Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Our Fake Immigration Crisis

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted March 30, 2006.


The current debate on Capitol Hill is the result of the latest in a long history of scare tactics. But as millions protest nationwide, has the ploy backfired?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Robert Scheer

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

There is no immigration crisis -- other than the one created by a small but vocal stripe of opportunist politicians, media demagogues and freelance xenophobes. So it has always been throughout the history of this country when anti-immigrant hysteria periodically reigns during low ebbs in our national sense of security and vision.

The script is as old as the Mayflower: A false alarm is sounded that the values, wages and safety of the current roster of credentialed Americans are jeopardized by the "flood" or "tidal wave" or "river" sneaking across our porous borders -- be they Irish, Chinese, Jewish, Russian, Mexican or even the freed slaves seeking to earn an honest living in Northern cities after the Civil War. Any and all manner of societal problems are to be laid on these scapegoats, and the same simplistic solution offered: Find and deport them, and don't let any more in.

Luckily, although it sometimes takes years or even decades, saner voices eventually prevail, acknowledging that the continued influx of immigrants has always fueled America's astonishing economic and cultural rise ever since the original natives were bum-rushed off their turf. Immigration laws are liberalized, compromises are reached, amnesties are offered, and the Immigration and Naturalization Service bureaucracy grinds on.

Having intermittently covered this issue for the Los Angeles Times over 30 years, I can well recall the peaks of panic in which we reporters were dispatched to the border and out into the fields to witness the arrest of people desperate to find work -- only to be embarrassed by the hunted eyes and clutched crosses of the enemy discovered.

Such frenzied attention was inevitably followed by a lull in which most Americans were quite happy to eat the food harvested by those same harassed and abused workers as well as entrusting the "illegals" with the care of American homes and children. On no other issue is there such an extreme disconnect between attitudes and actions.

When Wal-Mart was busted for hiring undocumented workers, did anybody boycott the company for it? Of course not; consumers value price and aren't concerned, for the most part, about how a company accomplishes cheapness. If, however, people do really care about keeping all jobs open to American citizens, then there is only one effective strategy: Level the playing field by enforcing labor laws.

Some 2 million immigrant workers now earn less than the minimum wage and millions more work without the occupational safety, workers' compensation, overtime pay and other protections legal status offers. Consequently, when the president says that immigrants perform work that legal residents are unwilling to do, he may be right -- but we don't know. The only way to test that hypothesis is to bring this black market labor pool above ground.

That approach has been tried in California with some success. José Millan, who until this year ran such an enforcement program as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's labor commissioner and before that for Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, told me that legalization of undocumented workers is essential to improving the situation for everybody.

"I am in favor of anything that brings these workers out of the shadows and into the sunlight; it's very easy to exploit a population when they're afraid," Millan told me Monday. "We would be a better country if we recognized the fact that there are 10 million undocumented workers in our midst, and we would be better off if they were granted the benefits and responsibilities of a legal existence."

This current xenophobia is no more warranted than it has been in the past. The number of claimed "illegal aliens" as a percentage of the population is clearly absorbable by the job market as our low unemployment rate demonstrates. Yet, the Republican Party and the Congress it dominates are currently teetering between driving undocumented workers further underground or taking a saner compromise approach.

The former, a draconian bill already passed by the House of Representatives, would legalize witch-hunts of undocumented workers, by reclassifying them as felons; their employers would be subject to a year or more in prison and punitive fines; as would even church and nonprofit organizations who offer succor to them.

Because employers are not trained to play cop, they will simply be driven to discriminate against job applicants based on "foreignness" determined by ethnicity or accent. The more reasonable alternative co-authored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., and embraced as the heart of the proposal adopted by the Judiciary Committee on Monday, shuns the criminalization of the undocumented, instead offering paths -- albeit long, arduous and uncertain ones -- to legal status for undocumented workers already here.

This is a moment of truth for America. It is time to acknowledge that we need the immigrant workers as much as they need us, and to begin to treat them with the respect they deserve.

Digg!

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq. See more of Robert Scheer at TruthDig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sorry Charlie, no tuna.
Posted by: dadzilla on Mar 30, 2006 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is a worker shortage, why hasn't real wages risen?

This is only one of many questions I'd like to hear an answer too.

While the author claims of racist attitudes may be true to some extent, understating the sometimes-ugly realities of unchecked immigration isn't going to resolve problems either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: redstarwraith
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: kelly.nickell
» Phony crisis? Posted by: lclark
» Part2 Phony crisis? Posted by: lclark
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: Uncle Tupelo
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: nonaste
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: wolfcry
» OVERPOPULATION Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Sorry Charlie, no tuna. Posted by: jlohman
A total fudge of the real issues at stake
Posted by: Bobsays on Mar 30, 2006 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The crisis over illegal immigration is not just a phantom scared up by right-wing politicians. All western countries are now coming to question the role of migration, legal and illegal in the current context. All these countries have had mass migration from developing countries for decades now. And people can see the results clearly.

It is a profound disquiet that has descended upon people, and it is justified. They find it hard to believe that unchecked migration is benign when they see it drag down wages, benefits and standards. They find it hard to believe our cities are getting better, when people can clearly see that they look more and more like the third world. All of it poses a very serious question: what constitutes prosperity and what is a high standard of living.

For those, like the author, who claim it is just an old-fashioned debate over race are blinkered. People can see that countries like Japan, Singapore, South Korea are highly modern, prosperous societies without mass migration. The myth that unchecked mass migration automatically brings prosperity has been unmasked. Also, in the case of China, we can see that a focused government can propel development at a furious pace. The US government’s past decades of laissez faire inaction now also looks foolish.

In the advanced age we live in, it is clear that countries can become as wealthy and prosperous and comfortable as they want to. It is just down to policy, cohesion and hard work – all attributes in high display in Asia. Mexico, on the other hand, fits into a more traditional developing nation model: high rates of corruption, little focus, poor education levels, low standards, and a compulsion to just export its problems, preferably to the US.

Mexico does not have to be that way. It is actually a very privileged and wealthy nation compared to other developing countries. It could solve its problems of poverty and underdevelopment if it valued all its citizens. And valuing citizens is key to development. It is the reverse of current immigration policy. Current policy is predicated on the idea that if you can’t get somebody to do a job for X amount, then just import a cheaper worker. When they become too expensive, get another one. There is no incentive to do things smarter. Countries that avoid this model instead invest in doing things smarter and in educating and skilling up their population.

This debate has to be removed from a debate over race. It is about the future of economic prosperity of the west and the US. And we know that there is no future in becoming cheap and dumb.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We, the people, AlterNet readers are the real resource.
Posted by: JPHickey on Mar 30, 2006 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder why Alternet keeps up with this negative binge of articles designed to aggravate most dedicated readers. Maybe AlterNet is not populist but really just dilled with effete Wasnington insiders?

Alternet elitists are so far removed from the working people that they have nothing better to do than to thumb their noses at what is happening to our most needy citizens who do most of the real work.

My biggest regret is that millions of illegal aliens aren't taking away the prosperity from the smug, over-educated advantaged class that write for AlterNet.

Along with the New York Times, the owners of the media are shaping what passes for news to suit their own less than honorable purposes reducing the viability of our form of government. Too much spin and not enough beef.

Actually the greatest service that AlterNet is providing for me is the posts of the greatest talent pool in the World, AlterNet readers. I'm getting a fabulous education from all of you, in fact I've made a special reference file. Thank you so much! At least I know I'm not alone, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The border is not safe
Posted by: uphill on Mar 30, 2006 4:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Advocates for uncontrolled immigration from Mexico, like Robert Scheer, should accept their share of responsibility for the DEATHS of thousands of people in the desert from dehydration, starvation and murder. If the U.S. had effective control of the border that wouldn't be happening, and the immigrants we need -- YES, WE ALL ACCEPT THAT AND WE'RE NOT RACISTS! -- would get in safely and legally, as they do when they come in from any other part of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get a grip, people
Posted by: elitist_insider on Mar 30, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagining that your own personal take on and experience with immigration provides you with the whole story is just as 'elitist' as the work of any think-tank PhD. Borders, meanwhile, are imaginary lines drawn in the sand by politicians most of whom are long since dead. Economics and culture laugh at these lines today and will continue to do so into the indefinite future. It is folly to fight it. Migrant workers and their jobs both exist. A match will be made. And as a society, we will do far better in recognizing and dealing with the facts as they are than in trying to invent other facts that never will be. See 'War on Drugs', for example. Militarize the borders...deport people by the hundreds of thousands...make felons out of thousands of employers...these are the 'elitist' ideas, ideas born of sheer hubris. Recognize the situation as being THE situation...then learn to live and deal with it. Other approaches are doomed to utter failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Economics Posted by: uphill
» RE: conomics Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Get a grip, people Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Get a grip, people Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: conomics do not laugh at borders Posted by: elitist_insider
» RE: Get a grip, people Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Get a grip, people Posted by: threedfm
» RE: Get a grip, people Posted by: kelly.nickell
Truth in Advertising
Posted by: dlf on Mar 30, 2006 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please respond to this article written from an historical viewpoint of immigration and its effects. Then discuss the issue of how race has played out in this debate from the beginning of immigration into this country.

Far too many of these types of articles, which deal with surface issues of this debate make me think Alternet and Neo-liberals have an agenda. And their agenda is to blur the truth, ignore history, make excuses to maintain and exploit cheap labor, and to brainwash their constituents in the process.

I can't believe you think by ommission, you are spreading truth. If this were the Washington Post and the writer was Domenech you would see all the ommissions of truth. But, because this writer is doing what journalism teaches us, seek out those who share your opinion, and make it appear this is common belief. How are you more honest in your reportage than mainstream media?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Truth in Advertising Posted by: Uncle Tupelo
» RE: Truth in Advertising Posted by: Gma1
» RE: Truth in Advertising Posted by: Uncle Tupelo
» RE: Truth in Advertising Posted by: Uncle Tupelo
» RE: Truth in Advertising Posted by: freeda
Aversion To Work
Posted by: dlf on Mar 30, 2006 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But ensuring that the people who come in do so legally requires work. Apparently since the bureaucracts and their lackeys have a real aversion to it, they've decided we all should. So they keep telling us what we won't do when in fact it is they who have not done their jobs.

Why are immigration court dockets backed logged, why can't they process greencards in a more timely fashion, why can't they enforce the law, why can't they find illegals who hide in plain sight? If they expended the energy to do what they are charged with doing, rather than telling us what we don't want to do, they might find a real solution is already available. But because they are incompotent at their own jobs, unable to clean up behind themselves, and their real fear is that truth gets unmasked we are all made to suffer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aversion To Work Posted by: ErikM
» RE: Aversion To Work Posted by: dlf
"Fake Immigration Chrisis" Wha-a-???
Posted by: Gma1 on Mar 30, 2006 5:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Fake Immigration Chrisis" - Hel-l-o-o. Mr. Scheer should do his homework. http://www.cis.org/immigrationnews.html Unless, of course, he'd really rather not deal with the problems. Also, amnesty DOES NOT WORK. It was tried before and the result was that millions of Latinos came across our borders, illegally. Let's get this straight: my mother's family were LEGAL IMMIGRANTS in the early 1900s, so I really am in favor of legal immigration. I have no racist problems. But, you know what, I did have a problem with illegals and perhaps some legal emigrants marching through American cities carrying the Mexican (NOT AMERICAN) flag with slogans such as Viva Mexico. If they don't want to be Americans, what are they doing here, marching in our streets?They don't want to assimilate into our heritage, they just want the money? I believe the organizer did not realize that she only galvanized American citizens against people by doing this.

This is a problem that affects particularly our middle class by driving down wages. Does Mr. Scheer not realize that this glue that holds our economy together (check what Henry Ford had to say about this) is being eliminated? It is not totally the fault of illegal aliens (correct, but not politically correct term) but is the fault of all of us for allowing our government to not penalize employers for breaking the law. Mr. Scheer seems not to be disturbed by people breaking the law. I am. In the past five years our laws have meant nothing to an administration that spends most of it's time (or so it seems) finding ways to "get around" the laws that annoy them. This country is in deep trouble and Mr. Scheer needs to wake up. It's not only the immigration problem, it's all the problems caused by a Congress that will tolerate anything in the name of corporate interests and do as little as possible, or, nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Political Shell Game
Posted by: sugamretniw on Mar 30, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe any of this political posturing. No one has any intention of sending those immigrants anywhere. Republicans split on the issue? No they're not, they're just attempting to get twice the payoff. Half of the Republicans appeal to their more xenophobic constituency and the other half appeal to the pro-immigration and let's not forget the MASSIVE amounts of immigrants who will become legal citizens(just watch and see) who once legal citizens will vote for whom? The Republican party(or that's what the Republicans hope). Don't forget that money controls America and big money likes immigrants. It's always so fascinating to watch the wwf-styled political posturing in the media and then watch the populace truly be pulled into the "debate" as if there ever was one. As a character in movie "Hellboy" said, "I see the puppet, but where is the puppet master?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Political Shell Game Posted by: kelly.nickell
It's not the jobs, it's the pay
Posted by: don_alejandro on Mar 30, 2006 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush’s claim that American’s are unwilling to do jobs immigrants do is just another lie designed to mislead American’s about the real issue, which is cheap (virtually slave) labor. When I imagine talking to my brother, an airline pilot and Bush supporter who seems otherwise rational, I imagine asking him if he would fly airplanes for 3 dollars an hour, no benefits (and no getting paid for lounging about in the airport before a flight, I’m talking about air-time only). I suspect many American’s would be glad to do the jobs now foisted primarily on immigrants if those jobs actually paid a living wage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my own story . . .
Posted by: petrovsky on Mar 30, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has become such a hot topic lately and I don't think it's just a coincidence that we are being bombarded with daily doses of xenophobic Republican rhetoric and recalcitrant Democratic propoganda just as Bu$hco's numbers plummet and 9/11 questions are being asked a la Charlie Sheen de novo. I digress.

I grew up in a small agricultural town in western Colorado which always relied on immigrant labor to harvest sweet corn, pick cherries and peaches and bag potatoes, etc. I no longer have many connections with that small town just fond memories of the way it used to be. I will admit that this post will appear to have racist overtones but I don't care at this point. I know this is not the case but I do understand how the lines between racism and rapid social change are being blurred and it becomes increasingly difficult for many to distinguish between anger and regret over how things used to be and what is quite simply fear of what the future holds.

Anyway, this small town was never wealthy or up and coming like nearby Telluride or Crested Butte but it had its own charm for those of us who called it home. We realized that immigrant labor was par for the course in a town with a finite number of residents (maybe 1500 to 2000), 350 of whom were students. I can recall instances of "redneck racism" as I like to call it but for the most part Mexican immigrants were accepted and even flourished opening their own video store and restaurant. Around May of each year we noticed a spike in the number of newbies in town which, not surprisingly, coincided with the agricultural season. This was actually an indicator of prosperity as Olathe Sweet Corn was quickly becoming recognized as the best in the US. The town commemorated the success of the corn with a yearly festival held each August. Things were good and we couldn't have been happier.

Unfortunately things have changed drastically for that small town. More and more immigrants started pouring in in subsequent years. The first generation of Mexican immigrants relayed a message back home to eager workers hungry for a piece of the action - "come to CO, they have more jobs than they can fill". Soon Main Street began to resemble a Mexican border town complete with mini-stores selling chiclets, catholic candles and frozen enchiladas with 2 Western Union outlets appearing in short succession. It wasn't long before the last burger joint in town closed its doors in favor of another Mexican restaurant. The demand was no longer there. People who had spent their lives in that sleepy town pulled up stakes and moved away, immigrants buying their vacated houses for paltry amounts. The latest arrivals did not send their children to school (even with illegals status our school district encouraged all immigrants to attend) nor did they make a serious attempt at integration primarily because they did not have to. The store clerks spoke Spanish better than English and Univision made them feel right at home. There was no English language requirement at work as picking corn or peaches does not necessitate a powerful command of any language.

These days that small town has little resemblance to the town I grew up in. Lowrider Monte Carlos and Honda Civics with neon rims and Mexican flags predominate and one must now speak Spanish to read the storefront signs. The newest arrivals were willing to work for less than the first generation, replacing them in the fields and orchards. Wages HAVE fallen for all as employers, native or Mexican, hire the latest immigrants to keep costs down. I don't cast any aspersions at the immigrants. They did what they had to in order to survive. I cannot say that I blame the farmers either as it would have been nearly impossible to convince white men and women to perform those menial tasks. There doesn't seem to be any right answer but I know that I feel hollow inside when I pass by now and again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: dlf
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: petrovsky
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: dlf
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: dlf
» Hypocrite Posted by: sausage
» RE: Hypocrite Posted by: petrovsky
» RE: Hypocrite Posted by: sausage
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: zooeyhall
» Oh, and BTW Posted by: sausage
» RE: Oh, and BTW Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: saywhat?
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: dlf
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: janvdb
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: dlf
» RE: my own story . . . Posted by: petrovsky
Sick In On 4/17/06
Posted by: dlf on Mar 30, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who want to send a message to our government that we are mad as hell and won't take it anymore are asked to call in sick on 4/17/06. Also don't drive or buy anything on that day. Let's show them what economic power we have in our hands. Stop complaining about policy, without doing something about policy. Black people faced death and dogs to gain not only our rights, but the rights of others. What are you willing to do for your rights? Pass this on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Immigration Makes Economic Sense
Posted by: RickyRicardo on Mar 30, 2006 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is correct, the immigration issue is another conversative red herring, a scare tactic designed to distract the public from the real issues. But aside from the moral and political issues, legalizing, even embracing immigration makes economic sense.

There is a very simple reason our country should embrace immigration, one that other countries, including Canada, understand. Our population is old, and getting older. Within the next 10-15 years, as workers retire, more money will be paid out in social security than taken in via payroll taxes.

If we embrace immigration, we will be increasing the pool of relatively young, payroll tax-paying workers. They get the benefit of being here with access to better opportunities, and we get help financing our retirements.

Why isn't anyone, especially our leaders, talking about this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Immigration Makes Economic Sense Posted by: Rod from Canada
» RE: Immigration Makes Economic Sense Posted by: RickyRicardo
» RE: Immigration Makes Economic Sense Posted by: Rod from Canada
» RE: Immigration Makes Economic Sense Posted by: kelly.nickell
Seriously, though
Posted by: stormchilde1975 on Mar 30, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would the anti-illegal immigrant commentors have us do? We have (depending on who you trust) 11-20 million illegals in the US. Can you imagine the expense associated with rounding them up, verifying that they are not citizens, and deporting them? Suppose it costs $10,000 a head (a conservative estimate). That comes out to at least 110 billion dollars!
I'm not saying we don't need better border security. We do, and we need Mexico's help to get it. I imagine we could fund a joint border security initiative for quite a bit less that 110 billion dollars.
Meanwhile, it seems like the only way to get a handle on the illegals already here is to enforce existing rules on businesses (including heavy fines for non-compliance) and let illegals know that we will not penalize them for coming forward and working to become documented.
Those complaining about wage deflation should also be aware that as all these 'under the table' jobs get dragged back into the sunlight, the resulting wage increases will be reflected in much higher prices for food and other staples. Prices are already being inflated by the decreased value of the dollar and increased oil prices. Naturally, these price increases will impact the poor harder than anyone, since we spend more of our income on necessities. Six-dollar-a-gallon milk, anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Seriously, though Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Seriously, though Posted by: stormchilde1975
Quit making this issue about "legal" immigration. Its about unfettered....
Posted by: Prophit on Mar 30, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... illegal immigration and that has not been the history of this country. Why is there really an illegal immigration problem??? All you have to do is look at the pictures taken of the hoards of marchers and you will see it clearly.

There are now two countries with two sets of citizens and two cultures which is a recipe for destruction of this countries basic identity. These people were wearing and flying mexican flags, NOT AMERICAN FLAGS which would have given a much different message than it did. That act simply confirmed the falsity of the propoganda that these are poor humble people coming to America to become US citizens and coming for a better life.

Those pictures clearly proved that wasn't the agenda at all.

Let me give you some stats for your author above who is apparently a spokesperson for Walmart and other corp entities who believe in exploiting these people as slave labor.

Arguments and facts:

1. A study by Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies shows that between March 2000 and March 2005 only 9 percent of net new adult jobs went to native-born Americans.

2. One comparison of Camarota's is especially striking: the number of adult immigrant workers with a high school degree or less increased by 1.6 million while unemployment among their American counterparts increased by nearly one million -- and the number of discouraged Americans who left the labor force altogether rose by 1.5 million.

3. The impact of this low-wage immigrant competition has been especially severe on black Americans. According to a recent New York Times report: "The share of young black men without jobs has climbed relentlessly, with only a slight pause during the economic peak of the late 1990s. In 2000, 65 percent of black male high school dropouts in their 20s were jobless -- that is, unable to find work, not seeking it or incarcerated. By 2004, the share had grown to 72 percent, compared with 34 percent of white and 19 percent of Hispanic dropouts."

4. As statistics show, there are no occupations in which immigrants form the majority of workers. So Americans actually do the jobs they allegedly won't do. Illegal immigrants, despite their impact on wages, are less than 5 percent of the U.S. work force and only between a quarter and third of workers even in those industries most dependent on them. And their disappearance -- as suggested in the pro-illegal immigration movie, "A Day Without Mexicans" -- would result not in the seizing up of the U.S. economy but in the automation of some jobs, the export of others, and an increase in wages for low-paid Americans, including legal and assimilated Hispanic immigrants already here.

5. For low-paid immigrants, mainly but not entirely Mexican and Hispanic, are among those who suffer from continuing high levels of unskilled immigration. As Robert Samuelson has argued in his Washington Post columns, our immigration policy is a recipe for importing poverty: "Since 1980 the number of Hispanics with incomes below the government's poverty line (about $19,300 in 2004 for a family of four) has risen 162 percent."

6. A survey of recent economic research on immigration by a Cambridge economist and an Oxford demographer concluded with dry British understatement: "The claim that U.S. prosperity has been driven by immigration, as opposed to driving it, appears to lack any academic support."

(SEE NEXT POST FOR REMAINDER)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» CONTINUED FROM ABOVE....... Posted by: Prophit
» CIS is right wing sink tank Posted by: sausage
Why Blame the Vulnerable?
Posted by: Radicalizer on Mar 30, 2006 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must admit that I am somewhat surprised by the comments some self-identifying leftists have been making in this whole debate. The issue surrounding the plight of "illegal" immigrants is complex and multi-layered, but I am puzzled by a couple of things:

1). Why is it that the conditions that give rise to the massive influx of people trying to enter western countries are not villified as much as the poor migrant workers themselves are? By arguing that borders need to be fortified in order to "protect" American jobs and wages, the ones responsible for the miserable conditions migrant workers face in their home countries are left alone. Instead of being mad at workers in India or China for taking an "outsourced" American job for a fraction of an American's salary, why not direct the anger at the corporations that thrive on this sort of unethical practice?

2). Why is it OK for people to feel threatened by "immigrant" workers and yet not feel dismayed when their head-of-state says that these workers need to be "protected" so that they can continue to do all the low-paying shit work "Americans don't want to do"? Does this not imply that he views people wanting to do this type of work to be less worthy in his eyes than an American citizen? Is that not problematic as well?

The problem here is not that these people pose a threat to the United States or any other wealthy nation. Rather, the economic imperialism of the West has created the system of exploitation that has lead to the current influx of economic refugees trying to do what every ancestor of a self-identifying American did generations ago; make a better living for themselves and their familes by chasing the elusive "American Dream." It's a damn shame that so many people in the U.S. are quick to blame the deterioration of the American workplace on other workers and not "the bosses" who consistently place profits above people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Blame the Vulnerable? Posted by: Uncle Tupelo
Illegal's are part of Neo-Con Strategy
Posted by: rkewen on Mar 30, 2006 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Ronnie Raygun entered the White and began his war on the middle class, there were 2,000,000 illegal immigrants in the US, according to accepted estimates. Today there are 10 to 12 million depending on who you believe. This is all part of the effort to eliminate any bargaining power that workers have by allowing desparate people to accept wages that will not support an American family and health and safety conditions that would bring complaints from the Humane Society if they were imposed on animals.

For Mexico the second leading source of income, after oil, is wages sent home by illegal (and perhaps some legal) workers in the US. But the existence of this pool (10% of the US labor force) easily controled by fear of deportation, in classic supply and demand fashion drives down the bargaining power of all workers and allows CEO's and stockholders to seize an extortionate share of the value of all workers sweat. In earlier times in America indentured servants and black slaves served the same purpose.

Instead of criminalizing the illegal immigrants and those who might help them by providing food in a soup kitchen, medical assistance or shelter, it would be far more effective and appropriate to crimiinalize the CEOs and contractors who benefit from their exploitation. If the CEO of a meat processing firm or Wal-Mart executives hiring illegals faced serious jail time, the problem would solve itself in short order.
But that is unlikely to happen because that would involve holding accountable Bush and the Republican's base.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

criminalizing immigration
Posted by: rickcreswell@yahoo.com on Mar 30, 2006 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Criminilizing immigration has always been a big business gimmick to get public support for a systemthat makes it easy for business to exploit a labor pool simply because it's illegal. What a cool business plan to allow illegal treatment of workers who are afraid to report their employers for fear of importations. Good for at least one free week of work without a paycheck. I've done work that immigrant labor does. I've even done it for mimimum wage. But I can't work for less.
I say make minimum wage a living wage for US citizens and open up the borders. Then the only criminals would be ceos and their lackeys whose crime would be mistreating workers of any stripe. This also solves the so-called social security crisis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Native American Perspective
Posted by: dancingcloud on Mar 30, 2006 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've not heard one word regarding free travel for indigenous people in a superficially divided reserve, such as the Yaqui, Apache, or Kumeyaay nations which cross from the US into Mexico. Nor have I heard even mention of the fact that Mexican Indians have no papers with which to present their case. Many Mexican Indians are born in a village with no record from state, city, or clergy. How are they to "get in line" with no papers? Let's face it, the only Mexicans who are truly despised are the Indians who speak Spanish...a colonial language, not their native language. The day workers I meet in San Diego speak some dialect of their indigenous language. Spanish is a second language to many of them. I don't think anyone hates light-skinned, wealthy people from Mexico. Remember, please, that California is an occupied land (statehood for only 150 years). California was "Mexico" for only 24 years. By definition, indigenous people throughout the North and South American continents are "Native Americans." A little respect, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Battle Flag? Posted by: YogiBear
it's really just union-busting
Posted by: gerdhansel on Mar 30, 2006 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today’s furor over undocumented Hispanic workers may appear to be a racially charged, clash-of-civilizations struggle, but pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. It’s really just the same old union-busting.

Consider how the love-hate relationship between undocumented immigrants and everybody else who works for a living in this country looks a lot like the conflict between union non-union workers during a strike.

Management can bust the union by sneaking in non-union workers to keep the factory running while the union workers are on strike. Sometimes financially strapped union workers will also decide to cross the picket lines. Those who cross the picket lines are called “scabs.” When the players of the NFL went on strike, for example, Randy White of the Dallas Cowboys crossed the picket lines and played with the scabs.

Nobody blamed the “scab” players for taking advantage of their once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to play in the pros, and some of the better scab players even remained in the league after the strike ended. But NFL owners had successfully humbled the union by fielding scab teams.

Major League Baseball’s union was stronger and their strike crippled baseball. It was the year without a World Series, the year that could’ve been for the Cleveland Indians, the year that drove the fans away.

All American citizen or legal resident workers belong to a “union” of sorts. They are the “protected, unexploited” union, which (supposedly) guarantees they will be paid a living wage; will be taken care of by worker’s compensation if they get hurt, and can form a union and bargain collectively with management.

Undocumented alien workers are the “scabs” in this scenario, because they are both unprotected and exploited, and will accept whatever pay they’re damn well offered because who are they gonna complain to, the Border Patrol?

Don’t believe the corporate propaganda that says undocumented aliens do the jobs Americans won’t. They are the “scabs” in an ongoing, nationwide “strike,” who will do the job for less money than their “union” counterparts, and put up with abuse that no “union” worker would ever endure.

They are the slaves of corporate America, which will lie, steal, kill and turn us all against each other to keep their supply of “scab” slaves flowing across the Rio Grande River. And they won’t stop until they turn all of us into slaves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Beginning of National ID Cards
Posted by: metamind on Mar 30, 2006 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of one comment is certain that biometric ID cards are required to stop illegal immigration. This is already part of the legislation being considered. There's only one problem with it: EVERYONE would have to get one of these cards, regardless of whether they have been living here all their life or they just migrated here. Otherwise, how is an employer to know whether you are one of the people who is required to have an immigrant ID card?

Any immigrant can have forged documents. How is the employer to know? If anyone must have one, everyone must have one. That's the only way the idea works.

We should resist any immigration bill which requires "biometric ID cards" for "guest workers."
It's the beginning of a slippery slide into tyranny.

Papers, please?

I'm an American. I don't need no stinking papers! That's fascism.

Steve Moyer
http://stevemoyer.us

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just an observation
Posted by: deeannef on Mar 30, 2006 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a person who lives in Southern California and has seen the walkouts and all the media coverage, an interesting point come to mind. These protestors are fighting for the right to work for substandard wages, bad working conditions, doing jobs no one else wants and being looked down upon. To me this seems a tad bit ironic. I don't know about anyone else, but protesting for these reasons seems to be a lot like protesting that they are using an old rope instead of a new rope for your hanging.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It should be be obvious . . . Posted by: stormchilde1975
» Culture of life, indeed! Posted by: chasaturn
» No need Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: Just an observation Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Just an observation Posted by: Doubtom
It's BECAUSE of the border...
Posted by: chasaturn on Mar 30, 2006 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that these folks are fleeing dollar a day jobs for even as little as $4 an hour here. A convenient border to ship your manufacturing plants across, export a zillion jobs, then point fingers and make a further effort to imprison the poor and deny them any opportunity to do better. NAFTA, CAFTA and all the other trade agreements are at the root of the problem(s). That, and companies owned (shareholders) by people who do NO work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: