Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Conservative Hand of Hollywood

By Justin Clark, Nerve.com. Posted March 29, 2006.


The Christian leader of megaplex Regal Cinemas is trying to shape what audiences see -- and don't see -- at the movies.
Advertisement

Consider the following scenario: It's Saturday, and you feel like going to the movies. You see the latest installment of The Chronicles of Narnia advertised in your local Examiner newspaper, part of a chain whose name has been trademarked in more than seventy cities. You decide to go to your local theater -- a Regal, Edwards, or United Artists. You sit through twenty minutes of advertising, followed by the film itself, which has been delivered from studio to theater by a fiber-optic line.

The underlying theme? Every stage of your moviegoing experience -- from production to promotion to distribution to exhibition -- was controlled by one man: sixty-six-year-old religious conservative Philip Anschutz.

Named Fortune's "greediest executive" in 1999, the Denver resident is a generous supporter of anti-gay-rights legislation, intelligent design, the Bush administration and efforts to sanitize television. With a net worth of $5 billion, he is Forbes ' thirty-fourth richest American, two spots above Revlon's Ronald Perelman. Anschutz heads a vast media empire whose assets include the Examiner chain, twenty percent of the country's movie screens, and a sizeable stake in Qwest Communications, the scandal-ridden telecom giant he formerly directed. (Anschutz was accused of helping falsely inflate Qwest profit reports, then making millions by selling his own shares in the company -- a claim he ultimately settled by paying millions to charity.)

Anschutz's stake in Hollywood has been growing since 2000, when he began buying the bankrupt Regal, Edwards and United Artists chains and founded two film studios, Walden Media and Bristol Bay. In many areas of the country, the Regal Cinemas chain is the only option for seeing first-run films. Carole Handler, a prominent Los Angeles anti-trust attorney, says this gives Anschutz considerable leverage in his latest domain of conquest. "Anschutz is the person who went and bought the theaters out of bankruptcy," she says. "Don't think that passed unnoticed by the studios."

Anschutz has gained considerable power in negotiating licensing agreements with the film studios, contracts which impact everything from where a movie is played, to how long it runs, how it's marketed, which upcoming releases are given trailer time, and how revenue is split between the studio and the theater. It is a kind of power, says Handler, that harkens back to the early days of cinema, when studios, distributors, exhibitors and even movie star magazines were concentrated into the same relatively few hands.

There's a twist, though: Anschutz's politics. A heavy contributor to the Republican Party for decades, Anschutz helped fund Amendment 2, a ballot initiative to overturn a state law protecting gay rights, and helped stop another initiative promoting medical marijuana. More recently, he helped fund the Discovery Institute, a conservative Christian think tank that mounted a public relations campaign and financed "research" into intelligent design. He has also supported the Media Research Council, the group that generated nearly all the indecency complaints with the FCC in 2003.

Ironically, it was Hollywood that saved Anschutz. As a friend of his told Fortune, Anschutz "has a latent interest in doing something significant in American Christianity. He is working deliberately and diligently on it."

Anschutz did not respond to my request for an interview, and he has given only a handful over the past few decades. This is not for lack of an opinion or a story to tell. A devout Presbyterian who grew up in Kansas, Anschutz is married with two daughters and a son. He inherited his father's land investment and oil exploration business, but didn't grow up wealthy; in fact, he gave up his plans to attend law school because the family business was failing.

Ironically, it was Hollywood that saved Anschutz. After discovering a major oil well in Wyoming, the well caught fire. Anschutz sought to hire Red Adair, the legendary oil well firefighter to put it out, but wasn't able to pay Adair's fee. Anschutz realized he could pay Adair -- and make $100,000 on top of that -- by selling the rights to the footage to Hollywood.

Having faced tough times before, Anschutz is probably not overly concerned about the fact that theater attendance was down six percent this year, even in an industry with thin profit margins. Earlier this month Regal reported a forty-three percent increase in fourth quarter profits, a windfall partly credited to another Anschutz venture, the holiday blockbuster and Christian allegory The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Narnia has grossed close to $300 million, a far cry from the first film Anschutz produced, 2002's Joshua. A depiction of the Second Coming, Joshua pulled in less than $1.5 million for its studio, Epiphany Films, a specialty label of Anschutz's proselytic-sounding Crusader Entertainment. While websites are usually maintained even for box office flops -- 2003's Gigli, for instance -- Joshua's site has been taken down, and its URL redirects visitors to the studio's new name, Bristol Bay.


Digg!

Justin Clark has written for L.A. Weekly, Psychology Today and Black Book.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Once again corporations run supreme!
Posted by: kgs1947 on Mar 29, 2006 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corporations are running the major spiritual, political, media, health/medical industries of this country. They have infiltrated every aspect of our lives without challenge by this lame congress and the alcoholic man in the white house. And, we simply sit apathetically and watch it happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How strange...
Posted by: Kevbo on Mar 29, 2006 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How strange it is that his riches are coming from the distribution/presentation of the very same kind of materials that he will likely do his best to eliminate.

Similarly in Murdoch's case, some of his media outlets have been known for airing more provocative or racy fare while he raised a conservative/right wing news channel to prominence, whose commentators and faitful eschew such "sinful" content.

It is obviously dangerous for those who are not conservative Christians as corporations such as those above wield political power not merely business power. Their grabs of market share become accompanied by political power grabs. Media ownership rules are changed to suit them. Government funds are given to faith-based organizations. Opposing philosophies are squelched and shouted down. Religious organizations threaten economic damage to bend corporate wills to their liking. Cries by the Christian majority of alleged persecution becomes justification for protections and fortifications against minority views... with the goal being their elimination.

They grease the election skids for W.-esque politicians who will obey and be more than willing to advocate an intertwined agenda of faith-based business and faith-based culture. The result being the forceful censure of differing ideologies and market competition at the same time.

It's obviously already happening.

The best strategy for those of us with alternate views for protecting ourselves against such domination would seem to come ironically from the faith-based playbook: boycott those businesses. Don't attend Regal Cinemas. Don't give those corporations your money if you can avoid it. If you can't shake their faith, at least get their attention by hitting them in the pocketbook. Furthermore... buy more porn! Donate to public television and radio! Complain to advertisers that you won't buy their goods if they choose to advertise on FOX News or in Regal Cinemas. Express your views as loudly as they do! Podcast, blog... do something before you lack the freedom to do what you want do about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How strange... Posted by: Barbara
Thanks for the tip-off; from now on I boycott
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 29, 2006 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No more patronizing Regal Cinemas or Anschutz's other companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

movie watcher
Posted by: fuzypupy on Mar 29, 2006 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really wanted to see George Clooney's good luck and good night I couldn't wait until it come to the theater however only one theater in Houston,Texas played it, the one downtown so i waited for it to come to a theater near me i live 40 minutes out of Houston, in Katy Texas. It never played in the theaters here I had to buy it on DVD which I was going to do anyway but I wanted to see it on the big screen. But good news for me, someone in the movie business is talking about releaseing new films on DVD and Pay Per View at the same time as theater releases, I for one Love the Idea

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is very scary stuff
Posted by: beverleec on Mar 29, 2006 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am appalled at how WE THE PEOPLE are being dragged into this conservative Christian quagmire. I am appalled that no one in the commerical world fights this, because the dollar is HOLY, not the religious beliefs. We should be warned not only by the military/indutrial complex, but the military/industrial/Christian right complex...the rest of us are forgotten. Very, very scary stuff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Corporate Theaters and Films Posted by: playitsam
Woo-Hoo!
Posted by: clntbrtn on Mar 29, 2006 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Three cheers for Anschutz!

Go get 'em, tiger!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Woo-Hoo! Posted by: Ellie1
Morality?
Posted by: aussidawg on Mar 29, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People like Anshultz (and Bush, DeLay, Ralph Reed, Rove...) will destroy anyone and do anything they can to achieve wealth and power. Once they get to the top of their pathetic hill, they stand up and preach about morals and Christianity and push their interpretations of morality on others. Perhaps they would do better to follow Christ rather than talk about him They seem to believe in the teachings of the Bible only to the point to where it doesn't interfere with their ends. Yes, perhaps they are Christians, but only when it's convenient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And your point is?
Posted by: jesme on Mar 29, 2006 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one of those weird articles that uses a grim and menacing style to describe something about as frightful as a Disney cartoon. A conservative Christian wants to make conservative Christian movies! Oh no! The horror!

Do you guys have any idea how utterly goofy you sound? Don't change, though. It's why I love to visit the site. Learning what scares leftists provides me with lots of harmless amusement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And your point is? Posted by: juliasews
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: jesme
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: Againstthewindwalking
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: jesme
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: jp77
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: alterhead
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: dcr386az
» RE: And your point is? Posted by: Againstthewindwalking
20 minutes of advertizing
Posted by: Guy on Mar 29, 2006 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
20 minutes of advertizing before the movie starts is enough to put the final nail in the coffin of the movie theatre industry. If I am subjected to TV-style commercials or any other blatant advertizing (aside from coming attractions which I like as long as they don't give away too much) I complaint to the theatre manager and tell him/her that if that continues, I won't be coming back to this theatre. I hope that you all do the same. I am not going to pay 10 bucks for the honor of sitting through commercials.

Guy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 20 minutes of advertizing Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: 20 minutes of advertizing Posted by: BlueTigress
Get your facts straight!
Posted by: phils on Mar 30, 2006 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a note to the author....
Please get your facts straight before you begin a diatribe. The name of the gentleman who petitioned for the abolition of the slave trade and later slavery was WILLIAM Wilberforce not Wilbur. He was not a Christian REVIVALIST. He was a long-time member of parliament who, after his conversion, was convicted that the slave trade was inhumane and "the scourge of England." Like Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King who waged a tireless non-violent revolt, Wilberforce was so relentless in his abolition of the slave trade that he finally convinced much of the British Parliament (that had previously been concerned ONLY about themselves and not the cry of the needy) to outlaw the slave trade and later, slavery. It was the influence of Wilberforce that later gave courage and conviction to the abolitionists in the US to continue in their battle against slavery. Would the author have rather seen slave trading continue? Does the author not believe this is an accomplishment worthy of mention on film in a world that is so full of sell-outs and short on heroes? Or does he simply want to throw dirt on anyone who has a connection to the Christian faith? While all of us are well aware of the abuses by people of faith (and people in general...Stalin and Hitler had no religious affiliation), let us not forget the creative advancements and justice-making by people like Dorothy Day in the Worker movement, Mother Teresa in the streets of Calcutta and around the world, Bono in his efforts to relieve debt, the bishops of Central America who have fought against multinational corporations and for workers not to mention the early pioneers of hospitals and education who were predominately people of faith.
Just something to think about...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get your facts straight! Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: Get your facts straight! Posted by: Voicedude
» Mother Teresa movie Posted by: BlueTigress
This is not new.
Posted by: coyote on Mar 31, 2006 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The film industry has always been run by a small handful of megalomaniacs. Disney has always been a very conservative enterprise, only just branching out of G into PG in the 80's. It's show business not politics. "Step right up folks, see a piece of the True Cross, see the Worlds Largest Guinea Pig...or if you didn't bring the wife and kiddies with you..see two Pinheads having sex with the Bearded Lady"
If "Broke Back Mountain" were to hit 300 million you can bet your ass there would be a series of Gay Cowboy movies.
Like it or not, there is a Bible Belt in this country and it wants to be entertained as much as anyone else. It just doesn't want to get freaked out by weird shit.
They don't want to see South Park any more than I want to set foot in a Church....I guess I'm going off on a rant here but back to the conservative marketplace...fine, let it be conservative, things don't have to move so damn fast.
I kind of liked when I was a kid and we saw "A Clockwork Orange" and "Harold And Maude" in the art houses with others of our kind. We were cool.
And maybe cool is the key word. There are those who think they are cool but only if the cool isn't too cool. Maybe it's time to take our cool off the table. Stop putting it out there for everyone to see. The cool people will still be able to find it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why don't these folks stay home?
Posted by: CovertRage on Apr 2, 2006 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This same hand full of idiots wants to define all sin, heresy, and anathema based completely on what they find to be offensive, threatening, and frightening. If life in the everyday world is that disconcerting outside the comfort and security of their homes, perhaps they need never leave home.

Jesus never lived like that. Jesus ate with sinners. Jesus never tried to use His position to rule the world. Jesus was neither respressed nor repressive. Jesus was not judgemental or bigoted. And Jesus had no motivation for His actions but love. He sacrificed all from nothing but love. Self-righteous, holier-than-thou hypocrites, out to transcend their dainful humanity to become the sons of God Almighty by virtue of their Divine Manifest Destiny, to reap the lottery-esque blessings of prosperity may actually be sincere. One of these days though, the truth will finally pierce that willful blindness to reveal that they are sincerely WRONG!

Those who devote themselves to God shouldn't have that tight a grip on trying to control this life in the world. Saint Paul said that true believers devoted singularly to God are to not conform themselves to this world. Jesus said to spread His Good News. Nowhere is there a mandate noted to rule the world. True Believers pursue peace at all costs. Jesus Himself ordered His true Followers to let the wheat and tares grow together, since He was going to fan the threshing floor at the time of Harvest. Jesus promised that at the appointed time of the great harvest He would know those who fed the hungry, clothed the naked, sheltered the homeless, offered support to widows, elderely, and orphans, and freed captives out of nothing but a motivation to love as He has loved. Though Christians travel through this life ever expectant of this time of Harvest, the Bible also tells us that no one, including Jesus Himself, knows when God is going to close this age.

God-blessed America is not a Christian country. The United State of America is a democratic republic, boasting a smattering of real believers amidst its heaps of bible belting zealots. American law is built on the premises, precedents, and statues of British Common Law. The Magna Carta, not the Ten Commandments. Whether these zealots acknowledge it or not, Jesus was all for the separation of church and state. Jesus wanted there to be a very distinct difference between things offered to Caesar and things offered to GOD. Jesus was an orthodox Jew, raised from His youth to know the differences between the holy and the profane. He refused rulership of the world in the Wilderness, a strange fire He knew did not glorify His Father in Heaven. Subsequently, Jesus never lent His Name at any time to advance any religious whore straddling a beast wallowing in the political sea, as is obvious in His separation from the chief priests of the synagogue and the native tetrarchs who subdued His people in the name of Rome.

True believers who are offended by decadent entertainment, lude prose, gratuitous nudity, and vile song lyrics don't need the FCC to impose biblical standards for appropriate entertainment on the nation. Owning a Bible to read is conveniently cheaper than owning a 62-inch Sony or going to the movies. Like their Master though, believers figure those who want to see movies should see them. After all, when the youth wanted to spend time with his new bride, and that man wanted to bury his father, Jesus bid them go, and moved on to recruit followers ready to do the work of His Kingdom at that moment. He neither judged nor damned them, but welcomed all who immediately answered His Call.

If noses offend zealots, then zealots should cut off their own noses, without trying to pass laws that demand I too cut off my nose, or, worst of all, zealots be mandated to cut off my nose. Anyone should be free to not spite his face by virtue of his own faith, not legalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

to clnbrtn
Posted by: Ellie1 on Apr 3, 2006 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are an asshole. You demonstrate the reason this country is in such a disastrous position. I hope you have kids who die in Iraq, you sactimonious, bushit idiot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Some good points, but a LOT of inaccuracies!
Posted by: Voicedude on Apr 3, 2006 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author here has made some good points, but his article is filled with a LOT of inaccuracies and supposition.

I don't have a lot of time to go into great detail here, but look at just a couple of claims made in this article:

First, comparing the Chronicles Of Narnia to 2002's Joshua in almost ANY way is just plain silly. Joshua was a small film with an original story that received no publicity at all. Narnia is based on famous author C.S. Lewis' beloved, worldwide popular book that has entertained generations. One has a simple, 'slice-of life' story, the other was an action/fantasy with tons of special effects following on the heels of Lord Of The Rings. It's like comparing a two-day parking lot carny to Walt DisneyWorld. (On second thought, they still have WAY more in common than those two films do!) Also, comparing Narnia to Passion Of The Christ is faulty as well, since churches were directly part of a grass roots involvement in the films release. Hundreds of private screenings were arranged with local chuches all over the country. Narnia had no such connection or support from any chuches that I am aware of. It didn't need it.

Particularly telling is the error of calling Kermit the Frog and Shrek "Disney characters"! Any child can tell you that these two are NOT Disney characters. Kermit is from Henson Productions, around LONG before Disney had any connection with them. (yes, there's a recent Disney connection with a ride at DisneyWorld and the film Muppet Treasure Island, but DisneyWorld also has Lucas' Star Tours and the Alien Experience - are THEY Disney characters, too? Uh.....NO!), while Shrek is from Disney's fiercest competitor DreamWorks. These facts should be obvious to anyone and are easily verified if someone feels like doing research. To miss something so obvious - well, clearly the author isn't interested in facts.

I would like to say, however, that Anschutz is a Christian about as much as Bush is (translation: not much. Actions speak louder that words.) Anschutz is as Christian as Kenneth Lay, and does not speak for me, my Christian friends, nor Christ himself. He's about as Christian as Zell Miller is a Democrat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ellie & clnbrtn
Posted by: Roverton on Apr 5, 2006 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ellie,

Is the philosophy , "Sins of the father..." the best take a Progressive would want to use here?

The Blo-gic behind anyone applauding an individual as un Christian as the Devil himself, secretly mocking everything they believe in just to make profit off of us like a farm animal, is not something I would personally file inder "Wise Moves".

But hey, it's a free country - right?

Is ignogance evil?

Children must be instructed to hate. It's not in them at birth, as a rule. Most parents do not do this to their own.

Too many kids in the crossfire, facing another generation's madness right now.

It should not be their legacy. We've become all too cavalier about the lives of our babies.

I don't disagree with your basic point, though.

Respectfully,
rover

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Other things about Anschutz
Posted by: truthteller on Apr 7, 2006 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really didn't know much of this about Anschutz. What I knew about Phil Anschutz was as the maverick millionaire that bought the Denver and Rio Grande Western RR in the 1980's, revived the Winter Park Ski Train and then merged the D&RGW with the failing Southern Pacific and cashed out the whole thing to Union Pacific in the late '90's. That's the rosy picture of him portrayed in the railroad industry and railfan hobby press. I really don't think other railroad fans I know would have any knowledge of this side of Anschutz. I'm not sure what this says about the hobby press, which is pretty universally a cheerleader for the industry, if not at least politically uncontroversial. I think it probably speaks volumes about how someone like me, who considers himself an informed and politically savy progressive, could miss this info about someone potentially as important and scary politically as the Coors family and Richard Mellon Scaife.

I certainly won't hesitate to pass this damning information along to others in the railroad hobby about someone usually thought of in positive terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hollywood is Racist !!!
Posted by: 777 on Aug 6, 2006 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hollywood !!!

Hollywood movies are generally meant for white people .... the movie industry was never meant for Latinos & Blacks nor Asians or any mixed race people and the funny thing about this is that the Jews helped support the racism in the film industry!!!

The film industry in Hollywood only sees white people....... until you have more ethnic movie producers.... that is what Hollywood will always be a Racist Haven for White Film and TV producers.

You have a few good Latino and Asian, Black actors in Hollywood. and hundreds that you don't ever see.... but Hollywood has pretty much filled there quota on Latino and Black, Asian actors and actresses ......no matter what they tell you or try to sell you...your eyes don't lie and neither does the camera...but white people do every day in this industry and they don't have to change there racist ways because they have the industry in the palm of there hands just like anything else in this country.

"Hollywood and the Movie and TV Industry belongs to "White People" and was never meant for anyone else....just like the clothes for "Tommy Hilfiger"...where never meant for "Blacks to Wear"

People of all ethnic backgrounds in this country are brain and whitewashed and the actors and actresses are too... they don't see the big picture!!!...the big picture is that the movie and TV Shows were meant to advertise White Men and White Women!!! and to glorify there image all over the world...and this is an inside thing.... something you will not read in a book or find anywhere else ....why do you think that most of all the casting calls are mainly cast by race and ethnicity?

Well .....take a strong look at how all the movies are being created to today when they have beautiful Latino or Black and Asian women in movies and TV and very few at that.. who are they coupled up with?....well lets see?...hum.. Ok "White Men" you will very rarely see it the other way around. The Movie and TV glorify White Men as the bread winners voted the worlds Sexiest and the Wittiest and Romantic Adventuress, Responsible and Caring.

And when they show a Latin and Black guy or Asian guys on TV ....well lets see?...he is Funny, Comical....A bad guy or a thug and just a Karate fighter and also as your Traditional Side Kick!!!.

If you think That ... I am full of crap and negative for stating all this... you just turn on your TV or just go to the movies and you tell me what you see....remember your eye's don't lie neither does the camera !!!

A solution to all this above? quit supporting there ratings and there movies and rental movies and just get regular basic cable and save your money instead of making these people "Become Richer" who don't want to see you on the TV succeed ... and when you hit white people in there pockets then you will see a change ...see Asians and Latinos and African Americans and all other ethnic races of people you have the power ...it is at your finger tips to a remote to your TV set you can make a difference.

If you don’t …it will get worse!!! Don’t Support there Ratings or Films “Hollywood Will Go Broke!!!”

Send this letter to Everybody you know and don’t know!!! Send it all over the world!!!


777

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]