Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush's Imperial Presidency

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted April 26, 2006.


The Bush administration has pushed hard for limitless powers to spy on, imprison and torture American citizens in the name of 'security.' Is this really what America stands for?
hightower_apr06image
Illustration by Matt Wuerker
Advertisement

A fellow from a town just outside of Austin wrote a four-sentence letter to the editor of our local daily that astonished me: "I want the government to please, please listen in on my phone calls. I have nothing to hide. It is also welcome to check my emails and give me a national identification card, which I will be proud to show when asked by people in authority. What's with all you people who need so much privacy?"

Well, gee where to start? How about with the founders? Many of the colonists who rose in support of the rebellion of '76 did so because their government kept snooping on them and invading their privacy. Especially offensive was the widespread use of "writs of assistance," which were sweeping warrants authorizing government agents to enter and search people's homes and businesses -- including those of people who had nothing to hide. The founders had a strong sense of the old English maxim "A man's house is his castle." They hated the government's "knock at the door," the forced intrusion into their private spheres, the arrogant abrogation of their personal liberty. So they fought a war to stop it. Once free of that government, they created a new one based on laws to protect liberty -- and this time they were determined to put a short, tight leash on government's inherently abusive search powers.

Hence, the Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Periodically in American history, presidents have tried to annul our basic right to be left alone. John Adams imposed the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus during the Civil War. Woodrow Wilson conducted the Palmer Raids. FDR interred Japanese-Americans and others. And LBJ and Nixon used the COINTEL program to spy on war protestors and civil rights activists, including Martin Luther King Jr.

In each case, however, the abuses were temporary. Americans rebelled and gradually brought the government back in line with our country's belief that privacy, a basic human right, is a cornerstone of democracy.

Bush's push

Now comes the Bush-Cheney regime, pushing the most massive and rapid expansion of presidential might America has ever known. "I believe in a strong, robust executive authority," growled Dick "Buckshot" Cheney, architect of the power grab. He added, "The president of the United States needs to have his constitutional powers unimpaired, if you will." I wouldn't, but they're nonetheless asserting an imperious view of unlimited executive power that is foreign to our Constitution, demolishes the founders' ingenious system of checks and balances (key to the functioning of our democratic republic), and transforms America's government into a de facto presidential autocracy.

Their push includes a White House program of domestic spying so sweeping that it would make Nixon blush; an audacious claim of a unilateral executive right to suspend treaties and ignore U.S. laws; an insistence that a president can seize U.S. citizens with no due process of law and imprison them in CIA "black sites" or send them to foreign regimes to be tortured; a series of new plans for military spying on the American people; the repression of both internal dissenters and outside protestors; an all-out assault on the public's right to know; and well, way too much more.

The rise of a supreme executive is such a fundamental threat to our constitutional form of government -- and to who we are as a people -- that the Lowdown will devote both this issue and next month's to it. The media barons have covered this rise only sporadically and disjointedly, but it's important for We The People to see the frightening whole of it and launch the rebellion of '06.

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY. Richard Nixon is the godfather of the Bush-Cheney philosophy of executive supremacy. "Well, when the president does it, that means it is not illegal," Tricky Dick explained to us some 30 years ago. This plenipotentiary view of the American presidency (which would send shivers through the founders) is behind the unilateral, secret and illegal directive issued by Bush in 2001, ordering the NSA to spy on ordinary Americans. It's now conceded that untold thousands of citizens who have no connection at all to terrorism have had their phone conversations and emails swept up and monitored during the past four years by NSA agents.


Digg!

Jim Hightower is the author of "Let's Stop Beating Around the Bush" (Viking Press). He publishes the monthly Hightower Lowdown; for more information about Jim, visit jimhightower.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Shtara
Posted by: shtara on Apr 26, 2006 3:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I've lived a little too long, I grew up in the REAL America, the real DEMOCRACY, now I've lived to see its FALLING. I'm glad Mom and Dad aren't here anymore. Dad fought almost five years on the front in WWII, he was on the beaches from Salerno, France, Italy, Africa, and the big beaches on D-Day, he saw his friends to the right and to the left die, expecting to fall with them at any second. He taught us kids that God came first, Country second, and family third. Too bad our President's father didn't teach him the same. Emperor's went out in the last century... I thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shtara Posted by: greentime
» RE: Shtara Posted by: hisnibs
» Democratic America? Posted by: Cathyc
Let's IMPEACH him now
Posted by: thinkverybig on Apr 26, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are we waiting on folks. Call your congressional leaders and tell them to IMPEACH BUSH now.

I've already made several calls voicing my concerns.

Your turn!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's IMPEACH him now Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» (correction) Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Halliburton President!
Posted by: williameon on Apr 26, 2006 5:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Halliburton
Presidency

The
Corporate
Bums Rush

As
The Clone
Sells:
Wholesale
Hypocrisy

Revolving Doors
Stuck
Corp. Politicians
Run
Amuck

The
System Corrupt

Reboot!
Reprogram:
Democracy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Halliburton President! Posted by: gonzoskismet
Eternal vigilance
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Apr 26, 2006 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom. This is only half the story. It's not enough to watch and sit idly by. It's not enough to bemoan the end of Democracy and do nothing. There is no substitute for action. The time for action is now while we still have the freedom for peaceful rebellion.

We have two alternatives; either we take absolute control of our government or allow it to take absolute control of us.

It is common knowledge that our government has been shifting to the right toward fascim for decades. Since WWII the corporate establishment has been trying to undo the New Deal. It has gradually taken over the Democratic Party and we now have one party with two names. There is no "peoples party".

We now live under the tyranny of "taxation without representation" that sparked our Revolution. The Democrats won't run a liberal candidate for president unless their corporate sponsors allow it.

We may be played like a fish. The fisherman allows the line to slacken when the fish might break free. Then when the fish is exhausted he doesn't fight and is landed.

We must take control of both parties now. We must force them both to run on the issues important to the majority of voters.

They now run on superficial issues such as the candidates phony "image". And they run on divisive issues that the corporatocracy doesn't care about and neither party will actually do anything about. These are issues such as abortion, and prayer in schools. These are always carefully preserved to be used in the next campaign.

We must force them to face issues such as war powers, campaign financing, exportation of jobs, and health care. These are the issues that are important to the ordinary citizens. We must force both parties to commit to a stand on these issues before the next election.

We must force a showdown. We must take absolute control of the corporate establishment now or it will take absolute control of us eventually.

Click on Join Us Now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Eternal vigilance Posted by: blars
» self-sufficiency Posted by: rtdrury
"Dictator" Bush, not "emperor" Bush
Posted by: Citizendeane on Apr 26, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush is not claiming the authority of an Emperor. To say so is nonsense. Emperors have the authority of masters over servants, slaves or other subordinates. Dictators, since the Roman Republic, have the authority to suspend parts of a constitution to protect the state founded on that constitution. Bush has assumed and is exercising dictatorial powers in order to "defend America in a time of war." The so called war (against "terror") is a lie of his regime's devising for the purpose of making wars to benefit national corporations and to pursue national supremacy generally. This, my friends, is a description of fascism. Mr Bush and his cronies are fascists, that is the correct word for it, like it or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Len, not quite the right terms Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: Len, not quite the right terms Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Imperial titles Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: Imperial titles Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Imperial titles (ugh) Posted by: Citizendeane
» Gays and Jews in Germany and the USA Posted by: Citizendeane
» Gays and Jews in Germany and the USA Posted by: Citizendeane
» Scientz: exactly right! Posted by: Citizendeane
» Its too big a stretch try "fascism" Posted by: Citizendeane
» 2006 and 2008 likely frauds Posted by: Citizendeane
» Well put, brother Posted by: Citizendeane
IN THE NAME OF SECURITY
Posted by: eileenflmng on Apr 26, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"democracies" will committ any human rights abuses they desire and a limp Fourth Estate colludes with them.

Case in point:
“Many journalists come here to the American Colony, from CNN and NY Times. They all want to cover my story, but their EDITORS say no."
-Mordechai Vanunu @ the American Colony March 26, 2006 to WAWA Reporter + Editor

Vanunu's current trial fighting for the inalienable right to free speech in Jerusalem began January 25 2006 obfuscated by the Palestinian elections held on the same day and continues on May 1, 2006.

-excerpted April 1, 2006 WAWA BLOG:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, we all hate Bush...
Posted by: djtyg on Apr 26, 2006 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But can we try changing the record once in a while? It seems like the regular "Bush sucks" article is a standard fallback when Alternet doesn't have any new stories.

At a 32% approval rating, Bush is almost completely destroyed. We need to put forth our own ideas, and tell how we plan on getting America out of this mess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: VisionQuest
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: VisionQuest
» And another thing . . . Posted by: VisionQuest
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: dave236412
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: dave236412
» One idea put forth.... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: Yes, we all hate Bush... Posted by: dangerouslysane
The biggest crisis since the Civil War
Posted by: SufiLizard on Apr 26, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Folks, I've been saying this since about Sept. 12, 2001. We are facing the biggest crisis to our democracy since at least the Civil War - maybe since the Revolution.

In fact after the initial shock of seeing the images from NYC on September 11, my horror was magnified because I immediately saw this coming. I'm not clairvoyant or anything, just an accurate judge of the character of this corrupt, megalomaniacal administration.

We need to pull out all the stops for the 2006 mid-term elections. It's going to take more than just sending a check to the DNC and whining on liberal blogs. We all need to get out there on the ground. We need to talk about these important issues to everyone - not just preach to the choir.

Support the Democratic Party at the local level and the local candidates. Get involved to steer the supposed "opposition" party back to full vertebrate status. It's supposed to be "WE" the People, but we need to act decisively and vigilantly right now if we want any future generations to be able to experience self-government.

I'm running for state office myself and I'm giving my full support to the Democratic congressional candidate who wins the primary in my district. As a candidate I will be going out, knocking on doors, attending all the fairs and parades this summer and talking about the serious issues of self-government versus totalitarianism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This IS Civil War Posted by: Steven Wanzell
what's the problem?
Posted by: kryptx on Apr 26, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not intended as a rhetorical question.

The article is written as to object to the president's depiction of his policies as inconsistent with his actual policies. Is it just the inconsistency that you don't like, or is it also the policies themselves?

On eavesdropping: If you've heard the "right-wing spin machine" at all recently, you have heard that former FISA court members have testified that the President (this and former) has always had the authority to eavesdrop whom and when he pleases. FISA is a court that was established for the purposes of authorizing specific wiretaps in the context of the Cold War, not to restrict what wiretaps could ever be allowed. This should be common knowledge by now. I'll reply to this post with an excerpt from the hearing which took place just last month.

On torture: is there any condition under which you think it would be appropriate to torture a captive? Consider the worst scenario you can imagine. If you believe it would be in contradiction to our spirits as Americans to torture a terrorist who is known to have information regarding the whereabouts of a device or person who, left unchecked, would likely kill thousands of people, then it is in fact you whose policies are inconsistent and inhumane. If you just object to an open "torture anyone you want" policy, then that's a little more reasonable. Sadly the article is quite ambiguous on this point.

On "successes": I like the way this author spins the Brooklyn Bridge scenario. The Brooklyn Bridge was targeted by Al Qaida. The CIA picked up intercepts in Arabic, and kept hearing Brooklyn Bridge. So they did something which they never would have done before the Patriot Act was passed (which required it): they sent that information to the NYPD, which flooded the bridge with cops up and down its span. So this guy Faris, who was their operative, came and cased the bridge. We picked up his signal sent back to Al Qaida saying the weather in New York was "too hot" to proceed with the plan.

Now, one of the guys we captured in Afghanistan was Khalid Mohammed. He told us of Al Qaida's plan to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge and fingered Faris as the guy who was going to do it. So that information went to the NYPD (which it normally would not have done), we got into the apartment, found all of the surveillance tapes and his engineering plans for blowing up the bridge, and we arrested him. He later pled guilty to two counts of providing material support to Al Qaida. So to label this claim to success as "ludicrous" is just irresponsible.

For more information on the Faris story, the telegraph has a decent summary.

Other places that are claimed by the administration as having been potential targets of Al Qaida, discovered by U.S. Intelligence: The Citycorp Center, the NYSE, the Garment Center, the Hoover Dam, New York New York, MGM Grand, Excalibur (casinos in Vegas), synagogues in Virginia, the IMF Building and World Bank in Washington... it goes on and on. See more examples here. So there are more than two successes claimed by the administration. I don't know how many of them are true or significant, but there really are quite a few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: brunowe
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: brunowe
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: Jesse
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: brunowe
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: Jesse
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: brunowe
» RE: what's the problem? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: What Law? Posted by: Cathyc
Bush Supporters
Posted by: outtolunch on Apr 26, 2006 8:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think anyone who defends Bush's domestic spying by saying "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about" ought to have everything about them made public. After all, if they have nothing to hide, what do they have to worry about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: kryptx
» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: kryptx
» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: Bush Supporters Posted by: Steven Wanzell
He Must Be Impeached
Posted by: ZPaul on Apr 26, 2006 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must not doubt. The far-reaching negative effects of his lies, and actions supported by lies, cannot be ignored. Bush must be impeached.
When, on retiring, William F. Buckley, the 20th-century "guru of conservatism", finally admitted to what most thinking people knew (and what he knew, but didn´t want to admit when he was "on active duty"): that Bush´s invasion of Iraq was, and is a disaster. And if he didn´t say more, it´s maybe because he still wants his memoirs to be a best-seller among cons.
Bush must be impeached.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just another weapon of mass distraction!
Posted by: getagrip on Apr 26, 2006 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While everyone sits around pointing fingers, the real agenda is unfolding. It is the goal of the NWO to destroy the US and merge it with Canada and Mexico. They wish to create the American Union and the ONLY way they can accomplish that is to have the american people demand something be done about the irreversible corruption in Washington. Bush's job is to make sure that the people demand he and his cohorts are removed from office and replaced by something better.......and the solution will be offered, the American Union.

The Democrats are doing nothing because THEY are also in on the agenda. Not your local level politicians, but the policy makers in Washington. They are all under the control of private organizations that have infiltrated and now control everything that goes on. CFR, Trilateral Commission, Skull & Bones, Scroll & Key, Bilderbergers, Bohemian Grovers, Masons, Zionists etc. etc. etc.

All of these are working towards one world government, one world army (NaTo), one world religion, one world currency and a microchipped population that is a cinch to control.

Bush is nothing more than an organic fingerpuppet. He literally controls nothing and is in essence a very bad "B" movie actor. If you don't like the script for the movie, don't blame the actors, blame the script writers.

Time is running out for "real" change. Remove all of these private organizations from government and BAN them from ever holding office again. THAT is the ONLY way anything will EVER change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AND DEMS VOTED FOR ALL OF IT!
Posted by: nbrown on Apr 26, 2006 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You complain about national ID cards... DEMS VOTED FOR IT!!!

You complain about the PATRIOT Act... DEMS VOTED FOR IT!!! TWICE!!!!

You complain about spying, like CALEA for example.... DEMS VOTED FOR IT!!!!

You complain about torture and human rights violations -- a direct result of war.... DEMS VOTED FOR IT AND CONTINUE TO VOTE FOR IT!!!!

Seriously. You guys are lame. You're not anti-spying or any of this stuff. Alternet is a front for the Democratic Party, which VOTES FOR ALL OF IT!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yeah! Which is why Posted by: Lizmv
» RE: AND DEMS VOTED FOR ALL OF IT! Posted by: dave236412
» RE: AND DEMS VOTED FOR ALL OF IT! Posted by: dave236412
» you are an idiot Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: you are an idiot Posted by: kryptx
Dems
Posted by: Roverton on Apr 26, 2006 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GOOD COP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dems Posted by: baloo
» RE: Dems Posted by: nbrown
Welcome to the Police States of America
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 26, 2006 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you doubt we are well on our way you've not been paying attention. Congress and Presidents under both parties have been moving us down this path for a long time. The current crop of Nazis in control of Congress and the Executive are just more blatant and are moving us faster down this path.

Long before 9-11 paying for airline tickets with cash marked you for observation. If found to be carrying a large amount of cash they would be detained and quite harshly examined for the crime of carrying a large amount of money. The last time I checked, US Currency is clearly marked with the text
THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.
Pull a bill out of your wallet and check it out. How can paying for a First-Class Air Fare be probable cause for detention, seizure, etc? Does guilty until innocent seem like it applies here?

How about restrictive currency controls that hold up transactions of $5,000 or more at your local bank. Not coming into or leaving the country, just depositing it in the bank-- from another financial account. Five grand isn't a lot of money these days, but the IRS and law enforcement want to treat you like a potential money launderer.

Warrantless roadblocks by police trolling for anything they can use to fill the jails. The Supreme Court has ruled TWICE that without a specific probable cause these must be posted & voluntary, otherwise they constitute unlawful seizure. Despite this, local and State Police do this all over the country in direct violation of the law. Your papers, please. Just like the old Soviet Union.

Organized entrapment, where local and sometimes Federal law enforcement hire kids to try to buy Alcohol or Cigarettes. Regardless of the hair-splitting of the lawyers, this is nothing more than entrapment.

Mr Webster, Please
entrap |enˈtrap| • trick or deceive (someone), esp. by inducing them to commit a crime in order to secure their prosecution.

Have a chronic sinus condition or allergies? Buy too much Pseudoephedrine, a highly effective non-prescription decongestant, and Officer Friendly will be coming to visit.

Want to Fly? The government wants everything but a DNA sample these days. Don't forget to use your credit or Debit card, they may bust you if you pay cash. Besides, the Feds subscribe to private Data Mining Services that collect transaction data on you that the Feds are prohibited by law from collecting. These they just go out and buy it just like Identity Theives. They gain access to records of your ATM, Debit Card and Credit Card transactions. Cell Phone records are also available.

I'm not paranoid, but this is just the tip of the iceberg. The same 'security' cameras, sometimes with face-matching technology, being used to keep you 'safe' in public can be used as weapons for unwarranted surveillance for extra-legal purposes. The list is long and worrisome. In some hands this stuff could be used for good. In many hands, this could be used for all kinds of evil.

The Military-Industrial Complex has added the Police to it's club under the title of Homeland Security. Their track record of keeping us safe is not good-- nor is their record of respecting people's civil liberties. The answer to everything from Illegal Aliens to drugs to terrorists is always the same:

More Police with less supervision and more 'latitude'.
Eroded Civil Rights for the citizen.
More controls on citizens.
More secrecy for the government and less privacy for you.

'W' & the Bushworld cronies are just a more evolved form of a species that has been around in both parties for a long time. It's time to put someone else in charge. Someone who knows, understands and holds the Bill of Rights near and dear to their hearts would be nice for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Another Caligula Posted by: Nick
» Yes. Greed Is America's "God". Posted by: Steven Wanzell
Reasonable and practical
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Apr 26, 2006 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Arar case is the lynchpin. Rally to one man's case...and then it is all of our cases. Plus, he's innocent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe the time has come
Posted by: Lizmv on Apr 26, 2006 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To do away with the presidency all together. Perhaps we would be better of with a board of selectmen that is balanced between political parties. In order for democracy to continue to evolve, we need to dilute power from above and enrich the grass roots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe the time has come Posted by: Baranga
The Bush Family
Posted by: magistre on Apr 26, 2006 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to know where the Bush "goverment" is going examine just how closly the Bush family has been intertwined with the "Uber-fascists" of this country. They led the "paper" companies that fronted for the funding of the up-and-coming Hitler (these are the people who probably gave Adolph his marching orders). They own the voting machines and all three branches of the government if you think it will be a "peaceful" overthrow of legitimate government, think again. These "people" love to see human blood flow.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Bush Family Posted by: Cathyc
spread the message
Posted by: ccBallagh on Apr 26, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every one can see this president's illegal actions on a level never-before-seen in america. if america is to be the land of the free we need to ensure that we remove these cancers on our democracy. A masive voting reform and adjustment of checks and balances so all branches are equal in power, and most of all we need to get the man's fat nose out of our business. All this with a president who never really was voted in...

IMPEACH PRESIDENT BUSH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

spread the message
Posted by: ccBallagh on Apr 26, 2006 3:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
every one can see this president's illegal actions on a level never-before-seen in america. if america is to be the land of the free we need to ensure that we remove these cancers on our democracy. A masive voting reform and adjustment of checks and balances so all branches are equal in power, and most of all we need to get the man's fat nose out of our business. All this with a president who never really was voted in...

IMPEACH PRESIDENT BUSH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: avaged from Depravity Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: avaged from Depravity Posted by: Cathyc
Misinformed and pittiful
Posted by: mcarlotti on Apr 26, 2006 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that the majority of Americans who are against the NSA spying program are both misinformed and taking this too far. The gentleman who submitted the letter to the editor noted at the beginning of this report hit the nail on the head: If you have nothing to hide then your privacy is not invaded. To be overly concerned with privacy could be the doom of this country, as it neglects security. Since 9/11, there has not been a single attack on US soil, nothing that came close (though many plots were discovered and thwarted). Why are we so successful in the War on Terrorism on the homefront? The answer is easy: new additions such as the Patriot Act, NSA spying program, and detention centers are all vital to gain intelligence to keep us safe. Anyone who would rather be free is taking all the government does for granted, as all must realize that it is not easy keeping us all safe, that sacrifices are required, and believing that we can be as safe without these programs is both ludacris and naiive. As for opposition, I have heard two clear points that people have made against these programs, both were outlined in this article (a fine job I might add, more articulated than I have yet to see). The first is that the founding fathers were against it. There is a major flaw in this argument, that flaw being the fact that our "founding fathers" did the same things that we do now. The American Revolution is VERY equatable with the War on Terrorism concerning tactics used; torturing, interrogation, and executions of British soldiers were held often to boost morale and rally the cause. They believed in taking any action to ensure victory in the war, just as we do now. And for the argument that they wanted independence due to spying by the British, well that statement is a blunt lie, as there were many factors for rebellion, including trade embargos with other countries, shipping taxes, lack of representation in Parliament, and nowhere at all was there an outcry against spying. The second argument used is mainly that it will cause the United States to become a dictatorship under a unitary president. This argument is far more preposterous than the first, as this is simply not possible. First, if the President wanted this power, he would have taken it by now, the fact that he remains humble toward both Congress and the Supreme Court shows his adherence to the system. Second, Bush is nothing compared to past Presidents, who in hindsight were supposedly good presidents, but at the time conducted many tyrannical and non-democratic activities. Nixon of course comes to mind before any, but also there was Theodore Roosevelt, who was by definition the most imperialistic president of them all. His goal before anything was to gain land, show off American hegemony, and trample anyone in his way (and this is not against terrorist organizations, this is directed towards sovereign states).
When we take a step back for a moment, and actually balance the tangible positives against intangible negatives that occurs from Bush's programs, we realize it is completely for the best. If these programs were to be ended, 9/11 would happen all over again, and more than just once, probably worse. Instead of taking our security for granted, we should realize that in order to stay safe these programs are completely required, because at the end of the day, programs can always be undone, rights replaced, but lives cannot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: the poet
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: gonzoskismet
» Lambs For The Slaughter Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: Steven Wanzell
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: deaudonnee
» Is it just me? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Is it just me? Posted by: kryptx
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: the poet
» The War on Paragraph breaks Posted by: Allison
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Misinformed and pittiful Posted by: SufiLizard
» RE: Misinformed and pitiful Posted by: Aussie Kim
Hope for our future..
Posted by: Evo1450 on Apr 28, 2006 8:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an idea for us to consider. For our future, our childrens future and the future of this once great country.

http://www.lincolninitiative.org/

[«