Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

F/X Plays the Race Card

By Sheerly Avni, Truthdig. Posted March 15, 2006.


A new reality series has a black family and a white family switch skin colors. But is that really the whole difference?
bruno200x150
Black/White

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sheerly Avni

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

UPDATE: The show's producers, under fire from its participants, alter parts of the show that were deceptive. Episode 2 of the show airs Wednesday, March 15.

"Black.White.," a six-part series that debuted last night on the FX channel, bills itself as groundbreaking and provocative television, a fearless exploration of racial tension in America. In theory, it could be.

Its premise is provocative enough: Two families -- one black, one white --are made to live in the same house for six weeks in the San Fernando Valley, with camera crews following them around as they grapple with the impact of skin color in America.

Plus, there's a twist: Before almost every day of shooting, the families undergo three hours of makeup magic to effect a complete swap of their racial identities. Brian, Renee and Nick Sparks, a black family from Atlanta, get spray-painted pale skin, light-colored wigs and everything else it will take for them to pass as white. The white family -- Bruno Marcotulli, his girlfriend Carmen Wurgel, and Carmen's daughter Rose -- are all made up to look black.

And the conceit works, thanks to the show's makeup experts, whose previous credits include the race-swapping comedy "White Chicks," the gender-bending film "Big Momma's House" and the spectacularly gruesome "The Passion of the Christ." Made up in skin drag, both families are let loose on the streets of Los Angeles, followed by either hidden cameras or a crew that tells curious passersby only that it is "shooting a documentary on families."

As the series unfolds, we watch 18-year-old Rose -- adorable in a shellacked wig and slathered in enough dark foundation to almost obliterate her teenage acne -- try to make her way through an Afro-centric spoken-word poetry workshop. Forty-one-year-old Brian Sparks, on the other hand, hidden behind an unfortunate but very effective red mustache, sits in on a focus group on racial attitudes among white men, and must endure hearing one of the men in the group admitting that, after he shakes a black man's hand, he feels compelled to wash his own.

Meanwhile, 48-year-old Carmen -- an attractive blond location scout with heavily aerobicized triceps and a proud liberal heritage ("my parents were active in the civil rights movement") -- has to shop for outfits for herself and her boyfriend for their visit to an all-black church. Carmen's choice? An African-print dashiki.

If all this sounds like a Chappelle skit gone to graduate school, that's because it sort of is.

Gangsta-rapper-turned-actor Ice Cube served as the show's co-executive producer, in addition to writing its theme song, "Race Card." R.J. Cutler, who made the groundbreaking 1993 documentary "The War Room," a behind-the-scenes look at Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign, is the one who developed the idea. Cutler hesitates to call the film a documentary, but he has also taken great pains to distance the series from the much maligned and wholly contrived world of reality TV, calling it instead a "reality experiment." As you might imagine, the project has not been free of controversy. Nelson George, an eminent hip-hop journalist, activist and himself a producer of a documentary about race in America, went so far as to tell the Los Angeles Times that this kind of television is "phony and dangerous."

Phony, maybe, but not dangerous. The white adults -- Bruno and Carmen -- are a parody of smug ignorance, fond of expressions like "I'm coming from a place of …" and "I want to speak with an open heart." But it's Bruno, a 47-year-old substitute teacher -- the kind who you just know tries to high-five the kids and doesn't even notice their snickers -- whose behavior most begs for a smackdown.

Bruno is full of hokum about "personal responsibility," and "getting back from the universe what you give to the universe," and good or bad energy, but what he is most excited about, he tells his incredulous housemates, is the chance to be called a "nigger" by an unsuspecting stranger.


Digg!

Sheerly Avni is a San Francisco-based writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
other reasons why black people are poor
Posted by: hmmm? on Mar 15, 2006 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Rather, it's the fact that so many of the people who happen to have black skin are also desperately poor, and for plenty of complex and not particularly TV-friendly reasons: a devastating historical legacy; failing educational systems; welfare reform; measures like the Rockefeller Drug Laws (which have done more to destroy black families than anything else since slave days); the list goes on and on." - it would have helped if you had mentioned in the rest of the "list" of why certain black americans are poor---black fathers abandoning their children, the black community perpetuating violence against itself, black youth peer pressuring each other to not assimilate or become white and speak correct english or try in school etc. You might have meant to include these in your list or not but for the sake of fairness they deserve to be included. *Also, i dont know if you can say this is strictly black americans, as many immigrants from Nigeria and Haiti have worked to become educated and financially comfortable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why bother analyzing?
Posted by: YogiBear on Mar 16, 2006 6:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All TV shows like htis one are going to either seek out people who will be confrontational to each other, or be so absurdly ignorant so as to be comical. Of course the woman on Black White would pick out an African type dress -- if she wasn't the type to overdo it, the family wouldn't ever have been selected. Or perhaps, the producers encouraged them to go all out. Or perhaps both.

This is the formula for all of these "reality" shows. What purpose is there to analyze the behaviors of TV people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black White is a good catalyst for discussion
Posted by: sugamretniw on Mar 21, 2006 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think hmmm's comment kinda goes to the heart of the point of the article. We as Americans seem to not be addressing the fundamental causes of poverty and ignorance. I believe that poverty is a symptom, just like absentee fathers and violence in black communities. Why do so many black men leave their families? Do we honestly believe it's because they just like to travel? Or because they're still trying to get the hang of polygamy? I don't think so and I bet if many of these men were asked why they left they would give a myriad of reasons all fully shared by men of other races and ethnicities. The only difference statistically would be how the African-American men dealt with those feelings. I think the best and all-encompassing explanation of the problems confronting the African-American group is the loss of their culture many hundreds of years ago. If culture is defined as the traditions, beliefs and behaviors that unify a group and give that group a single lens to see the world then I don't really see how any one could argue anything but that African-American's only real culture is that of racism. Meaning that perhaps the only force that unifies most African-Americans is the belief that America does not like them. While some people might claim that that is enough of a unifying concept I would disagree - strongly. As a thought experiment, imagine that there were some ray or beam that could broadcasted over America that would change all Indian's(from India) skin colors to resemble that of Caucasians. I don't believe that they would cease being "Indian". They would still have their language, traditions, history, and uniquely "Indian" perspectives on the world of which I believe that the majority of them are proud of. Can we say the same of African-Americans? Maybe, but I don't believe so. I think a lot of Black people would embrace their new complexions and give NO indication what their race was a day ago. For many African-Americans, their history began with slavery but when slavery was abolished, unlike the Jews, who were able to reclaim their heritage following the holocaust, Blacks in America simply moved from mental / physical bondage to a mental /economic one. I think that institutionlized racism has and still does tremendous damage but I also believe that African-Americans still perpetuate the slave-culture that we were infused with hundreds of years ago. I believe that African-Americans pass around a sort-of "idealogical" virus so like hmmm pointed out, why do Black kids seek out and riducule other Black children who are performing well scholastically? If you think about it it's totally irrational behavior but very systematic, in fact, too systematic for mere children to implement on a national scale. I believe that it's the virus at work and I think if we look at the statistics we would have to agree that it is a very effective process.

Just my two cents, Adieu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]