Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Budget and the Damage Done

By Rose Aguilar, AlterNet. Posted March 22, 2006.


The 2006 budget clipped the wings of many organizations that provide basic services to the poor. Bush's 2007 budget could ground them permanently.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rose Aguilar

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Every month, 80-year-old Sally Shaver pays someone to drive her to the Harvest Hope Food Bank in Columbia, S.C., to pick up a box of fresh produce, baked goods, dry cereals, juice, canned goods and cheese. "It really helps me out because after paying for my rent, phone bill and medication, I barely have enough for food," she says. "If I could work, I would, but I have an artificial knee and a pacemaker, and I can't get around."

Shaver, who worked as a nurse's aide for most of her life, brings in $451 a month in social security. Her fixed income qualifies her for the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP), which is designed to improve the health and nutrition of low-income senior citizens, pregnant women, postpartum mothers, infants and children.

Last year, CSFP provided 536,196 people with a monthly box of food. Bush's proposed budget for 2007 calls for a nationwide elimination of the entire program.

"As a food bank, we are very concerned about this program. When you have a growing population of elderly in this state, how are we going to find other resources to replace it?" asks Denise Holland, executive director of the Harvest Hope Food Bank. "We have already been serving these seniors for two years, and they have gotten accustomed to this. I can't turn people away in wheelchairs. My heart won't let me do it."

Holland says if the program is cut entirely, she'll seek food and financial donations to ensure the neediest recipients continue to receive their monthly box of food. "Because they are on a fixed income, this box makes the difference between them not having enough to eat for the month to really being able to spread it out over the month," she says. "When they experience hunger, their health is going to decline, which is going to cost us more to help them in other ways."

The Harvest Food Bank serves 56,000 people per week in 18 South Carolina counties, but is only able to offer the CSFP in two counties because of funding constraints. Bush's 2006 budget cuts forced the program to cut the number of boxes it offers from 1,400 to 1,200 per month and that's just in two counties. More than 350 low-income senior citizens are on the program's waiting list.

South Carolina ranks second nationwide for the highest percentage of hungry people and fifth for the highest percentage of individuals with food insecurity, according to the Center on Hunger and Poverty.

Child care's ugly death

Because kindergarten isn't required in Indiana, affordable child care is crucial for low-income single mothers like 25-year-old Shalaywa Murphy. Her $9.95 an hour job as a sterile processor qualifies her for voucher assistance at Imagination Station Child Development Center in Michigan City, one of only two licensed daycare centers in the area.

Murphy's 6-year-old son attended kindergarten at the center until she went on a six-week maternity leave. "If you're on maternity leave, your child can't continue daycare unless you pay for it," she says. "Because I don't get paid maternity leave, I can't afford it, so my son is now home with me, and I worry about his education."

Because Murphy is low on cash and wants her son back in school, she plans to ask her doctor if she can go back to work a week early. The problem is, her newborn is on a waiting list with 150 other families who are also eligible for voucher assistance. "You have no idea when your name will come up," she says. "I'll probably have to pay $120 a week, and it'll be hard to make ends meet."

The 2007 budget cuts would result in an even longer waiting list, says Deborah Chubb, executive director of Imagination Station.

"We have people that come in here every day who can't get on the list and can't get a job because they can't afford child care," she says. "We've also had a lot of problems where people get in and then get a raise and no longer qualify. That creates a revolving door because they can't afford to pay $140 a week and end up losing their jobs. It's an ugly death."

Imagination Station cares for 123 children ranging in ages from 6 weeks to 12 years and is open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m. to accommodate working parents. "We work really hard to try to get low-income families in here because the kindergarten that is offered is only half a day. It's insane that you have to pick up your kid at 11:15 and take them to a child-care provider," Chubb says. "Imagine if you work at McDonald's. No one is going to let you run over and pick up your kid. I've offered one mom to pick up her kid because she can't do it."


Digg!

Rose Aguilar is a San Francisco-based journalist who recently returned from a six-month road trip through the so-called "red states." She is writing a book about her journey.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Revolution
Posted by: peritonlogon on Mar 22, 2006 1:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does it strike anyone else that the actions taken by this administration are made specifically to provoke a revolution?

Are lobbyists, corporations, and the 'elected majority' so powerful and arrogant that, in the effort to grab all the money and power from our withering system, they would cut off their own feet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Revolution Posted by: thinkverybig
» They will cut off their own feet Posted by: Lincoln fan
» Thanks I needed that. Posted by: Lincoln fan
death and life
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 22, 2006 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More money for death and less money for life makes complete assholes of the right-to-life Bushies and their supporters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: death and life Posted by: Pseudo Morals
Biggest financial scandal in history?
Posted by: ceti on Mar 22, 2006 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Iraq, they were playing football with bricks of $100 bills, while malnutrition and absolute destitution is increasing in the US... This is so disgusting, that no comment is even necessary...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tired of this?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 22, 2006 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Bush's budget makes cuts in services that people need, while continuing tax breaks worth trillions of dollars that go overwhelmingly to the wealthiest among us."

The obvious reason for this is that our government's job, like all governments, is to protect the rich and powerful from the poor and weak. It isn't a question of which party is in power. Although the Democrats seem to be the lesser of the evils, both parties are financed by the corporate establishment. Both parties represent the establishment; neither party represents the people. We are back to the days when our forefathers' battle cry was "Taxation without representation is tyranny!".

Armed revolution is out of the question but a peaceful revolution is called for. To save our country we must take control of both parties. We must force them to do the will of the majority with justice for the minorities.

Make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" a reality. Join The Lincoln Initiative a non-partisan grassroots movement. We are a federation of voters each demanding that his/her most important issue be supported by both parties. We have no organization, no leaders, no registration, no contributions, and no meetings. Click on Join us today

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They call themselves Christians!
Posted by: tclaverdure on Mar 22, 2006 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So in the GOP world Jesus tells his sheep to steal from the poor and give to the rich? Why do the Dems not contiuously point out this glaring hypocricy? GROW A SPINE Demowimps, ask Sen. Feingold how its done I am sure he can set it straight. Gore/Feingold 2008.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you INSANE?!?! Posted by: J-
» Gore Is a New Man Posted by: nergohs
» RE: Gore Is a New Man Posted by: J-
» RE: Are you INSANE?!?! Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: Are you INSANE?!?! Posted by: Maryanne
» RE: They call themselves Christians! Posted by: famouspipeliner
Fear & Loathing in the Carlyle Group
Posted by: fiskhus on Mar 22, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While your story regarding the death of true public service is important, it should come as no surprise to anyone.

George Bush and others associated with his family and businesses are of a social class that actively fears poor people and wants them dead, as efficiently and expeditiously as possible.

The BUSHCO pursuit of the death of the poor also satisfies another GOP policy goal - the destruction of the public's trust in government. This is the real reason for everything BUSHCO has implemented at a policy level. Their seeming incompetence, especially, speaks to this policy objective. After all, it is their inability to get things done that will have the desired effect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gazooks
Posted by: gazooks on Mar 22, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You think that this is bad? We ain't seen nothin yet. The naivety and ignorance, born of conditioned arrogance and self delusion by American Government inspired culture is nothing less than astounding! Ever wonder where that pervasive sense of helplessness originates every time that you read of a new outrage? It comes from being fooled again, and again, and again. (meet the new boss) We all believe the LIE. We want to believe the LIE. We don't count ourselves responsible for our own decline, most of us only suspect that we actually are in decline. As Zappa sang," It can't happen HERE". Well, guess what? Eisenhower warned and had it almost exactly right. Imagine, the greatest prophet of the 20th century was a Republican General! It wasn't Leary, Dylan, Abbie, Malcolm or Martin. It was Ike who warned of the GREAT LEACH that would systematically disenfranchise American citizens and destroy a free and equitable society. He was right, and it's almost over. It IS happening here. The current distraction in Iraq is only symptomatic of the underlying disease. We have all swallowed the LIE that we are the deserving moral superiors of the world with God (or not) on our side, and sold our political souls to the landlords of corporate America. Our destiny now is to serve as example for surviving democratic nations of the Great Lesson. The Boomers, born with the greatest expectations that humankind had ever entertained, dropped the ball, and WE HAD THE BALL! (or a ball) But, despite our great enterprise, don't expect to end your life with the same prospects for your children that we only managed to flirt with. The GREAT LEACH will see to that as it sucks the last vestige of personal power and freedom to choose from the tired, poor and weary. But why should we complain? How dare we complain! We allowed ourselves the grand privilege of being unable to distinguish faith from knowledge, and history from hysteria or when enough was enough. And we can't help our children avoid that abyss, we're too concerned with own appointment with oblivion. So, enough. Get used to having less, and seeing your family, friends and neighbors having less. There will be more. More poor, more untreated illness, more under and mis-educated, more uniformed keepers, more hopeless homeless, and more, many, many more wondering what happened. What happened to America? (read: Empire of Debt)
("...so if you see your neighbor carryin somethin, help him with his load. And don't go mistakin paradise, for that home across the road") Dylan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gazooks Posted by: Lincoln fan
It's not what we spend as much as how it is spent.
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 22, 2006 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole system is horribly perverted and broken. Given the amount of money our government spends and has spent over the years, the streets should almost be paved with gold.

It's more than obvious that our federal, state and local governments are rife with graft, theft, cronyism, waste, carelessness, ineptitude and outright fraud. What that has given us is a debt-ridden system that does very little well, costs us a great deal and serves everyone but the very well connected poorly.

Why is it that we can afford a trillion dollar misadventure in the middle east but cannot afford to adequately care for our elderly, our working poor and our children? Why is it that in the world's wealthiest economy tens of millions live in dilapidated trailer parks and public housing?

I'll spare the finger pointing, but our government and society is in a race to the bottom and what we will end up with is a dangerously stratified society. Our policies have been and are creating a PERMANENT underclass that is poorly housed, educated, fed, protected, cared for and employed. That is the formula for a revolution. Maybe not today-- but somewhere down the road.

The real attraction and genius of America has not been all of the sh*t we were taught in Civics class-- it was the knowledge that anybody who worked hard enough could better their standing and pass along a brighter future to their children. That whole system is on the endangered species list.

The new system will result in a number of classes:
1- The Super Elite who are liquid financially, go to the best private schools and universities, have choice access to healthcare & credit and live in gated communities.
2- The Elite who have access to most of the same things with preferred credit and live in gated communities or upscale neighborhoods.
3- The working trolls who have borrowed insane amounts of money to secure a Public University Education for an underpaid job and an overpriced mortgage in a community with good public schools.
4- The squeezed, who have just enough training, credit and skills to just get by but not ahead. Too rich for assistance and too poor to get ahead. Their kids will get to go to poorly funded and equipped public schools while living in ever less secure neighborhoods.
5- The underclass, who live in the worst housing, go to the worst schools, live in the very midst of a criminal economy, depend on a rapidly shrinking social safety net, work in below living wage jobs (if at all) and are just about completely cut off from any chance of opportunity to get ahead.

We are well on our way to this condition and, like a cartoon snowball rolling downhill, the speed is accelerating. The longer we wait to reverse this the more expensive, hard and long-term it will be.

What are you prepared to do about it?

Every vote counts and is precious. Put your elected officials on notice, put local party officials on notice. The status quo is not acceptable. Get with the program or start typing up your CV. They will not understand anything else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly what we do Posted by: Lincoln fan
» class structure Posted by: wli
Well, get ready for more religion in government...
Posted by: adso on Mar 22, 2006 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like the "Faith-Based" programs are about to get the strategic situation needed to infuse more religion into government.

Hmmmm...let's see...If I cut financing to government social programs while concurrently increasing Federal Budget monies, the People's money, to faith-based groups to "assume" the government's role in those areas (or, more accurately, to defacto assume a position in government, given the tax money and all...)...hmmmmm...(insert best Papa Bush mind-voice here)..."Might be prudent... .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Budget - Schmudget
Posted by: chasaturn on Mar 22, 2006 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No money. No budget. Simple. We're broke, don't forget that, folks. And what do we do with people who steal everything and murder countless thousands? Why, we "reelect" them, of course. Wonderful place, America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To Promote the General Welfare
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Mar 22, 2006 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's pretty clear by now that our Govt has given up on that line. Unless you happen to mean the welfare of the Rich.
Here's some reality.
I make 29,000 a year. Not tuppance but not great either.Mortgage...$820/mnth,Utilities..$350/mnth,monthly income...$1751.
Now I just had my tranny go out in my car. Nothing flashy,a '98 Winstar. Still ,it cost me $2002. The only way I could pay for the car was to take out a second mortage.
They told me they could'nt give me a line-of-credit because I owed some bills,imagine that. My Mechanic needed to be paid right away. I needed my car right away. Enter the check joints.Between what I had on hand and what I could scrape out of the check joints, I was able to pay for the car. But everything else took a major hit. Mortgage got paid but not much else.By the time the bank got around to making me an offer,I had debts over my head and contemplated being a 'research patient'. Since I was assured,by the Bank, it would only take 2 weeks to get,I went for it. It took a month and a half!! Rolling over the checks just to eat,no bills,just food for the family. Thank God I had some value in my modest house,waiting out the bank,and the creditors was tense, but you knew there was money comming. Even if the wait wrenched your guts. There was a time when I did'nt have this safety net.
That's nothing compared to a great many folk way worse off than I. It'll be tight but I'll get along. Being $40 above the limit for Govt aide, I have a special place in my heart for the Poor. The fact is, if you make 40 or 60,000/yr YOU'RE POOR!
If you're raising a family,you're DIRT POOR. This Govt has left the People behind. They don't care for the low income,save as canon-fodder,or slave labor in hazardous or
menial employment.
The canceling of programs for the poor will have one direct impact. People will be forced to do whatever is neccessary to
survive. Unfortunately that means the crime rate in poor districts will rise. More poor People will be put in prison to become part of the untold slave labor force. More housing for the Poor will be deemed 'unliveable' and torn down for the next Valet Parking Shopping Mall. Or even left on a roof to roast in the sun,surrounded by the stench of death and decay,
only to be shot for grabbing food,water and blankets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

timeless
Posted by: timeless on Mar 22, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what about declaring bank rupt or some similar process. start again(how to start again, here and now?) build up this country first and formost. Rediculous to give away what is such a scarcity now. Think of all the people who could use a job that would afford them life. Throwing stones at the neighbors who also have glass houses makes what kind of since? Let there exist the seeds of intelligence. aloha

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This gutting and cutting of social programs began with Raygun!
Posted by: mombot on Mar 22, 2006 7:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone remember that cuts to programs that help women, children and the poor started under pres. Reagan? As soon as he got in, he cut pregnancy programs (ones that actually cut pregnancy rates!) right after he took office. Bush II is just keeping in line with the GOP agenda. It's the 80's all over again without the big hair.
Our family is just above the limit for any sort of benefits; food is so expensive and I'm allergic to wheat and dairy products, so most programs that give out cheese don't help me. Non wheat products cost more, Soy milk costs more than cows milk; you get the picture.
All this food in this country and we let people go hungry just because they don't have the money! This has got to change. I figure that we should adopt a Star Trek ideal; hunger eliminated!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are you ready to pick up the slack?
Posted by: Undercover Brother on Mar 22, 2006 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
did you ever help the homeless person on the street that asked for some change??

not to get all Whitey Ford on ya but i listen to the so called Dems and/or liberals say how bad the response was to Katrina and other storms but when they showed up in our city they did nothing.

in fact, most of you did nothing regardless of party or beliefs.

my home was opened and used, not only by victims from the Gulf States but to our troops coming home to sleep in cars and trucks parked at the end of my street.

i wish i had money to give these people to get a hotel or even apartment. but i do have left-over food. i can stop buying that latte and give half the 3.75 to the homeless person at the bus stop....heck i can even start a savings account for MY future.

i work for a good company (don't like the industry much since it causes many of these problems) work with good people but they are fat and unhealthy so and they continute to cry about stories like this...but do you think they would give up that latte and Krispy Kreams???

of course not...would you??

or even better question...will you??

it was all our responsibilty to these people when it WAS in the feds budget...nothing has changed now that it has been cut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the point of "starve the beast"
Posted by: wli on Mar 23, 2006 12:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The right wing wants to bankrupt and discredit the government in order to turn the country into a theocratic plutocracy at the mercy of right-wing billionaires by virtue of its immense debt. They've largely already succeeded and made this a fact on the ground. The trappings of theocracy are largely Dominionist/Calvinist notions to morally justify/motivate plutocracy.

In any event, the party's over. Even if the US withstands the drive for plutocracy it's been irrevocably Thirdworldized. The only debate anymore is how soft or hard the landing will be.

It's preposterous to pretend that the electoral arena is anything but rigged 19 ways from zero. The actual repositories of power must be captured in order to have any effect, probably by stealth. These are transnational corporations, immense fortunes, military/intelligence institutions, and the like. Ridiculous games about voting one way or another will get you more of the same (as per the Democratic Façade).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]