Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sticking Up for the Big Guys

By Onnesha Roychoudhuri, AlterNet. Posted February 17, 2006.


One of Washington's most well-known -- and industry-funded -- lobbyists takes on labor unions.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Onnesha Roychoudhuri

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Page through a recent copy of the New York Times or Washington Post, and you're likely to find quite a few articles on the unethical goings-on of lobbyist Jack Abramoff. But the great irony is that those articles are often sandwiched between misleading ads funded by an even more brazenly corrupt lobbyist who has evaded the law for decades.

One of these full-page ads proffers something called "the new union label." The graphic features a "closed" sign hanging over a padlocked fence. "Brought to you by the union 'leaders' who helped bankrupt steel, auto, and airline companies." In the bottom right corner is the website "UnionFacts.com," with the slogan, "The facts they don't want you to know."

If you missed the quarter-million-dollar ad campaign, perhaps you caught the giant, inflatable dinosaur installed outside AFL-CIO headquarters, with picketers sporting signs: "AFL-CIO: Colossal Fossil," "Smart Union Leaders: Extinct?" and "Labor Leaders: Dis-organized."

Who is behind the campaign? It's actually nearly impossible to tell who's behind the Center for Union Facts. While you can read extensively about the nonpartisan, educational motives of the site, what appears only once on the site, buried in a press release is Richard Berman's name. Yet it is Berman, the Washington lobbyist for the tobacco, restaurant and beverage industries, who is behind the high-visibility campaign.

A former labor law director for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Berman served as vice president of the restaurant chain Steak and Ale as well as the Pillsbury Restaurant Group before founding his own lobbying group, Berman & Co.

Berman's work on behalf of his clients -- among them Monsanto, Coca-Cola, Tyson Foods, Philip Morris and Hooters -- includes opposing the Americans with Disabilities Act and arguing against increases in federal minimum wage. Berman also helped defeat legislation that proposed a lower blood-alcohol threshold to qualify as drunken driving (In response to the MADD campaign, Berman said, "I don't believe that having a glass of anything makes it unsafe to go behind the wheel.") And his clients? Monsanto, Coca-Cola, Tyson Foods, Philip Morris, Outback Steakhouse, Hooters, Red Lobster, just to name a few.

Berman is talented enough that he can apparently serve as both an industry lobbyist and "consumer advocate," protecting our rights to ingest whatever those industries send our way.

But the AFL-CIO labor union believes UnionFacts.com is in fact a front group designed to stealthily aid business groups. AFL-CIO spokeswoman Esmerelda Aguilar sent AlterNet a document stating in part:

Unionfacts.com is a project of the Chamber of Commerce, according to an anonymous source. In a meeting of the State Chambers of Commerce National Conference held on Sanibel Island in Florida on Jan. 26, the Chamber announced it was spending $8 million a year to launch this anti-union website.

Berman's rebuttal to this charge, as reported by the New York Times, is that "when he spoke at the conference, [Berman] neither asked for nor received contributions. Rather, he said, he asked chamber officials to recommend that businesses in their states donate to his efforts."

It's this kind of sly language, hinging on technicalities, that has kept the origin of the anti-union smear campaign under wraps. And though Berman has come under considerable criticism, he carries on undeterred, telling the press:

This is just the beginning of a major education campaign about union leadership ... We're going to tell everyone the facts that labor leaders don't want you to know.

The allegedly nonprofit Center for Union Facts is not the first front that Berman has established to advance his clients' cause. While Berman runs the for-profit Berman & Co., he is simultaneously at the helm of his nonprofit called "The Center for Consumer Freedom" (CCF). CCF is the group behind FishScam.com, a site that purports to tell you, based solely on your weight, how much albacore tuna (FDA and EPA be damned) you can safely eat. "We'll tell you what the scaremongers won't," proclaims the site.

The CCF started as the "Guest Choice Network," which got off the ground thanks to nearly $1 million in funds from Philip Morris. In the next two years, the tobacco titan pumped $2.1 million more into the "nonprofit" to keep it rolling. From this consumer advocate platform, Berman put out newsletters that gave consumers the "real facts" -- promoting the safety of EPA-opposed pesticides.

The nonprofit fronts that Berman has established funnel money into his for-profit Berman & Co. Raw Story columnist Nancy Goldstein reports on the CCF's finances:


Digg!

Onnesha Roychoudhuri is an editorial fellow at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
In fact, it's downright impossible to tell who's behind the Center for Union Facts
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Feb 17, 2006 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Center for Union Facts" has a right to free speech, but the public has a right to know who's speaking. Every ad they, and similar organizations, place should be required to disclose the source of funding in the same size type as the text.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's called mislabeling
Posted by: SDres11 on Feb 17, 2006 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think you'd better start learning from George Lakoff what the cons are planning to do next. Mind you, this isn't new but it's only becoming more obvious that they want to trick and mislabel. Strict Father Morality has more than enough weaknesses to be torn down so the folks there just want to simply window dress themselves borrowing a few nurturing phrases to hide their real intent. It's Machievellianism at large but silently moving in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gosh, the CofC is at war with unions? Who would have ever guessed?
Posted by: Sojourner on Feb 17, 2006 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I try to stay out of other people's wars. The only ones who do not know about Berman are those, like me, who don't care. If he's violating the law, take him to court.

Misinformation is just another word for advertising. Give the Devil his due. He stinks. So what else is new?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]