Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pledges and Punishment

By Esther Kaplan, AlterNet. Posted March 15, 2006.


The director of an HIV prevention program explains how the Christian Right's growing control over U.S. foreign aid policy may cost Indian prostitutes their lives.
031506_story
indian prostitutes education
Advertisement

Since George W. Bush's first day in office, Republicans in Washington have come up with creative ways to attach puritanical restrictions to U.S. foreign aid, often at a tremendous cost to public health.

First came Bush's revival of Reagan's Mexico City Policy, which canceled funds for any family planning organization that advocates for abortion rights, a measure that pulled tens of millions of dollars from International Planned Parenthood and others on the far right's enemies list. Then came a State Department missive to USAID missions that all funded programs, publications, even websites had to fall in line with Bush's social conservative worldview on everything from abortion to drug use. Then Congress used the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, to set aside $1 billion for abstinence-only education, which bars discussion of condoms and safer sex. Most recently, Republican congressmen introduced a series of anti-prostitution loyalty oaths, requiring any organization receiving U.S. funds to combat AIDS or human trafficking to condemn prostitution in word and in deed.

This injection of conservative social mores into U.S. foreign aid policy has been fueled by what Rep. Barbara Lee of California has called a "coordinated campaign of false innuendo," led by such groups as Focus on the Family, which held a Capitol Hill briefing last year demanding that USAID be purged of its "liberal cancer," and by Republican ideologues like Representatives Chris Smith of New Jersey and Mark Souder of Indiana, each of whom seek to forge reputations as Capitol Hill's holiest. The strictures have produced a wholesale restructuring of who receives U.S. funds around the world -- from experienced family planning, AIDS, and relief organizations to public health neophytes such as Rev. Franklin Graham and the National Association of Evangelicals.

But harder to trace than who's joined the gravy train is what's happened on the ground to those who got kicked off. A consortium of international family planning organizations released a report, "Access Denied," in 2003 (updated in 2004) examining the impact of the Mexico City Policy. They documented a hobbling of HIV prevention efforts in Ethiopia and Zambia and, ironically, a potential uptick in abortions in Romania, where it is now harder to encourage women choosing abortions to access birth control in the future.

A recent Washington Post story noted that Brazil's decision to forgo $48 million in U.S. funds rather than sign the anti-prostitution pledge has put financial pressure on the nation's successful effort to combat AIDS. AlterNet had the chance to speak with Meena Seshu, director of Sangram, a small but widely respected HIV prevention program in western India, about how this crusade by social conservatives in Washington has reached all the way into her rural town.

With 5.1 million infected, India has the second-largest AIDS epidemic in the world -- smaller only than South Africa's in sheer numbers -- and infection rates among certain high-risk populations, including sex workers, has reached a stunning 40 percent. For 14 years, Sangram has been doing HIV prevention work among several thousand rural sex workers, helping them to form a prostitutes' collective, known as Vamp, which has lobbied the national government for improved condoms, enforced a 100 percent condom usage campaign within local brothels, and branched out to educate truckers, migrant workers and rural youth about HIV risk.

Sangram and Vamp together have survived on less than $150,000 a year -- even less now, since Sangram returned a $12,000-a-year grant to USAID last summer after refusing to adopt "a policy explicitly opposing prostitution," as the law requires.

Months later, Sangram remains in the crosshairs of the morality brigades. Evangelical missionaries targeted their town for a "rescue" last May, raiding the local brothels with military force to recover underage girls (they found only two). Last September, John R. Miller, head of anti-trafficking initiatives at the State Department, openly accused Sangram of thwarting efforts to rescue minors from brothels. And in early February, Rep. Souder circulated a dossier about the organization at a State Department briefing on Capitol Hill, accusing Sangram of "retraffick[ing] women back into a brothel" and calling for heads to roll at USAID. "It was a little over the top," said one Democratic congressional aide who received the document. "But USAID and the Global AIDS coordinator are feeling intimidated."

Just politics as usual in Washington these days, perhaps. But the consequences are serious for those, like Meena Seshu, who are on the frontlines of the global AIDS fight.

Esther Kaplan: So explain why you need to organize sex workers in order to combat HIV. This idea is extremely foreign on Capitol Hill.


Digg!

Esther Kaplan is a contributing editor at POZ, the national AIDS magazine, and author of "With God on Their Side: George W. Bush and the Christian Right" (New Press, 2005).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
addicted
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 15, 2006 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bushies are so addicted to false religious dogma that they are killing thousands in greedy warfare and killing millions with their ignorant and depraved sex/reproduction policies. As aids and other diseases spread throughout the world the Bush/Cheney death toll will become gigantic. Impeach all of the Bushies for spreading death throughout the whole world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: addicted Posted by: Gregor
End church tax exemptions
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 15, 2006 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans need to demand an end to the tax exemptions now granted to religious organizations at the local, state and federal levels.

These hundreds of billions of dollars each year -- of our money! -- are used to fund oppressive programs like the ones described in this article. That money also is used to fund various religious right hate campaigns such as the effort to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage.

The religious right's strange and hateful agenda is bad enough without us being forced to pay for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nd church tax exemptions Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: nd church tax exemptions Posted by: brenda123
» RE: nd church tax exemptions Posted by: Orwells_nightmare
» Not the answer Posted by: matilda
right wing poo
Posted by: saywhat? on Mar 15, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i regret to read articles like this knowing full well that our policies have done so much damage to the international community...it must be the secret strategy to keep americans dumb and working ...it wouldn't be so bad if we just cut funding, but we have to poke our nose into other countrys and their business....this is where sandra day o'connor and her criticism of the right wing judiciary is so absolutely clear...diligence is needed on the part of the left...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Foreign Policy and the Devadasis
Posted by: eastcoker on Mar 15, 2006 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Foreign policy has really devolved since I was a kid. My father has always been against it, and it only seems to be getting worse. Get the Christian Right out of the US government.
This is the same problem that is going on in Uganda with regards to the Christian Right and US foreign policy and condom distribution. This makes me sick.
I am a member of the Christian Left and I am deeply offended by the behavior of my Christian brothers and sisters on the Right. I am bringing this article and this issue to their attention to the best of my ability.
You know where the problem starts? Sexual repression. The Christian Right can not even *talk* about sex without blowing a gasket.
It is no wonder they have such a *mis* understanding of sex workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

where are the MEN?
Posted by: T.S. on Mar 15, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No talk of pimps, no talk of the millions of men who rent the insides of female bodies to rub their penises against just because women's humanity is valued so little they can. Why can't we talk about men's selfish sexual entitlement that is the true cause of spreading AIDS and disease among prostituting girls and their wives alike?

Why are the men who have so very much more power and control over these situations always left out of the conversation? I hate Bush as much as the rest of you, but Bush did not cause this problem however much his reductivist plans aren't helping solve it.

The girls in the picture above do not look over the age of 18. Look at them and ask yourself if they look like adult women to you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: where are the WOMEN? Posted by: Crazy H
» OK, but... Posted by: Lauren
» legalizing sex work Posted by: cicatrix
» RE: where are the MEN? Posted by: eastcoker
GOP Genocide Recipe
Posted by: abqbabe on Mar 15, 2006 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not merely oppression of women sex-workers. The Bush administration may appear to be simply trying to force situationally inappropriate, Western, Puritan morals on Indian prostitutes (and those of other countries). However, by using this as an excuse to deny aid for health care, family planning, and AIDS prevention they are essentailly condemning tens of thousands of people (mostly women and children) to early death, and possibly hundreds of thousands more to disease, want and malnutrition.

This is an ugly policy that exceeds mere conservative, male, Christian arrogance. That would be bad enough alone. In practice, what it amounts to is a selective war on the poor and underprivliged of nations we are supposed to be helping. Perfectly in keeping with ethics consistantly displayed by this Administration, of course. The poor and lower classes of any nation (including lately the US) are looked on [by the Bushies] as a sub-human class, as disposable as tissue paper once their usefulness has been wrung out of them. Why should the "immoral" poor of nations competing with us for increasingly scarce resources be saved?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize prostitution in U.S.
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 15, 2006 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some feminists are using the evils of prostitution -- and there are some -- as an excuse for male-bashing. You often see these people on TV inveighing against the male exploiters of women, etc., etc.

Actually, the exploitation of women -- and there is some -- that occurs in prostitution is just more reason to legalize it and regulate it carefully. This has been done in much of Europe and Asia, and works very well. In places where's it's well-regulated, women who enjoy the sex industry -- and there are many -- are able to make a good living safely and with dignity.

As the man-haters and Bible-thumpers espouse their (alleged) concern for those victimized, it would be more sensible for Americans to legalize prostitution and clean up the industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slavery is just another word...
Posted by: Lauren on Mar 15, 2006 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for nothing left to lose. This body ain't worth nothing if it aint free. A Spirit then's got nothing left to shake the blues... cause nothing, aint worth nothing... (tune fades out).

If a woman does own her own body... she should be able to sell it for sex if she wants to.

Men are willing to pay for this. Many women around the world have no other economic choices. Prostitute or starve to death. It is a sellable comodity. For some, it's all they have.

The effort to outlaw and punish it's every form is a way for these strange people to impose their religious ideas on very poor and defenseless people; in effect, to control and kill them. Exactly an attitude you would expect from the decendents of the owners of slaves. They feel entitled.

The religion is a sneaky way for these men to own slaves; it manefests in all kinds of strange ways. I am glad their Wagons Are Circling, soon they will realize how outnumbered they are, their bravado will collasp. We will then be better able to solve real world problems, save and improve our environment and people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The commodity of sex Posted by: eastcoker
» RE: The commodity of sex Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: The commodity of sex Posted by: eastcoker
Twiss Butler
Posted by: Twiss Butler on Mar 15, 2006 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Journalist Esther Kaplan gives a clear and revealing picture of the activities and attitudes of Indian health worker/organizer Meena Seshu.

Kaplan undercuts her reportorial credibility, however, by failing to interview a representative of a non-faith-based organization that has no difficulty working effectively for health and welfare of women in prostitution while rejecting prostitution as inimical to women's health and their social and economic status. In view of the fact that such organizations can readily be found in India (see www.catwinternational.org), there is no excuse for Kaplan's allowing to go unchallenged Seshu's misrepresentation of PEPFAR and the organizations they fund as telling prostituted women that they are "terrible people and that you're anti-them." Nor is it accurate to assert that these organizations are unable to work well with prostituted women and respond to their needs. They do it all the time.

It is no compliment to Alternet's readers that Kaplan assumed that Seshu's version of the facts would be uncritically accepted. An unbiased reader might well note that Seshu's method of cooperating with brothel owners and exploiting their employees' longing for self-esteem ends up promoting the activity that intensifies the spread of AIDS. Moreover, Seshu's dismissive reference to the government's identification of customer demand for prostituted sex as the key causal factor should be seen for what it is - a deflection of responsibility from the customers for their primary role in the AIDS calamity.

Twiss Butler

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]