Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Baghdad Embassy Bonanza

By David Phinney, CorpWatch. Posted March 8, 2006.


Heaping scandal upon scandal, the Kuwait company that won the contract to build the massive U.S. Embassy stands accused of using forced labor to fulfill its contracts.
Advertisement

Work for what is planned to be the largest, most fortified U.S. embassy in the world was quietly awarded last summer to a controversial Kuwait-based construction firm accused of exploiting employees and coercing low-paid laborers to work in war-torn Iraq against their wishes.

 

More than a few U.S. contractors competing for the $592-million Baghdad project express bewilderment over why the U.S. State Department gave the work to First Kuwaiti General Trading & Contracting (FKTC). They claim that some competing contractors possessed far stronger experience in such work and that at least one award-winning company offered to perform the all but the most classified work for $60 million to $70 million less than FKTC.

 

“It's stunning what First Kuwaiti has been able to get from the State Department,” one contractor said.

Several other contractors that competed for the embassy contracts shared similar reactions and believe that a high-level decision at the State Department was made to favor a Kuwait-based firm in appreciation for Kuwait's support of the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

 

“It was political,” said one contractor.

 

Mohammad I. H. Marafie, chairman and co-owner of FKTC, is a member of one of the most powerful mercantile families in Kuwait.

Cheap labor from Asia

Undoubtedly, most of the 900 FKTC workers living and working on the construction site of the massive embassy project have been pulled from ranks of low-paid laborers flooding into Iraq from Asia's poorest countries to work under U.S. military and reconstruction projects.

Meanwhile, FKTC’s general manager and co-owner, Wadih al-Absi jets back and forth to the United States, dreaming of magazine covers celebrating his rise to a global player in large-scale engineering and construction.

Raised in Beirut, he says he began his career much like the people he now employs -- as a laborer installing drywall. The Lebanese Christian escaped war in his home country in the late 1970s and moved to Kuwait. The Persian Gulf country welcomes, even recruits, expatriate blue-collar workers like al-Absi once was to do the grunt work and domestic chores in its booming, oil-rich economy. Today glitzy shopping malls, flashy cars and sprawling villas have become the norm and migrants make up the nearly two-thirds of this tiny desert state's 2.3 million population.

Building his own personal fortune, al-Absi, too, relies on migrant labor. FKTC is one of the many Middle East companies that collectively ship tens of thousands of cheap day laborers to Iraq's war zones where they are paid just dollars a day.

Fortune favors a few

American contractors witnessing the plight of some of these migrants at military camps around Iraq have openly complained that the Asians endure abysmal working conditions, live in cramped housing, eat poor food, and lack satisfactory medical care and safety gear.

Typically, these migrants work 12 hours a day, often seven days a week, and earn as little as $500 a month performing tasks considered unsuitable for U.S. war fighters. They work construction, drive trucks, run laundries, clean latrines, pick up rubbish and operate stores, dining facilities and warehouses. Without them, and the "body shop" subcontractors that provide such laborers, the U.S. and coalition military camps -- virtually small cities -- would shut down.

It is a lucrative business for many companies, one that has helped trigger explosive growth of FKTC.

The company boasted of having $35 million in assets less than three years ago. Today, the firm has racked up hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. contracts in Iraq, pushing the company well past the $1 billion mark. With 7,000 employees in Iraq, the company claims to be holding $800 million in construction and supply contracts directly with the Army for military camps, plus more than $300 million under Halliburton 's multibillion dollar contract to perform military logistics for the occupation forces in Iraq.

It's the kind of success that allows al-Absi to enjoy finely tailored suits with French cuff shirts, send his children to American universities and enjoy the fruits of being a newly-minted millionaire. "I love America," he says freely.

Meeting over a morning coffee last September at the posh Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, a legendary Georgetown retreat favored by pampered heads-of-state, Hollywood elite, the Rolling Stones and business executives, al-Absi's eyes widened as he talked about his company's greatest prize – the U.S. embassy in Baghdad.

The new embassy

Indeed, the massive $592-million project may be the most lasting monument to the U.S. occupation in the war-torn nation. Located on a on a 104-acre site on the Tigris river where U.S. and coalition authorities are headquartered, the high-tech palatial compound is envisioned as a totally self-sustaining cluster of 21 buildings reinforced to 2.5 times usual standards. Some walls as said to be 15 feet thick or more. Scheduled for completion by June 2007, the installation is touted as not only the largest, but the most secure diplomatic embassy in the world.


Digg!

David Phinney is a journalist and broadcaster based in Washington D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yankee criminals, torturers and killers GO HOME.
Posted by: IanA on Mar 8, 2006 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the Americans are building cannot be considered as an Embassy but as another permanent base from which to continue indefinitely their illegal occupation while enjoying the protection of the Vienna Conventions for a ridiculous staff of over 1000. This is part of their plans after their illegal agression to run Iraq as a surrogate of Washington along with 12 or 14 permanent military installations. It is exactly this exhibition of hegemony that makes the USA a threat anywhere in the world.

Since the construction phase does not bring the facilities under the Vienna Conventions, the Iraqi government should issue a reasonable requirement in view of 60% unemployment in the country, that all projects including the construction of embassies must use at least 90% Iraqi labour for engineering and construction. It is ridiculous that all projects are using overseas labour in a country which has had its entire economy destroyed.

Yankee criminals, torturers and killers GO HOME.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Interesting idea but... Posted by: brunowe
» Agreed (mirabile dictu!) Posted by: brunowe
Neocolonialism is the neocon agenda
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 8, 2006 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is some quality investigative journalism - first of all it is factual, not based on some random opinion. The collection and presentation of factual details is the reporter's job - not that you'd know it from listening to the various cable news networks.

Second, regardless of who got the contract, it is obviously a colonial model - a palatial estate for the plantation masters built by slave labor, indentured servitude, whatever you want to call it. Perhaps an American contractor with a good record would have treated workers fairly - that's what the bidding process is supposed to address - a variety of factors.

Third, who knows the reasons why the neocons pushed the Iraq invasion - oil, water, WMD, the petrodollar value, regional geopolitics, sheer perversity - who knows what goes on in their twisted little minds. However, it has definitely turned into a documented attempt to snatch the natural resources - witness the oil production sharing agreements with all sales to be denominated in US dollars, all backed up by permanent military bases.

Finally, some reporter should take this same approach to the Katrina rebuilding contracts - here the workers are undocumented illegals from Mexico, who are subject to the same pressures as their counterparts in Iraq. The neocons have to play a double game here - reassuring the 'social conservatives' that they are anti-immigration, and reassuring their business partners that cheap controllable labor will be available.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mind boggles
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 8, 2006 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That $592 million embassy will become an $800 million project after the usual cost overruns -- and probably will end up in the hands of Islamic radicals in a few years.

And what's the deal with those oil production-sharing agreements? Why has there been no explanation in the media of precisely how those will work, and how much the U.S. oil companies will reap from them?

This orgy of tax waste just goes on and on. It's good to see a Washington reporter tackling these subjects instead of just parroting the Pentagon line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How is this different from any other government project put up for bid?
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 8, 2006 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe I'm missing something. Is there anything new in this report about the way government contracts are put out for bid?

I confess I only know what I read in the news, but it sounds like every other 'boondoggle.' Isn't that why that word was invented?

I'd really appreciate learning not just the gossip, of which there's an abundance in this report, but why I should pay attention to this gossip. I assume that the writer knows. Why doesn't he tell those of us who don't know? Or why does AlterNet publish half-a**ed reporting?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thaqalain
Posted by: Thaqalain on Mar 11, 2006 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for another company of said family,they r one of very decent,noble,respectable,wealthiest families in Kuwait.They can even build atleast 5 Whitehouses prior to target date by their own money.They r able to bring all required skills,resources to buid anything on this globe or any other palace for invaders on space.
They have built world's largest wooden launch by uitilizing knowledge and skills of poor SE asian workers.
One thing to be noted all miracles on this globe is built by utilizing skills/efforts of poor knowledgables.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bil
Posted by: Bil on Dec 31, 2006 9:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new1
new2
new3
new4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]