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s nearly been 24 hours and still no reply. What’s the matter, cat got your fingers?

Since you endeavored to engage in some (very) amateur psychology to highlight what you perceive as my personality flaws, I thought I would show my appreciation by returning the favor. In short Brasilaro, you:
are a pathological liar
are a hypocrite
have the intellectual capacity of a not so bright child
are a coward

You told a bald faced lie when you stated: “…you attack everyone else who comments on your egomaniacal screeds, not what was said". This is demonstrably false on 2 levels just by reading my posted replies.

I replied on a point by point basis to most all the replies to my posts, (including yours and anniedine’s). Secondly, I did not attack anybody who did not twist my words, nor did I attack anybody who did not attack me first. See my replies to ezilla in my original thread and to fork in the “not my experience” thread. Not a single attack or insult directed towards either writer.

You are a hypocrite by virtue of falsely accusing me of “truthyness”, all the while in engaging in it yourself. See the above statement. Enough said.

You were stupid to engage in the above listed behaviors while the facts are easily accessible on the very same page you we’re ignorant enough to post them on. Did you think I would not call you on it? This looks pretty egomaniacal to me (and yet another glaring example of your hypocrisy).

You are a coward because when you were called on these issues, you were not mature and honest enough to accept accountability for your blatant falsehoods. In fact you are too gutless to reply at all. You cut and ran like the coward you so obviously are. Your silence speaks volumes about your (lack of) character.

I would say you were a mental midget and intellectually dishonest but that would be degrading to little people everywhere and imply that you actually had an intellect with which to be dishonest with.

Given the personality traits you display, I think you would be an excellent candidate to work for Fox News. I hear that Bill O’Reilly needs a fluffer. You are more than qualified for the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sigh Posted by: brasilaron
» finally Posted by: felipe
» RE: sigh - I have to say Posted by: felipe
And Another for Anniedine
Posted by: felipe on May 7, 2006 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still no reply?
I guess you can't understand normal thought.
Twit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A reason not to join the military? This article does not justify this horrible and sad title.
Posted by: daa4 on May 7, 2006 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This aurthor is obviously pissed off and bitter for how she was treated in the military. It was obviously wrong to be treated like the examples in the article and treatment like this is handled differently in the civilian world. However, change comes from within and unless people with integrity and respect are in charge in the military this change will not happen. Discouraging people from joining the military to avoid harassment is sad and distasteful. This discouragment is going to keep reinforcing the class of people who are joining the volunteer corps now, people with limited ecomonomic options in life. I was a young female who joined the service at the age of 17 and I experienced the same type of harassment this aurthor did while I was at a service academy for 2 years. Military training is a tough mental and physical experience that I believe not everyone equally in this country can handle successfully, anyone seen full metal jacket? However, discouraging young recruits because of potential harassment issues is short changing someone and not giving them the benefit of the doubt that they may one day be the person that will help change the military away from this type of training. Change will only occur within the military and not from discouraging people with potential integrity with propaganda from joining. I had some of my proudest moments and moments I wish could be erased from my memory while I was in the military. However, without two sides to this story I feel nieve young recruits will avoid the military and not be able to develop into the person with out without integrity in the military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article
Posted by: nbrown on May 7, 2006 11:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes me want to read the book.

Well written and non-partisan.

Thank you for publishing it here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Naive?
Posted by: Guy on May 8, 2006 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I imagine all this is true and, yes, it is horrible. And the solutin is...don't join the military. It still is (at least for now) a volunteer affair.

First of all I was struck with incredible naivite of the author signing up in the first place and thinking it was going to be some sort of egalitarian nirvana.

And secondly, did anyone else catch that she turned down admission to an Ivy League university in order to join the Army? Now that's just dumb (unless there were other reasons like lack of funds for tuition, etc.).

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But if you don't join by choice....
Posted by: zipper696 on May 10, 2006 3:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then the spectre of THE DRAFT rears it's ugly head. This all volunteer Army (and Marine Corps) is hopelessly overstretched, even with the improper, extended use of National Guard units to plug the gaps.
If a strong extended drop in recruiting began and continued for a period then the Administration would have little choice but to up the ante.
Short of a reintroduced draft I can see cash prizes, guaranteed citizenship and various goodies being dangled in front of those good ol' boys who still constitute the main hunting ground for recruiters

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Insensitivity
Posted by: juhakalulu on May 10, 2006 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More often than I'd like, I'm dumbfounded by the depth of human insensitivity. What do we make of a military, supposedly the greatest in the world, that steadfastly refuses to treat its female members with dignity? Why is it that an odd century after the era of suffrage, there exist institutions that make women beg for rights that are theirs anyway?

I'm not a woman, but by virtue of being human, I can imagine how traumatising it must be to be victimised on account of one's gender, especially when such victimisation comes from the very people sworn to protect the rights of others.

In today's progressive society, there is no place for such archaic attitudes. Individuals and institutions which still cling on to them are bound to be swept away by the wave of change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Insensitivity Posted by: Guy
It happens!!
Posted by: sharand on Nov 14, 2006 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a private going thought basic training in Fort Jackson. There was a drill sergeant that had sexually harrassed many of the female during my cycle at Fort Jackson. This was in 1996, Everyone finally gang together and reported him. It was unbelieveable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]