Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Patty Hearst's 'Guerrilla' Legacy

By Cynthia Fuchs, PopMatters. Posted February 16, 2006.


The DVD release of a classic documentary about Hearst's abuduction raises timely questions about the intersection of terrorism and television.
guerrilla-taking-patty-hearst
Patty
Advertisement

"Mom? Dad? I'm with a combat unit that's armed with automatic weapons." -- Patty Hearst

"Even though this film is thoroughly immersed in the 1970s, I think it's a timeless story… and I wanted to create a documentary that would unfold like a political thriller and not be rooted solely in the past." Robert Stone's description of Guerrilla: The Taking of Patty Hearst -- newly released on DVD -- lays out its tensions acutely and evocatively. The film does bridge past and present, in sometimes eerie ways, tracing the initial marriage of terrorism and television, the connections between melodrama and news, sensationalism and ideology.

From its early moments -- a focus on the emblematic tape recorder by which Patty Hearst's saga was delivered to journalists amassed in her famous parents' driveway -- Guerrilla breaks down how terrorism becomes a function of its audience.

Combining interviews and archival footage (much unseen before this film), Stone shows the effects of Hearst's kidnapping on the self-image developed by the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA), and vice versa. While founding SLA member Russ Little imagines himself a product of a childhood spent watching movie adventurers like Errol Flynn, Mike Bortin -- who became a member later, after many of the original members had been killed in the famously televised L.A. shootout, and still wears mutton chop sideburns -- links his involvement to his opposition to the war in Vietnam. (As Stone says in the DVD commentary, "Vietnam doesn't explain the SLA, but it does explain the environment in which this group came together.")

As the film reveals, the SLA first emerged into the "public consciousness" when they assassinated Marcus Foster, the (first African American) superintendent of Oakland's public schools. As notorious as the group became with this "appalling act that made no sense whatsoever" (so described by San Francisco Chronicle reporter Tim Findley, the documentary's third primary interviewee), the Hearst kidnapping on 4 February 1974 made them worldwide.

As Stone describes it in his commentary, "This really was America's first encounter with modern, media-driven terrorism." (The DVD features terrific extras that elaborate on this process, including 53 minutes of Patty Hearst's tapes to her parents, plus seven minutes of the Hibernia Bank robbery and 27 minutes of Sacramento courtroom footage, when members were convicted of the shooting of Hibernia employees.)

While Guerrilla illustrates that the SLA imagined themselves as revolutionaries in the vein of Che Guevara or the kidnappers in Costa-Gavras' State of Siege, it also shows otherwise: they were searching for an identity and a coherent cause, influenced by what Stone calls "pop culture roots… They really loved movies." (He recalls that Hearst told him that the two films they took her to see while she was being indoctrinated were State of Siege and Peter Davis' Hearts and Minds.)

The white members were especially moved by the romance embodied by Cinque (born Donald DeFreeze), as "black prison inmates were the most oppressed of the oppressed." Radicalized in prison and then escaped, Cinque encouraged his followers to fight the "fascist pigs."

But, as Stone says, if the group begins as a political group, it transforms into a cult, referring to Cinque as "the fifth prophet," even as the police and Randolph Hearst "continue to deal with them as a real political threat."

This is connected to the melodrama of Patty Hearst, in the sense that her own transformation -- her immersion in the group and succumbing to Stockholm Syndrome -- was a public saga. When she speaks to her parents, saying, for instance, "Mom should get out of her black dress, that doesn't help at all," the intersections of tv and Hearst's own experience come flying to the forefront.

She's seen her mother on tv, or her captors have, and now they are orchestrating the spectacle. Stone's film includes no interviews with Patty Hearst, a decision he says in the commentary, is premised on his focus on her effects ("It's her enigma that makes her interesting").


Digg!

Cynthia Fuchs is Popmatters' film and TV editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We have always been entertained by violence, including terrorism.
Posted by: Sojourner on Feb 16, 2006 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, its effect on individual behavior is a complicated question. For some it releases tension. For others it provides an example.

The protests of the 60s, against racial discrimination and the Vietnam War, used the media for their own purposes. But the opposition did not wait long to turn the tables. Today, the media has been used to promote the Iraq War and turning the US into a police state.

Hearst's story needs to be combined with "Helter Skelter" to show how good intentions go bad. Our oppressive political atmosphere today is built on fear of the stupid notion of violent overthrow. It should be clear that domestic violence these days, as always, reaps the whirlwind. No one will ever have more guns than our government agencies.

Non-violence, self-sacrifice is the only way to change things. But that requires solidarity rather than do you own thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NETWORK REDUX!
Posted by: chanceny on Feb 16, 2006 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Clooney, who I soo like in oh soo many ways, is starting a production on live tv of the classic movie based on Paddy Chayefsky's "Network". That was the quintessential take on the delicate ballet of news and politics. All the cynicism, power plays, hypocrisy, greed, coupled with the need of our government to present their propagandized message intertwine with the realities of the day. You can feel the manipulation and cringe as the 'hero' self-destructs from a mix of paranoia and his inability to communicate his truth. I hope it will get a wide distribution, although just the name of Mr. Clooney seems to inflame those in power who wish nothing more than censorship of all those who are not among the righteous, pious and unabashedly hypocritical loyalists to team BUSH! I remained an avid tv viewer after seeing "Network", indulging myself in whatever goodies I was offered. Today, after my conscious decision to severely limit the 1,000,000,000 choices I am afforded by my friendly cable guys, I can understand the intense desire to just throw the tv out-the-window empowered by the refreshingly satisfying screaming coming from deep within me -- "I'M MAD AS HELL AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE IT ANYMORE".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NETWORK REDUX! Posted by: Jayzer
Interesting.
Posted by: Byrodude on Feb 16, 2006 5:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually played Willy Wolfe in a Student film done by a Brooks student this past session. The film was a retelling from Patty's point of vew the events leading up to her arrest. We watched that documentary almost exclusively for visual and character cues. It definetly helped our understanding of the material.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Same old same old on a different day
Posted by: outsidea on Feb 18, 2006 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in San Francisco when all this was going on and I remember most of it to this day in vivid terms, especially the burning to death of the SLA members in Los Angeles...on TV no less for the entertainment of the white leave it to beaver families across the land and warning to every one else what to expect if they messed with the system. What folks forget is that some of the whites in the SLA were formerly active in the Goldwater for President movement. Later when they discovered just how F***** white society was and how most of the history they had been spoon fed from grade one was sheer racist propaganda ...well frankly they freaked.

So in fact did I. I was a Vietnam Vet who returned a very disillusioned and angry person to the ZI in 1966 after a tour of 16 months in Nam. Though I went to the university with the intention of becoming a teacher and to help my country avoid making such a stupid mistake again...I could not do it. You see I went in thinking that Nam was actually a big mistake...a deviance from our true past. Well, the more I studied the more I came to see that this was not a mistake...this My Lai debacle...it was the same old shit on a different day.

You know what...its right back again with the Iraq debacle. Same old shit ...different day. Its not about theater...good or bad, or tv ratings, or bad hair days...its about anger and frustration and broken dreams and promises...a frightful witches brew that will have dire consequences...Abu Graib any one? What will be the measure of justice demanded for that!!!!!

Joseph

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]