comments_image -

How the immigration debate hurts the G.O.P.

Republicans are back-tracking, finger-pointing, and losing support
April 13, 2006  |  
 
Advertisement
 

The immigration debate is far from over and already the wave of pro-immigrant rallies have begun to affect the rhetoric. The demonstrations have divided and weakened the Republican Party, leaving them tangled up in their own politics in few different ways.

First, G.O.P. leaders are on the defensive, backtracking and finger-pointing like mad for supporting the criminalization of illegal immigrants. (Illegal immigration is now a federal violation, not a criminal offense.) In fact, some Republicans have decided they don't really support the legislation they wrote and/or voted for. Among them is Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R.-Wis.), who wrote the draconian House bill that prompted this month's rallies, and now blames Democrats for the harshness of his own legislation.

See if you can follow this: Back in December, Sensenbrenner introduced the House bill that would make it a felony crime to immigrate illegally or even assist illegal immigrants. When his bill was being amended, Sensenbrenner supported an amendment that would downgrade the charge from a felony to a misdemeanor. Most House Democrats voted against both the misdemeanor amendment and the entire bill. But due to Republican support, Sensenbrenner's bill passed anyway. The bill pissed off the Catholic Church -- many priests said they would defy any law that prohibited them from ministering to illegal immigrants. Then hundreds of thousand began denouncing Sensenbrenner's bill in a wave of demonstrations. Apparently surprised by the backlash, Sensenbrenner is now accusing Dems for refusing comply to the misdemeanor amendment of his own bill.

The Washington Post reports: "In a letter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops last week, Sensenbrenner charged that all but eight Democrats 'decided to play political game by voting to make all illegal immigrants felons.'"

Right, so now that he is realizing that his potential 'criminals' are real people putting up a real fight, Sensenbrenner says his idea of making 11 million people into insta-felons was perhaps, a bad idea, and blames his rivals for letting his bad idea make it through the Republican-controlled House intact.

Sensenbrenner isn't the only one trying to distance himself from the very bad idea of criminalizing millions of people. CNN reported yesterday that:

Maria Luisa Tucker is a staff writer at AlterNet and associate editor of the Columbia Journal of American Studies.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | Washington Monthly

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]