Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Blood is Thicker Than Blackwater

By Jeremy Scahill, The Nation. Posted May 1, 2006.


Lawsuits by families of soldiers-for-hire killed in Falluja have put a major war profiteer in the cross-hairs.
Advertisement

It is one of the most infamous incidents of the war in Iraq: On March 31, 2004, four private American security contractors get lost and end up driving through the center of Falluja, a hotbed of Sunni resistance to the US occupation. Shortly after entering the city, they get stuck in traffic, and their small convoy is ambushed.

Several armed men approach the two vehicles and open fire from behind, repeatedly shooting the men at point-blank range. Within moments, their bodies are dragged from the vehicles and a crowd descends on them, tearing them to pieces. Eventually, their corpses are chopped and burned. The remains of two of the men are strung up on a bridge over the Euphrates River and left to dangle. The gruesome image is soon beamed across the globe.

In the Oval Office the killings were taken as "a challenge to America's resolve," according to the Los Angeles Times. President Bush issued a statement through his spokesperson. "We will not be intimidated," he said. "We will finish the job."

Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt vowed, "We will be back in Falluja…. We will hunt down the criminals…. It's going to be deliberate. It will be precise, and it will be overwhelming." Within days of the ambush, US forces laid siege to Falluja, beginning what would be one of the most brutal and sustained US operations of the occupation.

For most people, the gruesome killings were the first they had ever heard of Blackwater USA, a small, North Carolina-based private security company. Since the Falluja incident, and also because of it, Blackwater has emerged as one of the most successful and profitable security contractors operating in Iraq.

The company and its secretive, mega-millionaire, right-wing Christian founder, Erik Prince, position Blackwater as a patriotic extension of the US military, and its employees are required to take an oath of loyalty to the Constitution. After the killings, Blackwater released a statement saying the "heinous mistreatment of our friends exhibits the extraordinary conditions under which we voluntarily work to bring freedom and democracy to the Iraqi people…. Our tasks are dangerous and while we feel sadness for our fallen colleagues, we also feel pride and satisfaction that we are making a difference for the people of Iraq."

The company swiftly rose to international prominence: Journalists were flooding Blackwater with calls, and military types were clamoring to sign up for work. "They're angry…they're saying, 'Let me go over,'" Blackwater spokesman Chris Bertelli told the Virginian-Pilot ten days after the killings, adding that applications to work for Blackwater had increased "considerably" in that time. "It's natural to assume that the visibility of the dangers could drive up salaries for the folks who have to stand in the path of the bullets," he said.

A day after the killings, Prince enlisted the services of the Alexander Strategy Group, a now disgraced but once powerful Republican lobbying and PR firm. By the end of 2004 Blackwater's president, Gary Jackson, was bragging to the press of "staggering" 600 percent growth. "This is a billion-dollar industry," Jackson said in October 2004. "And Blackwater has only scratched the surface of it."

But today, Blackwater is facing a potentially devastating battle -- this time not in Iraq but in court. The company has been slapped with a lawsuit that, if successful, will send shock waves through the world of private security firms, a world that has expanded significantly since Bush took office. Blackwater is being sued for the wrongful deaths of Stephen "Scott" Helvenston, Mike Teague, Jerko Zovko and Wesley Batalona by the families of the men slain in Falluja.

More than 428 private contractors have been killed to date in Iraq, and US taxpayers are footing almost the entire compensation bill to their families. "This is a precedent-setting case," says Marc Miles, an attorney for the families. "Just like with tobacco litigation or gun litigation, once they lose that first case, they'd be fearful there would be other lawsuits to follow."

The families' two-year quest to hold those responsible accountable has taken them not to Falluja but to the sprawling Blackwater compound in North Carolina. As they tell it, after demanding answers about how the men ended up dead in Falluja that day and being stonewalled at every turn, they decided to conduct their own investigation. "Blackwater sent my son and the other three into Falluja knowing that there was a very good possibility this could happen," says Katy Helvenston, the mother of 38-year-old Scott Helvenston, whose charred body was hung from the Falluja bridge. "Iraqis physically did it, and it doesn't get any more horrible than what they did to my son, does it? But I hold Blackwater responsible one thousand percent."


Digg!

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 1, 2006 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1940's, Senator Harry Truman, sitting at the head of a senate investigating commitee, equated war prfiteering with treason. The work of the "Truman Commitee", it is estimated, saved many thousands of lives and over a billion dollars. A good many corrupt contractors, along with a number of military personell, went to prison. The nation was so impressed with the driven integrity of this feisty little son-of-a-bitch from Missouri that in 1944 Franklin D. Roosevelt dropped his popular vice president, Henry Wallace, from the ticket and made Truman is running mate. Eighty five days into his fourth term, a tired and ailing FDR died suddenly of a cerebral hemmorage at his summer White House in Warm Springs, Georgia. Harry Truman was now the president of the United States.

Is there not a democrat out there with the same courage to investigate the obvious corruption and profiteering that is taking place today in Iraq? The duplicity that took place all those decades ago in what was yet to be called the "Military Industral Complex" occured right under the nose of a man who is now viewed to be one of the greatest presidents in history. Are these democratic and republican fools in the House and Senate naive enough to doubt that the problem today is much worse under the direction of the most criminal administration since the invention of dirt?

Harry Truman is dead and he's not coming back.

Pray for peace.
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Posted by: dadanbetty
» sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» RE: Young Lady from India..... Posted by: SoaringEarth
» RE: Young Lady from India..... Posted by: newqiplayer
» RE: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Posted by: ngemelis2
In the crosshairs? ...pull the trigger
Posted by: chasaturn on May 1, 2006 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Drop these oily slimeballs where they stand. This is a perfect bunch to have a crowd of "informational picketers" surrounding their homes and following their families everywhere they go. Let their neighbors know what a bunch of murderous jackasses they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it war profiteering or just profit making?
Posted by: YogiBear on May 1, 2006 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The News and Observer has uncovered a lot of flaws at Blackwater. It's good that it's coming to light. But this I don't understand:

"According to former Blackwater officials, Blackwater, Regency and ESS were engaged in a classic war-profiteering scheme. Blackwater was paying its men $600 a day but billing Regency $815, according to the Raleigh News and Observer. 'In addition,' the paper reports, 'Blackwater billed Regency separately for all its overhead and costs in Iraq.'"

Blackwater has to make money as a contractor somehow. If they didn't add on cost per contractor, the company itself wouldn't make a dime in profit. Can someone explain how I may be misunderstanding this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Should've been written better Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Melvin527
Posted by: Melvin527 on May 1, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be noted that that Erick Prince has a sister, Ms. Betsy DeVos.

Betsy DeVos was the head of the Michigan Republican Party for the past 4 years In additon to that, Betsy has a husband!:
Dick DeVos, whos business expertise at ruining Amway Corporation here in Michigan makes him the ideal choice for Republican candidate for Governor of the State of Michigan

Let the pigs run everything!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Melvin527 Posted by: djtyg
» Yikes! Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Greed is good????
Posted by: Smiggsy on May 1, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When are people gunna learn that money is not the be all and end all of a successful life. BTW any smart ex-soldier worth their salt would never have left the compound in the first place. So did they just think about the money, or not the service or the honour. They certainly were thinking about the money.

The person whoever coined the phrase "greed is good" forgot to add "murder is awesome" or "to honour thy dollar is to be better than be human" & "insanity is perfectly acceptable"...........

I'll coin a phrase for everybody: America is the new "disgrace"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Greed is good???? Posted by: djtyg
A$$es
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on May 7, 2006 8:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wanted to say that it's a crying shame that these men died in vain for a stupid, STUPID war, and that it's sick that they (and many other men and women!) are sitting ducks because some corporate stuffed shirt doesn't want to pay for some damned armor.

That's it. :P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A documentary you have to see
Posted by: kmore on Aug 9, 2006 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks if you're interested in more info on PMC's I was just at a screening of a new documentary called Shadow Company and i'm just blown away.

The implications of these guys running amok in Iraq, especially as the US begins to withdraw troops, just leave me shaking my head.

Anyway i'd encourage everyone to go and take a look at the trailer and if interested order the DVD. The doc was oddly fair and balanced, which might irk some people, but i thought it worked better than the same movie made from the fringes of the left or right wing.

The trailer:
http://www.shadowcompanythemovie.com/trailer2.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bil
Posted by: Bil on Dec 31, 2006 9:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new1
new2
new3
new4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]