Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Crash Course in Racial Perceptions

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, Pacific News Service. Posted March 7, 2006.


Want to know what's really behind Americans' racial biases? See the surprise winner of the Best Picture Oscar.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[Editor's Note: Although some of AlterNet's bloggers and writers have aired heavy criticisms of "Crash," Earl Ofari Hutchinson presents his reasons why it was the right choice for the Academy.]

"Crash" deservedly won the Academy award for best picture because it forces blacks as well as whites to honestly confront their stereotypes.

The film sets the course from the start when it goes squarely for "racial correctness." The opening shot has two young blacks charging out of a restaurant steaming mad. One of them claims that a waitress ignored them, then gave them lousy service, and the whites in the restaurant gave them hostile stares solely because they were black.

Then a white couple passes them on the street, and the wife locks arms with her husband for fear the two men would mug them. In an angry tirade, the angered young black covers the wide gamut of myths, stereotypes and negative perceptions that whites supposedly have of blacks.

While "Crash" pierces and pokes fun at racial stereotypes, it's the black perceptions about those stereotypes that makes the film unique. Many blacks take it as an article of faith that that most whites are hopelessly racist. A comprehensive Harvard University opinion poll in 2002 found that the racial attitudes of many whites about blacks are tightly wrapped in stereotypes. The poll reinforced the fervent belief of many blacks that whites racially disdain them. It's not that simple.

The majority of whites are probably genuinely convinced that America is a color-blind society, and that equal opportunity is a reality. They repeatedly told the Harvard pollsters that they believed blacks and whites had attained social and economic equality. Sure, the figures on income, education and health care show a gaping racial lag between blacks and whites. However, perception drives reality.

If many whites think racial equality is a reality, that's more proof to many blacks that whites are in deliberate racial denial. But many whites don't claim blacks are treated equally simply to mask their racial hostility to blacks. They no longer see "Whites only" signs and redneck Southern cops unleashing police dogs, turning fire hoses on and beating hapless black demonstrators. Whites turn on their TVs and see legions of black newscasters and talk show hosts, topped by TV's richest and most popular celebrity, Oprah Winfrey.

They see mega-rich black entertainers and athletes pampered and fawned over by a doting media and an adoring public. They see TV commercials that picture blacks living in trendy integrated suburban homes, sending their kids to integrated schools and driving expensive cars. They see blacks such as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in high-profile policy-making positions in the Bush administration. They see dozens of blacks in Congress, many more in state legislatures and city halls. They see blacks heading corporations and universities. Many whites actually believe that racial problems are a thing of the past and that blacks who incessantly scream racism about their plight are afflicted with racial paranoia.

On the other hand, many blacks erroneously assume that whites live an Ozzie-and-Harriet life of bliss and are immune to personal and social angst. They are puzzled when middle-class whites shoot up their suburban schools, and neighborhoods, bludgeon their children in their homes, use and deal drugs, have high suicide rates and commit bizarre anti-social acts. They don't hear and see whites' pain.

In "Crash," a middle-class white couple lives in a cloistered world, scared of and angry with minorities and in perpetual turmoil. It's fear, ignorance and paranoia to the nth degree. But it also makes perfectly good sense to them to feel as they do. The truth is that millions of whites are also trapped in a downward cycle of need and poverty, and have about as much chance of crashing into America's corporate boardrooms, joining university faculties and getting elected to Congress as do poor blacks. The sense among many whites that they are fast losing economic and social ground in America fuels much of their fury over affirmative action programs.

In the film, a white LAPD officer comes off as an unreconstructed bigot. Yet he's also beset by the psychological pressure and financial burden of taking care of his ailing father. He blames his father's medical and financial slide on the loss of his janitorial company's contract to a minority-owned company. Perhaps he's wrong, but that's what he believes. Many whites think that society is spinning out of control and that they have little power to run their lives. They see the federal government as the culprit. They blame it for being pro-higher taxes, pro-bureaucracy, pro-immigrant and pro-criminals' rights.

A mix of economic slippage, political cynicism and personal alienation, not blind racial hatred drives much of white anger toward blacks. An equal mix of personal alienation, false perception and distrust drives much of black anger toward whites. That's the not-so-subtle message of "Crash."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. He is the author of The Crisis in Black and Black (Middle Passage Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
HereticSpeaks
Posted by: HereticSpeaks on Mar 7, 2006 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do believe that the powers that be, stimulat the hatred between the races, because IMO if the races really got togther, they could destroy the ruling class, without violence, but like Europe STRIKE, Shut down everything, Tranportation, Communication, Military, Water / Sewer treatment, Etc.
The 1% ruling class can not keep the country going without the workers, everything would grind to a stop.
I do not think that will ever happen, UNLESS, the economic bottom drops out, and we have a depression like the Great Depression, and the public has nothing to lose, Starve like sheep, or die fighting for real freedom....

Que Sera, Sera.....

Later

Dirk

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

truth
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 7, 2006 3:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crash speaks more truth to power than power wants to hear and blacks speak more truth to power than most whites want to hear. Whites in the white house cannot speak any truth at all because the more the people know the truth the faster the Bushies will fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peer Above the Table
Posted by: evd on Mar 7, 2006 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that racial tensions between whites and blacks is a diversion created by the rich whites to take focus off of the gluttony of the richest 1%. Not unlike a banquet table where the rich are in a feeding frenzy and tossing occasional crumbs to the rest of us below knowing that we will fight each other for those measly crumbs rather than strive to peer above the table and see that there is so much to be shared and thus demanding that more be shared with the rest of us.

All of this is beautifully explained in "A Peoples History of the U.S." by Howard Zinn. A wonderful book that should be required reading in every high school across the U.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peer Above the Table Posted by: bwbrenton
» RE: Peer Above the Table Posted by: ALANHESTER
» Guide to the truth Posted by: evd
tbalx
Posted by: tbalx on Mar 7, 2006 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is curious to me that so many bloggers and writers have criticized this movie...what is the underlying theme of that? I think it is more than perception on the part of those bloggers and writers--so what is it? The need to always have a hierarchy so there is always someone to trample? What is it? How can anyone see that movie and not see your own self and question your own self? Ahhh, there it is--so much easier to question someone else's self.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tbalx Posted by: Brucewxx
» RE: tbalx Posted by: tbalx
» RE: tbalx Posted by: dlf
» RE: tbalx Posted by: Shalimarali
» RE: tbalx Posted by: Shalimarali
» RE: tbalx Posted by: dlf
I watched "Crash" a coupel of months ago
Posted by: sausage on Mar 7, 2006 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I ended up being disgusted with every character except the Latino locksmith.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Danielle, screw you Posted by: sausage
Quality of the movie
Posted by: brunowe on Mar 7, 2006 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although some of the perceptions in the film were on target, the plot of the film was overladen with coincidence. The flaw in Mr. Hutchinson's take is seen in his not discussing the quality of the movie as a movie. I didn't think it even deserved a nomination given the exclusion of The Squid and the Whale and A History of Violence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quality of the movie Posted by: stuck_in_FL
Re: racial tension via Crash
Posted by: nietgal on Mar 7, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't go to movies because I'm old/alone and it's not fun to go to movies. However, I read all about it. Since the Oscars treated all my caring life subjects, I have lived the black/white experience which has influenced my own perception of social interaction. Also I'm white and Israelite/Jewish and lived my first 20 years in an all black neighborhood in Washington D.C. which had both segregation and jewhating laws.

I learned to separate myself from blacks the very first day I crossed the threshhold of my first grade classroom. These strangers, all 6 YO whites, pointed their fingers at me and said "you play with coloreds". I never played with coloreds again. By the next grade my mom got me in kheder in the Southeast Hebrew Congregation which her family helped start. I also learned the whites hated Jews in the meantime.

It wasn't long before I thought to myself these powerful thoughts which I could never say outloud until now. If these white kids hated both Jews and Coloreds, then why didn't they make Jews go to school with the Coloreds. I wouldn't have minded. I thought, if they did that, I wouldn't have to go to two schools. I would be learning Hebrew and Bible and English and everything else in one school. Also I couldn't understand why the Coloreds hated Jews too.

As I grew older and listened to my two caretakers, mom and her sister, talk secret language talk "Yiddish", I realized something else. Jews looked down "Schwarzes" too. I didn't know the language, but I grew afraid because I said to me, the Coloreds, just like me, could understand the language even though they couldn't speak it. And like me, they knew what they would feel when they became an adult and had to take care of themselves.I just knew for my very life I could not breathe a word of this to anyone. It was much to powerful a thought for any adult to cope with. I said to myself, I know the real reason for not putting Jews in the Coloreds school. It's because they would all become Jews and Torah learning makes you smart.

By the time I was in high school, I knew how right I was. The stats said that it was a miracle. In medical school with a tight quota system against Jews, the vast majority of graduated physicians were all Jewish.

I tried out my theory at a local Jewish community center by saying that I raised my kids that it didn't make any difference to me whom they married as long as I had Jewish grandchildren. You should have seen the contorted faces that resulted in the group!! Half a century later, nothing changed.

I've about exhausted my own study of Bible history from 600 BCE to 600CE. I was shocked to see the word "taurat/torah" 16 times in the Koran. So now I really do see the entire majority of the world as Israelite/Jewish. I've studied MEIN KAMPF and created a MEIN KAMPF JEW FILE. I knew that Hitler knew all this. I've learned that Constantine when he created Christianity in 350CE, made it a capital offense to study Talmud. Just like Hitler.

The news today from Israel is that organized crime has taken over.

It seems that everyone on Earth does everything possible to avoid studying Talmud Torah in the original language. Torah was translated into the word "law" by the Greek Jews, but it's all the first five books of the original Christian BIBLE which is still used by the Catholics. So the only way to fight terrorism is to acknowledge the Big Five, and everytime you say "give me a five", everytime you shake hands, think Torah.

USA police should get a crash course in Talmud Tractate Sanhedrin which can give a basic legal course. Just know that the Hebrew in Isaiah hasn't changed for 2000 years. You can be an atheist and know Hebrew and lead the Talmud Tractate Sanhedrin and learn a lot to be a just human being.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Different Strokes
Posted by: dlf on Mar 7, 2006 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny how we all could see the same movie and walk away with such different understandings. I think every person in the movie was redeemed by their humanity.

Also while the author thought both Sandra Bullock and her husband (Brendan Frasier) were insensitive to race I found Bullock's character to be the overtly racist one. I didn't like the fact that the Black males were all portrayed as weak an image we see far too often, without the counter-balance of a Black man with substance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: Deep
» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: sh
» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: dlf
» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: Deep
» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: dlf
» RE: Different Strokes Posted by: 5bta3
Simplistic
Posted by: whitneybauman on Mar 7, 2006 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the analysis of the movie you present here is, well, too simplistic and typical of "American" views on race. First of all, the movie is about much more than black and white racial tension, something which your article tends to ignore thereby reflecting the reduction of racial issues to "black" and "white" that plagues the wider society. Second, and less seriously, though I agree with you that the content of the movie was good, the acting and execution of the film was hardly "best film" worthy. I thought the Oscars were about awarding cinematic acheivements, not only challenging ideologies. I mean how could a movie with Sandra Bullocks in it win over a movie with Philip Seymour Hoffman? Furthermore, it is not as if Capote and Brokeback Mountain didn't deal with challenging norms!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Simplistic Posted by: dlf
Stereotyping stereotypes
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 7, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hollywood and journalism often have the subtlety of a sledgehammer. That's what sells. "Novel" does not mean "new." It means being clever about the same old same old. Like sit coms. I gave up half-way through "Crash," because it promised the same old soap opera plot with the same old soap opera characters and the same old soap opera dialogue. (After "Pulp Fiction," clever dialogues between gangsters became old stuff.)

I would like to see some evidence that portraying harmful stereotypes defuses them rather than promotes them. My sense is that the violence in my streets is life imitating fiction. Entertaining ourselves with violence is as old as Greek tragedy. Maybe that's why we still believe we must conquer the world to become worthwhile.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

subtlety?
Posted by: jmao on Mar 7, 2006 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what is the not so subtle message of the white cop saving the black woman from the crash?

this highly manipulative scene is what spoils the film for me. there are a number of scenes that effectively
give us glimpse into everyday racist/prejudiced behaviors
but this one is not one of them. one could argue that this scene reinforces negative racial/gender power relations. this contrived scene fits in too neatly with the film's not so subtle message to render it unbelievable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: subtlety? Posted by: gwarek
here's a thought ...
Posted by: AnarchX on Mar 7, 2006 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... pretend race doesn't really exist. approach everyone you meet, no matter their skin colour, as you would somebody with the same skin colour as yourself. ignore the skin colour. culturally it is important. as humans, it is not.

remember, genetically we are more simialr than not ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for the reality check
Posted by: dbaldwin on Mar 7, 2006 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A welcome moment of clarity about America (I haven't seen the movie). Back in the 1940's Richard Wright wrote that "The negro is America's metaphor." The position of most white Americans is better represented by the condition of American blacks than by the images shown on TV, etc. of whites. We feast on average incomes, without exploring the median. A Bill Gates or a Paul Allen pulls up the average income of whites; the "average American" is far from enjoying the "average American income." Averages can't explain the kinds of economic and psychological realities pointed out by Hutchinson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

are we (americans) ready to hear what this movie has to say
Posted by: dgleason on Mar 7, 2006 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people who hate this movie have not confronted their own racism.

it is its honesty and depth that is significant. the layers upon layers of people trying failing trying something else and then noticing (if they are brave) that it is the same thing.

Tell me, where is the bravery in the film?

If you can't identify 5 instances of bravery you haven't even begun to have perceived the film.

If you are really brave, identify the 10 instances in the film where you could honesty say you have taken a similar position to an 'other'.

I am glad the academy gave the award to this film, i hoped it meant we were finally grown up enough to see it.

From some of the comments, the good and the bad, it is still a very narrowly openned window.

we are all racists. Until we embrace our own demons we don't have a hope in hell of interacting with each other with any authenticity.

not every day, not in every way, but it lurks temptingly around the corner of almost any thinking about what is 'wrong' with 'whatever'

the pins and pricks and imbedded peas of privilledge are knit deeply into all cultures, some more deeply than other, ours more deeply every day.

this film cut right through my life, came after a experience where i got to see the violence lurking under the surface of both liberal and conservative, black or white when their position of priviledge gets just a little shaken.

If you don't want to turn around some day and find out you have unwittingly participated in something horrific, learn what is in this movie, it is a lot to swallow, for any of us.

Not all of what is there to swallow is 'bad', the glimmer's of hope are there as well. I am hoping against hope that we have somewhere within us the willingness to give up even just a little bit of our righteousness for wisdom.

Its in the name and the first speach if you want to get it, right there on the top, not hidden ...

Danielle

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conservatives must be laughing
Posted by: Kym525 on Mar 7, 2006 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an idea - let's pit white liberals against black liberals by making 'Crash' the winner of the 2006 Academy Awards!

Let's make white liberals so upset that a supposedly 'groundbreaking' film - Brokeback Mountain - gets 'snubbed' (though Ang Lee won for Best Director) in favor of a film with racism as its theme - Crash. Hmm, let's pit homosexuals against blacks and watch them tear each other apart while the powers that keep both groups down watches from the sidelines with fiendish glee.

Amazingly - it worked. I guess no one learned a damn thing from either film after all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All this Crash discussion has really depressed me
Posted by: barbobot on Mar 7, 2006 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overall, I thought Crash was a really good movie. But that seems beside the point to me now. I really thought the originally analysis on Alternet of Crash, which I just read yesterday from the blog link, was messed up. I couldn't really understand it, but my main problem was the way it presented people. White people were all alike to the analysts. The same goes for some of the posts today. I'm white. Maybe I have some racist tendencies, but I don't really think so. I have had many friends of all races. I know that's a sterotypical response, but oh well, it's the truth. They treat me right, and I treat them right. One of my black friends got to go to college for free. I paid about 25,000. Thank god for my white privelege. Anyways, I vote for Democrats, and I considered myself liberal. But honestly, a lot of the analysis and comments make me feel like since I'm white, "I can't understand what minorities go through, and therefore can't really understand them, and just by being white I'm am blessed to gobble up resources undeservedly due to the privelege of my skin color, etc. etc." I thought the money I donate, the community service I do, and the voting decisions I make would hopefully help some minorities. But a lot of the analyses and commentary makes me feel like the minorities expressing those views, not all minorities, don't want my help. They seem to say the only way I as a white person could do anything for a minority is to simply die so that there is one more less closeted racist, overly priveleged, resource devouring white person in the world. And that depresses me. Makes me wonder why I should bother to do anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crash not nearly the best movie
Posted by: bethpikegirl on Mar 7, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crash was like a long version of an ER episode. The Constant Gardner should have been nominated and won, 'course it really is in a foreign language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black stereotypes
Posted by: Damien on Mar 7, 2006 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be a lot easier to overcome harmful stereotypes of black americans if the award for Crash hadn't been presented twenty minutes after we were all treated to the misogynist inanity of "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DNA sequence analysis shows minimal racial differences
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 7, 2006 5:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone should go take a look at this NYtimes story:

linked text

I've never though any of the 'races' were all that different from one another (shocking thought, isn't it) - and this DNA sequence analysis study more or less proves it - there only a handful of genes that determine skin color. Also - if a white and a black person have a child, the genes are shared 50-50 - so why do we call that child 'black'? I know it's a bit shocking, but hey - the genes don't lie. Of course racism is alive and well in the US - but all racists are bullies, aren't they? And all bullies, when you get them alone, turn out to be cowards -right? Ergo, all racists are cowards - regardless of their skin color. Still, they spout their in-group / out-group nonsense all the time - not one of us, one of us. It's just that they're afraid of being alone - pity the poor bastards. Enough already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism is a system
Posted by: tussinup on Mar 7, 2006 6:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't hate Crash, but I still thought that it represented racism as an incorrect idea, rather than as a system of opression. Usually, when someone wants to deflect attention away from that system (consciously or unconsciously) They will start out by claiming that the issue of race is very "complicated". Then they will point out some personal sucesses and failures on the race issue. Often, they will then point out that well intentioned white people have been hurt by "reverse racism". Then they will suggest that the solution is be more "compassionate". Meanwhile, the system of racial opression remains untouched and continues to function for the benefit of a few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not a Good Movie
Posted by: negrita7 on Mar 8, 2006 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, I am astounded how so many of those who post to alternet feel perfectly comfortable using the term "we" to refer to those of us who read alternet with the assumption that "we" are all white. "We" are not. "We " are also not wealthy, middle class or even making it. "We" are sometimes hitting the free library internet connection on our way to work. Anyway, enough ranting about that. Some of us disliked Crash not only because it was not a good film, but because the racial "message" was not on point. With all due respect to Mr. Hutchison who is a fine critic and writer, I think he is way off on this one. Alternet posted a review at one point by Jeff Chang and Sylvia Chan that skewers Crash as a feel -good-about-feeling-bad movie for whites. Those are my words, not theirs, but I think there arguments are convincing and well-reasoned.

There are a few good films out there that offer some stunning critiques of race and power in the U.S., I just can't put Crash on that list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Crash's Blindspot
Posted by: BBrock on Mar 8, 2006 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn’t think Crash should have won Best Picture because of its flaws as a film. Just because it tackled racial issues doesn’t mean it gets a free pass to do poorly in film storytelling. Also I thought it was odd that there was only one Latino character in the movie. And here is where anyone who says Crash takes on the racial issues of Los Angeles is mistaken.

LA is now over 50% Latino. It’s not just Black and White anymore. And this is what, as a city and a society, we aren’t addressing. The complexion of South Central is quickly changing from “Black” to “Brown”. My friends who live there are asking the same questions about immigration that peg Whites as racist. Racist graffiti using the “N” word has been popping up all over South Central for a few years now. The race riots that have been happening in the LA County jails could easily spill into the streets one day if this issue of Black, White and Brown doesn’t become the important issue for the city of Los Angeles and for this country. Here is the next chasm in America’s racial history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Crash's Blindspot Posted by: dlf
Black People Can Be Racist Also
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 8, 2006 12:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've heard bigoted, racist comments from black people all my life - they don't like Koreans, Jews, Hispancis, and ESPECIALLY homophobic nasty remarks about gays and lesbians. Why doesn't the author examine bigotry within his own people and stop alleging that the only people who are pig headed and bigoted are white people. This is a juvenile look at a complicated problem. The author also conveninently chose to ignore black on black racism - I've heard countless times from black friends that if they speak standard English they are accused of being Uncle Tom "oreo's" - especially if they have a decent job, own a house and are middle to upper class financial background. Black kids who earn good grades in school get taunted by other black kids for being "too white" and "not black enough". My black friends tell me that dark complected blacks are discriminated by lighter skinned cafe au lait blacks - i.e. if you are paler like Hale Berry or Tyra Banks then you are "in" - if you are darker skinned like Whoopie Goldberg you are "out" - a man who is black told me he has a hard time getting dates from black women because he has a big nose and dark, dark skin......he said black women want to date a light skinned man = - also the dark skinned children in the family aren't the "favorites" of the parents - the "favorite" kid is the lighter skinned kid. Is the author going to blame white people for this phenomena.....please examine "plantation mentality" within the black community - what is known as "handkerchief head" mentality...........some black people cling to the chains that bind them from their own self imposed bigotry - quit blaming white people for racism within the black community. There are PLENTY of black people who are bigoted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» All People Can Be Racist Posted by: YogiBear
Mr.
Posted by: GeraldM on Mar 8, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wrote, "The majority of whites are probably genuinely convinced that America is a color-blind society, and that equal opportunity is a reality." No doubt a true statement but how many whites are willing to tell anyone, even if it's not true, that his (or her) great grand mother was black? That's what the protagentist did in the book "Kingsblood Royal." (1950) I suspect the story's out come would be no differnt today, 50 years later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Crash" should have won
Posted by: noles1st on Mar 8, 2006 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that there is all this recurring debate after the award has been given is proof enough that it was an excellent choice.

The writer is exactly correct when he says "A mix of economic slippage, political cynicism and personal alienation, not blind racial hatred drives much of white anger toward blacks. An equal mix of personal alienation, false perception and distrust drives much of black anger toward whites. That's the not-so-subtle message of "Crash." '

Racism is more and less than simple hatred for a "color" with no thought for "why I feel this way." Racism is complex AND it is simple. This movie plumbed the depths AND dealt with the knee-jerk racist reactions that people have on a daily basis.

And yes, it includes all of us: the liberals, the conservatives, the blacks, the whites, the Mexicans, the Cubans, the Puerto Ricans, the Japanese, the Vietnamese, the Chinese, the Korean...have I mentioned enough yet?

The simple fact is that all societies are racist (inwardly toward their own members who are glaringly different and outwardly toward all the other societies that are not "like" them). In and of itself, that may not be a death knell for societies.

It is the society that will not look at itself in the mirror and stare unflinchingly at what looks back that is in trouble.

"Crash" encourages everyone to look.

However, a movie cannot make people change--or even want to change. Some of the comments and conversation that has surrounded the movie's win have made that obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this whole thing is so f* stupid ...
Posted by: cold2touch on Mar 8, 2006 4:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not acknowledge the simple, undisputed fact that everyone, every single gene in us came out of Africa (unless you are from Kansas)? And further down the memory lane, we all came from some worms partying in a swamp. America is divided in the following ways: rich and poor, honest and dishonest, bright and stupid. And very often, rich and dishonest overlap. And the semi-stupid discuss racial "issues", while the totally-fucked-up-stupid watch American Idol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My cat has more powers of analysis and interpretation
Posted by: RavenJ on Mar 8, 2006 7:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like the film it reviews, this article has all the nuance of a sophomore-level assignment. If Hutchinson is going to presume to tell me what many blacks think, and what many whites think, the least he could do is make some sassy, daring, shocking or hilarious claims. Good grief, I think everyone who reads AlterNet already understands that we tend to simplify The Other when we stereotype him. Editors, I count on you to publish more sophisticated pieces than this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ANswer To Blacks Can Be Racist Too
Posted by: dlf on Mar 9, 2006 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://paradox.rso.wisc.edu/sp99/art5.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

an asian-american perspective
Posted by: Chinless08 on Mar 11, 2006 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
first off, i want so say that i REALLY wanted to like the movie. but, i just couldn't get myself to do it. three reasons why:

1) in a film that flaunts itself as showing the "complexity" of race, i find that its representation of East Asians in the film was highly skewed and highly underdeveloped. race is NOT JUST BLACK AND WHITE, just fyi to the author. And if race is truly as "complex" as the filmmakers say it is (and which i think it is), the film would have developed the stories of the Asians. Watch the film closely, all ethnic groups are redeemed in some way and showed in a humanistic light. East Asians, according to the film, are just bad drivers and human traffickers. Especially in post 9/11 Los Angeles, where the Asian population exceeds the black population (check out socialexplorer.org), you would think that there would be more stories and more instances of race-related incidents (riots? helloooo?). I'm tired of Asians being left out of the race picture. It ultimately silences my point of view and negates the negative experiences i have had growing up as an Asian-American. Again, hollywood presents a one-dimensional representation of my ethnic group. I would think that a movie in LOS ANGELES about RACE would have been TRULY radical and humanely portray Asians. If you say, "Asians don't have any race problems in America," I suggest you google Vincent Chin, Wen Ho Lee, Joseph Ileto, japanese internment during wwII, etc.

2) Racism is not as overt as the film wants you to think it is. It is systemic and institutional. THIS is the problem. Few, if any, have the audacity to call a black person a "n(*&%" but an employer may have no qualms hiring a white person over a black person. To use a black example again (since most are familiar with it), a lot of people would claim that they are not racist because they have many black friends, but how many of them would attribute laziness and lack of ambition to countless blacks living in the projects? The film really says close to nothing about this systemic racism and how we are socialized into living in it and OVERLOOKING it, the basic message is "don't be prejudiced." sorry if you weren't aware of this already. it's a great message, but a forward thinking film about race (esp. one is best picture), should have a deeper and more disturbing view of how race permeates society.

3) The film basically turns stereotypes and prejudices up to TURBO. This shocks us into believing that this type of overt racism really happens. it really doesn't. It's unvoiced because deep down, everybody knows it's taboo to be racist or sound racist. NOBODY TALKS ABOUT RACE THIS WAY. through a series of (magnificently done, i might add) scenes and stories, it ultimately tell us that stereotypes are bad and you shouldn't be racist. there's a phenomenon called white privilege that basically states that whites don't have to constantly think about race. Basically, this film exploits that by forcing whites to think about race. and the film ends with the races understanding each other a little bit better. IT'S THE FEEL GOOD RACISM MOVIE OF THE YEAR. This is why it's so resounding with white audience members. But it doesn't go far enough. it bascially reduces racism to personal prejudice rather than commenting on the systemic and covert nature of race. racism is not just a personal thing and it will not go away if we do not acknowledge its systemic and covert characteristics. (for example, you may feel unprejudiced towards blacks after this movie, but will that make you think twice about how there is a disproportionate number of blacks in the prison system today?)

i liked the story a lot, but i'm frustrated at its message and its treatment of East Asians. It doesn't really advance our understanding of race. Yes, it makes us talk and that's a GREAT thing, but it doesn't make us talk about the REAL issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racial Perceptions
Posted by: Dianka on May 28, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clinton "hit the nail on the head" when he said, "It's the economy, stupid!" Do you seriously think corporations care
who they exploit, as long as there's money in this exploitation?
The issue is class, not race, and if we had any sense, we would also unite on this issue. We are the majority against a rich minority that has been free to overtake our political system.
The results of excessive corporate power have been devasting to this country. It is, of course, in the best interests of those in power to keep the people divided, and using race is a powerful tool. But think about it---you, whoever you are, have a common bond and common interest with millions of others, regardless of color, and this interest is to curb the power of that tiny group of wealthy elite who intent to turn the US into a feudal state.
Now, I'm not some "college radical"---I'm a middle-aged mom who lives in a primarily white and Native American rural community, and most of us have been pushed into poverty
by this increase of corporate power that has allowed them to strip away workers' rights and protections, and thereby gain considerable power over the lives of the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]