Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Warning: No-Groping Zone

By Suzy Khimm, AlterNet. Posted May 3, 2006.


The pink-striped cars on Brazil's trains and subways are reserved for women only, but is it protection or segregation?
Advertisement

They delivered a cold stare, then a sharp reprimand and finally gave a rousing shout for Roque Jose Santos to get out of their train car.

"This one's just for women, don't you know?" one female passenger cried as the 66-year-old music technician scuttled out of the compartment where, under Brazilian law, no men are allowed.

Last week, Rio de Janeiro became the world's third major city to bring women-only cars to its commuting trains and subways, joining Tokyo and Mexico City. A new law mandates a separate car for women during rush hour, marked on the outside by a pink-striped sticker or a sign with the symbol of a woman.

Many women have welcomed the law as a relief from the groping and sexual harassment they regularly experience in the packed cars. "Men think it's extremely normal to do this. They don't feel guilty at all," says Monica Aranjo Neves, 34, an administrative assistant who has been groped on several occasions. "We have to go to work, then take care of everything at home, and we shouldn't have to deal with this on the train."

Although transportation security will intervene, female passengers have taken it upon themselves to keep out invading men. While most men duck out quickly once they've realized their mistake, some are adamant about staying put, infuriated by what they consider to be a discriminatory measure.

"I'm against any form of inequality and segregation," says Paulo Vitor Matia, 18, a student. "They're acting as if women aren't capable of defending themselves, and they're labeling all men as abusers." Within the first week of the law, police have registered at least two incidents of men who claim to have been violently ejected from the women-only cars by security officers.

Proponents of the law argue that it was popular complaint that prompted the measure, gauged by calls received on a citizen's hotline. "It might seem like a law from another century. But unfortunately, the behavior of some Brazilian men is from another century," says a spokesperson for Representative Jorge Picciani, president of Rio de Janeiro State's Legislative Assembly, who authored the law. "It's a very old problem. Our grandmothers used to carry crochet needles on the trains to defend themselves from abuses. Whoever rides the trains knows how it is."

According to an online poll conducted last February by O Globo, a Brazilian newspaper, 67 percent of those polled were in favor of the measure. The widespread nature of the problem has even reached Orkut, the social networking website popular amongst Brazilians. An online community dedicated to "those who enjoy pressing up against women on crowded buses and trains" boasts 130 members and encourages them to leave descriptions of their encounters on the site.

Nevertheless, some believe the problem has little to do with the repellent intentions of Brazilian men -- and everything to do with an underfunded, overcrowded transportation system. "This happens in any crowd. The proximity of bodies creates a sense of permissiveness," says Andreia Maciel Garcia, 34, a theater professor at UniverCidade in Rio. "The issue is that these trains are too crowded, and the service provided is insufficient to give enough room for passengers to be comfortable."


Digg!

Suzy Khimm is a freelance writer based in New York City.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes, women and children first.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 3, 2006 12:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The quoted male critic of the practise seems to think it's more important for him to be certain than for him to be right. Whatajerk.

And, yes, some women sometimes abuse the special respect they get. On one bus ride, a senior white lady boarded to find all of the seats taken. So she protested aloud that someone should give her a seat. A younger latino woman who was getting off just a few stops down the road gave up her seat.

The African American woman sitting next to me humphed loudly, "We all work, too. And we're tired." It seemed to me to fit, because the passenger who demanded a seat was neither handicapped nor fragile. She is one of those who is used to demanding privileges.

It used to be called "courtesy." Now that I am up there in years myself but in good health, I have been offered a seat by someone younger on occasion. Again, it has been latino women. I've politely declined and it's not macho. Had I truly needed to be seated, I would have accepted.

Some of the old formal courtesies are neglected. "Hard and fast" distinctions are fewer. When it comes to an issue such as the special car in Brazil, it's easily settled. Ask the women. If they want it, great. If not, forget it. 99&44/100ths% of the men will understand. Fortunately, the gropers in the US are outlaws and so disapproved. But I have heard that in other parts of the world, it is a stolen secret pleasure. Still I wonder if it is not sadistic and sick. No, it is sadistic and sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wondeful Post Sojourner Posted by: sln70
Well?
Posted by: NoPCZone on May 3, 2006 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all for women having a sense of security in their person in all aspects of their lives, but I think this is a little extreme. A well placed knee should reform any gropers out there. Women can either be treated as special creatures on a pedestal or they can be equal-- there is no 3rd category.

If I saw a woman pay back a groper with a shot to the cluster I would ROTFLMAO. If all the women ganged up and beat him senseless it would be even better.

Much of the rest of the world has caught up or is catching up to the US in educational level, but obviously there is some work to be done. Maybe they ought to teach the men a course on respect for women as people and not objects.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Beg your pardon? Posted by: The Butcher
» RE: Beg your pardon? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Beg your pardon? Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Beg your pardon? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Well? Posted by: Panthere Noir
» well what? Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: well what? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: well what? Posted by: jwg
» RE: well what? Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Well? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Well - you got that wrong Posted by: Lizzzarde
safe
Posted by: rsaxto on May 3, 2006 2:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To be a safe woman or to be an equal woman - is that really the question? Or is it merely: when will all the big folks treat each other with respect and and kindness instead of with greedy take advantage of for fun and profit and dominion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cairo too
Posted by: earthly on May 3, 2006 3:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first car on Cairo subways is reserved for women only. I speak as someone who inadvertently broke what is probably an unofficial regulation (sorry ladies!) years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gender race gender race bushitler cheney sux evil white males
Posted by: cry0fan on May 3, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anything to keep the focus of the political debate off of real issues like progressive taxation, universal healthcare, mass immigration flooding the labor supply, and so forth

divide and rule, same as it ever was

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» stop your whining Posted by: brasilaron
Segregation isn't the answer to the groping mess !
Posted by: SDres11 on May 3, 2006 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead, hold those gropers accountable ! Segregation parking won't stop compulsive or even casual gropers from doing it again. It's just like the Omaha law that passed in NE promoting segregation and black and white schools instead of actually holding racists accountable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Where's your proof? Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
people
Posted by: parise on May 3, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why is it that everything has to be an argument? nothing can slide. no one can have even a bit of peace. no wonder we have such a hard time solving the worlds problems when we won't even let a woman avoid being messed with by going into a separate car. maybe she's tired and does not feel like stabbing someone with a knitting needle today. maybe she does not feel like going through the time and trouble to file a report, something that might take hours and hours. maybe she just does not feel like trying to educate her abuser today.

yes, it's everything that was mentioned, discriminatory, avoiding the real issues ect.. but doesn't a woman have a right to be free from abuse every once in a while without having to change the world? if not, better close down all those gyms we have here in america that are for women only because their there for the same reasons are they not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: people Posted by: the poet
Segregation.
Posted by: Longdream on May 3, 2006 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The short definition is the policy or practice of separating people with inherent differences in public places as a form of discrimination.

I'm assuming the women can use the regular cars if they wish, which makes this arrangement different from the above definition. The men aren't segregated, either, if there are still women among them on a train.

If this were a courtesy offered by a private carrier for the same reason, people might still complain, but a state-mandate has implications, the worst of which is that the state is unable or unwilling to raise its protection of women to the point where it's effective. They've put a band-aid on a hemorrhage, it was easy, and now that they've done something the police in Rio can go back to steering tourists away from the latest drug-related bombing mess.

Cecilia Soares has some of the right answers. This measure is useless without a public campaign saying that unwelcome sexual touching on a public conveyance is a crime, and will be prosecuted. Then, the state will have to prosecute a few people. If the transit security can throw a man out of the women's car, they can throw some cuffs on a guy who groped a woman.

There's nothing more empowering to a woman than feeling like a full, important, equal citizen of her country.

Grope that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hear, hear! Posted by: sln70
This is about Brasil
Posted by: brasilaron on May 3, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very few if any of y'all have any idea what Brazilian culture is like. The corruption and apathy of the police are rampant. Women are just as likely to get more verbal and perhaps physical abuse from the police than they got on the train if they tried to report a grope. Machismo is so deeply ingrained in so many Brazilian men that simply "educating" them will change nothing today, maybe over the course of many years, but that won't stop today's violation of women's physical integrity. I know many Brasilian women that are fed up with the rampant sexism of their culture and equally fed up with the non-existant response from the political realm. At least this measure is a start to recognizing that women shouldn't be treated as objects and that their personal space has intrinsic value. Stop debating this as if it were an American issue, it's not. Learn something about Brasil or Brasilian culture before you try to inject our more's into the equation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is about the U.S.A. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: This is about the U.S.A. Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: This is about the U.S.A. Posted by: Longdream
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: fork
» RE: ## Posted by: Baranga
» RE: ## Posted by: fork
» RE: ## Posted by: Baranga
» RE: ## Posted by: La Cucaracha
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: ezilla
» RE: This is about Brasil Posted by: Aussie Kim
Bottom Pincher
Posted by: ArunAguiar on May 3, 2006 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bombay has had women's only cars on the suburban trains for at least 40 years

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bottom Pincher Posted by: Aussie Kim
Reinforcing discrimination?
Posted by: nbrown on May 3, 2006 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
A new law mandates a separate car for women during rush hour, marked on the outside by a pink-striped sticker or a sign with the symbol of a woman.

What does "a woman" look like? It depends on what woman you're talking about, and furthermore upon who you ask.

I wonder if these stickers reinforce stereotypes about how women are supposed to dress and how they should look to observers.

In the US, where I'm from, we have the same sort of stickers and icons all over the place. We should move beyond these ways of describing people to more objective methods. Men and Women work fine, for example, without reinforcing stereotypes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How backwards!
Posted by: lamar on May 3, 2006 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Americans don't understand is that machismo is rampant in Brazil. The last time I was there they even had separate restrooms for women. How backwards can you get?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How backwards! Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: How backwards! Posted by: lamar
» RE: How backwards! Posted by: Aussie Kim
RogerEd
Posted by: rogeralexander on May 3, 2006 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday, women in Mumbai, India, welcomed an additional 'women's only' local train (there are 4 services daily already). This is besides 'women's only' coaches in every train on the network. Not surprising. Groping seems to be sick universal phenomenon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: RogerEd Posted by: Longdream
They have every reason!!
Posted by: Baranga on May 3, 2006 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brasilaron, who I can only assume is Brazilian, paints an accurate picture of life in much of Latin America. I currently live in Argentina and have a Brazilian wife in addition to having lived in Brazil for some time. My wife has detailed instances of being groped in places ranging far outside of public transportation. She has been groped at concerts, in bars and clubs, on the beach and in malls. I say "groped" but much of what women experience here is beyond "groping". I would venture to say that many of the women are outright raped in public places. My wife and I comforted a girl who actually had a finger forcibly inserted . . (you get the picture) at a concert on the beach in Rio once. It was one of the few times in my life that I was capable of seriously hurting someone but as some of you might know, you never know who is carrying a gun there. The police did nothing!

Many Brazilian, and more specifically, Latino men view this as a normal part of life. My wife is constantly harrased in Argentina by men who show absolutely no compunction for staring at her breasts or stopping dead in their tracks, doing a 180 to stare at her ass when she passes. It makes for particularly interesting moments when she passes 3 or 4 men, usually standing around doing little more than smoking cigarettes, as they whistle, howl and stare. Some even make comments that are so inappropriate that I won't even mention them here. There is seemingly little respect for women here in South America, and very little respect for the notion of "couples" as much of the harassment I have mentioned occurs when I am at her side, holding her hand. It is ridiculous and shameful. Thankfully she is used to this kind of behavior and it doesn't bother her so much anymore but I often see European and American women here who are left absolutely stunned by the crass and uncouth comportment of many Latino men.

Women are afforded little legal recourse when sexual harassment occurs because like Brasilaron mentioned, the police are just as likely to harass themselves or at the very least ignore the situation. I am all for women having their own subway cars and I only wish Buenos Aires would follow suit. It really is a disgrace to see women treated in this way and certainly Brazilian women didn't just wake up one day and decide they needed their own subway car. This was the culmination of years of socially condoned harassment and intimidation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: tincat2
» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: Baranga
» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: Baranga
» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: Baranga
» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: They have every reason!! Posted by: Aussie Kim
If they feel safe, keep it...
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on May 3, 2006 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a comment likening this to the slow dearth of smoking in the US. This references that comment:

Most people don't start to smoke when they're 2 or 3. That's when lessons about respecting women and such start to conciously stick. Most people start smoking at 18 or so; by then, a man is going to be very much conditioned in his behavior, plus he will have had that behavior validated many times over by his dating experiences up to that point. Add to this a deep, DEEP cultural standard that doesn't exist with smoking, and you have a mess that will take generations to fix...if the men even want to fix it.

These are attitudes that have been there for aeons. Don't think that they're going to change thier stripes right. now. because it's civilized, goddammit.

Wanna see machismo? Look to the 18 yr old asshole who stays on the car against the women's wishes. He thinks he can "change" their minds, as if he has some God-given right to do so. That's the attitude you're up against...young men who think they know better than the 60 year old grandmother, or the career woman.

If these women want this, and it makes them feel comfortable, and thier government is taking steps to accomodate thier needs, more power to them. I have a feeling that most men would rather let the women in that car feel safe than soothe thier own wounded egos and impose thier presence where it's not desired.

And as far as the activists against it? If most commuters aren't fashed by the new cars, then it smacks of do-gooderism, and they should leave well enough alone. If they don't want to use the cars, they don't have to!

By the by...yeah, tell some poor 13 year old schoolgirl who gets groped that she has to knee someone in the balls. Good luck with that. And the woman would be arrested quickly, no doubt: there is little or no tangible proof of a grope, but there's plenty of proof from a blow to the body. Stupid idea, that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gropers
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on May 3, 2006 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately things like this happen on crowded trains and subways and people will always seek an opportunity to grope women. And let's not be quick to blame every Brazilian man for this inappropriate behavior.
I live in Los Angeles and during rush hour city buses get packed and males and females are pressed next to each other when seats are all occupied, and I haven't seen any groping incidents.
In the end, we men must behave ourselves in public and not give others a reason to ride in separate train cars. Women don't need another reason to complain about our behavior. C'mon, guys, we need to get it right. Don't act like idiots. Keep your hands to yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ya can't always get what you want...
Posted by: Mexile on May 3, 2006 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Women and Children" cars on the Mexico City Metro are strictly segregated. At Pino Suarez Metro Station (my regular station) there are police barricades, and officers with truncheons enforcing the rules on the platform during rush hour. Yeah, it's a hassle, and I understand that younger women MAY feel the segregation is sexist (but at least in Mexico City, there's no rule that they MUST use this amenity).

Our Metro is terribly overcrowded, and women are vulernable to men who take advantage of the situation. Some are able to turn the tables (I was on a bus, where a woman who was groped made a huge scene, told everyone exactly what happened, and -- Mexican cabelleros to the rescue! -- the groper was lucky to escape without a lynching). Younger women are more assertive, but sexual equality is still a new idea for us. Hey, racial equality is relatively new in the U.S. and still requires "affirmative action" laws. These kinds of regulations -- philosophically pure or not -- are necessary for a generation or so.

By the way, we've changed the rules a while back: the segregated cars are for women and children, the physically handicapped and the elderly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Groping Zone
Posted by: sabr on May 3, 2006 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Osama has said that women are exploited everywhere and treated like sex objects. Part of the problem is the way women dress, overly exposing themselves. Cleavage shown outside the bedroom makes it the community chest for all to see. The short skirts must become longer, the shirts must become looser. Women dress like prostitutes and then complain that men respond to it. Of course some men are just degenerates and will harass any woman, so the train idea is a good one until society at large changes the way it views women. Muslim women are not allowed to go out without a male escort to protect them, if more people became Muslims this would stop the problem of groping.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Groping Zone Posted by: lamar
» RE: No HYPOCRITE Zone Posted by: Baranga
» RE: No Groping Zone Posted by: Longdream
» Is this an Osama Zone? Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Is this an Osama Zone? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: No Groping Zone Posted by: popsicle67
Easy
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 3, 2006 5:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For everyone who think that women should just have to put up and/or fight back instead of being kept safe on their way to work, an answer that equalises things again is: have a female-only carriage at one end of the train and a male-only carriage at the other. Simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: asy (in more ways than one) Posted by: Aussie Kim
There was an old woman who swallowed a fly...
Posted by: anothername on May 3, 2006 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My friends are always amazed when I relay any incident in which I don't stand up and demand my rights, whether as a woman, as a worker, or as a constituent. No matter how much I fight, I cannot be working defense/offense every moment. For example, I have stopped trying to recycle. As a tenant and a carless person, it is virtually impossible to recycle plastic, glass, or paper. I went out of my way for years to recycle, but not any more.

I perfectly understand women who just want a moment of peace in their day. I think that the government and transit authority should act to make the ride safer and more enjoyable for the women, and the men.

However, practices started for a good reason have a nasty way of turning into tools of suppression. I heard an interview with a woman, years ago, who had written a book about how the hajib became expected of chaste Muslim women. Centuries ago, upper class women started to wear head coverings to separate themselves from the prostitutes. Thus, it is with cautious approval that I hear of the separate train cars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

barnwell
Posted by: laredo on May 3, 2006 10:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They instigated the same thing for the trains over here in Belgium for New Year's Eve. You can't beat ushering in the New Year by getting groped by some drunken slob.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's just how some men ARE, so women sometimes have to adapt
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 3, 2006 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason women-only train carriages exist is probably the same reason why a woman will never be President of the US.

Men are seen as decisive go-getters, who hunt, who get what they want and who can command respect just by standing upright (using only 2 limbs).

In much of the world women are not treated this way and quite possibly never will be. They are seen as overly-emotional (men, of course, are NEVER emotional, they never gossip, they never over-react, etc ), incapable of logic, too wussy to make decisions and too "nice" to make any tough, "sensible" decisions. They are not given respect just for exisiting, and are given less respect because they don't have a penis. They are seen as toys and not worthy humans capable of anything clever or useful.

In countries where religion rules, all this is especially true. Better equality is seen in countries where religion know its place, which is NOT in government, for example.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tejanopapa
Posted by: tejanopapa on May 4, 2006 1:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paternalism is a double-edged sword. In any society where women fail to be recognized as equal partners in social, economic, and political activities, men will not be respected as equal participants, either. Yes, some men may be in control of the major social institutions, but all men do not have equal access to the citadels of power and control. The majority of men are seen as pawns to be used and manipulated but kept in their place by being told, for example that if women, or foreign workers, or those poorer than themselves, are not humiliated and controlled, that what little success the majority may have achieved will be taken from them by these marginalized groups. So, men vent their frustrations on the wrong targets, and blame, not those whose advantage it is to make it difficult for them to get and keep decent employment, having an adequate home, providing health care and education for their children, but on the ones who share their same plight, and would join with them in achieving a more just and equal society, if only they would open their eyes and see who are their potential allies and who are not, and never will be, their friends. As long as men treat women, foreign workers, the poor, as threats to their well-being, they will not be able to make appreciable social and economic gains, because their attention is on the wrong focal point. Women are not the enemy of men. Foreign workers are not the enemy of men. The marginalized poor are not the enemies of men. "Those who have eyes to see, let them see."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: Longdream
» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: tejanopapa
» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: Longdream
» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: tejanopapa Posted by: tejanopapa