Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Defining the Melting Pot

By Maria Luisa Tucker, AlterNet. Posted April 11, 2006.


The thousands of immigrants and their supporters, young and old and from all over the world, who rallied in New York yesterday proved they are an inseparable part of the country.
041106_storya
Toward a Real Immigration Debate

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Maria Luisa Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In New York's Washington Square Park, the influence of immigration -- both legal and illegal -- was obvious long before today's immigrants' rights rally began. Hours before the marchers arrived with their flags and megaphones, nannies from the far corners of Latin America and Africa strolled through the park with their fair-skinned American toddlers in tow. Mexican and Irish construction workers ate Indian kati rolls on their lunch breaks. A gaggle of international students from New York University hailed a taxi, driven by a man with a West African accent.

Then, the pro-immigrant marchers converged.

From far off, it sounded like an impromptu pep rally, drums banging and whistles blowing. Once engulfed in the frenzy of the crowds, marchers could have been in any number of places. Phoenix, Los Angeles, Atlanta -- any of the 100 plus cities where people rallied on the National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice. The chants were similar, the signs were similar, the message was clear: 11 million illegal immigrants, along with millions of their legal relatives and friends, want legal status. "We love America!" one marcher exclaimed via megaphone. "We are America!"

Children and parents, friends and cousins, cheered at this pronouncement. "We are here to let them know we're working hard. We're already part of this nation," said Tito, who crossed into the United States illegally ten years ago and now lives with his wife, Reyna, and their two kids in New Jersey. The children, 7-year-old fraternal twins, are American-born. Reyna is a naturalized citizen. If Tito were to be deported, Reyna would be an instant single mom. She is acutely aware of this fact and says she is here for him and many more relatives who are here illegally.

Alongside entire families, students and union organizers supported the immigrants' call for citizenship.

"I feel that our country needs to acknowledge the people that do most of the low-wage labor," said David Vigil, a Columbia University student, ESL teacher and former organizer for the Janitors for Justice campaign. Though he acknowledged the worry that illegal immigrants take citizens' jobs, Vigil said "I think it's problematic to say to they're 'our' jobs and not somebody else's, especially since so many companies don't respect borders anyway."

The long march was slowed by police officers using strict crowd-control measures; marchers were gated in on many blocks, and near City Hall they were allowed to leave but not to reenter. Throughout the long afternoon, the mood was jubilant, and the speakers plentiful. Among the notables were Manhattan Rep. Charles Rangel, Sen. Hillary Clinton, Al Sharpton, a handful of local elected officials, heads of immigrant rights groups and the like. The most compelling stories, though, were not the political but the personal.

Representing an immigrant network called Families for Freedom was a young man named Julio, who told the story of his father's sudden deportation. "Six immigration agents with guns took my dad … they deported him without telling us anything and turned my mom into a single mother," he said. "Immigration laws are tearing families apart, taking mothers and fathers away from their American-born children."

It was the family ties at this and other rallies that seemed the strongest motivator for many marchers. Contemplating the day's events, Mexican-American author and scholar Richard Rodriguez likened the entire immigrant movement to a family gathering. He wrote in Salon:

Indeed, illegal immigrants, who were supposed to live a shadowy existence, belong to neighborhoods and to church congregations that were willing to stand alongside them. And most important: Many millions of illegal immigrants have U.S. relatives, sons and daughters, in-laws, cousins, grandchildren.

That family tie is the lesson of these parades. In Houston and Boston, in Phoenix and in San Jose, Calif., what we saw were not exactly "protests," nor were they political demonstrations, primarily. We were seeing huge family gatherings, celebrations of the clan.

In Los Angeles, I saw a veritable platoon of young women with baby strollers, the babies asleep or not, the women chatting, as though they were headed to the grocery store. I saw carnival balloons and comic oversize sombreros. I saw the Mexican Virgin of Guadalupe floating on somebody's shoulders. I saw the flags of several nations, often, of course, Mexico's. On one Mexican flag, an old man with an Indian face had taped the photographs of his sons, serving in Iraq.

In generations past, for example during the Depression, once America had done with the eager hands of Mexico, there were mass deportations. Send the Messicans back!
But now, how do you deport so many millions who belong to even more millions?

For the hundreds of thousands of marchers and the millions who support them, the answer is simple: You can't.

Digg!

Maria Luisa Tucker is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Blame the Government, not the immigrants
Posted by: thinkverybig on Apr 11, 2006 12:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I blame the United States Government for allowing this to happen.... The Republicans spent millions on investigating and impeaching Clinton when there was certainly more important issues to be dealt with....

Corporations hiring illegals to help with their bottom line.... is a travesty and I hope the House bill becomes LAW.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How? Easy.
Posted by: Baal_Labs on Apr 11, 2006 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how do you deport so many millions ...

Easy. You don't. They themselves choose to go back and forth at will, and using their own money.

Criminalize their employers, with mandatory, unavoidable jail time. And then they will not get hired. And they will go back on their own. The same way they got here. And then maybe they will fix their own country, just like they should have been doing all along.

Another fake problem, promoted heavily by the sloganeers to distract attention from the real problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How? Easy. Posted by: Mutternich
No they didn't prove that!!! They proved they are "proud" of breaking our laws.
Posted by: Prophit on Apr 11, 2006 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do we expect though. The biggest supporter of all of this is an "avowed law breaker" and thus leads this NEW NATION of law breakers in saying its ok to break American Laws.

We are being led by someone who doesn't care about our 250 year history of "the rule of law" in this country and simply ignores it when it suits him so why do we expect illegals to feel any different. They are the new perveyors of the new attitude here following the lead of our illustrious President who wants them here for his corporate masters to use as slaves.

I don't blame them one bit. If the President of these United States says the rule of law is what ever I want it to be and right now unlimited infusion of illegal immigrants is what I want then it will be so and these new illegals will follwo this president by "CELEBRATING THE BREAKING OF AMERICAN LAW BY MARCHING AND CELEBRATING SUCH ACTS". They are literally protesting to be able to break our laws with impunity and Bush and the employers are supporting them in it so I can't blame the illegals.

They are simply doing what our nations leaders are doing. I am thoroughly and honestly disgusted and not fooled by the real agenda here. Doing away with Sovereignty is the issue and this is the tool to affect regionalization of the northern western hemisphere. Peaceful and aided invasion. That has always been the way to take over a nation without firing a shot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't you have a job? Posted by: sausage
» Our laws? Posted by: chief of okeefe
» RE: Our laws? Posted by: BsAs light
» RE: Our laws? Posted by: Prophit
no, illegal migration does not enhance the country
Posted by: lclark on Apr 11, 2006 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.rense.com/general70/horridf.htm
"I live in Minnesota which is as far from the Mexican border as should be necessary to be out of the Mexican invasion but not so due to a local Hormel meat packing plant that thought it would improve its profits if it replaced all the union workers with Mexicans. They never had a shortage of workers; in fact, they had a waiting list of legal citizens wanting jobs there, but now they won't hire an American citizen because the Mexicans don't like working along side whites; and well, accidents happen. I moved out of town so my kids could go to school without fear of violence. Mexican gangs are rampant even in the elementary schools. To add insults to injuries, I have often been harassed by Mexicans. What really got me steamed is the other day I went to Walmart and a Mexican kid wore an Aztlan T-shirt. Though in Spanish, it depicted the western USA combined with Mexico colored in with the Mexican flag. Ironic given that he's living in Minnesota which isn't even in the 'Aztlan' territory. Big business is making a lot of money off of their 'cheaper labor' but we are paying for it."

NAFTA is one cause of promoting massive illegal migration but its continuation promotes the goals of corporatist, not people, migrants or citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American
Posted by: AlienSlave on Apr 11, 2006 5:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to see the end of the Irish ST Patrick’s day green shit. The end of German October fest, the end of French Mardi Gras, The end to the stupid Dutch spring tulip festivals and clopping in the streets and a bunch of other mindless ethnic unPatriotic American activities. I praise the government for issuing green cards then not following through by letting them expire and thus turning people into illegal aliens. We need to build up the judicial side of our government and provide more jobs for the legal system and get more tax dollars flowing into building more jails. Without these people we would have no one to run through the system.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imbeded Bush propagandist
Posted by: JPHickey on Apr 11, 2006 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering her duplicitous use of the the word immigrand alone, Maria Luisa Tucker, might well be one of the covert Bush Administration spin doctors.

Fortunately the Arizona Republic still does print professional journalistic articles such as an excellent one in yesterday's edition. Migrant issue divides Latinos

Apparently there are millions who don't understand or appreciate the role of rule of law in the U.S., and are willing to accept verbal scams like redefining the term immigrant to encompass illegal immigrants.

Maybe these illegals are already wealthy enough and confident enough to attempt to usurp the political power of this entire nation, but though we may not be marching now, there are tens of millions of us who are legal citizens and we will be voting to see to it that this nation puts the rights of its own citizens first. Heads shall roll as we remain the majority, and we want legal enforcement against illegal employers to come first.

Of course, I agree with David Sirota that the corporate/government has had a lot to do with destroying Mexico's economy. Mexico is a failed nation which is why so many of its citizens are fleeing to the U.S. just to survive. Everything within reason should be done to help Mexico get back on her feet so that her citizens could return to a life of at least moderate prosperity in their homeland.

Maria Luisa Tucker has found a secure niche for herself within the exstablishment of exploiters, as a front-person. She's not really motivated by compassion for the poor but to ensure her own position within the status-quo mentality.

AlterNet has lost a great deal of my resprect through the articles jounralistically shoddy articles that are more like propaganda aka White House spin. Nevertheless though I find articles like Defining the Melting Pot to be essentially worthless, what I glean from reader comments has served as an invaluable resource in filling out my own understanding of the issue, enabling me to discuss these matters authoritatively, something that remains elusive for Ms. Tucker.

P.S. Obviously AlterNet is engaging in one-sided commentary. I'd like to suggest that the editors at least feature two commentaries -- one for each side! Their sponsors probably won't permit that, I suppose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America, where we speak in headlines
Posted by: MarujaCanta on Apr 11, 2006 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am dismayed at the posted reactions to the above piece because they highlight a problem far worse than immigrant rights. It seems to me that if one is keen on having an opinion about an issue so vast as immigration law and reform, that perhaps research therein and not pure reaction would be appropriate before making such egotistical, declaratives as, to paraphrase, "THEY'RE breaking our laws!" Excuse me, but common sense implies that anyone willing to leave everything (family, friends, all possessions, all things familiar) for a country where one knows life will be unbearably hard and hostility will await them at every turn, is someone desperate for a better life. If you don't believe in "their" problems, travel south of the border and stay for a month outside of a major city. Please do the research America, the immigration process in this country began to significantly degenerate into chaos starting with legislation mandated during the Regan administration, though the US's meddling and war games south of our border are a much older story of banditry, coup's and deceit. Also, there aren't enough jobs in this country in the current global economy world; not for college graduates, day laborers, farmers, white collar employees etc. The problem is rooted in a government given up by the people (there is no one reason why), turned on the people, and hardly ever for the people. Classism, ignorance and stubbornness keep most American minds, eyes and ears from seeing what's going on. The immigration situation is merely a festering symptom of the larger socio-political stranglehold on true American ideals, such as justice and punishment for the real criminals in America. The scandals from the top that explode on our television screens every morning leave us all babbling in headlines and blaming someone other than ourselves for, to quote Marvin Gaye, "what's going on."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And your solution is? Posted by: YogiBear
How Did ALTERNET Wind Up On THIS Side of the Issue?
Posted by: jyork on Apr 11, 2006 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, guys, you picked the wrong side of this issue. Are you all dupes for the Democratic Party? They sold out to their corporate money-base and here you are doing it too.

This issue has nothing, as in NOTHING, to do with immigrants, fair play, or anything on the TV. It has to do corporate America's deciding to change the demographics of the US. Before ILLEGAL immigration, we had a growing-old population at near zero growth rate. They saw a chance to change-the-situation-on-the-ground through ignoring enforcement and ignoring illegal hiring. The engine behind all of this is illegal hiring of illegal aliens.

I think we all should have had a chance to determine as a matter of US policy if we wanted to add another 100 million people to the population of this country, pay for the costs of infrastructure to support the 100 million illegal aliens (they are not paying for it), allow Mexico to export its poverty to the US and to export its most volitile political opposition to the US as well. What we saw in France with their immigrants rebellion is in stage one in the US with our illegal immigrants. They are showing daily on TV how dangerous they are. You are seeing step one of a major shift in power-politics in the US and those of us born here are not going to like it one bit.

ILLEGAL immigration is OK with you? Get real! Start to think things through for heavens sake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When a law doesn't reflect reality...
Posted by: Andros on Apr 11, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But they broke the law! Well, yes, but the punishment should fit the crime. The vast majority of them have lived responsible & productive lives within the law since their original trespass. Any illegal can’t afford to be apprehended for any serious legal violation because this would result in deportation. Most, some 70%, have been in the country more than 5 years! These immigrants come here because they need a job, want to improve their lot, and reunite with family members. Most have been exploited by American employers. We have already given amnesty to all those American businesses that have benefited from this hard-working & underpaid labor pool. The plain truth is that a great number of the immigrants are essentially citizens already. We have to recognize this fact. The test of citizenship is, in my estimate, more than a formal exam in civics--an exam that most "bona-fide" Americans would fail. It's a rational and an emotional decision to be an American. Once the decision is made, then you measure the commitment and the contributions the individual makes to his adoptive country.

The law itself is not very rational in my estimate. It’s a failed law. It’s not a good law. Let me give you another example: Millions of Americans buy drugs from Canada because they can’t afford to buy them here. The health care/Medicare system is a mess. Yes, there are laws, some passed in the last 2-3 years. Well, be honest, if you needed a prescription drug for your health and couldn't get it here (for whatever reason), you’d buy it from abroad even if this meant that you’d be breaking the law! What should the punishment for this be?!!

Patriotism? The vast majority of people who come to this country are more patriotic than the rest. Have you seen how many non-citizens have served and died in our wars? They’re “green card” holders fighting for a country where they cannot vote in. Do you pay attention to the names of those killed in Iraq every day? Do you recognize how many have Latino and Asian surnames? They are the sons & daughters of relatively recent immigrants. We know immigrants pick our produce, but they also risk their lives for America.

The xenophobes point to the non-English ancestry immigrants as groups that resist integration, politically and culturally. I don't buy this, but if this were so, what’s the harm? Having enclaves with different-looking and speaking people? So what? It’s always been the case in our history, when adults make a transition from one country to another. It’s hard to master a language when you’re older, work very hard to make a living, and have little time for leisure. And yet, immigrants do make the effort to learn English and fit it. We know that by the third (if not the second) generation, there's a rapid change. It’s a fact, that the children of the immigrants throughout our Americanexperience have assimilated well and have had a faster socio-economic mobility than the older groups. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Immigration, Arlen Specter (R-PA), is the son of two immigrants! [his mother came from Russia and his father from eastern Europe]. All immigrants realize the benefits from being fully integrated in the society at-large. It just takes some time for it to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Illegal Immigrants are this year's "queers"
Posted by: sausage on Apr 11, 2006 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(I posted this here yesterday, on Joshua Holland's blog and it's still appropriate)
This is a wedge issue par excellence. It plays right into the Republcian base's inherent misanthropy.

Despite all of Sensenbrenner's huffing and puffing about 700 mile wall, arresting Catholic Workers giving water to Mexicans and Central Americans crossing the desert, the GOP ain't gonna do a thing! Why should they, their big business contributors, Tyson Food and Wal-Mart among others, hire too many undocumented workers to stop now.

The Republicans have found a wedge they can drive into the ground all summer and hope that enough folks, who are otherwise fed-up with Bush and all the administration's shenanigans, will vote'em back into office in November.

Then the GOP won't do a f*ckin' thing about immigration "reform."

Why do you think Frist killed the McCain/Kennedy compromise and House Republicans are still stomping around like a bunch of little Brown Shirts.

Wedge issue politics. That's all it is, folks.
(Now,an addendum)
But from the turnout at Sunday and Monday's demonstrations it seems as if the knuckledraggers of the Republican Party have picked a fight with people who are ready, willing and able to fight back. And, unlike gay pride parades, the marches yesterday and Sunday featured families, so the MSM couldn't focus on the flamboyant, the outrageous and the just plain kooky exceptions among the marchers to make the rule.

This goes on long enough a real A Day Without a Mexican maybe in the offing.
(Second Addendum)
Since no right wing trolls have challenged my thesis, I must be hitting close to the mark.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ROFLMAO!! Posted by: sausage
» RE: OFLMAO!! Posted by: BsAs light
» RE: OFLMAO!! Posted by: YogiBear
White Ignorance Rides Again
Posted by: StuartH on Apr 11, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading these posts, and realizing that the demographic here is almost entirely white habitual computer users seems redolent of an ignorance of history and the racial derivation of this issue.

In this case, there are aspects that are never on the table, such as the role of US corporations and our government in the economics of Central and South America that has been forcing local peasants to leave their communities.

Your savings and your retirement funds are heavily invested, through coordination by the larger banks in things like taking peasant land out of local food production and dedicating it to Burger King.

If you look at the history with an unblinking honesty, you alse see an empire-building attitude with its roots in the treatment that America gave to its native peoples in the nineteenth century. The US military, through such institutions as the School of the Americas, has been very influential in causing a lot of people to conclude they should leave and go to America rather than stay and participate in civil debate.

I often wonder how come we can't talk about that. Are we threatened with being "disappeared"?

How ironic that an exodus of largely indigenous people out of the south, caused somewhat by our economic policies, should set off a wave of indignation that Indians are populating the US. Could this be a sort of historic karma?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: White Ignorance Rides Again Posted by: AreyouCereal
» respond carefully... Posted by: MarujaCanta
Immigrants are Americans
Posted by: Ghoulman on Apr 11, 2006 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immigrants are indeed Americans, from slaves to South Americans, and have been for over a hundred years. The truth is, America is a nation run by the White Man. The white men keep Washington and could give a flying fig how many protest.

Immigrants will gain nothing but the status quo... being an invisible slave to the "white mans burden".

Even these supposedly left wing articles, in support of sane immigration seemingly, ignore the incredibly racist society that is the very basis of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Immigrants are Americans Posted by: NoPCZone
HOT GIRL IN PICTURE!
Posted by: Ghoulman on Apr 11, 2006 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BTW, who is that seeeexy girl waving the flag in the pic here? I want real journalism damnit! What's her phone num... er, her name. Cause, that's all I need online to find... oh, said too much!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOT GIRL IN PICTURE! Posted by: NoPCZone
» a clue... Posted by: Baal_Labs
Where were they . .
Posted by: BsAs light on Apr 11, 2006 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny where are all these smiling, flag wavers when protests arise over the war in Iraq. IN fact where are any flag wavers out protesting the war anymore. Amazing how many people turn out for self-serving purposes but ask any if they care about the 75 Iraqis who were blown to bits the other day or the half-dozen US boys will be shipped home in caskets. Funny how they get out there and make a stink when it effects them but I haven't seen one "immigrant parade" calling for the end of the war or the impeachment of Bush. Interesting how that works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where were they . . Posted by: YogiBear
Melting Pot?
Posted by: MK/spirit on Apr 11, 2006 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the melting pot, those on the bottom get burnt and the scum rises to the top.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Melting Pot? Posted by: dlf
» RE: Melting Pot? Posted by: rg
» RE: Melting Pot? Posted by: dlf
Illegal immigrants are anarchists, no matter how well they behave themselves.
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 11, 2006 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anarchy is the rejection of laws. I had to laugh as I read the post upthread that blamed the law. One responder asked the poster to explain his basis for repealing immigration laws. No reply. I'm not surprised, since any answer would only be even more ridiculous.

Not even Thoreau, in his advocacy of passive resistance, denied that even bad laws need to be enforced, until they are overturned. That's because he wasn't an anarchist.

The disobedience to immigration law denies the foundations of the United States of America. Not ten billion marchers can change that. Not until the law itself is changed. Until then, deportation, shattered families will continue. I'm sure the Migra intends that to be the message south of the border.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another view
Posted by: JPHickey on Apr 11, 2006 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: Another view Posted by: dlf
Progressive Policy Direction
Posted by: StuartH on Apr 11, 2006 6:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above post actually brings intelligent thought to the table. It is worth reiterating the link to the article, "Stark Choices," on Tom.paine.com.

Finally, someone is proposing a progressive policy direction that would be sensible. In the US, including immigrant labor in the legal protections for labor so that the standards are not lessened makes sense. If that is combined with bargaining at the international level so that fair wage and labor conditions standards are included in NAFTA, CAFTA, and oher agreements, then you really begin to lessen the exodus.

Those who think that illegal immigrants should be considering the legality of crossing the border are apparently not really aware of what is going on. They do consider it, but they are forced into a circumstance that requires they face a really tough choice. Do the posters here, whose hands are not calloused, really think these people want to leave their homes?

I had an encounter once with three men who got into a taxi that I was driving at a bus station. They had just arrived from Laredo and this was in Austin around 1990. I was handed a well worn piece of paper with a barely legible address on it. I asked if they happened to know how to get there. They all three said "Si!" I looked more closely. They were smiling but you could smell the fear in the small space. I could see that they were campesinos, and that they were most likely from Guatemala at that time. It happened that I knew some people from there and had a pretty good idea of what these guys had come from. If they had been taken back they would have wound up in one of those "body dumps" that the killing squads threw dissident campesinos into after torturing them. No doubt, they had already seen family members meet that fate.

Since the peace accords in 1996, things are better, but the whole culture of poverty - colluded in by our corporations and banks - does not allow for questioning. Risking your life in a dangerous situation makes these arguments about "the law" seem petty and maybe even racist. Most people on this list would break and run for it if they had to, screw the fences or anybody in their way.

We need a solution that comes from understanding the true dynamics of the issue so that we don't put people in the position of having to break laws under dire necessity. What we need to get away from is the hypocritical Republican carping about "breaking laws" while at the same time supporting low wage employers who take advantage of people in no position to argue for any rights as workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Does The Census Do?
Posted by: dlf on Apr 12, 2006 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RE: Question for Josh
Posted by: joshua_holland@alternet.org on Apr 11, 2006 11:22 AM [Report this comment]

Legal residents are more likely to give information to census takers, more likely to be engaged in politics, etc.

You claim the census bureau to be junk data. Funny how we use it for almost all governmental and electoral functions.

Apparently Josh thinks so too!

Some interesting information regarding NGO's and the Census:
Congress does not intend that the prohibition should apply when beneficiaries receive benefits in the form of certificates, vouchers, or other forms of disbursement redeemable with nongovernmental entities. Where the character of the aid goes directly to the ultimate beneficiary in the form of a voucher or certificate, the beneficiary exercises personal choice as to where to use the voucher or certificate, and may or may not choose to redeem it at a religious provider which incorporates worship or instruction in its provision of services. Congress has recognized and allowed such use of vouchers and certificates in the Child Care and Development Block Grant of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858 et seq.)

Could this be why the Catholic Church and Christian Groups are so invested in "helping" illegal immigrants? And why these very groups are fighting so hard, to not be considered criminal for breaking the law, while receiving government big bucks?

(d) STATE AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE FOR ELIGIBILITY OF ILLEGAL ALIENS FOR STATE AND LOCAL PUBLIC BENEFITS- A State may provide that an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States is eligible for any State or local public benefit for which such alien would otherwise be ineligible under subsection (a) only through the enactment of a State law after the date of the enactment of this Act which affirmatively provides for such eligibility.

Could this be why NGOs like La Raza push so hard for illegal immigrants to fill out the census forms? Apparently if they did the government provides funding for services provided to them. This kind of mixed message on the part of the Fed is at the heart of the argument. For every law that makes illegal entry a crime, there is a provision that ignores the law. Perhaps it's time to replace your tired old representative. They created this maze, we need new representation to knock it down, and make our laws make sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whose Coalition Is This Anyway?
Posted by: dlf on Apr 13, 2006 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hammond said 85 electricians from his union were hired by a small minority-owned company that employs African-American electricians to work at a naval site in New Orleans. Knight Enterprises, realizing that many of the workers were homeless and broke, offered $28 an hour, meals, and tents as part of a six-month contract.

But three weeks after the unionized electricians began working at the site, the company that had contracted Knight replaced the workers with Mexican electricians earning 50 percent less, Hammond said.

The African-American electricians lost their jobs shortly after the Bush administration temporarily suspended pay provisions under the Davis-Bacon Act. The law mandates that tradesmen and women employed on federal construction projects must be paid the prevailing local wage.


http://www.truthout.org/issues_06/041106LA.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Business As Usual
Posted by: dlf on Apr 15, 2006 1:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LA Times Story About Contractors Using Go-Betweens To Hire Illegals

Under current federal law, companies face criminal or civil sanctions only if they knowingly employ undocumented workers.

"An easy defense … would be to say that they used this subcontractor who they assumed was checking the documents," said Jennifer Silliman, assistant special agent in charge with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in San Diego. "It gives a level of deniability."

Government Hires Illegal Immigrants

Updated: 11:38 AM EDT
Does the Government Employ Illegal Workers?


GRONTON, Conn. (April 13) - It's a little after 7 a.m. and work is already in full swing at this Groton, Conn., construction site, the future home of military housing for officers serving at the nearby Trident Submarine Base.

The U.S. military sub-contractor pouring cement at this site — Gargiulo Construction — says its payroll is completely in order. But in reality, some papers are fake. CBS News correspondent Armen Keteyian reports the group is undocumented workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A New Paradigm
Posted by: dlf on Apr 15, 2006 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boston Globe Article By Drake Bennett

And labor is not the only Democratic interest group with a complicated relationship to immigration. Traditional African-American civil rights organizations like the NAACP and the Urban League, normally liberal stalwarts, have shown some ambivalence over immigration reform. While they support legalization and amnesty programs, Roberto Suro points out, ''they're certainly not out in front on this issue. Contrast that to 20 or 10 years ago, during the last two big immigration debates. The civil rights organizations and lots of African-American organizations were fairly prominent in opposing restrictions. They're less visible now." When Representative Sheila Jackson Lee introduced a liberal immigration reform bill into the House, only nine members of the 43-member Congressional Black Caucus (of which Lee is a member), signed on to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]