Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Unsolved Mystery of the Oklahoma City Bombing

By Andrew Gumbel, Truthdig. Posted February 28, 2006.


Thanks to the efforts of a handful of dogged investigators, the FBI's own paperwork is beginning to seriously contradict the official version of the attack. And more is being revealed all the time.
022806_story
The Unsolved Mystery of the Oklahoma City Bombing

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Andrew Gumbel

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Long before the Iraq war, long before 9/11, the U.S. government had already mastered the art of fluffing its intelligence on a looming threat, botching the response and then working furiously to cover its mistakes.

The 1995 bombing of the Oklahoma City federal building -- at the time the worst peacetime atrocity committed on U.S. soil, with 168 dead and hundreds more injured -- has been largely overshadowed by the destruction of the World Trade Center and all that has followed. But the storyline is nevertheless unnervingly familiar.

Like the failure to prevent 9/11, this is a case of the federal government first failing to recognize or act on crucial warning signs and then claiming there were no warning signs at all. It's about coming up with a plausible cover story and sticking to it, no matter what. In contrast to the most glaring failures of the Bush administration, though, the government's bluff on Oklahoma City has gone largely uncalled. Timothy McVeigh, the alleged mastermind, was sentenced to death and executed, while Terry Nichols, supposedly his only accomplice, is serving a life sentence. And that, for most people, has been the end of the story. Only the dogged persistence of a handful of amateur investigators, academics, journalists and lawyers has revealed more uncomfortable truths about the bombing and who might have committed it. Thanks to a flurry of Freedom of Information and other lawsuits, the FBI's own paperwork is beginning to seriously contradict the official version of what happened. And more is being revealed all the time.

We now know, from court records and official documents, that at least two undercover operatives were gathering information on Timothy McVeigh and a group of like-minded white supremacists in the early spring of 1995, one of whom gave her government handlers specific information about a plan to blow up the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

We know that, after the bombing, the government expended considerable energy trying to track down a John Doe 2 and other possible accomplices of McVeigh and Terry Nichols -- the "others unknown" cited in the federal indictment -- before abruptly changing tack nine months later and insisting that McVeigh was the lone mastermind behind the attack and, eventually, that no one else other than Nichols had been involved.

And we know that, as the lone-bomber theory has come under increasingly skeptical scrutiny in recent years, the FBI and other federal agencies have expended considerable energy blocking access to their investigative paper trail. When one of the government informants from the spring of 1995 went public about her role, she found herself prosecuted -- unsuccessfully -- for allegedly harboring her own bomb plots; she has since gone to ground, too afraid to say more. At least one key government official, the state medical examiner in Oklahoma City, has indicated he was not given key information he needed to do his job. And one of the senior FBI agents involved in the early stages of the bombing probe now believes that enough new evidence has come to the surface from the files of his own agency to warrant a new federal grand jury investigation.

Perhaps most unnerving is the trail of dead bodies that has turned up over the past decade under less than transparent circumstances. A neo-Nazi bank robber called Richard Guthrie, one of the leading John Doe 2 candidates -- though never publicly identified as such -- was found hanging in a prison cell in July 1996. Kenney Trentadue, a man who looked very much like Guthrie, right down to a snake-motif tattoo on one arm, and appears to have been mistaken for him when he was picked up on a parole violation on the Mexican border in the summer of 1995, wound up bloodied and traumatized from head to toe in his cell at a federal detention facility in Oklahoma City. The feds claimed he hanged himself. An inmate who later came forward and claimed he witnessed Trentadue being beaten to death by his interrogators was himself found hanging in a federal prison cell in 2000.

The person who has done most of the recent work in unmasking the mysteries of Oklahoma City is Kenney Trentadue's brother Jesse, a Salt Lake City lawyer who has not only fought to have his brother's death recognized as murder, not suicide, but is also suing the FBI to release a trove of documents that might shed light on the links among McVeigh, Guthrie and a group of Guthrie's associates widely suspected -- at least outside the confines of the Justice Department -- of being McVeigh's bombing accomplices.

Jesse Trentadue has been all over the federal government like a bad case of lice ever since the authorities at the Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City unsuccessfully tried to arrange for Kenney's battered body to be cremated before the family had had a chance to look at it or even learn what kind of injuries he had sustained. He not only insisted on the family taking receipt of the body, he has also raised question after question about the government's credibility. Jesse has gotten a prison guard to admit under oath that he lied when he testified about seeing Kenney hanging by a bedsheet, gotten the authorities to admit they never told the medical examiner's office that someone else's blood was found in Kenney's cell, and cast compelling doubt on the suicide note Kenney supposedly scrawled in pencil on his cell wall saying he had lost his mind.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Double standard in the handling of a terrorist attack.
Posted by: farhada on Feb 28, 2006 2:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amazing to read the federal government reaction to the Oklahoma bombing. The white Christian boy who killed 100s of people was not the same as dark skin muslim Arabs.

The double standard is so obvious but the wrong doing of the federal and local polis is the same. Reading this article makes me wonder what kind of treatment those "other guys" have received in US prisons?

Compare this case with Jose Padial's case or this case with Wiliam Krar's case. That should make people think that there is something extremely wrong with the justice system in the US.

I would recomend the following link to compare the difference between the handling of terrorist suspects:
The Minority Report Style Pre-emptive Arrests

/Farhad

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRUTH!
Posted by: rsaxto on Feb 28, 2006 2:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will someone please explain why the feds have such a long history of covering up the truth and why are these coverups today even worse than they were at Oklahoma City time? Has the federal government gone totally senile or crazy? Will we the people ever get the truth? Do we have to impeach thousands of federal workers? Should we conclude that fascists rule America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TRUTH! Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver
» RE: TRUTH! Posted by: gar
» RE: TRUTH! Posted by: starvinmarvy
» RE: TRUTH! Posted by: gar
» RE: TRUTH! Posted by: UncleTom
the story of the bombing and Timothy McVeigh has always been more complicated
Posted by: erinroses on Feb 28, 2006 4:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This adds another wrinkle to the Oklahoma bombing. Even before this information, the government has only described T.M. as an evil "lone-gunmen". As Gore Vidal has pointed out, there was much more to T.M. than the government or the media wanted us to know. For the government, they wanted to cover-up the other paths, for the media it is a much easier story and falls into the black and white understanding of the daily TV consumer, to describe T.M. as "evil". I look forward to learning more about the latest evidence and hopefully to see it in more mainstream media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice or not
Posted by: Gma1 on Feb 28, 2006 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to believe that all this is a result of an on-going investigation of these Neo-Nazi groups. But that's quite a stretch in time as well as credibility. Neo-Nazi groups are on the prowl again as in Toledo, OH and in Orlando, FL. We have so much to worry about in this country! Democracy is hard!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Justice or not Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Justice or not Posted by: brunowe
Lies? Say it's not true!
Posted by: tkwilson on Feb 28, 2006 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing that we are seeing pretty consistently is evidence of government sponsored duplicity when it comes to acts of domestic "terrorism". Nearly all information about any of these events goes into a black hole called "classified information" for "security reasons". This has been going on for decades.
What it does is create a gargantuan quagmire for concealing evidence of malfeasance and/or criminal activity on the part of government employees, agents or contractors.
When the investigative and judicial arm of the government is complicit in these acts; either overtly or negligently (such as the judges subjective "refusal to believe" relevant evidence), the field is wide open for those on the inside to literally get away with murder, often in plain view of the public.

Here's a clue; If you appoint the "doers" to investigate the scene of what may potentially be their own crime, what is the likely result of the investigation? Certainly not an objective investigation, and most likely the cover up of a crime.

Why 99% of the public refuses to get it is beyond me.
Would anyone like to tell me why two huge crime scenes (the APM building and the Twin Towers) were cordoned off and demolished within a matter of days, making any meaningful in depth investigation of the means by which the crimes were commited impossible?

The real mystery here is why the general public is so bleeding STUPID!! If you refuse to be anything but a sheep, don't bitch about the wolves. Nobody cares what a sheep thinks and even less about what it says; not even other sheep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lies? Say it's not true! Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: Lies? Say it's not true! Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Lies? Say it's not true! Posted by: ravengrrrl
» RE: Lies? Say it's not true! Posted by: starvinmarvy
Military Industrial Congressional complex needs you!
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Feb 28, 2006 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They need you to depend on it. The organization of this complex is such that it depends on mayhem for cash flow to maintain power. The last thing this group can afford is peace. A boogyman had to be invented that was nebulous. Terrorism is ideal. Terror within and outside this country is the concept that the Chicken-hawks and War whores wanted the average citizen to feel, converting what are supposed to be a well read electorate into Chicken-littles.

The liquidity gained by these groups is far more insidious than the majority realize, grabbing money not only from overblown military expenditures that only a very paranoid and terrified people can provide, but also the running of illegal weapons, technology and drugs. The information is available to anyone that reads and is interested in how our government works. Facts come from senate and congressional hearings, financial sheets of public companies. Additional information can be found from the Freedom of Information Act at GW University, GAO, breakdowns of employment figures, monetary policy and money supply... This administration is turning this country into one of secrets, classifying more information than any other which should tell us something, i.e. we will never know much about the precursors to Gulf War I because most of it is classified for the next 20+ years if even then.

The transparency of our government is disappearing and the people that have researched information for this article are going to have a much more difficult time if our government continues to make more information classified than unclassified both historical and current day. IMHO, there will come a day where investigative reporting of information that shows government complicity will be treated as enemies of the state and that this day is rapidly approaching unless we, the people do something about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: oral history is what remains Posted by: ravengrrrl
What About The Physical Evidence?
Posted by: woodna on Feb 28, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we also not pursuing the scientific evidence, that prooved beyond any shadow of doubt, that the explosion could not have produced the massive dammage to the building that occurred?This story has changed many times to try to explain what compounds were used.How can a column closer to the explosion than another suffer minor dammage while the one further away be pulverized?Why was a major crime scene destroyed ten days after the explosion and the debris buried in a landfill, fenced in and patroled by guards and dogs 24-7?Too many unanswered questions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome to the Propaganda State
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 28, 2006 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay- I think this article is a joke. That doesn't change the basic fact that whenever anything goes seriously wrong and US government agencies are involved, the first people who are called are the 'public relations response team'. Their job is to make the government look good, regardless of the situation - they probably aren't even informed of the actual details of the events. For example: the 9/11 PR response team is responsible for the 'bombs in the towers' story, the 'missle hit the Pentagon' story, and for the coverup of the flight 93 shoot-down by military jets (which they had to do, unfortunately). That is the real 9/11 conspiracy story. Oh - and are you surprised that some angry cops would beat up anyone involved with bombing their friends and colleagues? The best minds in the art of public manipulation are using all the tricks at their disposal to screw the American people over - and Bush is paying them about a billion dollars a year for their services (or rather, he is funneling taxpayer money to them). Some subset of the PR team is in psyops - psychological torture in Iraq, Aghanistan and Guantanamo. As they say, it's all about hearts and minds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome to the Propaganda State Posted by: thoughtcriminal
clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Feb 28, 2006 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The politicians and the punditocracy insist we're a nation of laws, not men. If so, why is it we still don't know who shot Jack Kennedy, or the real story behind the Oklahoma City bombing, or Osama bin Laden's relationship with the Bush family, or the real story behind the killing of Bobby Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. As long as the CIA is above the law, law breaking by the government will go on. We can depose or kill foreign leaders with impunity and a somnambulant couldn't care less. Hey, that's what empires do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Feb 28, 2006 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I neglected to mention we still don't know the real story behind 9/11, and won't unless and until there's a vast overhaul in the leadership and I don't see that happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: starvinmarvy
» 9/11 was a controlled demolition Posted by: fifthworld
So what?
Posted by: eringhorm on Feb 28, 2006 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm bothered by the way the one suspect's trans status was mentioned in this article. His membership in a white supremacist organization is relevant to the story. But what does being trans have to do with his being a criminal? Is the author using this to imply that the man is crazy? I realize this isn't an Alternet original article, but I'm still upset about this factoid being included in the manner that it was.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!! !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! !!!! Q!!!!!!
Posted by: Againstthewindwalking on Feb 28, 2006 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!

!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!! !!!! ! !!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !X !!!!!!!!!!!!

Yours truly,
Stoney 13

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Labeling someone a "closet transvestite" is insulting and and has nothing to do with this story
Posted by: woodswoman on Feb 28, 2006 12:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an important, well-written story. However, given Alternet's progressive inclusive politics, I am quite shocked to read a description of one of the suspected criminals as "the brains behind the gang who also, curiously, happened to be a closet transvestite with a penchant for shaving his pubic hair and painting his toenails pink."

This implies that the guy MUST be bad news -- after all, he was a transvestite who shaved his pubic hair and had pink toenails. This is a gratuitous insult that has nothing whatsoever to do with this story.

I am especially surprised to see this kind of prejudiced language on AlterNet, a website that typically features articles focused on ending discrimination. I look forward to reading more articles about further developments in the Oklahoma City bombing case, and hope they don't contain this kind of unwarranted attacks on individuals' sexual expression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're not paying attention
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 28, 2006 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you read this article and still believe that OK City, and 9/11, by the way, were NOT inside jobs. Enough said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Video documentary
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 28, 2006 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See Daniel Hopsicker's excellent reporting, by the way, on "Cover-Up in Oklahoma City" as well as, more recently, the mind-boggling (and difficult) "Mohammed Atta and the Venice Flying Circus", on the flight-training scenario.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good troopers follow orders
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Feb 28, 2006 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is yet another case of Govt flunkies doing the bidding of the wicked. ARA is a fed front,imported along with the American Nazi Party. Militias were in the process of being busted up because they wetre a threat to 'Bad Govt'. Which by the way is what we have. Civilian Militias are the People's defense against just this kind of governance.They were in the way of the govt's plans,so they had to be broken up. With the attendant smear campaign to make it look good to the public.
The OK bombers were no different than the folks that blew up the Trade Center. They were all dogs on the Govt's leash.
This country HAS to have 'enemies'. That's how they get the People to give up their money,freedoms and Liberty,with Fear.
If they can make you believe the guy next door is a threat,they win. A fearful populace is easier to control. Most telling of all is the fact that no fed level employees were in the building when it was bombed. Why? They were'nt the targets. The target was the American People and their rights.
It was a direct hit,for we lost a lot of privacy rights and folks became more suspisous of manure trucks. The feds knew this was happening for their inside people helped find the targets.
Just like Pine Ridge in the 70's. The feds had men planted inside the reservation. They helped Wilson form the 'goon squads' and picked their targets. Mostly Traditional and Activists were their victims along with a few children,just like Waco. This Govt will pull any string as long as it gets them what they want in the end,so screw the People. The real
pisser of it is that they are getting away with it.
This Govt, from the Whitehouse to the Congress to the C.I.A. to the F.B.I. straight up to Homeland Security is a pile of manure a thousand feet high. The corruption that seethes out of D.C is the bane of Liberty and the killer of Freedom.
Through means of fear and intimidation most foul, this Govt
has hornswaggled the People into a Global War and forced a trade off of Liberty for an imaginary enemy that truly has no face. In a country of True Peace and Freedom and Liberty
there would be no Mcvieh's or ARA or Nazi Parties, the People would shun them just for talking such stupid nonsense. When folks blow up Govt buildings it's because the Govt has become the enemy of the People. When they act like Ol' Timmy and the others,it's because they're being 'made' the enemy. OK, 9/11, Iraq,and soon Iran are all smoke screens
to protect a corrupt governance whose alledged leaders are skimming as much money off the People as they can so we can all be left holding the bag. They don't care about the People. If you think they do....you drank the koolaid. Ask an Indian how far you can trust the Govt. How about the folks in New Orleans. Or Florida from the year before. Maybe go into the ghetto,I'm sorry, the Low income district, see for yourself just how much the Govt is taking care of it's people. It's not.
The Govt is Taking Out it's people. The Target is on ALL OF US. It's up to us, The People, to get rid of this problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waking up, are we?
Posted by: Senqi on Feb 28, 2006 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey hey, it's late in Europe and I'm tired, so I'll be short..
The American public needs to realize that they have been
played royally.. One of the main things to acknowledge is
that the official story of 9/11 is a LIE. Do some research.
It was an inside job, designed to bring on the neocon dream
of perpetual war abroad and fascist control at home..
More blood for oil, for oil, for oil...

Please comment, I'll be back tomorrow. Good night, and
good luck..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Waking up, are we? Posted by: fifthworld
» RE: Waking up, are we? Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: Waking up, are we? Posted by: fifthworld
» Inside job, absolutely Posted by: fifthworld
Martial Law coming to a theatre inside you
Posted by: fifthworld on Feb 28, 2006 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wanna bet, anyone, that if Shrubster's poll ratings (ostensible ones, that is) get below 30%, that will suitably pee him off to go overboard with his corporate mandate of full-spectrum fascism? I know, just look around already. But hey, why keep "creeping" along with the Homeland dimension, make it plain with a press conference: evening curfews, no communications, books confiscated. And your gold bullion stash too.
Then a hunting trip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accidently typing the complete works of Shakespeare? (NT)
Posted by: brunowe on Feb 28, 2006 5:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is starting to sound like the same old story.
Posted by: popsicle67 on Feb 28, 2006 6:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know the one,the story about the king who hires the bandits to justify raising the peasants taxes so the king can hire soldiers to catch the bandits. The only hitch for the bandits of course is that occasionally one has to swing on a short piece of rope to keep the peasants happy. Luckily for the king, the two most common substances in the world are fear and stupidity. Usually they can be found together, and in
copious amounts. Unluckily for the king, there is also that one pain in the ass that will at times not believe the king just to be contrary. The fortunate thing for the peasants is that when the pain in the ass finally gets his teeth set in the kings posterior he holds on with the grim determination of a preacher with a half empty collection plate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nichols?
Posted by: MEL810 on Feb 28, 2006 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am originally from OKC. The NICHOLS family in OKC owned a huge seed & feed company that sold, amongst other things, fertilizer.
The Nichols family, like many rich Okie and Texan scions, has long been known as politically to the right of Attila the Hun.
I have always wondered if Terry Nichols is related to that same family and if there is a connection there?
I think that might be worth investigating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

White supremacists or Middle-Easterners...?
Posted by: BeeGee on Mar 4, 2006 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The conspiracy blogs have lots to say about Middle-Eastern involvement in the Oklahoma City bombings. This is one of them:

Link

Others go further into the Middle-Easterners in the motel (five or six paragraphs down in this articles) and say that some of the alleged 9-11 terrorists were later identified as part of the group.

One more mystery to unravel sometime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If only you were there...
Posted by: bassman on Mar 5, 2006 2:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is going to sound crazy, but I was in Oklahoma the month that that bombing took place. It was very strange. For three days (leading up to the bombing) there were big skinhead dudes, on big motorcycles, with little flags flying behind them, riding around Tulsa and OK City. What struck me as strange was that alot of them had shotguns sticking up out of their saddlebags. To really get to the bottom of this, you need to understand just how corrupt Oklahoma is. Were the witnesses at the McVeigh trial testifying to reduce charges of their own? What were their charges? Answer these questions, and you'll find this (like almost everything else) had a lot to do with drugs, power and most of all, MONEY...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]