Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bernie Sanders' Independent Revolution

By Blair Golson, Truthdig. Posted March 27, 2006.


The only Independent member of the U.S. House discusses his Senate campaign, and his plans to shake up our two-party system.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Blair Golson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Bernie Sanders won election as Vermont's sole member of Congress in 1991, he became the House of Representative's first Independent in 40 years.

Through eight terms in office, the former mayor of Burlington, Vt., has struck a maverick, middle path between Democrats and Republicans, agitating most often for pocketbook issues of importance to middle- and lower-class Americans: protecting Social Security, expanding access to lower-cost prescription drugs, raising the minimum wage, and promoting trade policies that protect rural and manufacturing jobs.

The Nation magazine, which profiled Sanders last August, had this to say about the congressman's ability to operate effectively across the political spectrum:

When the question of the moment is, What's the matter with Kansas? it's no surprise that Democrats want to know how Sanders wins tough races in an overwhelmingly rural state by drawing the enthusiastic support of precisely the sort of white working-class voters Democrats have had such a hard time hanging on to in recent months.

With polls consistently showing him to be far and away the most popular politician in Vermont, Sanders is currently seeking the Senate seat of the country's other famous Independent, James Jeffords, who is stepping down from office next year. In this, however, Sanders may be in for his toughest fight yet; his GOP contender in the race, high-tech entrepreneur Rich Tarrant, is the state's wealthiest person, and plans to pump upward of $10 million of his own money into the campaign -- five times the most money ever spent on a Vermont race.

The congressman spoke with Truthdig's managing editor, Blair Golson, about the current administration's standing as "the most reactionary government in the modern history of the United States," the failure of Russ Feingold's movement to censure the president, and the progressive revolution he hopes to lead in American politics as the junior senator from Vermont.

Blair Golson: What did you make of the president's Cleveland speech on Iraq?

Bernie Sanders: Same old, same old. Clearly what's going on in Iraq is a disaster; clearly the president has no plans on how to get our troops home. Just as he had no plan for waging war, just as he went to war under false premises. So his Iraq agenda is a disaster. My own view is that we need to bring our troops home as soon as possible. And by that I mean the majority in the next six months, and the rest within the next year. Polls indicate that the majority of Iraqis want our troops home, and we should respect their wishes.

BG: In light of the president's persistent unpopularity, should we expect increasing resistance to his policies in Congress?

BS: What you are going to see is a more unified Democratic Party, and you're beginning to see some modest dissent on the part of Republicans who, because of the president's free fall in the polls, are more comfortable doing that. You already saw that on the Dubai Ports World, you'll see it on budget issues, you may see it on the war, or environmental issues. There are virtually no moderate Republicans left in Congress -- but the few that are there may choose to stand up on some issues and speak out.

BG: Bush's numbers have been in a free fall for several months now -- since Katrina. Why haven't we seen Congress playing a more aggressive role up until now -- until his numbers have bottomed out to historic lows?

BS: Well, I'm not the leader of the Democratic Party.

BG: Sure, but my question wouldn't only apply to Democrats.

BS: The answer is that the Republican Party is a tightly controlled party in Congress, and they don't tolerate dissent very easily. People lost their committee chairmanships, people don't get access to campaign funds when they dissent. That's been the history of the modern Republican Party in Washington. But we'll see some Republicans, because of Bush's free fall in popularity, show a little bit more courage.

BG: In the wake of the WMD scandal and the botched rebuilding of Iraq, can we expect tougher questioning on Iraq?


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Blair Golson is the managing editor of Truthdig.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's Time for a REVOLUTION
Posted by: thinkverybig on Mar 27, 2006 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The immigrant uprising, fair and decent wages to live, corporate abuse of illegal immigrants, failures by the United States government to enforce laws sooner resulting in the present chaos, corporations paying CEO's 2500 times more than the average worker, the government allowing monopolies therefore creating systems where the few control more and so on, unfairness in our justice system where the majority is of one race or those who are poor, unfair trade practices or no trade at all with nations of color, ignoring poverty in the U.S and worldwide, neglect of our own poor and middle class for the benefit of big business, politicians being bought out by lobbyists and corporations, politicians giving themselves pay raises while millions are without jobs and 45 million plus are without healthcare, lack of compassion and help for poor nations worldwide, failure to institute campaign finance reform, government corruption, outsourcing of american jobs and more are reasons America is in need of a revolution. It's time for a change in our political, social, and judicial systems in this country.

With so many other important issues we could be addressing, we choose to invade two other countries, spend over 350 billion in tax payers money, and be responsible for over 2500 U.S. Soldiers lives not counting those who are injured emotionally and physically. And also the tens of thousands of Iraqis and Afghans we have killed and scarred for life. Where are our priorities or is it all about the money.... not the people. It's time for a CHANGE and the sooner the better folks... It's time for a REVOLUTION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Throw which rascals out? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: It's Time for a REVOLUTION Posted by: rboska48
Excellent article and the hope for change a brighter chance
Posted by: HawkSpirit on Mar 27, 2006 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People are so demoralized about being able to change things in Washington with the Democrats and here is a man standing up to big money and using his grassroots organization to good effect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go, Bernie!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 27, 2006 2:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh yes. Both Parties are mired in corruption and need to be completely overhauled. The fact that Hillary Clinton is now the odds-on favorite to win the 2008 nomination is just further proof - as if any were needed - that the party of Franklin Delano Roosevelt has has plunged into the ideological sewer. When Russ Feingold stood up in the Senate and called for a censure of the most corrupt and incompetent president in United States history, his fellow democrats deserted him. What a bunch of faggots! Is Russ the only person in the senate with courage? Apparently.

As for the Republican party, it must be destroyed. DESTROYED, I SAY!! (Does that sound angry eenough? I'm workin' on it). Dwight D. Eisenhower once said in a letter to his brother, Milton, that if ever the day comes when a political party tried to do away with social security or interfere with the rights of workers, "you will not hear from that political party again in your lifetime". Ike was not the dottering old fogey we sometimes portray him as. In fact, the old bugger had alot on the ball. Remember his warnings about the rise of the military industrial complex in the final address of his presidency? I rest my case.

Bernie Sanders' candidacy is cause for hope. Our fouding father's vision of the future of their republic did not include ANY political party and calling for a third one does seem self defeating - BUT IT IS THE ONLY WAY OF DEFEATING THE STATUS QUO! And as far as the presidential race in 2008 is concerned....

Did I hear someone say, "President Feingold"?

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Go, Bernie! Posted by: thinkverybig
» Third party Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Go, Bernie! Posted by: Steve Adair
» Faggots? Posted by: Nheduanna
» RE: Faggots? Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Go, Bernie! Posted by: hhartman
» RE: Go, Bernie! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Go, Bernie! Posted by: hhartman
Censure and other matters
Posted by: kgs1947 on Mar 27, 2006 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Censuring Bush is just one important step toward reform of the current government system. It is crucial, I think to not only censure him but to impeach him. I see it as a #1 priority as we continue to address how he has undermined the very infrastructure of our nation. Why does the current Democratic leadership feel that censureship or impeachment will take away attention from other important issues? It makes no sense to me. They have a job to do and the current administration is undermining their responsibliity to do it. So, start with step one and keep moving forward!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are they really that stupid?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Mar 27, 2006 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"it's no surprise that democrats want to know how Sanders wins tough races in an overwhelmingly rural state by drawing the enthusiastic support of precisely the sort of white working-class voters democrats have had such a hard time hanging on to in recent months."

Maybe, you pea-brained democrats, can't realize alot of people want somebody that isn't bought and sold like most of our "leaders" and "representatives".

It's all a sham. democrats are swine gobbling up all they can at the trough just like the repugnicans. The democrats just don't have the tusks like the nasty boars that call themselves republicans.

I sure hope Sanders wins. The last thing we need is another politico that bought his or her position in the "government."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The independent congressman and the independent voter
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 27, 2006 4:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bernie Sanders has the right idea. We have two parties to work with just as the congressman does. Both are corrupt. We have the most reactionary government in modern history because both parties are financed by the same reactionary corporatocracy. The corporate establishment that would take us back to the age of the robber barons.

Like Congressman Sanders, the working class voter must fight both parties. We have an advantage that he doesn't have. That is, we outnumber the opposition.

While the congressman calls for a grassroots movement to take the control away from the Republicans and the monied interests, I think that we must take away control from both parties and the monied interests.

We can take control if we ignore parties and ignore candidates and focus entirely on the issues that concern us. Issues such as healthcare, exportation of jobs,, living wages for all, a more equitable tax structure, and a dozen more that are important to us.

We can take control of both parties now when our votes are powerful: after they're cast our votes have no power until the next election. Make both parties accountable before the election. We simply have to tell both parties what we want and tell them that we won't support any candidate that doesn't support our issues. We have voted for the lesser of the evils too many times. Voting for a party's candidate who will not carry out our agenda is a losing game.

Join The Lincoln Initiative and make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. This is a true grassroots movement. There is no organization, no leaders, no registration, no contributions, no meetings, and no hassle. Fight the revolution from the comfort of your home.

Click on Join us and bring your friends

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Independence!
Posted by: AlanSmithee on Mar 27, 2006 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bernie is being very diplomatic, but he's also very correct as far as he goes. The only way out of the horrible situation we've created for ourselves is the long long road of Independent Action.

Here's the first step: Voters For Peace

Sign the pledge. Get organized. Declare your independence!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Independence! Posted by: Lincoln fan
much more aware
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 27, 2006 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bernie Sanders is much more aware of where the USA needs to go than most Democrats. If the Democratic Party doesn't move toward the Sanders positions many more Democrats will be lost to Independent progressives and the dems will shrink and shrink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

decent dissenter
Posted by: decenter on Mar 27, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the political system that we have is a 200 year old relic that was the best option to deal with the constraints of travel time and limited communication peculiar to that era. I don't suggest revolution but, instead, evolution. Maybe it's time for an un-mediated democracy where our direct votes decide where our tax money (money=power) goes. Do you think that the founding fathers would have come up with a representative republic if they had the option of direct voting using the internet? I, for one, don't think that I am represented in Washington, I would not be spending 60% of our taxes on the military and a pittance on caring for the sick and injured in our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: decent dissenter Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: decent dissenter Posted by: rboska48
» RE: decent dissenter Posted by: 5000dx
You Tell'em Mr. Sanders
Posted by: lively56 on Mar 27, 2006 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have always admired Rep. Bernie Sanders for his tenacity in Congress. I think it is a shame that my Democratic Party has stooped to the level it has. The people of Vermont have voted for Mr. Sanders as their Congressman for a lot of yrs. now, so I have a feeling they're not going to let some greedy self serving millionaire, who thinks by throwing a bunch of money around, is going to win. The people of Vermont have to much to lose. How about a Sanders/Feingold for President ticket in 08?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Tell'em Mr. Sanders Posted by: triana1326
"middle path?"
Posted by: mozillafs on Mar 27, 2006 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Through eight terms in office, the former mayor of Burlington, Vt., has struck a maverick, middle path between Democrats and Republicans..."

Middle path? The guy's an out-of-the-closet socialist, god bless him. The problem I have with Bernie is that once he's gone, so is the movement behind him. He hasn't joined the Progressive Party, he hasn't built up a non-personality-based electoral organization. He needs to grow some coattails, to ensure that more progressive left candidates and issues succeed when he leaves the political scene.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This makes it simple: Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: "middle path?" Posted by: 5000dx
FROM VERMONT - WE LOVE BERNIE!!!!
Posted by: Be_a_Citizen_4_a_Change on Mar 27, 2006 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We love Bernie in Vermont. I was amazed when I first moved here a few years ago and attended my first BERNIE BARBECUE at a local church. People of ALL political persuasions showed up to pay homage to BERNIE because he shoots straight and doesnt mince words. People respect that, even though they may not necessarily agree with him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Money where mouth is" -- CONTRIBUTE already
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Mar 27, 2006 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting:
Here's a story in which Bernie Sanders ... bernie.org ... probably as close to 'one of the good guys' as we have these days... explains how the other guy is willing and able to try to BUY the election -- and 'we' don't mention the URL at which to make a contribution.

Personally, I think it matters: not only that we contribute, but that we contribute directly through BERNIE.ORG

(Did I mention that it's BERNIE.ORG ?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Time for a CHANGE
Posted by: thinkverybig on Mar 27, 2006 11:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The United States immigration policy needs a complete overhaul. My question is this. Why are Cubans allowed to come ashore to the U.S. and Haitians are sent back at sea? This blatant act of racism is shameful and disgraceful and should be changed immediately. The United States is so set on trying to maintain control of its super power status that it doesn’t care who it tramples on the keep it. But what is the reason for not allowing people of color to enter into the U.S. other than racism. What is the reason it has allowed illegal immigrants to come in the U.S. and work for wages well below minimum wage? For businesses to continue to prosper while keeping the bridge wider between the rich and the poor, which is a new form of present day slavery by big business with the U.S. Government’s approval. Haven’t we had enough of free labor? I think 400 years of it is quite enough and by the way, where is that 40 acres and a mule you promised those slaves?

While the republicans were spending millions of dollars of tax payers money to investigate and impeach President Clinton, we could have been focusing on issues such as illegal immigration, poverty, jobs for Americans, campaign finance reform, political corruption, the outsourcing of jobs to other countries, the environment, overpaid CEO’s, outlawing lobbying, outlawing monopolies, corporations taking advantage of citizens with ridiculous late fees on credit cards, bank teller fees and more

It’s time for a change in our political, social and judicial system. The time has come. I’m ready, are you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bernie Is the Real Thing
Posted by: davidt on Mar 31, 2006 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have met Bernie, worked for his campaign, played in a duo for a fund-raiser he had at Marlboro, VT. He is a joy to listen to because--he listens to you BEFORE he speaks. Let me repeat that. He listens to you BEFORE he speaks.

He is a shrewdie from the big city--NYC, he started as a mayor who was concerned that everyone gets a fair share of the pie--which is what politics is really about. Look up politics in an etymological dictionary and you wil see the word--people.

Bernie is about the people, and since he has much experience in dealing in DC bullshit he knows who, how and when to get things done.

Since he is blessed with an obdurate sense of justice & COMMON SENSE he can articulate with unerring accuracy what are the basic needs of a human being. AND, as those needs evolve with the advancement of the years the permutations of those needs do not escape him.

The guy who I played with at the fund-raiser for Bernie told me that he went to DC on a vacation with his family and he made an appointment to meet Bernie. Guess what? He showed on time and he spoke with him at length! Take a stab at how many dudes in DC you can tell that story about! By the way, my friend is an auditor in a small bank in NH-not a high-roller by any means.

Finally, we do NOT need a revolution, we need a RESTORATION.

The current mess we are in, and it is considerable is an almost unrecognizable contortion of the genius of our Founding Fathers. The basic nuts & bolts of democracy are well-camouflaged right now but through a steady series of "cauterizations" of the corporate assaults to cleanse the infections put it place by the Almighty Political Donor Class, we will begin to restore our Democracy.

Democrat? Republican? Independent? Socialist? Who gives a damn, really! I can think of no more able foot-soldier to begin this battle and recruit other sympaticos than Bernie Sanders.

David T. Gray
Claremont, NH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]