COMMENTS: 58
Bush's '16 Words' Were False
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
The revelation of the warning from the closely guarded State Department memo is the first piece of hard evidence and the strongest to date that the Bush administration manipulated and ignored documents information in their zeal to win public support for invading Iraq.
The memo says: "On January 12, 2003," the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) "expressed concerns to the CIA that the documents pertaining to the Iraq-Niger deal were forgeries."
Moreover, the memo says that the State Department's doubts about the veracity of the uranium claims may have been expressed to the intelligence community even earlier.
Those concerns, according to the memo, are the reason that former Secretary of State Colin Powell refused to cite the uranium claims when he appeared before the United Nations in February 5, 2003 -- one week after Bush's State of the Union address -- to try to win support for a possible strike against Iraq.
"After considerable back and forth between the CIA, the (State) Department, the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Association), and the British, Secretary Powell's briefing to the UN Security Council did not mention attempted Iraqi procurement of uranium due to CIA concerns raised during the coordination regarding the veracity of the information on the alleged Iraq-Niger agreement," the memo further states.
Iraq's interest in the yellowcake caught the attention of Mohamed ElBaradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Association. ElBaradei read a copy of the National Intelligence Estimate and personally contacted the State Department and the National Security Council in hopes of obtaining evidence so his agency could look into it.
ElBaradei sent a letter to the White House and the National Security Council (NSC) in December 2002, warning senior officials he thought the documents were forgeries and should not be cited by the administration as evidence that Iraq was actively trying to obtain WMDs.
ElBaradei said he never received a written response to his letter, despite repeated follow-up calls he made to the White House, the NSC and the State Department.
Vice President Dick Cheney, who made the rounds on the cable news shows that month, tried to discredit ElBaradei's conclusion that the documents were forged.
"I think Mr. ElBaradei frankly is wrong," Cheney said. "[The IAEA] has consistently underestimated or missed what it was Saddam Hussein was doing. I don't have any reason to believe they're any more valid this time than they've been in the past."
As it turns out, ElBaradei was correct, the declassified State Department memo now shows.
Monday's declassified State Department memo was obtained over the weekend by the New York Sun under a Freedom of Information Act request the newspaper filed last July. The Sun's story Monday morning, however, did not say anything about the State Department's warnings more than a week before Bush's State of the Union address about the bogus Niger documents.
The memo, dated June 10, 2003, was drafted by Carl Ford Jr., the former head of the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research, in response to questions posed in June 2003 by I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, about a February 2002 fact-finding trip to Niger that former ambassador Joseph Wilson undertook to investigate the uranium claims on behalf of the CIA.
The memo had originally been drafted in June in response to Libby's questions about Wilson. But after Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times July 6, 2003, in which he disclosed that he had personally investigated the Niger uranium claims and found that they were false, Powell requested further information from his aides. Ford went back and retrieved the June memo, re-dated it July 7, 2003, and sent it to Powell's deputy, Richard Armitage.
The Sun reported that the memo contained no direct reference to Plame Wilson's CIA status being marked as "secret" despite the fact that the word "secret" is clearly marked on every page of the INR memo.
The memo does not say that the State Department alerted the White House on January 12, 2003, about the bogus uranium claims.
But the memo's author, Carl Ford, said in a previous interview that he has no doubt the State Department's reservations about the Niger intelligence made their way to President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
One high-ranking State Department official said that when the department's analysts briefed Colin Powell about the Niger forgeries, Powell met with former Director of the CIA George Tenet and shared that information with him.
Tenet then told Vice President Dick Cheney and then-National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice and her former deputy, Stephen Hadley, that the uranium claims were "dubious," according to current and former State Department and CIA officials who have direct knowledge of what Tenet discussed with the White House at the time.
The White House has long maintained that they were never briefed about the State Department's or the CIA's concerns related to the Niger uranium claims.
"I refuse to believe that the findings of a four-star general and an envoy the CIA sent to Niger to personally investigate the accuracy of the intelligence, as well as our own research at the State Department, never got into the hands of President Bush or Vice President Cheney. I don't buy it," said a high-ranking State Department official. "Saying that Iraq sought uranium from Niger was all it took, as far as I'm concerned, to convince the House to support the war. The American people too. I believe removing Saddam Hussein was right and just. But the intelligence that was used to state the case wasn't."
A spokeswoman for Tenet said Monday that the former head of the CIA wouldn't comment on the newly declassified document but promised that Tenet would tell the "full story" about how the infamous 16 words wound up in Bush's State of the Union address, in Tenet's book, "At the Center of the Storm," expected to be published in late October.
Many career State Department officials interviewed Monday said they were upset that the so-called "16 words" made their way into the State of the Union address and they are pleased that the INR memo has been declassified, thereby proving that their colleagues sounded early warnings about the dubious Niger intelligence.
A State Department official who has direct knowledge of the now declassified INR memo said when the request came from Cheney's office for a report on Wilson's Niger trip it was an opportunity to put in writing a document that would remind the White House that it had been warned about the Niger claims early on.
Many other State Department officials believed that the existence of a memo that would, in essence, disagree with the White House's own assessment on Niger would eventually hurt the administration. Â Â Â
"This was the very first time there was written evidence -- not notes, but a request for a report -- from the State Department that documented why the Niger intel was bullshit," said one retired State Department official.
"It was the only thing in writing, and it had a certain value because it didn't come from the IAEA. It came from State. It scared the heck out of a lot of people because it proved that this guy Wilson's story was credible. I don't think anybody wanted the media to know that the State Department disagreed with the intelligence used by the White House. That's why Wilson had to be shut down."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Captainmagic on Apr 20, 2006 12:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Captain OUT!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: The Butcher
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: Captainmagic
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: naima
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: taxidave
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: woodford54
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: marcos
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: akwash79
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: brunowe
» But many other countries have evolved!
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» Well, America The Puritan
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: there never was a true america!
Posted by: tanstaafl28
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 20, 2006 1:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you look at (for example) the Sydney Morning Herald, the UK Guardian and BBC, Asia Times Online, etc. you come across many stories that simply aren't reported in the US. Even if a story is reported, if the corporate masters of the press don't like it, it gets buried. During the Clinton era the daily headlines were always on Ken Starrs latest statement about stained garments - and now, the stories that should lead to Bush's impeachment are run once on the center pages and then buried. This is due to editorial control, and the editors take their orders from the corporate board of directors. The notion of an independent liberal free press is very quaint. These same corporate forces are now trying to control the 'alternative press' - look at the recent takeover and gutting of New York's Village Voice.
When we see (just for example) that the Carlye Group (arms financiers, among other things) has a member on the board of the New York Times, it doesn't take much imagination to realize that major economic forces (such as arms manufacturers, investment banks and oil producers) have a serious vested interest in controlling the information that reaches the American people.
The conclusion is that we live in a multi-tiered propaganda state - some of which is designed to distract and stupefy, some of which is designed to paint a rosy picture of US economic and military activity - all of which is designed to keep the truth from the people. What is the antitode? Actual investigative reporting - the kind where you ask questions, not the kind that begins, ad naseum, with "Today American officials said..."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: US corporate media has abdicated all responsibility
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: US corporate media has abdicated all responsibility
Posted by: deha
» Parallax View
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: OneFUSM on Apr 20, 2006 5:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» My best guess is the Vatican...
Posted by: SeverelyJaded
» RE: My best guess is the Vatican...
Posted by: Judy in Big Thicket
» Your Vatican
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: The Real Question...
Posted by: willymack
» RE: The Real Question...
Posted by: EQdi
» RE: The Real Question...
Posted by: watchdog
Comments are closed-
Posted by: woodford54 on Apr 20, 2006 5:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: GWB...
Posted by: willymack
» RE: GWB...
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: GWB...
Posted by: woodford54
Comments are closed-
Posted by: medstudgeek on Apr 20, 2006 5:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Do we really need more parodies?
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cannoliamo on Apr 20, 2006 7:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The truth is insignificant to the neocon ideology. The only thing that matters is that Saddam Hussein and his henchmen were not allies to the US and would have (if they were able to) developed WMD and ballistic missile technology and used them against us if given the opportunity (plus they controlled vast oil reserves and were not christians).
Keep in mind, the Bush Administration is NOT interested in fair and unbiased decisions. Many of these people believe the earth is 6000 years old, Adam and Eve were the first humans, Noah saved all the animals with his ark while god filled the oceans, Jesus died for their sins so they can go to heaven when they die, etc. etc. etc. Truth is FAR less important to them than the preservation of their dogma, their wealth and their security. Attacking Iraq was necessary in this regard and no rationale or historical review will ever convince them otherwise.
Are you sure you're not a communist?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» In fact, lies are more important to them than truth...
Posted by: SeverelyJaded
» RE: In fact, lies are more important to them than truth...
Posted by: jwg
» RE: So what ????
Posted by: watchdog
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cycledco on Apr 20, 2006 8:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The high drug costs and the rediculous abstinence requirements have hamstrung treatment of HIV in Africa. You don't get what is advertised with these people.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Understatement of the millenium
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Apr 20, 2006 8:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There never was a true America
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: There never was a true America
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fespada on Apr 20, 2006 9:22 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the height of hubris to claim naming rights which exclude 80% of the population of this geographic entity. But it is a good clue to the horrors that the ruling elite has brought on the world in the name of "democracy". For it is a great cover for the "Have Mores" who have engineered "regime change" whenever the target regime threatens to go its own way, and, in particular, when it makes any attempts to do what is best for its people. Read William Blum's Rouge Nation for an expert analysis of this history of lies and death.
So that nothing should surprise us, for they have been with us from the start.
The real question is: When are we going to say: "I'm not going to take it any more?" I propose the following: on a set day, preferably on a week-end, when most of us are home, that we all stick our heads out our windows and let loose with a roar which will be heard all the way to Washington. It may not bring down this bunch but it will certainly make us feel a bit better, in order to be able to deal with the next outrage.
Frank Espada
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Frank Espada
Posted by: Lincoln fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aussidawg on Apr 20, 2006 3:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Righting and calling? Surely you're not serious.
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» Oops! "Writing". (Its the acid from my youth.)
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: ighting and calling? Surely you're not serious.
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: ighting and calling? Surely you're not serious.
Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nbrown on Apr 20, 2006 4:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But before we rush to the Democrats, let's consider how they vote for the war as well.
And more specifically, that John Kerry lies about his Iraq withdrawal position.
We're getting screwed by both parties. I don't think either one of them, then, is the answer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie
Posted by: nbrown
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Both Bush, Kerry lie
Posted by: kryptx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tanstaafl28 on Apr 20, 2006 9:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only the shameful silence...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Apr 21, 2006 2:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: clntbrtn on Apr 21, 2006 2:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: foodnotoil on Apr 23, 2006 12:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...further, might I add, that's also how you build a case for impeachment...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Apr 24, 2006 6:26 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xbj on Apr 29, 2006 5:40 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Must feel really good to be the most hated man in the world when all you've been was a mentally deficient puppet and frontman for absolute evil. Truly takes a sociopath.
My empathy makes me try and try again, but I can only imagine. It's been a long time since I was a 13 year old liar and loser. I never stuck a lit firecracker up a frogs' ass though or sliced open a living cat, that's for sure.
But then it wasn't my Dad who engineered AIDS and the tainting of WHO smallpox vaccine that is causing the holocaust of 100 million people worldwide from AIDS, either.
Absolute evil runs deep, and "the American way of life is not negotiable."
To Christ, everything was negotiable except the truth. Therein lies the difference.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




