COMMENTS: 382
Immigrants Rising
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Less than three months ago, the leadership of the House of Representatives, in a vicious act of "drive-by" legislating, rushed through a bill that experts consider to be the most anti-immigrant piece of legislation in the United States in 80 years.
Here are some of the lowlights of the Sensenbrenner bill, HR 4437:
- 11 million undocumented immigrants would be declared "aggravated felons" for having come to this country to do back-breaking work at low wages in order to feed their families.
- Priests, nuns, health care workers and other helpers would be threatened with jail time for assisting the undocumented.
- Local police would have to enforce federal immigration laws, undermining community policing strategies meant to build confidence between police and immigrant communities.
- Day labor sites would be shut down by federal law, overruling the hard work of activists and enlightened local communities attempting to solve problems caused in part by Congressional inaction on comprehensive immigration reform.
- Seven hundred miles of walls would be built between the United States and our friendly neighbors to the south, an act that has touched off a diplomatic crisis with Latin America.
The self-righteous politicians who cooked up this bill were undoubtedly pleased with their handiwork. They wanted their colleagues to go back to their districts over the holidays with something to crow about on talk radio and at town hall meetings. The lucky were invited to the Lou Dobbs show.
But politics is like physics: For every action there's a reaction. What looked so tempting last year is looking counterproductive this year. It seems the House anti-immigrant tantrum has angered and activated immigrants, their allies, religious leaders and local governments like never before. Here are some recent events:
- On March 7, over 30,000 immigrants showed up on the west lawn of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., to protest the Sensenbrenner bill and to call for legalization. Families came from work and from up and down the East Coast to show their faces and raise their voices. Many carried simple homemade signs that said, "I am not a criminal."
- Later that week Chicago was the scene of a rally that according to police drew at least 100,000 immigrants, and organizers claimed drew over 300,000. Both the Chicago and D.C. rallies were marked by unprecedented cooperation between the labor movement, immigrants rights advocacy organizations and community organizations led by immigrants.
- Cardinal Mahony of Los Angeles recently announced that if the Sensenbrenner bill becomes law he will instruct his priests to defy it and provide services to the undocumented, even if it means going to jail.
- City councils and county supervisors from Southern California to Ohio and Massachusetts are passing resolutions against the Sensenbrenner bill and calling for comprehensive reform that puts immigrants onto a path to citizenship.
- Beyond Chicago, in Portland, Ore., 5,000 people protested HR 4437. Religious leaders are staging vigils in Ohio. Activists are demonstrating in the Michigan State House, and immigrants are pouring into Washington, D.C., to lobby for comprehensive reform along the lines of the McCain-Kennedy bill pending in the Senate. When Sen. John McCain traveled to Miami and New York to talk about immigration reform, 1,000 immigrants showed up in each city to cheer.
- Even the undocumented Irish from the New York and Boston are becoming active. Some 2,000 descended on Washington, D.C., this week. Wearing T-shirts emblazoned with green lettering that said "Legalize the Irish," they lobbied lawmakers to back the McCain-Kennedy bill with its earned legalization provisions.
- The business community is also upset over the Sensenbrenner bill. Groups of employers are flying into Washington, DC and demanding meetings with their representatives. Their message: they need immigrant workers and want to see their work force legalized, not deported.
Call it the backlash to the backlash. Some are even calling the passage of the Sensenbrenner bill the "Proposition 187 moment" of this decade, referring to 1994, when California Gov. Pete Wilson and the Republican Party won re-election by supporting the anti-immigrant ballot initiative Prop. 187. The measure and the ugly campaign for it so angered Latino and Asian immigrants that it led to a surge in citizenship and voting that threw the Republican Party out of virtually every statewide office for a decade.
Obviously, some Republicans understand that supporting immigrants is good for the country and their party. Sen. McCain of Arizona, a leading contender for the 2008 Republican nomination for president, gets it. So do some of his possible rivals for the Republican nomination, Sens. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.
But more typical of the current thinking in GOP leadership circles is Sen. Bill Frist of Tennessee. He's gearing up to usher a Sensenbrenner-like bill in the Senate, presumably to score points with the same rabid anti-immigrant crowd the House played to. He probably thinks it will help him in the GOP presidential primaries.
Well, Pete Wilson thought his 1994 anti-immigrant platform would help his 1996 run for president. But his role in turning California from a purple state into a blue one and his reputation as a polarizing figure in immigrant communities made Wilson so radioactive no national politicians will be seen with him to this day.
Think about it. Over the past three decades, the GOP has systematically targeted employers, Catholics and Hispanics in order to forge a governing majority. Now, House Republican leaders are targeting employers, Catholics and Hispanics in order to appease talk radio hosts and the loud-but-not-large anti-immigrant zealots.
Here's a political prediction: over time, the Minuteman vote will pale in comparison to the political tsunami gathering strength in immigrant communities and among pro-immigrant constituencies across America.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: medstudgeek on Mar 25, 2006 2:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: conomic effects of immigration
Posted by: outsidea
» Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants
Posted by: catfish
» RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants
Posted by: cry0fan
» part 2 (was RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants_
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants_
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: Joseph
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Joseph
Posted by: outsidea
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 25, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: overage
» RE: BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: puddytat
» RE: one more
Posted by: commonsensewithstanding
» RE: one more
Posted by: mzbuz
» RE: one more
Posted by: cry0fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prophit on Mar 25, 2006 3:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, that piece of legislation wasn't about the politicians, its about the Americans who are pressuring them to stop this wholesale slaughter of our nation economically. You have no idea the millions who are being coordinated by a group that is very effective in getting us all to call, fax and phone to stop this rampant ravaging of our nation and its economic foundation.
Its not about rascism, its about globalizing a one world work force at subsistance level wages. We are in the fight for our economic lives and if you don't see it, then your not affected and probably couldn't care less.
if you don't address this issue that affects working class Americans then you won't win marching by the thousands. You will be arrested for violating our laws and prancing around like Bush thinking its ok to flout our nations laws.
If they would break the law by coming here illegally, then they will break other laws and then we will dinintegrate into chaos and anarchy. Forget it. I won't cooperate with this whole movement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: outsidea
» Typical bleeding heart that is aiding and abetting his corporate masters.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Typical bleeding heart that is aiding and abetting his corporate masters.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Typical wedge issue--divide and conquer
Posted by: geming
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: agarcia
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: djtyg
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Not going anywhere, I, unlike you believe in free speech! LOL
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: thinkverybig
» jennherne
Posted by: jennherne
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: Violetflame11
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» You are right, Chasintrane01, but
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Thank you for the response, Chasintrane01.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Thank you for the response, Chasintrane01.
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: rclord
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Oakland on Mar 25, 2006 4:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Attack on the Middle Class
Posted by: numen
» Right, Oakland, but there's plenty of blame to go around, here.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Your View(s) on this topic
Posted by: FedUp
» Well, fedUp,
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Well, fedUp,
Posted by: FedUp
» Truly, fedUp,
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Slowburn on Mar 25, 2006 5:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should Pay their fair share of taxes, speak English and wrap themselves in American flags, any one else should be promptly ejected to make room for those that will.
It would be interesting to know how many of these marchers are paying social security taxes, unemployment taxes, or registered for the draft? do they consider themselves Americans, or do they believe they should get all the benefits of being Americans without having to contribute their fair share?
Any illegal immigrant that believes they are above, or simply disregards our laws should just keep marching right back to where they came from, because they are creating the same conditions in this country that they are trying to escape from in their country of origin in the first place. Would you, who ever you are, want to live in a house without doors? And frankly i am tired of paying almost a third of my wages to support those that are not willing to be Americans in America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: andreamerida
» Where are your links to your so called facts? For instance.......
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Where are your links to your so called facts? For instance.......
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: Slowburn
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: agarcia
» Agarcia, you must be aware that
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» You're blind to the moral bankruptcy of your agrument
Posted by: sausage
» So a wrong hundreds of years ago justifies destorying the country now???
Posted by: Prophit
» Prophit, you're an idiot!
Posted by: sausage
» Oh, dear, more name calling.
Posted by: Prophit
» I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, Prophit, but
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: You're blind to the moral bankruptcy of your agrument
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: hafnjun
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: zedaker
» Medical/Welfare is only for legal immigrants and citizens
Posted by: andreamerida
» RE: Medical/Welfare is only for legal immigrants and citizens--NOT!
Posted by: agarcia
» Wait a minute, hafnjun...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: tresdelsol
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: warhol1
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: oldman52
» Re: Please get your fact straight
Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: e: Please get your fact straight
Posted by: agarcia
» Well agarcia, just think a little further.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Damn right it's for Americans
Posted by: kooz
» RE: Damn right it's for Americans
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrGeneNelson on Mar 25, 2006 5:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Available references document the multi-million dollar NIF budget and the inter-relation between AILA and NIF. Frank was also executive director of "Immigration Works."
Chicago March 11, 2006 Demonstration
... Frank Sharry, executive director of the Washington-based
National Immigration Forum, said the Chicago rally would get
the attention of Capitol Hill lawmakers. Sharry's first
reaction when a Chicago participant e-mailed him photos from
his cell phone: "Wow."
Frank Sharry Info
Is This a Fair Fight?
ABP - July 8, 2003. This week, Spanish language TV featured a report from Frank Sharry, who spoke in perfect Spanish. The banner read "Frank Sharry - Ford Foundation." The Ford Foundation has $9.5 billion in assets. It works to keep America's borders open by financing groups such as MALDEF and NCLR. Adding in the virulent anti-American SPLC, and these three groups bring in more than $78 million a year to destroy America's sovereignty. Last year, American Border Patrol's total income was less than $50,000.
Is this a fair fight?
_________
Frank Sharry Profile
Executive director of the National Immigration Forum
Open Borders advocate
Refers to U.S. efforts to enforce immigrant visa compliance as "heavy-handed tactics [that] seem more like the old Soviet Union and South Africa."
Another AILA Connection: www.immigrationforum.org/PrintFriendly.aspx?tabid=732
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So Frank Sharry has a viwpoint on the issues.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: So Frank Sharry has a viwpoint on the issues.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Ahem peeringlynx...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Frank Sharry's Open Borders Background
Posted by: JessB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kathat on Mar 25, 2006 5:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With 45million American children without health insurance, and aid to the disabled and elderly cut for our own citizens, we don't even have the resources to care for these people.
We have our own poor that everyone seems to forget about.
This is about NAFTA and American corporations making it impossible for the little guy to make a living in Mexico and South Amercian countries.
We let our corporatins rape and pillage other countries in the name of profit, that outsourcing leads to less production jobs here, and then we are expected to believe that the service jobs ought to go to the very people we put out of work in their own country??? I don't think so.
This isn't about racism, it's about common sense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xactly!!!!!!! What about the massive increase in street people in America?
Posted by: outsidea
» Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: commonsensewithstanding
» Your lack of intellectual discourse tells us who is who here!
Posted by: Prophit
» And what about the rest of us, Prophit?
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Exactly my point!!!! In fact I do just that!
Posted by: Prophit
» Shows you what stereotyping does..... your off base completely.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Who cares how many march?? i don't
Posted by: fferris
» RE: Who cares how many march?? i don't
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 25, 2006 5:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That hasn't the proverbial snowball's chance. So far as I can tell, the critical dimension of the immigration issue is whether progressives can agree. I shouldn't be surprised that the acts in Congress have dividing the opposition as a motive. I could point to a hundred other examples of such.
At the moment, my community, where real estate values have been propped up by immigrants willing to live three families in a two bedroom cottage, is coping. That's not likely to continue for long, even if our Asian creditors do not call in our marks.
LA jails are now in a full scale race war, as are LA streets. The housing market is slipping. The bankruptcy bill is now law. Our public schools are struggling. Our public health system is in chaos. And on and on. We are in deep do-do. The question is how do we get our politicians to pay attention.
Hit the streets. It's as old as the Boston Tea Party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: zedaker
» Ending the designation "person" for corporations is gonna be tough.
Posted by: Sojourner
» And, please include ...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: tussinup
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Steve Adair on Mar 25, 2006 5:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: kathat
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: thinkverybig
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Mar 25, 2006 6:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A "Marshall Plan" to invigorate Latin American national economies could not only relieve the pressure on our own border and labor force, it could revitalize our own machine tool and capital goods sectors. Latin American capital goods have to come from someplace, why not our own "rust belt?"
Instead of IMF and World Bank austerity "conditionalities," sacrificing economic development on the altar of "debt service" and other usurious ripoff scams, all remaining Latin American foreign debt needs to be forgiven as was urged by the late Pope John Paul II. But for usurious IMF and World Bank lending practices that would land any US banker in prison, those countries would have repaid all their foreign loans years ago.
New long term, low interest credit needs to be extended, specificially directed to upgrade of Latin American economic infrastructure and industry. CAFTA and other globalist scams are not working. Aside for gutting the agricultural economy of my state, Louisiana, CAFTA is clearly not providing the national economices in Latin America the development capital to afford their workers sufficient employment opportunities to encourage them to remain at home. Economic development of the ecnomies of Latin America is the best way to deal with illegal immigration.
TagsNOLA
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why do they come?
Posted by: outsidea
» Excellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: xcellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: xcellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: birdman on Mar 25, 2006 6:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Invade Mexico! In a campaign of shock and awe, we storm Mexico City. Then we install an interim government, presided over by a U.S. Viceroy, while we prepare for "free" and "open" elections. In the meantime, we take over the mexican oil industry ...
-- Oh, wait! We just tried that in Iraq. Dang!
But seriously folks -- Just think for a minute about who profits from this whole mess. Our corporate overlords have done quite well by having illegal workers in this country. They have mostly accomplished their mission of driving down wages and working conditions for American citizens. Now the illegals can all go home, thank you very much. The nativist politicians can be turned loose against foreigners, mostly to stir up that Republican base, get them distracted from the mess in Iraq, get them turning out at the polls in November to keep American Republican, just like God intended.
Meanwhile, Americans are getting poor and desperate enough that WE'LL do the dirty and dangerous jobs soon enough. (Or we'll join the army.)
Oh, and that 700 mile wall? That's to keep US IN!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You are so right about that!
Posted by: Prophit
» Birdman, don't forget
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Birdman, don't forget
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Hola, chasintrane01 . . .
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 7:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last night I went to a showing of Good Night and Good Luck followed by a symposium which included a panel of journalist. These journalist were members of the "liberal" news media that included Nick Clooney. I found them to be shills for the industry. Clooney went so far as to say, "I don't think there is a corpirate conspiracy other than to make money." In other words he doesn't think they have a social or political agenda. All media has an agenda, and today media chooses to bonk you over the head with its message. The message of the day is repeated over and over until the parrots are able to spew it verbatim. I have no faith in the credibility of any news medium with only one point of view. I have no faith in a news medium that doesn't look beyond the narrow perimiters it sets, to keep truth from being exposed. Alternet has yet to acknowledge the civil rights violations by the pro-illegal movement, and its proponents. Because if Alternet or any so-called liberal outlet ever really looked at the issue from the ground up, and not from a position of elite myopia, you might find the holes in your position. Like a neocon clinging to WMD you have drowned out the voices of opposition for your truthiness. In three years when the political landscape has remained unchanged don't ask why. The answer lies in the fractured Left's inablility to give voice to its own minority, because the same people who have always known what is best, still think they do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» Yeah? Well what's your diatribe have to do with the topic at hand?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: JessB
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veive on Mar 25, 2006 7:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahahaha, good one!
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Mar 25, 2006 8:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend of mine keeps telling me I should watch "A Day Without A Mexican," a film about a day when all Mexicans vanish from Los Angles, CA. and the hapless Anglos are left to do menial labor for themselves. I always ask, "But what about the Chicanos? They're American citizens, aren't they?" That's not the point of the film, however. So one day I will view it.
But why do Senators McCain, Hagel and Brownback support the plight of illegal immigrants from south of the boarder? Because the base economy, agriculture, meat packing, tourism, rests on the backs of Mexicans, Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans who risk their lives and run the gauntlet of horror for work in substandard conditions for low wages.
It would serve these venal, greedy, stupid racist Republicans right if they get their wish; Build a wall running from California, through the Gadsden Purchase and down the Rio Grande to the Gulf of Mexico. Then who will be left to butcher our hogs, pick our tomatoes and bus our restaurant tables?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You make erroneous assumptions that end with erroneous conclusions!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: You make erroneous assumptions that end with erroneous conclusions!
Posted by: outsidea
» Your the one who is wrong. Illegal immigration came first and then union busting.
Posted by: Prophit
» I am old enough too!
Posted by: sausage
» You just made my point, so your the one not reading right!
Posted by: Prophit
» prohit you are still doing it!
Posted by: zedaker
» I agree with you but its a catch 22. If you don't take that away from....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Narco-NYC on Mar 25, 2006 8:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: outsidea
» Name calling, name calling, name calling...........
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: overage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mincemeat on Mar 25, 2006 8:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
computer programmers in this country on account of cheap labor imported or outsourced. The buying
power of the working poor, and the lower half of the entire wage spectrum, is being destroyed by a
human tidal wave of illegals invading this country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: JPHickey
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jax on Mar 25, 2006 8:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't care where you are from or your race or your station in life.... NO AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD HAVE TO COMPETE WITH ILLEGALS FOR JOBS AND HEALTHCARE.
Yes, most of us who contribute to sites like this one; are progressive minded; but enough is enough. We are a very welcoming people, but allover the United States communities are being destroyed by this activity and not just Black communities... increasingly many of the majority White communities are losing out on this devastating proposition.
I am no way near being a Bush fan or anything like that, in fact I think that HE IS THE WORST president to come along in my life time, and I am 39 years old. But, Bush is not pro illegal per se; he is pro Business and as long as businesses can hire people to work for slave wages and be happy about it; then that is what they are going to do!
Call me insensitive, if you must, but I have gotten to a point where I believe that we have to start thinking of ourselves first, and this spills over into getting out of Iraq and letting them deal with their own issues.
Companies who hire illegals will close if we decide as a nation not to support them. If you go to a store and they have illegals working in them...walk out.
In some of the midwestern states they are asking now when they call for home repairs who is doing the work, if illegals are doing it they keep shopping.
Again, I don't care who is here, but it is obvious that it matters how they got here and what they bring with them.
We should also start looking at the negative impact of Asian illegal immigration on this country; as well as Latin immigration.
Almost half of our own citizens don't have insurance; and even more are having a hard time paying for prescriptions to live; not to even mention the tensions that these people bring when they demand that American communities benefit them to their own demise.
NO MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. IF CONGRESS WON'T DO RIGHT BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEN IT IS TIME TO GET RID OF THEM. IF OUR BUSINESSES WON'T DO RIGHT THEN WE DON'T PATRONIZE THEM.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: zedaker
» Yes, but they can be prosecuted and they can be run by "moral humans".
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: rosegypsi
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: zeldar
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RichardT on Mar 25, 2006 8:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can not have people crossing our borders illegally. This needs to stop. Employers that hire them and those organizations and people who shelter them need to be held accountable.
While we need to find a way to deal with the "illegal’s" already in the country, this is a totally different issue and the debate about this issue should not be linked to our efforts to secure the border by any means necessary.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mont on Mar 25, 2006 8:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: depressed wages
Posted by: zooeyhall
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Mar 25, 2006 8:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We have Laws
Posted by: oldman52
» Angrygramp
Posted by: jbwestwood
» Thats the whole point of this issue!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: We have Laws
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zedaker on Mar 25, 2006 9:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Most ag jobs are below minimum wage as are bussing jobs in restaurants!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: raise minimum wage to $10/hr and tie it to cost of living index
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mpa on Mar 25, 2006 9:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Man was made for action, and to promote by the exertion of his faculties such changes in the external circumstances both of himself and others, as may seem most favourable to the happiness of all."--The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Part II Section III Chapter 3
In other words, its about time for the revolution in halting the greed of neo-colonialism. Its not in the best interest for the world(Earth) for economic-plutocracy to exist. Duh!
Oye immigrante yo te apoyo por toda mi vida. Tu y yo venceremos la opresion de los que se creen amos de toda nuestras vidas.
Have a good day,
Marcelino Peña
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» See? You make my point.
Posted by: Prophit
» Marcelino, I'm with you 100%...We are just living the "Harvest of Empire"
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: Latin American/North American History 101
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: About time...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sandra on Mar 25, 2006 9:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jennherne on Mar 25, 2006 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get a clue people. These very immigrants give far more to our economy than they take. This is not my claim but the claim of some of the most notable economists in the country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: JPHickey
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: dlf
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: agarcia
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mutternich on Mar 25, 2006 10:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We gotta get the Republicans out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not only 'anti-immigrant'...
Posted by: sarahenany2
» RE: Not only 'anti-immigrant'...
Posted by: cry0fan
» Since when is making a slave of a desparate person.........
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LXM8899 on Mar 25, 2006 10:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: neogaia
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: khathu
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: kathat
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: LXM8899
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: overage
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» THE DIFFERENCE IS THEY CAME LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT?????
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: THE DIFFERENCE IS THEY CAME LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT?????
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gramps on Mar 25, 2006 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an attempt to provide the basis for a Nazi government in the United States. an attack on a minority population. What will you do with the twenty million Mexicans that have families and homes here? Will you build some more gas chambers and ovens like Hitler did? We are all children of immigrants. The Pilgrims were illegal immigrants. Read the inscription on the Statue of Liberty.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: gramps
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Sorry, gramps
Posted by: FedUp
» The reason there are spanish names in Calif and Texas is ........
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chasaturn on Mar 25, 2006 11:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Krotos on Mar 25, 2006 11:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nevertheless, a very good case can be made for limiting immigration. If you look at the history of immigration to the United States, there's been a conspicuous cycle consisting of four or five decades of liberal immigration policies followed by a similar length of time during which immigration was highly restricted. The previous period of open immigration was from about 1880 to 1920, when the ancestors of most of today's Irish-, Italian-, and Jewish Americans came to the country. The majority population felt just as economically threatened by the Irish, Italians, and Jews back then as it does by Latino immigrants today (e.g., the infamous "No Irish need apply" help-wanted signs), and viewed them with just as much suspicion, as low-class, crime-prone aliens who would radically alter America's culture and values if they became too numerous.
Starting in the 1920s, immigration became very restricted and remained that way until the mid-1960s. That was a very good thing for the newly arrived groups. It allowed them a generation or two to be fully assimilated into the broader society, a process made much easier when they were no longer perceived as invaders. Today, no one would be uncomfortable if their child married someone with a last name like Minelli or O'Reilly, or even think twice about it.
I'd like it very much if no one thought twice about their child marrying someone with a last name like Gomez or Ruiz. And to that end, I think we're overdue for another period of restricted immigration so that Latinos can become just as fully integrated into American society and culture as people of Irish, Italian, and Jewish descent are.
-K.Ai.-
(note: I'm reposting this from an earlier discussion which got archived shortly after)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sensenbrenner's bill stinks,
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Sensenbrenner's bill stinks,
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 12:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 12:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: dlf
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: dlf
» serious versus parody/satire
Posted by: Michelle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Mar 25, 2006 1:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 25, 2006 2:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Univisión has a viewership equal to that of CNN. It's prime newscaster, Jorge Ramos is viewed more than any Anglo-American counterpart. You can get the percentages and stats from one of his books: "Atravesando Frontreras", "La Otra Cara de América", or "La Ola Latina", all available in an English version at your local book peddler, or on the internet.
And that leads to another reality. Publications, auto manufacturers, cosmetics, investment companies, mortgage lenders, colleges and universities, clothiers, law enforcement, real estate agents, hotels and resorts, etc., etc.,etc. have all faced the reality of Latino buying power, and, in the not too distant future, their political clout.
Pretending to get a handle, at this late date on the "problem", is like trying to get the toothpaste back in the tube.
Latinos, in their "huge" numbers, and in all their racial combinations, differences; from Argentina to Haiti, to Venezuela, are here to stay.
So, by all means, build the wall, pass legislation, create detention camps. The giants around you are waking up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eality
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Reality of remmittances
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 25, 2006 3:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue of "illegal immigrants" was created as a result of our government's destructive "free" trade/market policies and as a result only big and crooked business got its share of all the free lunches leaving the rest of us with a higher bill in the long run. It's bad enough that these same shenanigans that cry about "illegal immigrants" and bringing puppet-style "democracy" are hell bent on copying the Mexican government's model of increasing poverty against the working class leaving them lost and scattered. There's no doubt that today's cons have no problem if a corrupt corporation or big business plucks an immigrant illegally for cheap labor but for those poor souls scattered and lost and trying to hang on to their lives, they just got to PERSECUTE them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cry0fan on Mar 25, 2006 3:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, this thread is a tour de force repository of neoliberal globalist propaganda.
Let's see if we can summarize all the talking point propaganda the pro-mass immigration fauxliberals are outputting here:
1. TINA==There Is No Alternative. This means mass immigration and the neoliberal rat race to the bottom is INEVITABLE, so just relax and enjoy it cuz it is an UNSTOPPABLE FORCE OF NATURE. Pure nonsense of course. But what do you expect from the neoliberals?
2. If you are against mass immigration from the 3rd world, then you are a Nazi racist. The race card! Hooks into the elite entertainment media propaganda that has been output for years that says that all white people are inherently racist and must atone for their sins. Pure nonsense, as I pointed out in this same thread elsewhere.
3. They were here first, so they deserve to come here. Another fauxHistorical canard. Tens of millions of white Americans are part native American, including me.
4. Anyone up for completing this list of pro-mass immigration neoliberal talking points?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't forget 'we r all immigrants'card
Posted by: kathat
» RE: Don't forget 'we r all immigrants'card
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: john henry on Mar 25, 2006 6:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: now the south has come north
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Michiganman on Mar 25, 2006 7:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close our borders to ruthless greedy countries/corporations NOT PEOPLE! Deal only with benevolent forces and see how fast the world business model changes.
Hey we are ALL immigrants! Don't slam the door just because there are fewer jobs here. The pigs are gonna win whether we close the borders or not. It'll just be a slower death!
Wake up folks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just another smokescreen
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Just another smokescreen
Posted by: peeringlynx
» ideas please
Posted by: kathat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zeldar on Mar 25, 2006 7:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!, but Plz count them first
Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!
Posted by: Uncategorizeable
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 25, 2006 7:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read this great article
Peace and prosperity has not been a hallmark of régimes in the hemisphere, and the consequence of U.S. intervention and meddling in Latin America is bearing this bitter fruit that so many North Americans oppose and attribute to some well-oiled, organized invasion from its southern border.
While it may be creditable to label it an invasion, it's roots are based on the treatment that Latin America has received from the U.S.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AGREE 10,000% fedup, great link
Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: AGREE 10,000% fedup, great link
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: A History Lesson - Wouldn't have worked if the politicians in ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thehodges1@prodigy.net on Mar 25, 2006 10:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MEXICO!! VIVA BIG BUSINESS!! So give it up Middle America. The President breaks the laws and creates a war to kill the young so give the illegals the right to own this country since you can't send them back to do for their country what they are doing for America. Help!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EQdi on Mar 25, 2006 11:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should be real interesting watching how this plays out in Washington.
Immigrants and their supporters have shown the rest of America how to stand up against the bullshit Washington dishes daily. Maybe they'll get off their asses and protest the damn war.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: DJ
Posted by: peeringlynx
» I disagree! I think that demonstration with Mexican flags all over.....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cinattra on Mar 26, 2006 12:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue is about fairness of competition between businesses that hire illegal immigrants and businesses that do not. The issue is about the social side-effects that illegal immigration has brought with it. The issue is about what is Mexico doing what are any of these foreign governments doing to promote job creation and economic opportunity in their countries? I'm sure there are other issues other readers could name as well. This is by no means an exclusive list.
The point to leave with is this stand up to your own governments and push for reforms like we do in the U.S. every two, four and six years respectively. March like that (500,000 march on L.A. on 25 Mar 06) on Mexico City and see what happens i.e. apply your rights where they will make the most difference.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The issue is bigger than illegal immigration
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tomo on Mar 26, 2006 12:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BaBe_714sa on Mar 26, 2006 12:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: THIS IS B.S.
Posted by: FedUp
» Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 26, 2006 1:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask for their Green Card. If they do not have one it's into the van. Give them the option of military service or deportation. 4 years of service will get you expedited citizenship. It will solve two problems- recruitment and illegal immigration.
Join the Army and go to Iraq or go home to whatever rock you crawled out from under. If you don't respect our laws we don't want you.
We Arrest.
You Decide.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Next Protest-Show Me Your Green Card , Please
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: Next Protest-Show Me Your Green Card , Please
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nbrown on Mar 26, 2006 1:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If someone wants to move to find a job, that is his or her right. Using government coercion to prevent someone from exercising that right is anti-freedom.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: dlf
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Aaaah and what country's laws does this freedom come from????
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beausoleil on Mar 26, 2006 6:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: turning the new world order inside out
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: Your knowledge of Latin American History
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Your knowledge of Latin American History
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: This may or may not enlighten you.....
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uphill on Mar 26, 2006 6:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Border is a national security problem too!
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 26, 2006 6:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Cinattra, you have hit the nail on the head why aren't the marchers marching in their homeland?
2. Why is it they feel emboldened to demand another sovereign nation give them the rights of citizenship, without the burden of citizenship?
3. What is the difference between a pre-emptive strike against a sovereign nation by force or one that attacks the infrastructure?
4. Don't each serve to cripple the native populace?
5. If more than half of all illegal immigrants come from Mexico, and that country's average educational level is between 6th and 8th grade, how many of their young men and women are even qualified to serve in the armed services?
6. If as studies show a majority of illegal immigrants don't finish high school, how are they qualifying for jobs that natives need diplomas for?
7. If newly arrived illegal immigrants have no job references, how are they more qualified for jobs than natives, who are asked to provide them?
8. Do you consider hiring practices that give a clear advantage to illegal immigrants discriminatory towards natives?
9. If not why not?
10. Are you in favor of discrimination?
11. Under what circumstances do you view discrimination as acceptable?
12. What would you do to a politician in your democracy whose record showed a wreckless disregard for his/her constituents wishes?
13. Are Americans entitled to the government they pay for?
14. Why aren't people from nations south of Mexico marching against their border policies?
15. One day in April of 2005, the Mexican deportation center held 630 people from 150 nations, do you really believe both Mexico and America can provide adequate border security with a guestworker program?
16. Do you care if America can provide adequate border security?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» & why is Alternet ignoring us?
Posted by: uphill
» RE: & why is Alternet ignoring us?
Posted by: dlf
» RE: & why is Alternet ignoring us?
Posted by: uphill
» RE: & why is Alternet ignoring us?
Posted by: dlf
» For your entertainment, ANSWERS!
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» alright, I'll answer #1.
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: alright, I'll answer #1.
Posted by: dlf
» RE: For your entertainment, ANSWERS!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: For your entertainment, ANSWERS!
Posted by: dlf
» They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: uphill
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: uphill
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: uphill
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: dlf
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: uphill
» RE: They DO pay taxes, but...
Posted by: dlf
» RE: For your entertainment, ANSWERS!
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Mar 26, 2006 11:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not going to address in detail the plethora of arguments that have been thrown forth by the pro-immigration, 'let them all in and damn the consequences' crowd (perhaps the flimsiest of all being the notion that because the U.S., or any country for that matter, is a 'nation of immigrants', that such an argument is and of itself is reason enough to throw the welcome mat out to every Tom, Dick and Harry on the face of the planet in perpetuity).
I would just throw a couple of thoughts at Sharry and like-minded thinkers: Firstly, do any of you ever give the slightest thought to the enormous and adverse environmental impacts of sizeable population influxes when you denounce (often in very unflattering language) those who favour restrictive immigration policies, for whatever reason?
And, secondly, to those who relish hurling the 'racist' or 'xenophobic' epithets left, right and centre, at every opportunity (typically as a very poor substiture for meaningful and intelligent debate): You are fond of labelling as 'racist' those who are opposed to the immigration of peoples of very differing cultures/backgrounds (often to any immigration by anyone, needless to say) , and whose immigration radically alters the cultural/social make-up of the host country or community (important note). Would it not be equally 'racist' to consiously favour immigration policies which achieve such radical changes in a society's make-up? And I mean any society, anywhere in the world.
I am not going to rehash the economic arguments re immigration; others have pointed out quite well, for example, the adverse effects that mass immigration has on wage levels, and, subsequently, on poverty levels.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: pro-immigration bias
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djtyg on Mar 26, 2006 11:52 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to find out how they organized these protests so well, and in such a short amount of time. Then use it for other issues.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peeringlynx on Mar 26, 2006 1:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But this comes down to more of the soul and character of this country. It started because somewhere, sometime ago a wealthy business owner came to understand that someone looking for employment or already under his employ was an illegal (whether this was the maid in a movie star or politician's house or a warehouse worker) , so instead of abiding by the law the wealthy individual looked at the monetary advantages for him to employ or keep this illegal worker. Less documentation needed, less money paid out for the illegals services, less chance of lawsuits, no reason to abide by labor laws of break times, meal times, and overtime. Multiply this out by multitude of employees and the wealthy only got richer and instead of employing illegals to do jobs no one else would do they simply are getting away with paying wages to them with less benefits and less risk there millions growing while they will not pay and American citizen to do the job, why should they if they continue to have a seemingly endless work force that can save them tons of money and make them have the advantage over the competition. But in the truth they are simply robbing from the future and and because of greed not supporting their fellow Americans. Of course this applies to those companies and individuals that are actually doing this as I want to believe that their are many reputable and upstanding business owners and companies that stay within the law and do not mind paying there American brother, their fellow citizen, proper wages and benefits, They can deal with the ethical and moral peace that they will only make 1million profit this year rather than 1.5 million, to use a generic amount, it could be in the thousands or billions depending on the size and scope.
Going back to your home , if you invited some destitute person into your house and they told you that they would work down at the local work yard and pay you half or all of your mortgage if you would give them your extra room. The only problem it is not extra, your son, your daughter, your mother, your best friend is in that room but is not paying you anything at all. Would you throw that "family" out of the house, or make them sleep on the couch so you could get the monetary gain from this person you do not know from Adam. Of course most would not, but unfortunately some would and in like manner the illegal is doing the same to the business owner he is actually paying him not to employee his family , his countrymen, that is exactly what he is doing because his illegal employment is money in this law breaking , greedy millionaires pocket so he can have an extra ranch or leer jet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peeringlynx on Mar 26, 2006 1:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the question would be then, mathematically how many illegals and immigrants do you think should be allowed in and how fast 20 million, 50 , 100 million -- immediately , in the next year , 5 or ten years? How many and how soon, and appear moralistically the angelic good samaritan while still maintaining a sustainable economy and standard of living that actually makes people want to risk there lives to sneek here. But mathematical it is impossible that the United States absorb an unlimited number or immigrants and illegals in an indefinite period of time, so what is the responsible approach, to holding greedy business owners and independent contractors and corporations and outsourcing companies accountable to the law designed to protect the citizens right to operate, live, and work in a community and culture that is supportive and self-enriching and empowering towards life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness when they are selling our bithright and bringing the curse that comes with it, desolation and becoming the outcast and wanderers in our own land, so was the case with Esau that for a moments satiation sold his soul, so too the business owners and politicians for a moments satiation of cheap labor, easy consumers, and easier votes are on the precipice of sacrificing this nations birthright.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Selling our Birthright? II
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Selling our Birthright? II
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: Selling our Birthright? II
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Selling our Birthright? II
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kooz on Mar 26, 2006 2:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's an issue designed to distract Americans from the right-wing conservative Christians and Jews immoral and corrupt actions that are, and probably have already, damaging our once great nation.
So to all of you who think this issue means anything, except to rally millions of people of color to vote for Democrats, think again. Republicans are done, dead, fucking sickos with no vision for anything good. Replicans are worse than crakheads who steal costume jewelry.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: dlf
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: oldman52
» I protest
Posted by: kathat
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: uphill
» Stop that!
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: The real story is RACISM!
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peeringlynx on Mar 26, 2006 2:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I moved out to LA a decade ago and in that time alone I have seen nearly triple the amount of mexican immigrants that are paid cash "under the table" paying no taxes, fake or stolen social security numbers from deceased people or alternate actual living indviduals and less and less of them that are English proficient. 10 years ago almost all I came in contact with could converse in English or of their own respective accord brought a relative or friend translator now at least half demand a spanish speaking employee. Interesting that for several hundred years and with less amenities than today Mexican and Spanish immigrants had no problem learning English and operating in a total English society , it is only in the last couple decades that they have become unable , or is it unwilling, to learn English. All other ethnic groups I run into particular Middle Eastern speak English fluently and their mother tounge is from a complete different language root. The business I have been in has afforded me the opportunity to have dealt with about 10 new fresh individuals a day, working with credit applications and their bureaus, incomes, employment etc so I find out alot about these people. So over 10 years that is greater than 30,000 people I have personally dealt with and I am only one employee of a company with hundreds and the interaction and consensus and knowledge we have distilled is basically the same. The respect or want to learn the national Language is decreasing, identity fraud and theft of socials etc is increasing, employer violation of law by paying unreported wages is escalating, flying of mexican flags? Is this immigrant assimilation into American culture? Well I think the majority of the country now will sit up and take notice and realize that this much of a demostrative show necessitates a equalizing response and more research by them. The majority of the nation which did not know the extent of the presently revealed attitude by said immigrants will now begin to get involved and the momentum will only increase on initiatives that are of the kind being demonstrated against.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They have exposed themselves
Posted by: kathat
» RE: They have exposed themselves
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Mar 26, 2006 2:31 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A War On The American Working Class
Posted by: opivy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 26, 2006 3:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read This
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eality Check
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Reality Check
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: eality Check
Posted by: dlf
» RE: eality Check
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djtyg on Mar 26, 2006 4:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DataDoc on Mar 26, 2006 9:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Build a wall? They'll dig a tunnel, like the quarter-mile tunnel from Tijuana to San Diego.
How'd the Berlin Wall do? Like the Berlin Wall, with enough machine-gunners, you can probably keep most people out, but eventually it will be torn down! And is the Israeli wall keeping out the suicide bombers? Not so well...I guess some people just keep sneaking through the checkpoints.
Did we go to war with Mexico or something? When Americans will work with the low wages and poor working conditions that immigrants will put up with, we'll get our jobs back, but don't expect American big business to cut off immigrants and start hiring Americans at double the pay. Wal-Mart is not going to go for that.
This is some kind of Rambo fantasy that we can stop all Mexicans from coming across the border. What next a fence along the Canadian border? Maybe we can pay for those fences with our big budget surplus. Oh, I forgot we are nine trillion dollars in the hole! Maybe if we cut school lunches for poor kids? Now we've got enough for Halliburton to build the first mile of fence.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Reality Check II
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tomo on Mar 26, 2006 10:58 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: axolotl_helix on Mar 26, 2006 11:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have already been so many more things to be angry about. But it took this to get their attention.
It seems like the act of such a sorry mass of selfish, nearsighted, arrogant, hypocritical bastards- with a huge sense of entitlement and no sense of responsibility- that I say go ahead and grant them all citizenship.
They'll fit in here just fine.
I don't side with the Official Liberal Party Line on the immigration issue at all. (The idea that taking any kind of action against the illegals is a "racist" attempt to deprive them of their "rights.") No, our Bill of Rights, farce though it may be anymore, is for citizens.
You might have good reasons for lying on your resume, but if the business finds out, they have every right to fire you. You may have good reasons for trying to hide income from the IRS, but if they find you out, you will pay up with interest or you will go to jail. You're taking on a risk when you break the law, and for many people the benefits outweigh the risks- but when they catch up with you, you have no place demanding freedom from the consequences of your actions.
A second thought: It's obvious to me that the U.S. govt. and businesses have together made sure that the illegal immigration is as consequence-free as possible, to their own benefit.
So to suddenly start seriously enforcing the immigration laws is going to make people angry, just as it would if the Highway Patrol suddenly started seriously enforcing the speed limit laws. I can understand that. If this is a serious change in policy, and not just an attempt to pander to the xenophobe demographic, maybe amnesty should be granted to all existing illegal immigrants who came over during the policy of tolerance and looking the other way.
And a third thought:
At least we don't have to be kept in suspense any longer as to what Homeland Security's "new programs" are going to be.
You see, if illegal immigrants become felons, it will be an easy step to use the Patriot Act's broad new definitions of terrorism ( they are foreign nationals entering the country for the purpose of committing a felony...) to arrest and detain them indefinitely without trial in Halliburton slave-labor camps.
Then the former middle class, who have been working service-sector jobs at hourly wages since all the technical and manufacturing jobs went to India and China, can now do all the minumum wage unskilled labor jobs that the Mexicans used to do. The former upper-middle class can then take over their jobs, while the rich get richer, as always, by shuffling around other people's money and debt.
Once they've got the KBR gulag systems stocked with all the illegal immigrants, (who'll miss them? No one with enough money to matter...) then start throwing in the dissidents. This is actually a great idea, because just like killing Muslim civilians generates more terrorism, imprisoning dissidents generates more dissent. So soon we'll have enough domestic prison labor to make the US competitive with Chinese slave labor, and, ( after multi-billion-dollar "Freedom Incentive" tax breaks ) enough of the multinational corporations will return here to manufacture cheap goods that we can then sell to the new class of debt-ridden gringo day-laborers.
Does that sound about right?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Wow, I don't like any of the sides in this argument.
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Mar 26, 2006 11:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more illegal immigrants there are, and the laxer the border control, the worse the situation gets. Countries that are very successful at both offering opportunities to migrants, and defending existing standard of living (Australia, Canada) have far stricter border controls than the US. It is not reactionary to have border control, it is actually the most liberal and progressive thing a government can do. It says clearly we respect you, your labour and we respect our existing citizens too. We will not conspire to drive down your worth nor will we do this to our workers either.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Massively warped debate by 'immigrant' defenders
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thinkverybig on Mar 27, 2006 12:34 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With so many other important issues we could be addressing, we choose to invade two other countries, spend over 350 billion in tax payers money, and be responsible for over 2500 U.S. Soldiers lives not counting those who are injured emotionally and physically. And also the tens of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans we have killed and scarred for life. Where are our priorities or is it all about the money.... not the people. It's time for a CHANGE and the sooner the better folks... It's time for a REVOLUTION.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A Complete and Total Revamping of our system is Needed
Posted by: Narco-NYC
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peeringlynx on Mar 27, 2006 1:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But the main point is that the Immigrants today come , knowing that they have access to all the public ammenities, and welfare and medical assistance and are using it as in California alone it is estimated that it cost 3 billion dollars a year to fund the illegals in that state alone.
Stark Contrast to the original founding immigrants -- there was not welfare, there were not free medical clinics, there were little if no handouts. You came here and lived and died based on your dream and drive.
I flew over part the Grand Canyon some time back in a helicopter tour and the guide showed us a road still visible etched into the landscape that Sooners or other covered wagon pioneer "immigrants " had made by there tens of thousands of wheels passing that same route which was one of the few passes through that area. He went on to explain how thousands of them were killed by ambush of the native Indians of that area. Yea the immigrants of yester year came with faith and hope and love a of a country that offered them the chance of freedom and very little else and many died like those pioneers or went insane or starved on the plains because they had no food or shelter but the immigrants kept coming knowing this , knowing there where no food lines, or medical clinics, and that they may die.
They came knowing if they did not get rid of that Irish accent they would probably never get a decent job and so they worked hard at it. Today these said immigrants demand we learn there language and come fully expecting and demanding and definitely using all the handouts. The immigrants that came in the founding this country cost it and its taxpayers nothing compared to the ridiculous monies being paid to harbor them now. If I told you that you were going to have to pay 10 to 20 percent more taxes next year so that about half of everything you made was taken by the government what would you say? H%!! no is what you would say but that is what it would take to keep the level of illegals coming into this country paid for if the government was not borrowing money and selling tresury notes to pay for it. But the government can not keep it up forever, just wait until you really start paying for your illegal immigrant support.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Welfare state kills drive to success
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Welfare state kills drive to success
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 27, 2006 6:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't ask me, man.
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: Don't ask me, man.
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 27, 2006 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with immigration, only with illegal immigration. If a person is going to disregard the laws of entry into a nation, which is nothing more than an extended community, what makes you think they will obey any other laws?
All I ask is that you learn our common language, obey our laws, put your allegiance to our country FIRST and live peacefully. Allowing millions of people who closet themselves in self-imposed ghettos extending to media is doing nothing but planting the seeds of future civil strife. The crazies that advocate the return of the southwest to Mexico should be treated as the subversives they are and charged with sedition.
How do you think Mexico would respond if tens of millions of english speaking non-hispanic Americans flooded in, expecting the full benefits and rights of citizenship? Mexico does not even allow Americans that are legally in Mexico to own property, among other restrictions.
If they expended half of the effort and coin on improving their own country instead of trying to come here, they might want to stay where they were born. These folks should be protesting the corrupt government in Mexico City-- not in the US.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The first job of a nation . . .
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: Said it Before & Again
Posted by: ElisaDetroit
» RE: Said it Before & Again
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: metamind on Mar 27, 2006 8:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For this reason and others we should have an extended debate about immigration without artificial constraints. Let's open the issue up for a robust national discussion.
As a candidate for the U.S. Senate I advocate a policy of Free People AND Free Trade. Notice the order of this: PEOPLE COME FIRST! We haven't focused on freeing the people of Mexico, China and other nations from the scourge of poverty and oppression. We've focused solely on the idea that free trade will produce free people. But is this notion founded in fact? The evidence indicates otherwise.
We should focus our trade policies on helping those nations which are moving forwards with increased freedom for their people. This means freedom from political oppression and economic oppression. The latter issue is especially relevant when examining the immigration issue.
People from all over the world want to immigrate to America. The criteria should include the human policies of their governments. Do they support human rights, democracy and individual liberty? Do they provide health care for their citizens? If they pass these criteria, and others, then we should welcome their people into America.
If the policies do not pass the criteria then we should examine each nation and each individual on a case-by-case basis. For example, we may wish to allow political refugees from oppressive dictatorships but not allow economic refugees. That has been U.S. policy in our recent history. We may wish to change this policy. It is part of the immigration issue.
These issues are part of the robust national discussion. If Congress proceeds to "rush the issue" we will be poorly served by whatver legislation is passed. We need the extended discussion. Let's resist the temptation for a "quick fix solution" and instead delve into the "black hole" of immigration with a healthy national discussion.
Let the national discussion begin. We can re-visit the immigration issue next year after we have explored all of these issues, and others, in a frank and thorough manner.
Patience is a virtue. May we have the patience and consideration needed to form a better consensus.
Steve Moyer
Candidate for U.S. Senate
http://stevemoyer.us
RR 1 Box 60, Warren VT 05674 802-496-8917
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Just wondering . . .
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: Free People AND Free Trade
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: Free People AND Free Trade
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Free People AND Free Trade
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: Free People AND Free Trade
Posted by: macdon1
» RE: Free People AND Free Trade
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uphill on Mar 27, 2006 11:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: macdon1 on Mar 27, 2006 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Offer jobs and they will come
Posted by: rclord
Comments are closed-
Posted by: macdon1 on Mar 27, 2006 12:09 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Angry Retired American
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Illegal Immigrants
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gerdhansel on Mar 27, 2006 12:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since their wings got clipped in the first half of the 20th century, the robber barons have longed for a return to the heady days of the Industrial Revolution when Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller OWNED their laborers.
They will never give up undocumented slave labor because the minute these laborers become legal the fat cats can no longer pay them next to nothing and treat them like animals.
This is what's really at stake here, but most of us are so fixated on calling each other racists and wetbacks we can't see who the real enemy is.
The robber barons are using this race-baiting business to keep us divided against each other instead of going after the real enemies of the working man.
Force the corporations to pay ALL workers a living wage and treat ALL workers equally, and this problem will take care of itself.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: haddit on Mar 27, 2006 1:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: haddit
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: haddit
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ElisaDetroit on Mar 27, 2006 2:30 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hot damn!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Hot damn!
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 28, 2006 6:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I have posted before the horseracing industry is a $139 billion dollar industry and it is actually about number five in GNP. Because horseracing supports veterinarians, blacksmiths, farmers, transportation of horses, all the people employed in each of these industries, racetracks, and casinos. Look up how much Louisville, Ky makes during Derby week.
If you look at the hotel industry in major cities banquet bartenders make b$g buc$s as do doormen. Many of these so called horrible jobs aren't horrible at all, and do in fact support families. I keep trying to figure out how racetrack grooms buy new cars, live in New York or California, and send money home. Americans in those states know what the cost of living is, that is why they are having a hard time believing these people are making minimum wage, paying taxes, and living hand to mouth. There are people in all types of trades who know how difficult it is to make a way for their family, who are beginning to notice the illegal day laborers at 7-11 pull up in new Explorers. Americans don't have to rocket scientist to understand the rhetoric doesn't match what they see.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pimpdaddy69 on Mar 28, 2006 12:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: BoldA Changing World and Country
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jyork on Mar 28, 2006 12:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That plan was to create a sitution "on the ground" that would be impossible to deal with except by accepting the influx of ILLEGAL immigrants. Or, to "say" that it could not be dealt with to create yet another muddying of the issue.
Opposing ILLEGAL immigration, especially in the 20 to 50 million people range or more is not racist, not against immigration, nor is it protectionist. One must understand that there are a handful of people who have deliberatly not enforced our boarders to achieve a goal and that goal is to raise the US population to 500 million in 20-30 years.
Now stop to think who would benefit from that and you will understand the issue better, or, even at all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Mar 28, 2006 1:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Or better yet, why don't you switch places and see how the dirt builds under your fingernails and smell the pesticides being sprayed all around you. The immigrants will be here much longer than you. I'm only dreaming. But you see, Sensenbrenner, would you pay $5 for an avocado?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just a Dream
Posted by: freeda
» RE: Just a Dream
Posted by: freeda
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gerdhansel on Mar 28, 2006 3:43 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Consider how the love-hate relationship between undocumented immigrants and everybody else who works for a living in this country looks a lot like the conflict between union non-union workers during a strike.
Management can bust the union by sneaking in non-union workers to keep the factory running while the union workers are on strike. Sometimes financially strapped union workers will also decide to cross the picket lines. Those who cross the picket lines are called “scabs.” When the players of the NFL went on strike, for example, Randy White of the Dallas Cowboys crossed the picket lines and played with the scabs.
Nobody blamed the “scab” players for taking advantage of their once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to play in the pros, and some of the better scab players even remained in the league after the strike ended. But NFL owners had successfully humbled the union by fielding scab teams.
Major League Baseball’s union was stronger and their strike crippled baseball. It was the year without a World Series, the year that could’ve been for the Cleveland Indians, the year that drove the fans away.
All American citizen or legal resident workers belong to a “union” of sorts. They are the “protected, unexploited” union, which (supposedly) guarantees they will be paid a living wage; will be taken care of by worker’s compensation if they get hurt, and can form a union and bargain collectively with management.
Undocumented alien workers are the “scabs” in this scenario, because they are both unprotected and exploited, and will accept whatever pay they’re damn well offered because who are they gonna complain to, the Border Patrol?
Don’t believe the corporate propaganda that says undocumented aliens do the jobs Americans won’t. They are the “scabs” in an ongoing, nationwide “strike,” who will do the job for less money than their “union” counterparts, and put up with abuse that no “union” worker would ever endure.
They are the slaves of corporate America, which will lie, steal, kill and turn us all against each other to keep their supply of “scab” slaves flowing across the Rio Grande River. And they won’t stop until they turn all of us into slaves.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's really just union-busting
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: It's really just union-busting
Posted by: gerdhansel
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rclord on Mar 28, 2006 5:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And why aren't these companies being censured?
Oh right, I forgot. They control the U.S. government.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: isaiah 06 on Mar 29, 2006 6:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't you come up with a more dehumanizing term for ILLEGAL ALIENS? How about "OUTLAW MARTIANS." Is that scary enough?
The Nazis during WWII were able to criminalize millions of people based on their ethnicity and national origin. It was part of German law to first deport the Jews and other minorities in the 30s then to place them in camps in the 40s. Alternet has already published a few articles about the camps for ILLEGALS and other OUTLAW MARTIANS that this country is preparing.
The Jews, the Gypsies and the Homosexuals. They were all illegal not too long ago. Would you have been one of the good Germans who respected the law?
Look at the origins of U.S. immigration laws. They were based on eugenics, the creation of the master race. The same white supremacist notions that were used against the Blacks in this country were also used against the Browns and the Asians. As far as forced sterilizations based on eugenics, that also affected poor Whites as well. This is what we have in common.
Let me share with you an interesting quote by a German admirer of U.S. immigration policy:
"Compared to old Europe, which had lost an infinite amount of its best blood through war and emigration, the American nation appears as a young and racially select people. The American union itself, motivated by the theories of its own racial researchers, has established specific criteria for immigration, making an immigrant's ability to set foot on American soil dependent on specific racial requirements on the one hand as well as a certain level of physical health of the individual himsef."
--Adolf Hitler, praising the U.S. Immigration Act of 1924
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: isaiah06
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 29, 2006 8:20 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Still, those who should put effort into examining the ramifications of the U.S. and its foreign policies of intervention, are complacent enough to target the people at the bottom of the pile.
Storming Washington will yield farther reaching and more tangible results than simply trying to build a wall. The border is necessary, but not the sole solution.
You all know where your jobs have gone, but you're accomplises to the crime by smuggly thinking you got your Nikes at bargain prices.
That's it, remove all your drag - examine the labels. Where was it made? Why wasn't it made in New Jersey, or Arkansas, or Tennesee? Because you wanted it dirt cheap, that's why. And because, in your mind, it's perfectly acceptable for the rest of the world to starve. But now, starvation, and misery are no longer an historical past, nor a "foreign" thing. You're one pay-check from it yourself. So your knee-jerk reaction is to go on a witch hunt - good for the adrenaline high, but not a solution to the problem.
Corporate America is lying to you and had succeeded into lulling you into complacency, but where did it get you? It got you to anger and frustration. And not unlike the adolescent that grabs a gun and goes wild, you're ready to go hunting; thinking that Mexicans are in "season".
Jump in your F150s and head for Washington, goddamit!
By all accounts, illegal immigration has grown exponentially, but vigilantism and scare tactics are nothing more than a bandaid on the fish tank - the leak will eventually continue.
There's alot of rage going on in these topics, but viable plans are missing in action.
More about your government's heinous behaviour towards Latin America here
If you really believe that the U.S. has treated Latin America with equanimity and respect these past 165 years, then you're living in a fool's paradise.
There's still time to take the U.S. back from the scum bags that are serving themselves with the large spoon.
Hunt them down; you know exactly where they are!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pimpdaddy69 on Mar 29, 2006 8:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sernahahn on Mar 30, 2006 7:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Augh!
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: Augh!
Posted by: YogiBear
» I know, and it's wrong
Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: I know, and it's wrong
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: medstudgeek on Mar 25, 2006 2:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: conomic effects of immigration
Posted by: outsidea
» Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants
Posted by: catfish
» RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants
Posted by: cry0fan
» part 2 (was RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants_
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: Cesar Chavez used to report non-union illegal immigrants_
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: Joseph
Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Joseph
Posted by: outsidea
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 25, 2006 3:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: overage
» RE: BUSH AND CRONIES LOVE IMMIGRATION, LEGAL AND ILLEGAL
Posted by: puddytat
» RE: one more
Posted by: commonsensewithstanding
» RE: one more
Posted by: mzbuz
» RE: one more
Posted by: cry0fan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prophit on Mar 25, 2006 3:51 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly, that piece of legislation wasn't about the politicians, its about the Americans who are pressuring them to stop this wholesale slaughter of our nation economically. You have no idea the millions who are being coordinated by a group that is very effective in getting us all to call, fax and phone to stop this rampant ravaging of our nation and its economic foundation.
Its not about rascism, its about globalizing a one world work force at subsistance level wages. We are in the fight for our economic lives and if you don't see it, then your not affected and probably couldn't care less.
if you don't address this issue that affects working class Americans then you won't win marching by the thousands. You will be arrested for violating our laws and prancing around like Bush thinking its ok to flout our nations laws.
If they would break the law by coming here illegally, then they will break other laws and then we will dinintegrate into chaos and anarchy. Forget it. I won't cooperate with this whole movement.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: outsidea
» Typical bleeding heart that is aiding and abetting his corporate masters.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Typical bleeding heart that is aiding and abetting his corporate masters.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Typical wedge issue--divide and conquer
Posted by: geming
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: agarcia
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: djtyg
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Sorry, I am not a supporter of communistic economic systems.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Not going anywhere, I, unlike you believe in free speech! LOL
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: thinkverybig
» jennherne
Posted by: jennherne
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: zedaker
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: Violetflame11
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» You are right, Chasintrane01, but
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Thank you for the response, Chasintrane01.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Thank you for the response, Chasintrane01.
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Well, Prophit, let's think this through!
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Hey, its a fight for survival!
Posted by: rclord
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Oakland on Mar 25, 2006 4:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Attack on the Middle Class
Posted by: numen
» Right, Oakland, but there's plenty of blame to go around, here.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Your View(s) on this topic
Posted by: FedUp
» Well, fedUp,
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Well, fedUp,
Posted by: FedUp
» Truly, fedUp,
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Slowburn on Mar 25, 2006 5:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They should Pay their fair share of taxes, speak English and wrap themselves in American flags, any one else should be promptly ejected to make room for those that will.
It would be interesting to know how many of these marchers are paying social security taxes, unemployment taxes, or registered for the draft? do they consider themselves Americans, or do they believe they should get all the benefits of being Americans without having to contribute their fair share?
Any illegal immigrant that believes they are above, or simply disregards our laws should just keep marching right back to where they came from, because they are creating the same conditions in this country that they are trying to escape from in their country of origin in the first place. Would you, who ever you are, want to live in a house without doors? And frankly i am tired of paying almost a third of my wages to support those that are not willing to be Americans in America.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: andreamerida
» Where are your links to your so called facts? For instance.......
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Where are your links to your so called facts? For instance.......
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: Slowburn
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: agarcia
» Agarcia, you must be aware that
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» You're blind to the moral bankruptcy of your agrument
Posted by: sausage
» So a wrong hundreds of years ago justifies destorying the country now???
Posted by: Prophit
» Prophit, you're an idiot!
Posted by: sausage
» Oh, dear, more name calling.
Posted by: Prophit
» I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, Prophit, but
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: You're blind to the moral bankruptcy of your agrument
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: hafnjun
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: zedaker
» Medical/Welfare is only for legal immigrants and citizens
Posted by: andreamerida
» RE: Medical/Welfare is only for legal immigrants and citizens--NOT!
Posted by: agarcia
» Wait a minute, hafnjun...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: tresdelsol
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: warhol1
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: oldman52
» Re: Please get your fact straight
Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: e: Please get your fact straight
Posted by: agarcia
» Well agarcia, just think a little further.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: thinkverybig
» Damn right it's for Americans
Posted by: kooz
» RE: Damn right it's for Americans
Posted by: oldman52
» RE: America is for Americans.
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrGeneNelson on Mar 25, 2006 5:30 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Available references document the multi-million dollar NIF budget and the inter-relation between AILA and NIF. Frank was also executive director of "Immigration Works."
Chicago March 11, 2006 Demonstration
... Frank Sharry, executive director of the Washington-based
National Immigration Forum, said the Chicago rally would get
the attention of Capitol Hill lawmakers. Sharry's first
reaction when a Chicago participant e-mailed him photos from
his cell phone: "Wow."
Frank Sharry Info
Is This a Fair Fight?
ABP - July 8, 2003. This week, Spanish language TV featured a report from Frank Sharry, who spoke in perfect Spanish. The banner read "Frank Sharry - Ford Foundation." The Ford Foundation has $9.5 billion in assets. It works to keep America's borders open by financing groups such as MALDEF and NCLR. Adding in the virulent anti-American SPLC, and these three groups bring in more than $78 million a year to destroy America's sovereignty. Last year, American Border Patrol's total income was less than $50,000.
Is this a fair fight?
_________
Frank Sharry Profile
Executive director of the National Immigration Forum
Open Borders advocate
Refers to U.S. efforts to enforce immigrant visa compliance as "heavy-handed tactics [that] seem more like the old Soviet Union and South Africa."
Another AILA Connection: www.immigrationforum.org/PrintFriendly.aspx?tabid=732
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» So Frank Sharry has a viwpoint on the issues.
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: So Frank Sharry has a viwpoint on the issues.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Ahem peeringlynx...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Frank Sharry's Open Borders Background
Posted by: JessB
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kathat on Mar 25, 2006 5:33 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With 45million American children without health insurance, and aid to the disabled and elderly cut for our own citizens, we don't even have the resources to care for these people.
We have our own poor that everyone seems to forget about.
This is about NAFTA and American corporations making it impossible for the little guy to make a living in Mexico and South Amercian countries.
We let our corporatins rape and pillage other countries in the name of profit, that outsourcing leads to less production jobs here, and then we are expected to believe that the service jobs ought to go to the very people we put out of work in their own country??? I don't think so.
This isn't about racism, it's about common sense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xactly!!!!!!! What about the massive increase in street people in America?
Posted by: outsidea
» Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Your ignorance on the issue is not my responsibility. Educate yourself.
Posted by: commonsensewithstanding
» Your lack of intellectual discourse tells us who is who here!
Posted by: Prophit
» And what about the rest of us, Prophit?
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» Exactly my point!!!! In fact I do just that!
Posted by: Prophit
» Shows you what stereotyping does..... your off base completely.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Who cares how many march?? i don't
Posted by: fferris
» RE: Who cares how many march?? i don't
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 25, 2006 5:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That hasn't the proverbial snowball's chance. So far as I can tell, the critical dimension of the immigration issue is whether progressives can agree. I shouldn't be surprised that the acts in Congress have dividing the opposition as a motive. I could point to a hundred other examples of such.
At the moment, my community, where real estate values have been propped up by immigrants willing to live three families in a two bedroom cottage, is coping. That's not likely to continue for long, even if our Asian creditors do not call in our marks.
LA jails are now in a full scale race war, as are LA streets. The housing market is slipping. The bankruptcy bill is now law. Our public schools are struggling. Our public health system is in chaos. And on and on. We are in deep do-do. The question is how do we get our politicians to pay attention.
Hit the streets. It's as old as the Boston Tea Party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: zedaker
» Ending the designation "person" for corporations is gonna be tough.
Posted by: Sojourner
» And, please include ...
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: tussinup
» RE: I'm glad to see the streets full of protestors.
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Steve Adair on Mar 25, 2006 5:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: kathat
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: thinkverybig
» RE: Think about it...
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Mar 25, 2006 6:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A "Marshall Plan" to invigorate Latin American national economies could not only relieve the pressure on our own border and labor force, it could revitalize our own machine tool and capital goods sectors. Latin American capital goods have to come from someplace, why not our own "rust belt?"
Instead of IMF and World Bank austerity "conditionalities," sacrificing economic development on the altar of "debt service" and other usurious ripoff scams, all remaining Latin American foreign debt needs to be forgiven as was urged by the late Pope John Paul II. But for usurious IMF and World Bank lending practices that would land any US banker in prison, those countries would have repaid all their foreign loans years ago.
New long term, low interest credit needs to be extended, specificially directed to upgrade of Latin American economic infrastructure and industry. CAFTA and other globalist scams are not working. Aside for gutting the agricultural economy of my state, Louisiana, CAFTA is clearly not providing the national economices in Latin America the development capital to afford their workers sufficient employment opportunities to encourage them to remain at home. Economic development of the ecnomies of Latin America is the best way to deal with illegal immigration.
TagsNOLA
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why do they come?
Posted by: outsidea
» Excellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: xcellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: xcellent, that is exactly what Bush recommended. Glad to see he has....
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: birdman on Mar 25, 2006 6:59 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Invade Mexico! In a campaign of shock and awe, we storm Mexico City. Then we install an interim government, presided over by a U.S. Viceroy, while we prepare for "free" and "open" elections. In the meantime, we take over the mexican oil industry ...
-- Oh, wait! We just tried that in Iraq. Dang!
But seriously folks -- Just think for a minute about who profits from this whole mess. Our corporate overlords have done quite well by having illegal workers in this country. They have mostly accomplished their mission of driving down wages and working conditions for American citizens. Now the illegals can all go home, thank you very much. The nativist politicians can be turned loose against foreigners, mostly to stir up that Republican base, get them distracted from the mess in Iraq, get them turning out at the polls in November to keep American Republican, just like God intended.
Meanwhile, Americans are getting poor and desperate enough that WE'LL do the dirty and dangerous jobs soon enough. (Or we'll join the army.)
Oh, and that 700 mile wall? That's to keep US IN!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You are so right about that!
Posted by: Prophit
» Birdman, don't forget
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
» RE: Birdman, don't forget
Posted by: chasintrane01
» Hola, chasintrane01 . . .
Posted by: HeidiLockwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 7:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last night I went to a showing of Good Night and Good Luck followed by a symposium which included a panel of journalist. These journalist were members of the "liberal" news media that included Nick Clooney. I found them to be shills for the industry. Clooney went so far as to say, "I don't think there is a corpirate conspiracy other than to make money." In other words he doesn't think they have a social or political agenda. All media has an agenda, and today media chooses to bonk you over the head with its message. The message of the day is repeated over and over until the parrots are able to spew it verbatim. I have no faith in the credibility of any news medium with only one point of view. I have no faith in a news medium that doesn't look beyond the narrow perimiters it sets, to keep truth from being exposed. Alternet has yet to acknowledge the civil rights violations by the pro-illegal movement, and its proponents. Because if Alternet or any so-called liberal outlet ever really looked at the issue from the ground up, and not from a position of elite myopia, you might find the holes in your position. Like a neocon clinging to WMD you have drowned out the voices of opposition for your truthiness. In three years when the political landscape has remained unchanged don't ask why. The answer lies in the fractured Left's inablility to give voice to its own minority, because the same people who have always known what is best, still think they do.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» Yeah? Well what's your diatribe have to do with the topic at hand?
Posted by: sausage
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: JessB
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: chasintrane01
» RE: Like Clinging to WMD
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: veive on Mar 25, 2006 7:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Hahahaha, good one!
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sausage on Mar 25, 2006 8:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend of mine keeps telling me I should watch "A Day Without A Mexican," a film about a day when all Mexicans vanish from Los Angles, CA. and the hapless Anglos are left to do menial labor for themselves. I always ask, "But what about the Chicanos? They're American citizens, aren't they?" That's not the point of the film, however. So one day I will view it.
But why do Senators McCain, Hagel and Brownback support the plight of illegal immigrants from south of the boarder? Because the base economy, agriculture, meat packing, tourism, rests on the backs of Mexicans, Guatemalans, Hondurans and Salvadorans who risk their lives and run the gauntlet of horror for work in substandard conditions for low wages.
It would serve these venal, greedy, stupid racist Republicans right if they get their wish; Build a wall running from California, through the Gadsden Purchase and down the Rio Grande to the Gulf of Mexico. Then who will be left to butcher our hogs, pick our tomatoes and bus our restaurant tables?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You make erroneous assumptions that end with erroneous conclusions!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: You make erroneous assumptions that end with erroneous conclusions!
Posted by: outsidea
» Your the one who is wrong. Illegal immigration came first and then union busting.
Posted by: Prophit
» I am old enough too!
Posted by: sausage
» You just made my point, so your the one not reading right!
Posted by: Prophit
» prohit you are still doing it!
Posted by: zedaker
» I agree with you but its a catch 22. If you don't take that away from....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Narco-NYC on Mar 25, 2006 8:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: outsidea
» Name calling, name calling, name calling...........
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Bad Move
Posted by: overage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mincemeat on Mar 25, 2006 8:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
computer programmers in this country on account of cheap labor imported or outsourced. The buying
power of the working poor, and the lower half of the entire wage spectrum, is being destroyed by a
human tidal wave of illegals invading this country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: JPHickey
» RE: Our Economy Is Ruined!
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jax on Mar 25, 2006 8:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't care where you are from or your race or your station in life.... NO AMERICAN CITIZEN SHOULD HAVE TO COMPETE WITH ILLEGALS FOR JOBS AND HEALTHCARE.
Yes, most of us who contribute to sites like this one; are progressive minded; but enough is enough. We are a very welcoming people, but allover the United States communities are being destroyed by this activity and not just Black communities... increasingly many of the majority White communities are losing out on this devastating proposition.
I am no way near being a Bush fan or anything like that, in fact I think that HE IS THE WORST president to come along in my life time, and I am 39 years old. But, Bush is not pro illegal per se; he is pro Business and as long as businesses can hire people to work for slave wages and be happy about it; then that is what they are going to do!
Call me insensitive, if you must, but I have gotten to a point where I believe that we have to start thinking of ourselves first, and this spills over into getting out of Iraq and letting them deal with their own issues.
Companies who hire illegals will close if we decide as a nation not to support them. If you go to a store and they have illegals working in them...walk out.
In some of the midwestern states they are asking now when they call for home repairs who is doing the work, if illegals are doing it they keep shopping.
Again, I don't care who is here, but it is obvious that it matters how they got here and what they bring with them.
We should also start looking at the negative impact of Asian illegal immigration on this country; as well as Latin immigration.
Almost half of our own citizens don't have insurance; and even more are having a hard time paying for prescriptions to live; not to even mention the tensions that these people bring when they demand that American communities benefit them to their own demise.
NO MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. IF CONGRESS WON'T DO RIGHT BY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THEN IT IS TIME TO GET RID OF THEM. IF OUR BUSINESSES WON'T DO RIGHT THEN WE DON'T PATRONIZE THEM.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: outsidea
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: zedaker
» Yes, but they can be prosecuted and they can be run by "moral humans".
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: rosegypsi
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: zeldar
» RE: Illegals Gotta Go!
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RichardT on Mar 25, 2006 8:24 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can not have people crossing our borders illegally. This needs to stop. Employers that hire them and those organizations and people who shelter them need to be held accountable.
While we need to find a way to deal with the "illegal’s" already in the country, this is a totally different issue and the debate about this issue should not be linked to our efforts to secure the border by any means necessary.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mont on Mar 25, 2006 8:32 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: depressed wages
Posted by: zooeyhall
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Mar 25, 2006 8:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We have Laws
Posted by: oldman52
» Angrygramp
Posted by: jbwestwood
» Thats the whole point of this issue!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: We have Laws
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zedaker on Mar 25, 2006 9:10 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Most ag jobs are below minimum wage as are bussing jobs in restaurants!
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: raise minimum wage to $10/hr and tie it to cost of living index
Posted by: thinkverybig
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mpa on Mar 25, 2006 9:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Man was made for action, and to promote by the exertion of his faculties such changes in the external circumstances both of himself and others, as may seem most favourable to the happiness of all."--The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Part II Section III Chapter 3
In other words, its about time for the revolution in halting the greed of neo-colonialism. Its not in the best interest for the world(Earth) for economic-plutocracy to exist. Duh!
Oye immigrante yo te apoyo por toda mi vida. Tu y yo venceremos la opresion de los que se creen amos de toda nuestras vidas.
Have a good day,
Marcelino Peña
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» See? You make my point.
Posted by: Prophit
» Marcelino, I'm with you 100%...We are just living the "Harvest of Empire"
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: Latin American/North American History 101
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: About time...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sandra on Mar 25, 2006 9:11 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jennherne on Mar 25, 2006 10:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get a clue people. These very immigrants give far more to our economy than they take. This is not my claim but the claim of some of the most notable economists in the country.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: JPHickey
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: dlf
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: agarcia
» RE: jennherne
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mutternich on Mar 25, 2006 10:23 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We gotta get the Republicans out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Not only 'anti-immigrant'...
Posted by: sarahenany2
» RE: Not only 'anti-immigrant'...
Posted by: cry0fan
» Since when is making a slave of a desparate person.........
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LXM8899 on Mar 25, 2006 10:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: neogaia
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: khathu
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: kathat
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: LXM8899
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: overage
» RE: This is a country of Immigrants
Posted by: dlf
» THE DIFFERENCE IS THEY CAME LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT?????
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: THE DIFFERENCE IS THEY CAME LEGALLY!!!!!!!!!!!! GET IT?????
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gramps on Mar 25, 2006 11:07 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an attempt to provide the basis for a Nazi government in the United States. an attack on a minority population. What will you do with the twenty million Mexicans that have families and homes here? Will you build some more gas chambers and ovens like Hitler did? We are all children of immigrants. The Pilgrims were illegal immigrants. Read the inscription on the Statue of Liberty.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: gramps
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Sorry, gramps
Posted by: FedUp
» The reason there are spanish names in Calif and Texas is ........
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chasaturn on Mar 25, 2006 11:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Krotos on Mar 25, 2006 11:37 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nevertheless, a very good case can be made for limiting immigration. If you look at the history of immigration to the United States, there's been a conspicuous cycle consisting of four or five decades of liberal immigration policies followed by a similar length of time during which immigration was highly restricted. The previous period of open immigration was from about 1880 to 1920, when the ancestors of most of today's Irish-, Italian-, and Jewish Americans came to the country. The majority population felt just as economically threatened by the Irish, Italians, and Jews back then as it does by Latino immigrants today (e.g., the infamous "No Irish need apply" help-wanted signs), and viewed them with just as much suspicion, as low-class, crime-prone aliens who would radically alter America's culture and values if they became too numerous.
Starting in the 1920s, immigration became very restricted and remained that way until the mid-1960s. That was a very good thing for the newly arrived groups. It allowed them a generation or two to be fully assimilated into the broader society, a process made much easier when they were no longer perceived as invaders. Today, no one would be uncomfortable if their child married someone with a last name like Minelli or O'Reilly, or even think twice about it.
I'd like it very much if no one thought twice about their child marrying someone with a last name like Gomez or Ruiz. And to that end, I think we're overdue for another period of restricted immigration so that Latinos can become just as fully integrated into American society and culture as people of Irish, Italian, and Jewish descent are.
-K.Ai.-
(note: I'm reposting this from an earlier discussion which got archived shortly after)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Sensenbrenner's bill stinks,
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Sensenbrenner's bill stinks,
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 12:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 25, 2006 12:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: dlf
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: cry0fan
» RE: about 30% of all white Americans are part Indian (was RE: We aren't all immigrants)
Posted by: dlf
» serious versus parody/satire
Posted by: Michelle
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pacto on Mar 25, 2006 1:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 25, 2006 2:42 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Univisión has a viewership equal to that of CNN. It's prime newscaster, Jorge Ramos is viewed more than any Anglo-American counterpart. You can get the percentages and stats from one of his books: "Atravesando Frontreras", "La Otra Cara de América", or "La Ola Latina", all available in an English version at your local book peddler, or on the internet.
And that leads to another reality. Publications, auto manufacturers, cosmetics, investment companies, mortgage lenders, colleges and universities, clothiers, law enforcement, real estate agents, hotels and resorts, etc., etc.,etc. have all faced the reality of Latino buying power, and, in the not too distant future, their political clout.
Pretending to get a handle, at this late date on the "problem", is like trying to get the toothpaste back in the tube.
Latinos, in their "huge" numbers, and in all their racial combinations, differences; from Argentina to Haiti, to Venezuela, are here to stay.
So, by all means, build the wall, pass legislation, create detention camps. The giants around you are waking up.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: eality
Posted by: dlf
» RE: Reality of remmittances
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 25, 2006 3:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue of "illegal immigrants" was created as a result of our government's destructive "free" trade/market policies and as a result only big and crooked business got its share of all the free lunches leaving the rest of us with a higher bill in the long run. It's bad enough that these same shenanigans that cry about "illegal immigrants" and bringing puppet-style "democracy" are hell bent on copying the Mexican government's model of increasing poverty against the working class leaving them lost and scattered. There's no doubt that today's cons have no problem if a corrupt corporation or big business plucks an immigrant illegally for cheap labor but for those poor souls scattered and lost and trying to hang on to their lives, they just got to PERSECUTE them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cry0fan on Mar 25, 2006 3:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, this thread is a tour de force repository of neoliberal globalist propaganda.
Let's see if we can summarize all the talking point propaganda the pro-mass immigration fauxliberals are outputting here:
1. TINA==There Is No Alternative. This means mass immigration and the neoliberal rat race to the bottom is INEVITABLE, so just relax and enjoy it cuz it is an UNSTOPPABLE FORCE OF NATURE. Pure nonsense of course. But what do you expect from the neoliberals?
2. If you are against mass immigration from the 3rd world, then you are a Nazi racist. The race card! Hooks into the elite entertainment media propaganda that has been output for years that says that all white people are inherently racist and must atone for their sins. Pure nonsense, as I pointed out in this same thread elsewhere.
3. They were here first, so they deserve to come here. Another fauxHistorical canard. Tens of millions of white Americans are part native American, including me.
4. Anyone up for completing this list of pro-mass immigration neoliberal talking points?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't forget 'we r all immigrants'card
Posted by: kathat
» RE: Don't forget 'we r all immigrants'card
Posted by: dlf
Comments are closed-
Posted by: john henry on Mar 25, 2006 6:01 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: now the south has come north
Posted by: peeringlynx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Michiganman on Mar 25, 2006 7:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Close our borders to ruthless greedy countries/corporations NOT PEOPLE! Deal only with benevolent forces and see how fast the world business model changes.
Hey we are ALL immigrants! Don't slam the door just because there are fewer jobs here. The pigs are gonna win whether we close the borders or not. It'll just be a slower death!
Wake up folks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just another smokescreen
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Just another smokescreen
Posted by: peeringlynx
» ideas please
Posted by: kathat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zeldar on Mar 25, 2006 7:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!, but Plz count them first
Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Illegal is Illegal!!
Posted by: Uncategorizeable
Comments are closed-
Posted by: FedUp on Mar 25, 2006 7:52 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read this great article
Peace and prosperity has not been a hallmark of régimes in the hemisphere, and the consequence of U.S. intervention and meddling in Latin America is bearing this bitter fruit that so many North Americans oppose and attribute to some well-oiled, organized invasion from its southern border.
While it may be creditable to label it an invasion, it's roots are based on the treatment that Latin America has received from the U.S.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» AGREE 10,000% fedup, great link
Posted by: Michiganman
» RE: AGREE 10,000% fedup, great link
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: A History Lesson - Wouldn't have worked if the politicians in ....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thehodges1@prodigy.net on Mar 25, 2006 10:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MEXICO!! VIVA BIG BUSINESS!! So give it up Middle America. The President breaks the laws and creates a war to kill the young so give the illegals the right to own this country since you can't send them back to do for their country what they are doing for America. Help!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EQdi on Mar 25, 2006 11:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Should be real interesting watching how this plays out in Washington.
Immigrants and their supporters have shown the rest of America how to stand up against the bullshit Washington dishes daily. Maybe they'll get off their asses and protest the damn war.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: DJ
Posted by: peeringlynx
» I disagree! I think that demonstration with Mexican flags all over.....
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cinattra on Mar 26, 2006 12:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue is about fairness of competition between businesses that hire illegal immigrants and businesses that do not. The issue is about the social side-effects that illegal immigration has brought with it. The issue is about what is Mexico doing what are any of these foreign governments doing to promote job creation and economic opportunity in their countries? I'm sure there are other issues other readers could name as well. This is by no means an exclusive list.
The point to leave with is this stand up to your own governments and push for reforms like we do in the U.S. every two, four and six years respectively. March like that (500,000 march on L.A. on 25 Mar 06) on Mexico City and see what happens i.e. apply your rights where they will make the most difference.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The issue is bigger than illegal immigration
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tomo on Mar 26, 2006 12:25 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BaBe_714sa on Mar 26, 2006 12:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: THIS IS B.S.
Posted by: FedUp
» Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: Your wrong! Mexico SOLD California to the United States.
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 26, 2006 1:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask for their Green Card. If they do not have one it's into the van. Give them the option of military service or deportation. 4 years of service will get you expedited citizenship. It will solve two problems- recruitment and illegal immigration.
Join the Army and go to Iraq or go home to whatever rock you crawled out from under. If you don't respect our laws we don't want you.
We Arrest.
You Decide.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Next Protest-Show Me Your Green Card , Please
Posted by: Claudia
» RE: Next Protest-Show Me Your Green Card , Please
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nbrown on Mar 26, 2006 1:12 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If someone wants to move to find a job, that is his or her right. Using government coercion to prevent someone from exercising that right is anti-freedom.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: dlf
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: peeringlynx
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: No human being is "illegal"
Posted by: peeringlynx
» Aaaah and what country's laws does this freedom come from????
Posted by: Prophit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beausoleil on Mar 26, 2006 6:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: turning the new world order inside out
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: Your knowledge of Latin American History
Posted by: FedUp
» RE: Your knowledge of Latin American History
Posted by: cinattra
» RE: This may or may not enlighten you.....
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uphill on Mar 26, 2006 6:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Border is a national security problem too!
Posted by: FedUp
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dlf on Mar 26, 2006 6:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Cinattra, you have hit the nail on the head why aren't the marchers marching in their homeland?
2. Why is it they feel emboldened to demand another sovereign nation give them the rights of citizenship, without the burden of citizenship?
3. What is the difference between a pre-emptive strike against a sovereign nation by force or one that attacks the infrastructure?
4. Don't each serve to cripple the native populace?
5. If more than half of all illegal immigrants come from Mexico, and that country's average educational level is between 6th and 8th grade, how many of their young men and women are even qualified to serve in the armed services?
6. If as studies show a majority of illegal immigrants don't finish high school, how are they qualifying for jobs that natives need diplomas for?
7. If newly arrived illegal immigrants have no job references, how are they more qualified for jobs than natives, who are asked to provide them?
8. Do you consider hiring practices that give a clear advantage to illegal immigrants discriminatory towards natives?
9. If not why not?
10. Are you in favor of discrimination?
11. Under what circumstances do you view discrimination as acceptable?
12. What would you do to a politician in your democracy whose record showed a wreckless disregard for his/her constituents wishes?
13. Are Americans entitled to the government they pay for?
14. Why aren't people from nations south of Mexico marching against their border policies?
15. One day in April of 2005, the Mexican deportation center held 630 people from 150 nations, do you really believe both Mexico and America can provide adequate border security with a guestworker program?
16. Do you care if America can provide adequate border security?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
