comments_image -

Oscar controversy

Is it Palestinian or just from the Palestinian Authority?
February 14, 2006  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Wow, a real Oscar controversy... not just a bitchy comment about an abominable dress but a real live conflict on a global political scale...

It surrounds the fact that Paradise Now, nominated for Best Foreign Language film, was initially listed by the Academy as being "Palestinian."

As with many films these days (as well as cars, blenders, computers and even some food) PN is of mixed provenance. Gabriel writes: "[PN has] an Israeli Arab director, Israeli actors, a Palestinian crew and locations, a Jewish Israeli producer, and private European funding."

But two separate campaigns have been launched regarding the film's nomination, both with dubious merits:

First, Carpetbagger brough to light the anonymous petition demanding that the Academy withdraw the film's nomination because "glorifies" terrorism. (It most certainly does not.) On a separate front, the state of Israel and U.S. Jewish groups have made a formal request to the Academy to change the name of "Palestine" during their March 5th broadcast to "Palestinian Authority"...because, of course, if Hollywood even says the word 'Palestine', Israel will melt into a pool of butterscotch Jell-O.
The real issue here is that in a globalized world it's becoming increasingly difficult to tease out the provenance of anything. We've long sought to compartmentalize projects and products (see Olympic games...) but the fact of the matter is, borders are a fabrication -- and perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in cinema. Just take a look at the nations, municipalities, production companies and ethnic diversity represented by any film with a modest budget. This is about the symbolic recognition of a nation of Palestine, pure and simple.

For Israeli officials and Jewish groups to claim that because there's no formal nation, they couldn't possibly have a cinema is disingenuous. It's as though I annexed your house and claimed that because I'd taken it, the Better Homes and Gardens cover story is about my house. It's a rough analogy but you get the picture.

Gabriel has a nicer take: "This is an example of how Palestinians and Jews can work TOGETHER, instead of blowing their tiny shared square of desert to smithereens over useless prejudices." (ModernFabulousity)

--> Sign up for Peek in your inbox... every morning! (Go here and check Peek box).

Evan Derkacz is a New York-based writer and contributor to AlterNet.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]