comments_image -

Water, water everywhere

As long as you can afford it.
March 17, 2006  |  
 
Advertisement
 

The patronizing tone of today's AP article on the world water summit is a bit hard to take: "Water is worth fighting for-- even to the death, activists holding an "alternate" forum outside the world water summit said Friday. That attitude might seem strange in developed countries, where water flows at the touch of a faucet. But it isn't nearly as accessible in the developing world."

There's some big problems with those opening lines. First, it shouldn't be "strange" to any U.S. reader of international news that water is a limited resource. Big dams have displaced hundreds of thousands of people everywhere from India to the Phillipines to Mexico. But second, we have plenty of water problems here in the so-called "developed" world. In fact, the development is a big part of the problem.

One of the dams that's causing the most trouble here in the U.S. is the dam on the Klamath River. The problem is dear to me because I grew up on the Salmon River, a tributary of the Klamath, and the salmon sure don't run there anymore. The Klamath is too shallow and sick now to sustain the fish. For the first time ever, the Department of Fish and Game is considering banning all salmon fishing along a large part of the California and Oregon coasts.

But it's not just the dam that's to blame, it's the Bush administration. In 2002, the Bush administration chose to ignore its own federal biologists and diverted more water from the Klamath River for farm irrigation. As estimated 70,000 fish died of disease and suffocation because of the low water and high temperatures that resulted. According to a 2003 report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, it was the worst die-off in history on the Klamath, and possibly the entire Pacific Coast.

According to a government press release, the Bush administration is sending the U.S. Undersecretary for Democracy (did you know we had one?) Paula Dobriansky to the world water forum. The press release says that the focus of the meeting is "local action," which the U.S. "strongly supports."

Maybe someone could suggest to Ms. Undersecretary that local action, and equitable water distribution, begins at home.

Rachel Neumann is Rights & Liberties Editor at AlterNet.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]