Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democracy Behind Bars

By Cole Krawitz, AlterNet. Posted April 25, 2006.


Author Sasha Abramsky talks about how mass incarceration -- and the resulting disfranchisement of millions of Americans -- is destroying our democracy.
conned
Conned

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Cole Krawitz

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In his new book, "Conned: How Millions of Americans Went to Prison, Lost the Vote, and Helped Send George W. Bush to the White House," award-winning journalist Sasha Abramsky takes us on a journey across the nation, documenting through personal interviews of people in prison, former prisoners, state legislators and advocates how felon disfranchisement laws fundamentally undermine America's democratic ideals.

Today, nearly 5 million Americans are disfranchised from the right to vote either because they are in prison, on parole or probation, or because they live in a state that extends disfranchisement beyond the end of one's sentence. Racial, ethnic and economic disparities in the criminal justice system, and the "war on drugs" have resulted in the most severe impact hitting communities of color. Where African-Americans comprise only 12.2 percent of the population and 13 percent of drug users, they make up 38 percent of those arrested for drug offenses and 59 percent of those convicted of drug offenses, causing critics to call the war on drugs the "New Jim Crow." Nationally, an estimated 13 percent of African-American men are unable to vote because of a felony conviction. That's seven times the national average.

The United States is the only "democracy" in which people who have served their sentences can still lose their right to vote. As Jamaica S., a 25-year-old on probation in Tennessee who lost her right to vote shared in "Conned," "It seems when you're convicted of a felony, the scarlet letter is there. You take it everywhere with you."

We met up with Sasha to learn more about his time writing "Conned," the impact of disfranchisement and the reform measures being fought at the state level to repair our broken democracy.

Cole Krawitz: Sasha, tell us how you started to cover the impact of disfranchisement and voter restoration on the nation.

Sasha Abramsky: I had been writing about criminal justice issues for years, and was particularly fascinated with the broader political and economic impact of a series of policy choices made from the 1970s to the present day that had the effect of massively expanding the country's criminal justice system. The numbers were extraordinary: America had gone from having fewer than half a million people in jail and prison in the early 1970s to having over two million people behind bars by the turn of the century. I knew that, as the war on drugs, in particular, played out, it was having a huge effect on labor markets, on family structure, on community viability in poor neighborhoods; quite simply, in many instances so many people were being hauled off to jail and prison that entire communities were being dislocated. I also knew that ex-prisoners faced an array of post-sentence penalties -- from restrictions on what kinds of jobs they could get through to denial of welfare benefits, student loans and public housing if their felony convictions were drug-related. I had also heard that there were limits placed on their voting rights.

The day after the 2000 presidential election, I posted a story on Mother Jones online about a "purge" of suspected felons and about the impact it had clearly had on the Gore-Bush outcome. From there, I was hooked. The topic was, quite simply, too juicy to ignore.

CK: I was fascinated by your choice to use Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" to help narrate "Conned." Why de Tocqueville?

SA: De Tocqueville has always fascinated me. He's a European aristocrat who comes over to America in the 1830s to study the country's prison system; and he ends up spending nine months touring the country, absolutely intrigued by its democratic possibilities and by the expanding institutions of democracy and culture of democracy that he sees all around. In some instances he romanticizes the country -- and he certainly underestimates the central role of slavery. But his enthusiasm for the best aspects of American life is infectious.

Like de Tocqueville, I also grew up in Europe; in London. And I, too, have found myself, as an adult, fascinated by America's culture and politics.


Digg!

Cole Krawitz is communications and events associate at Demos. His work has appeared in New Voices Magazine, Clamor Magazine, and Nashim journal. Cole can be found blogging on Jewschool.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My point exactly
Posted by: thinkverybig on Apr 25, 2006 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been thinking about this subject for a long time and it's one of the reasons I plan to start "WeMustChange.org".

Our prison system is out of whack and systematically targets the poor for the pleasure of keeping big business of prisons happy. This must no longer be tolerated by us Americans, by anyone who has a heart. There is a better way and we must commit ourselves to finding it. I'm so glad that President BUSH stole those two elections, otherwise I wouldn't be as motivated and inspired to make a difference in the world I live. Since the election debacle, I have never been so enthused about bringing change to our society.

Not only the prison system but the judicial, social, political and econmic systems needs abolishing and we need to start anew.

We must change. A REVOLUTION is needed in this country and needed now.

I am in the process of creating a website by the name of "WeMustChange.org" and I'm looking for volunteers who might be interested in coming aboard and helping me get this concept off of the ground. I need a website designer, and some talented and creative people who are willing to put forth an effort to make a difference in this world. I am presently pondering websites formats etc. Please email ideas to david@thinkverybig.com

One thing I do want to address is oppression world wide. I need more ideas and view points. Let's make "WeMustChange.org" a household name. I need some good people on my team.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right on
Posted by: rsaxto on Apr 25, 2006 3:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Abramsky is right on with the facts and their consequences in this book. Add this to all the other electoral faults and corporate ass-kissing and there is no way the USA can accurately be called a democracy or even a republic. We live in a land ruled by the very worst people in its population. Decency has been coopted by corporate and political criminals who rule the world with the iron fist of mass murder, mass incarceration and mass disregard of the will of the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boston Tea Party Anyone?
Posted by: Beverly on Apr 25, 2006 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it people, the America that our forefathers intended to leave for all their followers has long gone, by the way of the dinosaur's!

Our elected officers no longer bide for the will of the people, they go for whatever will line their pockets with the most money and perks. We have a president "drunk with the power of his position", two parties who fight against each other vieing for the golden award of who can get the most points in their latest parlor game.

None of these individuals really care about the American public! Once elected into the shadow of the Whitehouse, these people suddenly become absentminded as to why they were voted for in the first place.

They're to represent the "will of the people"! Instead they become the "puppets" for big corporations who give them gigantic brownie points and a bone as long as they will make sure that the big businesses stay in control.

The citizens of America don't count anymore, we are no longer in control of our country," BIG BUSINESS IS"!

It's way past the time for another "Boston Tea Party" and if we wait too much longer to implement changes, there will no longer be an "America, Land Of The Free"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boston Tea Party Anyone? Posted by: bullwinkle6969
Sciopatchic profile
Posted by: oldsmobile on Apr 25, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think there indeed is a strange "sociopathic profile" that has become almost part of American pop culture. You can see it in reality cop-shows, where there is no compassion for the suspects being arrested (often in a rough manner) and sent to jail for long sentences.

I always find these kinds of shows disturbing. It seems when a person becomes a felon, or even a suspect, all humanity is drained from him and anything can be done to him. This kind of dehumanisation is really horrible, comparable to what the Nazis did!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sciopatchic profile Posted by: chutzpah
» RE: Sciopatchic profile Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Sciopatchic profile Posted by: Gregor
When women had no vote it was an issue
Posted by: DavidByron on Apr 25, 2006 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But when it happens to men nobody cares. That's why this story is written from the angle that it's a race issue, but it's far more accurately a gender issue. There are more than ten times more men effected than women by this sort of thing, reflecting the fact that the US justice system is itself incredibly sexist (again because nobody cares about men this is usually only presented as a race problem).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Feminist prejudice as usual Posted by: DavidByron
» RE: Feminist prejudice as usual Posted by: WyrdSister
» Grammar Posted by: BlueTigress
The Dark Side of Reaganism Down South
Posted by: Stonecutter on Apr 25, 2006 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it interesting--and utterly unsurprising--that the states with the most Draconian restrictions on restoring the vote to felons---mostly African-American--who have served their time are bundled in the South. After a lifetime of hearing southern boosters, mostly political hacks, bleet on about how the South has transformed itself from the days of Jim Crow into an egalitarian region of the country, where everyone is equal under the law, I'm sick of their brazen hypocrisy and obvious deceit. In many essential ways, the "new" South is simply the old South with "whitewash", and it continues to drag down the rest of this country with its reactionary politics and thinly veiled institutional racism.

Ever since the so-called "Reagan Revolution" morphed hordes of former conserative southern Democrats into Reagan Republicans and tipped the political balance of power below the Mason-Dixon line, the states there have done whatever it takes to contain the political clout of people of color by whatever means necessary. Incarcerating great masses of them, and then disenfranchising them indefinitely, has been extremely effective....the stats tell the story, and there's no question that this single method of exclusion was the difference in the 2000 election in Florida, which in tragic turn left us during the past 5 years with the worst presidency in American history.

Abramsky is on to something very big, and I for one hope his book will get wide distribution and discussion among thinking Americans, in time for this travesty to be righted before we're merely a nation of gated communities filled with rich golfers and bridge players oblivious to the real world outside their fortresses. One of the core engines of change will have to come from electoral imbalance being corrected by an influx of more progressive voters and candidates. Allowing those non-violent, non-sociopathic felons who've done their time to vote is a direct path to such change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Three strikes & MADD
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Apr 25, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article missed an important reason for the filling up of our prisons. The prison poplation is growing faster by putting people behind bars because of the mandetory sentencing of Three Strikes and MADD. There is nothing judges can do so prisons have to make space for these people and some violent offenders are let out early. Non-violent offenders are the fastest growing part of the population and are taking people that have jobs and putting them behind bars. The police mark the poor sections of cities in catching drivers and would never think of putting up a patrol in wealthy retirement areas. Three strikes is pure stupidity and rehabilitation becomes irrelevant. The resulting of lost productivity, no rehabilitation and the destruction of families seems to be the aim of programs. How many criminals are in jail for misdemeanors.

Another topic that I would like to see is the treatment of psychiatric patients in prison. Since 1980, treatment has gone from hospitals and mental health facilities to prisons and substance abuse houses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Three strikes & MADD Posted by: Cathyc
Maybe it's just me, but...
Posted by: jesme on Apr 25, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it's always seemed to me that there's a real simple solution for this problem. You ready? Here it is: Obey the law.

Actually, I'm agnostic on the question whether felons should be able to vote after doing their time. I'm not at all agnostic on the question whether they should be locked up for violating the law. And I find myself nodding off amidst the tedious argument over whether this or that law is "fair," or "fairly enforced." It's a good issue to debate, mind you. But while you're debating it, it helps to obey the laws already on the books. That way, you're free to move about, organize protests, elect candidates, and get the laws changed. If you're too stupid to obey the law in the meantime, you've made your bed and can lie in it.

As one who grew up in a gang-infested neighborhood, my sympathy for criminals is, to put it mildly, limited. If they can't be bothered to obey the law, I can't be bothered to worry about their voting rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» who the hell obeys the law? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» Well, there you are... Posted by: jesme
What is the rationale...
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Apr 25, 2006 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... behind depriving ex-cons of the right to vote? I would tend to think the ex-cons who shouldn't vote, by and large don't want to vote anyway. I think perhaps a compromise might work. Take away an ex-con's right to vote like is done today. But, after they are released and finish their time on probation, in a 1/2-way house, under house arrest or whatever, establish a precedure where they could apply for a restoration of rights. Set a hearing date and publish it with the public notices in the local newspaper and let the ex-con applicant appear before a magistrate to state his case. If there are any others who wish to testify in the matter, let them. Then leave open a 30 day period for people to submit written comments. Then, at the end of the thirty days let the magistrate render his decision. If the magistrate decides in favor of a restoration of rights, he need merely hand down his order and the applicant's rights would be restored. But if he decides against the applicant, the decision must be accompanied by an opinion justifying a ruling to deny the applicant's request for restoration of his rights. At the outset, the presumption should be in favor of the applicant. The burden of proof that the applicant should not have his or her rights restored should be upon those opposed. I think this would serve the interests of all concerned. Those sociopaths who should never vote wouldn't bother to apply and those reformed former felons who genuinely want to participate in our political discourse probably would.
TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is the rationale... Posted by: chutzpah
Some Irony
Posted by: skiptowne on Apr 25, 2006 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so ironic that most of the people, convicted of non-violent crimes in prison, pose little or no threat to the rest of society but, the corporate and political criminals are allowed to run roughshod over the U.S. and the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

eh?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Apr 25, 2006 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure I could dig up at least 1000 corpses of felons who are more informed than the average american, so why would we not want them to have the right to vote?? Why do we disenfranchise people at all? This is one of those issues that is a total no-brainer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sentencing Project
Posted by: ande3 on Apr 25, 2006 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Sentencing Project in a nonprofit organization which is attempting to overturn disenfranchisement issues in various states. Check them out @ sentencingproject.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY!
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 25, 2006 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have wondered, for years now, why the Democrats continue to prosecute Richard Nixon's other dirty little war, the Drug War. The Jim Crow, terrorist funding, anti democracy drug war. It's pure masochism since the drug war subverts the electoral viability of the urban poor most and these are core Democratic Party voters.

My Aug. 2005 essay on this issue: How America's right wing has successfully subverted our democracy

This essay of mine includes links to others on the issue. Pennsylvania safe incumbency is success of Jim Crow

You can see apportionment subversion by the GOP quite clearly on this page I host: Pennsylvania -democracy incarcerated-

The 2004 Congressional Research Service report to congress, "Illicit Drugs and the Terrorist Threat: Causal Links and Implications for Domestic Drug Control Policy" asserted that: "The international traffic in illicit drugs contributes to terrorist risk through at least five mechanisms: supplying cash, creating chaos and instability, supporting corruption, providing "cover" and sustaining common infrastructures for illicit activity, and competing for law enforcement and intelligence attention. Of these, cash and chaos are likely to be the two most important."

The CRS report irrationally concludes: "American drug policy is not, and should not be, driven entirely, or even primarily, by the need to reduce the contribution of drug abuse to our vulnerability to terrorist action. There are too many other goals to be served by the drug abuse control effort."

"Creating the chaos and instability" of subverting American democracy is, I believe, one of those "other goals" that are more important than "our vulnerability to terrorist action".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rather than just restoring suffrage stop arresting people
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 25, 2006 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'For the children', 'for the children' that's the demagoguery we hear.

America will never cleanse its gene pool with the criminal code. SEE: Issue One: Teens are not genetically wired to just say no

For the drug war we force children to run the gauntlet of their formative years between addict drug dealers, gangsters, predators and terrorists on one side and police with threats of mandatory minimums of anal rape for any child that does not 'just say no'. In the name of drug war we do this 'for the children'.

The solution here is not simply restoring suffrage but stop incarcerating people for personal behavior violations in the first place. At its worst addiction is a genetic based disease that America is treating with billy clubs.

Law and order, zero tolerance!!!!!

Zero tolerance is absolute intolerance. Absolute intolerance is fascism. We have indoctrinated two generations of American children with fascist reflexes of absolute intolerance and now we wonder why our children shoot up their schoolrooms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF YOU'VE SEEN THE BEAST, YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO TELL
Posted by: Ullern on Apr 25, 2006 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The consequence of the disenfranchisement of convicts is thus: If you've seen the "beast", i.e. the prison-system, you're FOR THAT VERY REASON not allowed to tell, by voting on law-makers.

This of course means penal law-making can go largely "unpunished", meaning uncriticized by those who best know the worst effects of the penal system. An important check on unidesirable effects is removed.

The effect is that the feedback-loop between the law-makers and the effected is cut. A healthy necessary circulation of info in society on how the systems work, is stopped from flowing.

Democratic? Hardly. Convenient for suppression of the voices with the most critical views to present? Absolutely.

Ole Ullern

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apportionment subversion the real success of felon disenfranchisement
Posted by: aahpat on Apr 25, 2006 4:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pennsylvania -democracy incarcerated-

Prisoners of the Census
Miscounting prisoners undercounts democracy
"In 48 states prisoners cannot vote, but the Census counts the nation's mostly urban prisoners as residents of the mostly rural towns that host prisons. Every decade, states use these "phantom" populations to redraw state legislative boundaries and re-apportion political representatives and power accordingly. With U.S. incarceration now setting worldwide records, and the consequences of that falling disproportionately on people of color, the harm to our democracy and civil rights is measurable and profound."

"Rural Pennsylvania harvests the majority of the prisons, but few of the prisoner seeds come from the rural counties that host the prisons. Twelve % of the state lives on Philadelphia, but 40% of the state's prisoners are from the city. No state prisoners are incarcerated within Philadelphia..."

EDITORIAL OBVSERVER
New York Times
Why Some Politicians Need Their Prisons to Stay Full
By BRENT STAPLES
Dec. 27, 2004
"The idea of counting inmates as voters in the counties that imprison them is particularly repulsive given that inmates are nearly always stripped of the right to vote. The practice recalls the early United States under slavery, when slaves were barred from voting but counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of apportioning representation in Congress."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and is there any wonder?
Posted by: saywhat? on Apr 25, 2006 7:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why we are fouth in line to put people to death in this world??...china # 1- saudi arabia # 2 --iran #3 - and the good ole usa #4..kind of makes ya feel proud ...doesn't it? even knowing these "felons" a good part of them - innocent! keep on bombing!!!!iran yo hoo!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End the War on Drugs
Posted by: janvdb on Apr 26, 2006 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't work. It's destabilizing Latin America and funding longterm unemployment.

Treatment, not incarceration.

If we stopped interdiction, the price of drugs would fall -- defunding the mafias which supply it.

And how many people you know would decide to start doing drugs -- destroy their careers, marriages and teeth -- because meth, cocaine and heroin are suddenly 10% of their previous price and easy to get?

Not that many.

The self-destructive are already on the stuff and the rest of us don't care what it costs.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Massive immigration unfairly impacts Felons upon their release.
Posted by: plantland on Apr 27, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having a "record" makes an ex-con unemployable in these times of having such a large labor supply.

Guys come out wanting a decent life, and willing to work.

African Americans can't get jobs in the unprosecuted underground economy of fairly well paid manual labor because the subcontractors hire preferentially from their own family or from their own villages. Plus, most ex cons can't speak Spanish.

The "path to citizenship" mentioned in the (amnesty) section will mean that those who came illegally will be in a position to sponsor their often very large families to come here legally.

Schools already devote more personal atention and supports to those who do not speak English. Many of these older teenagers were overlooked in their own schools. The situation promises to get much worse if the McCain Kennedy bill amnesty and guestworker bill is passed.
If you agree, please call your senators TODAY.
also, Diversity Alliance for a Sustainalbe America, www.diversityalliance.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]