Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dixieland Justice: the Slow Murder of Rodney Reed

By Jordan Buckley, WireTap. Posted May 2, 2006.


New evidence in the murder case involving a young black man and white woman unveils the menacing legacy of Jim Crow in the Deep South.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jordan Buckley

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Precisely a decade ago last Sunday morning, on April 23, just before the sun had come up, someone dumped the strangled body of Stacey Stites, a 20-year-old grocer, off the side of a dusty highway in the sleepy Texas town of Bastrop.

Although Rodney Reed has spent nearly the last eight years living a caged existence, subject to a determination by state courts that he shall die for Stites' murder, last month he returned to district court for a new hearing.

The results of Reed's return to the Bastrop County Courthouse very well may highlight the extreme consequences of interracial dating among young people in the South, even half a century after the end of state-mandated racial segregation.

In a rare move last October, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that that prosecutor's improper conduct, as alleged by Reed's lawyers, met legal requirements necessary to send the case back to trial court in Bastrop. There they could explore whether the state's lawyers hid evidence from the court that suggested Reed's innocence. To the disappointment of Reed's supporters, the individual who will soon decide if flaws in the previous trial merit a new trial, Judge Reva Townslee-Corbett, happens to be the daughter of the judge who presided over the trial in question.

But that's certainly not the only thing working against Reed and his chances at survival. As his case unveils, the menacing legacy of Jim Crow justice may remain alive and well today, imbedded deep in the heart of Texas.

In describing Bastrop's historical significance, Preserve America -- a White House-led initiative to recognize national heritage sites -- lists before all else that the community is "the second Anglo town established in Texas." For a black man in the (albeit post-apartheid) Deep South to pursue a furtive sexual relationship with the white fiancé of a white local cop may still prove to carry fatal consequences; Reed's fate will soon tell.

The state's case against Reed hinges solely on DNA evidence found that linked him to Stite's body. Accordingly, Reed's court-appointed attorneys promised jurors -- during their opening statement -- to reveal proof of Reed and Stites' affair and a reasonable explanation for findings of his sperm during her autopsy.

But despite court documents indicating that 11 different individuals had witnessed the affair, either by mention during the trial or by affidavit, the attorneys called just two witnesses. In so doing, they utterly failed to convince the jury of Reed and Stites' covert relationship, thereby offering no justification for the only piece of evidence connecting Reed to the crime.

They also failed to call Reed's cousin and co-worker Chris Aldridge, as well as the realtor overseeing Aldridge and Reed's remodeling work -- both of whom could provide an alibi for Reed that morning.

But perhaps the most shocking evidence never presented to the court also implicates someone other than Reed -- Stites' husband-to-be, a police officer in the neighboring town of Giddings, Jimmy Fennell.

The allegedly suppressed evidence presented in the new hearing

New information presented to the Bastrop court last month included testimony from Martha Barnett, who worked in the same shopping center as Stites. Barnett said she spotted Stites and Fennell in the predawn hours on the day of her murder; they were arguing in a convenience store parking lot, she told the court. In January 1998, Barnett reported the sighting to former Lee County Attorney Steven Keng and asked that he share the information with then District Attorney Charles Penick, the prosecutor in Reed's case.

Keng not only testified in court that Penick ignored the information and did not pass it along to Reed's attorneys, he also fingered Fennell as his best guess of Stites' murderer during an interview in the award-winning documentary "State vs. Reed." Keng, a former prosecutor in Giddings (again, where Fennell worked as a police officer), stated in the documentary, "My personal opinion when I heard that she had been killed was that Fennell had done it, immediately. And I know a number of people around here that felt the same way because they had observed enough about his personality that when we heard she was having an affair with a black guy it was, like, well that's why he did it."


Digg!

Jordan Buckley is a frequent contributor to WireTap Magazine and a writer living in Austin, Texas -- just south of Georgetown, a community which Jimmy Fennell has, since his fiance's murder, sworn to "protect and serve" in his work there as a police officer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Racisim
Posted by: Calamitysams@yahoo.com on May 3, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter how much people want to be convinced that racisim doesn't exist in the South any more, all you have to do is pay attention to what is still commonly occurring down there. The South has never stopped being the bastion of all racisim in the country and probably never will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]