Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

One Big Fat Lie

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted March 2, 2006.


America is allegedly in the midst of an obesity epidemic, but our obsession with weight is the real disease.
Advertisement

If you watch any mainstream news, you know that apparently America is in the midst of an obesity epidemic. Fear-producing news segments feature footage of overweight men and women, cut off at the heads like criminals, lumbering along the streets in Anytown, U.S.A. Ads with skinny women touting weight loss miracles as they look disdainfully at old pictures of their fatter, sadder selves run on a continuous loop on daytime television.

The scare tactics are working. Americans continue to pump billions, and blood, sweat, and tears into their "body projects," convinced that if they are fat, they are doomed.

Conflating fat with sickness is a dangerous delusion. The truth about fat, reinforced recently by a $419 million federal study involving 49,000 women, is that it does not automatically indicate unhealthiness. Many thin people, who don't exercise or eat balanced diets, are at a greater risk for disease than those with some extra padding who work out and eat relatively right. Your health can only be improved by movement and moderation. That's it. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association last month, concludes that low-fat diets do not, despite all of the hype, reduce a woman's risk of cancer or heart disease.

Being fat is not equivalent to being unfit. In fact, being underweight actually kills over 30,000 Americans a year. Equating weight loss, instead of lifestyle changes, with improved health is "like saying 'whiter teeth produced by the elimination of smoking reduces the incidence of lung cancer,'" argues J. Eric Oliver, author of Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind America's Obesity Epidemic. Even a group of CDC researchers admit that "evidence that weight loss improves survival is limited."

So why do highly educated, media-savvy Americans continue to buy into the idea that the thinner one is, the healthier and happier one is? The mammoth diet industry, not to mention the exercise, beauty, fashion, and cosmetic surgery industries, certainly has something to do with it. In America, alone, we spend $40 billion annually on diet products, even though diets prove to be ineffective 95 percent of the time. Not only is our stupidity disturbing -- those stakes wouldn't even lure the drunkest of Vegas gamblers -- but the implications are foreboding.

There is a slippery slope from dieting to disease, as the 7 million girls and women suffering from eating disorders in this country will attest. Thirty-five percent of those who diet go on to yo-yo diet, dragging their bodies through a cycle of weight gains and losses far more unhealthy than just being overweight; 25 percent of those who diet develop partial or full syndrome eating disorders. Mindfulness advocate Susan Albers writes: "The dieting mindset is akin to taking a knife and cutting the connection that is your body's only line of communication with your head." There is little hope for long-term health improvement with this vital line severed.

Cut off from our ability to listen to our authentic hungers, we ride a roller coaster of marketed cravings and emotional upheaval -- overeating, then guiltily undereating, then overeating again. But unlike brief and thrilling amusement park adventures, we can't seem to get off the ride. The explosion of coverage on "the obesity epidemic," though well-intentioned, has not served as the emergency break nutritionists and doctors so hoped it would. Instead, the sensational news spots on the dangers of obesity have often fed misperceptions about the direct link between fat and unhealthiness, or worse, fat and unworthiness.


Digg!

Courtney E. Martin's book, "Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters," will be published by Simon & Schuster's Free Press in March 2007. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But Americans ARE fat!
Posted by: oldsmobile on Mar 2, 2006 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about visiting Europe? People there are WAY thinner than in the States, and much healthier too.

Americans are fat because they eat too much and move about too little. Sure, there is a "diet craze" and eatign disorders and such, but with a simple lifestyle change that involves excersize and smart eating habits, one can have a normal weight, be healthy and live long.

Get over it, Americans are fat AND can do something about it too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: Arianna
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: honeyrose
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: winfield12
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: marymad
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: erinroses
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: redjenny
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: twilliams_ca
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: owleyes
» RE: But Americans ARE fat! Posted by: Gypsyvega
Choose Your Instrument
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 2, 2006 1:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting that the sharpest rise in obesity has happened along with the sharpest decline in smoking in the U.S. There is a lag, but it takes a while to pile on the pounds. I can see the class action lawyers circling around like buzzards at the prospects.

You do have a choice--

Smoke and risk dying from Lung Cancer, C.O.P.D. or heart disease.

or

Eat like the average american and die with Type 2 Diabetes & CHF as your weight continues to soar.

Make your final selection, please.

All irony aside, the death rate for people is still 100%. You can spend your whole life doing all of the right stuff, none of the bad stuff and you are still going to die. You might even die at a shockingly young age.

The one thing that is sure about life is that your next breath or heartbeat is not a given. Live in the here and now. Just do it wisely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A third (or more) way. Balance. Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Choose Your Instrument Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Choose Your Instrument Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Choose Your Instrument Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Choose Your Instrument Posted by: bettsoff
Government's solutions everything but helpful
Posted by: anothername on Mar 2, 2006 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have spent years screaming at the media and at governmental representatives about the lack of sidewalks and the reduction in public transportation as a significant contributing factor in the obesity of Americans. Yet, I have only heard one politician even suggest the link and that comment was made just this year by a candidate for governor in a midwest state.

Alas, what does Mike Huckabee talk about as obesity solutions as head of the National Governor's Association? It certainly is not about providing state money to communities for pubilc transportation and sidewalks. Public transportation is important because it gets people out of their homes, to the movies or to visit friends, instead of staying home eating.

Also in the mainstream press lately is the idiotic practice of having pre-paid food accounts for students so their parents can limit what they eat each day. Drive the students all over, then tell them they can only eat certain foods during a very limited time at school. (These prepaid accounts also resemble the concept of credit and/or debit cards, and the ease of swiping a card instead of counting cash and the ease of replenishing money, or expanding credit, whenever the funds run dry.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Questionable Statistic
Posted by: TomCampitelli on Mar 2, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being fat is not equivalent to being unfit. In fact, being underweight actually kills over 30,000 Americans a year.

I strongly question that 30,000 number. From where did it come? Are these people dying of starvation? Is this from anorexia? Since absolutely no backup is provided for this number, I can't take it very seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: cem1231
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: bwilmot
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: cem1231
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: Sunfell
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: redjenny
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: mclare
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: Krusty Geezer
» RE: Questionable Reasoning Posted by: DaftAida
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: Elfcat1
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Questionable Statistic Posted by: Sannanina
Ingredients and portion control
Posted by: Sunfell on Mar 2, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The obesity epidemic began when food ingredients began to change- particularly the switch from regular cane or beet sugar to high fructose corn syrup, and the changeover from animal fats to partially hydrogenated fats. The stated purpose was that these ingredients increased shelf life, but it was also a way to dispose of excess food. Scientists are learning that HFCS, along with the artificial sweetner aspertame, actually increases obesity, and the incidence of diabetes. And HFCS is in everything- it's very difficult to escape it unless you are very vigilant at reading labels. That goes for trans fats, too.

Portion sizes have jumped enormously since the 80s, too. When I go out to eat, I only eat 1/3 to 1/2 of what I am served and take the rest home- but most people clean their plates. A 'small' drink is the same size that a 'large' drink was 20-25 years ago. And a large drink ought to be served with a diving board, because they are so huge.

If you eat large amounts of crap food, you're going to end up with a crap body and crap diseases like high cholestrol and diabetes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good post Posted by: ccbite
» RE: Good post Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Ingredients and portion control Posted by: Undercover Brother
» RE: Ingredients and portion control Posted by: Undercover Brother
Extremes
Posted by: Orwells_nightmare on Mar 2, 2006 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's undeniably true that being thin is as health-dangerous as being fat, but why is this issue always phrased in a manner of extremes? It's obesity or anorexia, overweight or underweight, as if there's no such thing as a happy medium.

I seriously think the use of language is a contributing factor. We need to change the way we talk about this issue, for example, instead of 'weight loss' or 'weight gain,' how about 'weight control?'

If we change the emphasis from being thin to having a sort of 'corridor' of healthy weight to stay within, (you've seen the height-weight charts in doctor's offices =) I think people might take a more relaxed attitude, but it needs a proper, common sense and popular solution instead of medical authorities just shaking their finger and complaining about the 'thin at all costs' lobby

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xtremes Posted by: jackie
A fatty for everyone
Posted by: BuckFush on Mar 2, 2006 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to Houston, TX if you want to see a fat epidemic. Just try going anywhere in that substantially large city without seeing not just overweight people, but obese men, women, and sadly enough children. Go to Detroit, almost the same thing. Go to Omaha, almost the same there too. Check out rural America, more fat phuckers than skinny ones. Between the smokers, the over-eaters, and under achievers, our country's health care costs are soaring. These people are drags on the economy. What is worse, is the fact that these people are trapped by their own weaknesses, and the fat cats in the corporations are raking in billions.

This article is BS, disguised as roses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're missing the point Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: You're missing the point Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: jackie
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: Iconoclast421
» Don't be silly! Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: dankorn
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: Elfcat1
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: musicalbookworm
» RE: A fatty for everyone Posted by: guleblanc
sullen cheeks, sloutching chests, with sassy hips to the side
Posted by: saywhat? on Mar 2, 2006 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here in chicago, in the heart of the midwest, it is obvious to me that indeed we do have a fat epidemic...all over the midwest highschool kids are plumper than ever.....and even simple tasks like climbing stairs becomes a 'chore.'

i also have some dealings with anorexics which is probably the most devastating disease i have ever seen....those who don't recover literally waste away and the selfesteem of the (mosty) women is lower than any drug addiction....

the article correctly points out how diets further exacerbate the problem.....the other significant problem is the fast food industry

i think the solution to the problem involves education ...where does that begin? if parents are parked at the tv and not cooking meals what signal does that send?

i also don't understand this not thin , but skinny obsession this culture has....first of all most of us aren't that skinny, and when skin lays on bone so close we end up looking like corpses....plus the postures presented in fashion mags will cause aches and pains in the joints as we age....people in third world countries walk tall and straight and have fewer neck, back, and knee problems....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

missing the point
Posted by: jackie on Mar 2, 2006 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being fat is not a health issue! Science has not found a link between being fat and being unhealthy. Eating unhealthy food and not exercising are unhealthy, but being fat, in and of itself, is not a health problem. This is one of the points of the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» actually... Posted by: doctorsquared
I'm on a diet.
Posted by: bettsoff on Mar 2, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never tried one before. I'm on a diet from chain restaurants, from transfats, from high fructose corn syrup. I'm on a diet from huge portion sizes. I'm on a diet from overprocessed 'quick cook' anything.

I guess it's not so much a diet as relearning a healthy way to eat. This article provides just as much scaremongering as the articles it criticizes. All the suggestions for healthy lifestyle change are found in the comments. Thumbs down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm on a diet. Posted by: Polly
» RE: I'm on a diet. Posted by: owleyes
mortality rate and obesity
Posted by: jackie on Mar 2, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you look at the corrected data from the CDC on the rate of mortality associated with obesity, is is a fraction of that associated with smoking. They came out with a study a few years ago that claimed obesity was very dangerous, but a year later they retracted those claims when it turned out the data they reported were in error (of course, the retraction was on page ten and the original was on page 1).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is hilarious -- and sad
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 2, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article the most flagrant example of denying the obvious that I've seen in a while.

Just walk outside and check out the poor slobs waddling down the street like animated bowling balls. It's pathetic.

Diabetes has reached epidemic levels, and doctors are correctly warning that this national tsunami of fat will doom an entire generation to ill health for decades.

And yet people like Courtney Martin blame it all on discrimination against heavy people. Amazing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who are you? Posted by: Warp
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: Moonray
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: Warp
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: marymad
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: faeriefolk
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: redjenny
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: bettsoff
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: mclare
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: mclare
» RE: Who are you? Posted by: Warp
» RE: This is hilarious -- and sad Posted by: triana1326
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt
Posted by: truthtopower on Mar 2, 2006 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The overwhelming evidence, not to mention common sense if you've evern gone from being overweight to the right weight, makes it clear that this is just an emotional load of nonsense.

While it may suck that you are going to be judged on your looks and your weight, take a look at the number of octogenarians and centenarians that are 50 + lbs. overweight.

Fat and fit? Not if you want to live a long, healthy life.

Alternet, we visit to get away from ideologues, not to see a different brand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overweight and healthy
Posted by: lianne on Mar 2, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple of years ago, during a checkup with my doctor, I idly mentioned that according to the chart in his examination room, I was classified as 'obese' by the AMA standards.

He laughed.

As far as he was concerned, while I was thirty pounds or so over the 'ideal' weight for my height, my blood pressure was at the low end of the normal scale, my blood sugar was just dandy, my cholesterol was excellent, I exercise regularly, and while my diet isn't perfect, it's still more than adequate.

Basically, in his view you pile all that on one side of the scale against the weight 'problem', and he didn't conside it a contest. Ignore the scales and focus on the rest was his advice.

If only everyone in the medical field had his common sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overweight and healthy Posted by: GraceB
Now, now...
Posted by: mviscid on Mar 2, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think the author sounds like an obseity apologist. But she is pointing out how obsessed American people are with weight as a bottom-line indicator of one's worth, which a lot of these comments clearly illustrate. There are many reasons why people get fat in this country. Inner pain, for one. Which is no reason to say mean things about those people. Actually, a person's tendency to say mean things sounds like they have some inner pain of their own. Let's all start to bring balance in our lives with the person in the mirror, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$419 Billion
Posted by: FCAlive on Mar 2, 2006 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cost of the study / 49,000 women = ~$9 million per participant.

You probably meant $419 million

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oxymoron...
Posted by: montims on Mar 2, 2006 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"So why do highly educated, media-savvy Americans continue to buy into the idea that the thinner one is, the healthier and happier one is?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oxymoron... Posted by: DaftAida
Junk Science - No Citations to Back up His Claims
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Mar 2, 2006 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author states 30,000 people die every year from being too thin - but doesn't back this up with any citation or concrete evidence - then the author states people with eating disorders as the people who are dying because they are too thin. Eating Disorders are a psychiatric condition and it takes years of starvation in order to die from anorexia or buliumia (like Terry Schiavo). No one who is 10 pounds or so under their "target" weight or BMI body fat index is going to die.

There is PLENTY of clinical evidence that being slightly underweight is a way to extend your life. The author says that overweight people who exercise and eat properly are healthy than thin people who don't exercise and eat well. Being obese highly increases the likelihood of dying from colon cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Excess belly fat creates more cortisol stress hormones - this changes one's entire body chemistry.

Then the authors solution is to get more public transit so people will walk more for exercise. If someone is morbidly obese (10% more than having a BMI index of 26%) then walking to the bus and light rail is not enough aerobic cardiovascular exercise to melt the fat. A woman who is 5'4" and weighs 200 pounds needs to do aerobic exercise at least 3 times a week for 45 minutes each time in order to lose weight - walking to the bus or subway isn't going to do it. Of course, walking more and getting off one's fanny and out of the car is good for you - but it won't help someone who is 50 pounds or more overweight get down to a healthy size figure.

This is a very sloppily written article - it assumes that all Americans don't get enough sleep, watch TV 10 hours a night, stuff their pie-hole with Pizza Hut and Coca Cola - whilst going to the supermarket and buying low fat, low carb processed food. The most extreme of examples is used to make gross generalizations about millions of people. Yes, Americans DO eat too much junk food and are sedentary. I agree with that - but trying to present his argument that it is healthier to be fat and exercise if you eat whole foods - than it is to be underweight is NONSENSE.

Can't alternet get better articles than this? Who is your fact checker? Lots of allegations were made in this article with nothing to back it up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The comments prove the article
Posted by: pomes on Mar 2, 2006 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, the comments prove the point of the article. Fat people, regardless of their health problems, are clearly one of the only groups left in our society that are fair game for anyone to insult, anyone to degrade, anyone to make fun of, even supposedly "liberal/progressive" people who are "above" that.

The comments here are not the comments of people concerned about a potential health crisis. They are the comments of people who are excited to have a group to insult freely.

Comments like "fat phuckers," comparing people to bowling balls, someone even called overweight people "monsters." These are human beings. Just like the Muslims and other marginalized social groups people on this site are always sticking up for. And yes, overweight people ARE marginalized socially in many ways, ask any overweight person. They deserve the dignity accorded to any human being. Some of you are pathetic, on top of being hypocrites.

This issue puts the lie to many people's professed belief in human respect and dignity. As for the link between weight and health, weight is one of many, many factors which determine a person's overall health, many of which are far more important than weight but get far less attention because most people lose weight not to get healthy but to open the doors of society to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They deserve it Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: They deserve it Posted by: winfield12
» RE: They deserve it Posted by: redjenny
» RE: They deserve it Posted by: triana1326
» RE: They deserve it Posted by: marymad
Americans are "fat" is all ways
Posted by: fogpatch on Mar 2, 2006 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obesity is so prevalent in America that we have come to accept this as normal. "Supersize me!" is the rallying cry at fast food outlets. This fatness is a reflection of the national attitude - an orgy of consumer greed has become a way of life. Who cares about the consequences of this greed, More is Better, no matter what. We drive "fat" cars (SUVs), we live in "fat" homes (the bigger the better), we have a "fat" foreign policy (all the world is our political domain). While in Ohio recently, I was amazed to see so many fat people, but they also had a swagger to their step, like they were big rough tough Americans with their flags on their cars. Fat in the head too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SO TRUE SO True Posted by: AlterNug
» RE: SO TRUE SO True Posted by: pomes
Fat is not fit!
Posted by: badkitty53 on Mar 2, 2006 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're 50 to 100 pounds overweight, you're not healthy. For starters, your knees and back aren't built to carry that extra weight. Your heart is probably working overtime too. My husband developed diabetes nine years ago, and it's not like I didn't tell him he was at risk. Now, of course, he's lost the extra 50 pounds (down to 250!) but he still has high blood pressure. People like to say that this is a beauty/image issue but it sounds to me like they're making excuses for being unhealthy. I see enough fat unhealthy people to know that they can say all they want that 100 pounds overweight is beautiful, and maybe it is, but it's unhealthy too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More assholery
Posted by: pomes on Mar 2, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also love all the comments too of people saying, "I saw some fat people the other day and they were just walking around like they were normal people. Can you believe the nerve?!"

To me, I don't see the difference between that and "I saw two fags walking down the street holding hands like they were a normal couple. Can you believe the nerve?!"

To them, it is normal. It is their life. It is what they are. They aren't going to spend their lives hiding in shame and humiliation because you get your ideals of "normal" from Maxim and Cosmo, and I laugh at the idea that they should simply because it offends your eyes to see them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It is not the same Posted by: brunowe
» RE: It is not the same Posted by: pomes
» RE: It is not the same Posted by: brunowe
» RE: It is not the same Posted by: SabrinaRayne
» RE: It is not the same Posted by: pomes
» RE: It is not the same Posted by: saywhat?
» to krystal from a lesbian Posted by: Michelle
Balanced view needed
Posted by: audreyvest on Mar 2, 2006 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last night I heard some bright bulb radio commentator (didn't catch the name) say something along the line that the repercussions of the "obesity epidemic" will turn out to be far worse than the result of 9/11. Now come on! A book published a few years ago called "The Obesity Myth" by Paul Campos, which failed to receive the widespread attention it deserved, pointed out the contribution of the billion-dollar weight loss industry to the whole obesity epidemic hysteria, as well as the underlying yet politically correct prejudice involved. When I was in Paris, I noticed that most people walked and rode bicycles everywhere. Also, when they took a coffee break they had coffee, not coffee and a Danish. Let's use common sense and balance, not only in diet and exercise but in discussing the issue as well. Sure, Americans need to exercise more and be far more mindful of what we put into our bodies, but all this name-calling and relegating of people to second-class status is bogus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good call! Posted by: stuck_in_FL
An addendum
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 2, 2006 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After re-reading the column, it seems to me that Martin is mixing two dissimilar subjects. She really wants to talk about the bias against the overweight, but the approach she uses --saying the many health warnings are overstated -- is way off base.

There's simply too much illness attributable to obesity to pretend it isn't true.

She can make a good argument about the bias against fatties, but the Woman As Victim mantra is so tiresome. (We see plenty of that on the cable news networks every night.) Enough already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An addendum Posted by: mclare
» RE: An addendum Posted by: YogiBear
The Reality of Life
Posted by: kwfryatl on Mar 2, 2006 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In addition to the numerous, extremely well-documented health benefits of maintaining a healthy weight in proportion to one’s height and frame, there is another well-documented reality for those of us working in Corporate America: overweight/obese people receive lower salaries with fewer raises, fewer promotional opportunities, and less overall recognition. Is that right? Of course not. Is it reality? Of course it is.

Yes, it is very easy to be overweight in our society; however, given all the clear-cut facts regarding nutrition as it relates to simple biology (calories expended always need to balance calories ingested), like it or not, at the end of the day it comes down to one’s personal choice. (However, I want to make it clear that I do not believe – in any way – that struggling with being overweight/obese is any kind of “personal moral failure”.) While those choices may be influenced and motivated by numerous factors (including one’s psyche), the fact remains that at any time, we have an opportunity to make a choice for healthier living that will only serve to enhance our life in so many ways.

When the harsh reality of being 25 pounds overweight (and clearly on my way to even more) slapped me in the face, I realized it was my choice: no one was forcing me to drive-thru at the fast-food restaurants; no one was forcing me to eat an entire pint of Haagen-Dazs Chocolate Chocolate Chip; no one was forcing me to eat the entire, ridiculously large plate of food the casual dining restaurants put in front of me. When I looked in the mirror naked and didn’t like what I saw, I decided the time had come for me to simply make different choices regarding eating and physical activity, in addition to addressing whatever issues in my psyche may be have been influencing my eating patterns.

While I understand and sympathize with the author of the article and many of the comments posted here, I prefer to deal with reality, and the reality is that – for the vast majority of the population – being overweight/obese carries numerous, well-documented health risks, and – at this point in time – is simply not acceptable in our society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Reality of Life Posted by: mclare
I think this article is trying to say this:
Posted by: rclord on Mar 2, 2006 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obesity is caused by eating foods with a lot of artificial flavorings and chemicals. A lot of these foods are advertised as "less fattening."

People eat these foods, and then get cravings because the foods are not real. It doesn't fill them up. So they eat more and more of these foods, and it takes longer for them to stop being hungry. By then, they have gained some weight. This is most likely because the foods are probably more fattening than advertised.

I have proof of this: a year and a half ago I went to Italy, and I ate lots of pasta. I ended up being thinner than I would have been if I ate the same amount of pasta in the States! One of the people I traveled with had a similar experience, and he commented to an Italian friend of his about this. This friend said: "You Americans don't understand. Our foods don't have the artificial chemicals and flavoring and GMOs yours do."

Incidentally, I once read that Italy banned McDonalds' from being built in one or more of its cities, though I forget the cities' names.

I also think this situation in the United States is exacerbated by too unrealistic standards of thinness. People see pictures of fashion models, and try desperately to be as thin as the models are; not realizing that the models in the photos are often airbrushed to look more "ideal." So these people go on silly faddish diets, consume "diet" pharmaceuticals and "weight-loss" foods that are supposed to be chemically and/or genetically altered so they're less fattening, and then get depressed when they realize these things don't really work. By then, they have cravings because these "diet foods" are also not real food.

I believe that too much advertising and people being brainwashed by it is one reason why many Americans seem to be obsessed with weight. But obesity is also beginning to be a problem in other countries, due to consumption of McDonalds' and other fast foods.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Missing the point!
Posted by: goodnightjulia on Mar 2, 2006 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point of the article was not that fat = healthy. It was that carrying a little extra weight does not automatically equal unhealthy, and that being thin does not automatically equal being healthy. It is possible to be too thin. It is possible to be thin and still be too fat, in terms of fat/muscle ratio. It is possible to be thin and still be unhealthy, in terms of lifestyle--some people can stuff their faces with junk food and not gain weight, but being thin doesn't make them healthy.

Carrying around 50 extra pounds is unhealthy and hard on your body. No one is disputing that. The issue is that weight is a continuum; just because you're not skinny doesn't mean you're fat. It's not all or nothing--as long as you eat right and exercise, you can be healthy without being super-thin. Yes, it is possible.

Also, unhealthy though it may be, obesity should not make people "fair game". I like the comment above that mentioned that saying that fat people have some nerve walking around like "normal" people is like saying that gay couples have some nerve walking around holding hands or displaying any kind of affection like "normal" people. We liberal, progressive people here at AlterNet would never say something like the latter, would we? So why is it so acceptable to throw around the former?

I'm not crazy about everything in this article, but the point--that America has an obsession with weight and an extremely skiewed viewpoint concerning it--is valid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bottom line
Posted by: bettsoff on Mar 2, 2006 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]