Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Al Franken, Purveyor of Truth

By Laura Barcella, AlterNet. Posted February 9, 2006.


The famous funnyman speaks out about his latest book, Air America's future, and his potential run for the Senate in '08.
020906_story
Al Franken, Purveyor of Truth

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Laura Barcella

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Al Franken, the Air America radio host and bestselling author of new-ish book "The Truth (With Jokes)" (Dutton; October 2005), may have started his career in standup comedy, but he's evolved into one of America's more astute lefty commentators.

A refreshingly normal guy in the savage world of political spin and smear, Franken is progressive, but not radical enough to alienate moderate, middle-of-the-road folks. He's intelligent and well-informed, but without a whiff of his fellow Al (Gore)'s overeducated snoot. Approachable and friendly, but moody enough to seem, well, human, Al F. emanates a likeable everyman quality. Like his archnemesis, President G.W. Bush, who snared the last two elections partly based on his "good old boy" affability, it's easy to imagine hanging out with Franken: grabbing a pint, yelling at network news, smoking a cigar.

Fortunately for progressives, Franken plans to use his everyman appeal to his political advantage. He recently moved from New York City back to his hometown of Minneapolis, and he is weighing a run for Minnesota senator (as a Dem, of course) in 2008.

Franken spoke with AlterNet from his midwestern office about his campaign plans, his shit list's "most wanted," how to fuse satire and politics, and of course, "The Truth."

Laura Barcella: A lot has happened since "The Truth" was published in October.

Al Franken: A lot has happened since I wrote the book, certainly. Katrina happened since I wrote the book. Everything that I write about in terms of Iraq is about cronyism and incompetence, and that's what the whole story of Katrina is.

LB: What would you say about Katrina if you could go back and add a chapter?

AF: Katrina showed what was happening in Iraq, which was all this cronyism and incompetence and contracting that was going to people who didn't know what they were doing. And people who were stealing. The thing about Katrina is that people said, "Why was [former FEMA Chief Michael] Brown there?"

Well, people were saying he was there because he was Joe Allbaugh's roommate, and he needed a job because he couldn't keep the horse job; that's why he was there. Well, yeah, that's why he was there, but he was really there to funnel contracts to Joe Allbaugh, who, when he left FEMA, set up his own lobbying shop. He was there to make sure that he got the contracts, and there is no oversight of this at all in Congress.

And the same thing has happened in Iraq. Except that in Iraq, instead of poor people in New Orleans, the people who are dying are soldiers and Marines, and they're dying because we didn't do the reconstruction, and because the money was stolen, and because of incompetence. And because we didn't get the water up, and electricity [running], and the sewage taken care of. The people of Iraq became alienated right away, and that fueled the insurgency, and that's killed our men and women.

LB: How do you feel about the Alito confirmation?

AF: Well, it looks like he's going to get to cast the vote real soon on "partial-birth" abortion.

Today we had a decision by a court out in your area, on the 9th Circuit, that said the new law on "partial-birth" abortion is unconstitutional -- it's vague and it doesn't protect the woman's health. So, it'll probably come before Alito, and we'll get to see what a nightmare this is.

LB: Your last book, "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them," got a lot of press from both right- and left-wing pundits. Have you gotten any particularly ridiculous attacks on this book, any crazy press?

AF: No one ever actually challenges an actual, real fact. They just make these general broadsides about my book: "Oh, The Truth … it really should be called Lies. Oh, I guess that was the other book. I don't really know what to say …"

So I'm getting attacked right and left; mainly right. It's fine.

LB: Are they mainly personal or politically leveraged attacks?

AF: Well, they're both. They're personal attacks based on the fact that they don't like me politically. There are things like … there was some guy on "Bill O'Reilly" the other night saying that I go on USO tours as a publicity stunt. This guy doesn't know anything about me. I mean, it was weird to watch O'Reilly defending me. It was such an indefensible thing that O'Reilly had to say, "Well, how do you know?"


Digg!

Laura Barcella is AlterNet's associate editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
********
Posted by: decembrist on Feb 9, 2006 1:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Al Franken... though he seems a bit establishment in this interview, and the interviewer a bit soft on that same establishment for my tastes... like let's talk about Al Gore's "overeducated snoot." Way to repeat a Republican talking point from 2000 (which means absolutely nothing). Woohoo! let's go grab a pint!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ******** Posted by: BillC
al is great
Posted by: calibandita on Feb 9, 2006 2:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thank God for people like Al Franken, If only more people could be like him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: al is great Posted by: rsaxto
» RE: al is great Posted by: adp3d
I like Al, but ...
Posted by: paul_revere on Feb 9, 2006 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Al Franken. I read his books, including his newest. I saw him rip O'Lielly a new orifice on C-Span 2 at the Los Angeles Book Fair a few of years ago. He's sincere, compassionate and dedicated, and, at the same time, very funny. He is a very much needed shot of hope for our nation and our airwaves.

He would make a good senator because he tries to be more of a centrist at times, but that is the kind of person that drives me up a wall. Senators normally lack the spine and fire-in-the-belly to be a good president because they are always afraid of taking a stand and appearing partisan. That is why having Kerry and Edwards as the opposition to Bush was political suicide. Watching Senators respond to issues can really be frustrating because we want them to stand up for what is right and point out, in the most revealing and vociferous way, what is wrong. But this rarely happens.

The compromising trait of the Senate is part of the nature of this deliberative branch of Congress. Al would fit in nicely.

However ...

I believe Al's involvement in entertaining the troops has tempered his anger toward this horrible Administration. You just can't be a centrist and focus mainly on the healthcare issue. My god, we have a Hitler on the rise! The main focus has to be to clean out our Congress and then, with control of Congress, clean out the White House. We can only do this if we elect more Dems to Congress this November.

The centrist attitude brings to mind some analogies. Say you get bit by poisonous snake. What do you do? You have to get that poison out right away and try to get some anti-venom treatment. You can't just put a band-aid on the wound, and then start thinking about looking up methods of relief on the Internet. You have to act right away! Or, maybe better, you discover you have a tumor. If you act soon, you can reduce the size of the tumor and then have it removed. But if you wait to see if you can use an herbal tea to get rid of it, or you start a study group to talk about the cause of cancer, you will die in the meantime. That is the state of our nation! We have to be angry and willing to protest, to talk, to get out and find good candidates who are willing to support the many issues we collectively believe in. The heck with all the pansy-ass centrists! We only need 51% of the vote to elect new candidates and a new president so as to change the country, to take it back. The Founding Fathers didn't give a rat's pitoot about the Torries that sided with King George, nor about the idiots who watched from the sidelines to see who would win. Our patriots knew what was at stake and they pushed forward, not caring about the spineless colonists who opted to be moral and apathetic traitors.

Yes, I care about the healthcare problem in this nation. But I want the war to stop first, I want the troops home, I want the dishonest and traitorous Repugs out of Congress, I want Chimp, Darth Vader and Rumsfailed impeached and behind bars. I want the neocons swept out of the White House and the U.N., I want the poor and sick, the students, and the disenfranchised to receive some relief and feel some hope. And how do we get there? By getting mad and getting busy. You can't achieve any sort of reasonable healthcare system unless you have an Administration and Congress who are willing to participate. And this Admin and Congress aren't willing. They don't give a shit about you or me. So, the hell with the centrists!

So, Al, you keep doing your show and being funny. But I'm not willing to be soft on the sellouts. I will keep angry because I am angry. I am not willing to see more people die because my fellow citizens are total dumbshits and can't figure it out. I will speak truth to power, and if I have to put my fellow citizens in their place, then I will. I am just fed up with all the ignorance!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto on this Al.........! Posted by: Prophit
» RE: I like Al, but ... Posted by: TheJamea
» RE: I like Al, but ... Posted by: Democritus
» RE: I like Al, but ... Posted by: marytom777
» RE: I like Al, but ... Posted by: Lizka
Can anyone say: Replican Mouth-Piece?
Posted by: Ottomatic on Feb 9, 2006 4:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al how are you gonna get elected?
If Diebold Counts the Votes?
Repeating talking points is BU__! SH__!
Are you a comic?
or
Just another Replican mouth piece!

Mark Crispin Miller author of
Fooled Again
Connects the Dots on Election Problems -from interview at Buzzflash
I want to point out here that I’ve been an Independent for a long time, so I don’t have any partisan intentions. I see the Bush administration as profoundly un-American and deeply dangerous, but my motivation is not partisan. It’s civic, and it’s moral. I am frankly staggered by the fact that Democrats like Donna Brazile, and Hillary Clinton, and Christopher Dodd, and
Al Franken, and progressives like Mark Hertsgaard, and reporters like Manjoo, have all responded to the evidence of vast electoral fraud exactly as the perpetrators have themselves responded to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hold up a minute Posted by: bodhi99
respond to the right wing media
Posted by: lb on Feb 9, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Al, too. His books are hilarious. It might help his image to respond to some of the right wing media stories about him, though. The last one I read was that he is making 2 million dollars at Air America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REPUBS ARE VERY VULNERABLE ON HEATH CARE
Posted by: drricklippin on Feb 9, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I directly quote Bush SOTA speech last week"Our government has the responsibility to help provide health care for the poor and elderly and WE ARE MEETING THAT RESPONSIBILITY"(my caps) WHAT??? Then a week later propose massive budget cuts in Medicare and Medicaid and deep cuts in critical NIH research program from children! Even Al Franken could find little humor in that? If the DONKEYS don't jump on this I will be very surprised.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PS ON MY HEALTH CARE POST ABOVE
Posted by: drricklippin on Feb 9, 2006 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane"- Rev Martin Luther King Jr.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Run, Al, Run
Posted by: haystack1317 on Feb 9, 2006 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand fears that Al Franken is not the far left progressive many of us would wish for in Paul Wellstone's state, but he is one of the few people in the country who doesn't look weak when confronting the Republican media machine. Most elected Democratic officials look like buffoons when facing the opposition. Franken never looks like a buffoon unless he puts himself in that role on purpose. Perhaps because he seems willing to question himself on certain issues, and does in his books, he is more immune to the questioning of others. He doesn't sound defensive and can diffuse things with humour at a moment's notice. These are extremely rare and much needed qualities in the Democratic party right now.

I hope the state that elected Jesse Ventura will elect Al Franken. It can happen. He is not, as suggested above, a Republican mouthpiece. That's like calling John McCain a far-left progressive because he leans slightly away from the neo-con agenda on a few issues. (Even after Rove and Bush used every trick in the book to slander him and his family in the 2000 primaries, he still tows the line, stating that Bush's "heart's in the right place." Sickening.)

If nothing else, a Franken campaign would expose a lot of things about the current Republican party that no one else has been able to get into the mainstream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mr. middle
Posted by: binkey on Feb 9, 2006 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sound of Al:

Sure the war's a drag...but GEE WHIZ isn't it fun to hang out with the military? Wouldn't want to say anything too radical, or the big boys might not want me around.

Gosh those bad Bushies they would lie about anything, cheat and steal, send us off to war, torture, plot to blow up newspapers... but HOLY COW, if you'r tryin' to tell me they would steal elections...well, golly, I just can't go there. People might say I was a crack pot, and stop asking me what I think. Besides, everybody knows that we only fix elections in other countries. Not here, you silly dingle berries!

Let's face it, Al: Repeating Republican talking points, and supporting the entrenched, status quo Democratic party are just plain ol' midwestern good manners. And you want to be nice, or doggone it...people won't like you. And who will fawn over your opinions then?
I smell Woodward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's our Al ! Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» Not Really Fair Posted by: GreenLibbie
» RE: Not Really Fair Posted by: binkey
» RE: Not Really Fair Posted by: dlf
alternet falls in line with rest of media
Posted by: cry0fan on Feb 9, 2006 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
pushing the left elite and their moneymaking and powergrabbing schemes. Same as the rightwing outlets and their promotion of rightwing elite like Ann Coulter.

Same as it ever was. Liberals are supposed to be able to see behind all the machinations of the elite; they are supposed to understand the fallacies of dominance hierarchies and such.

But they do not...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor Richard IIIVII
Posted by: The critic on Feb 9, 2006 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep going, Al, you are one that might equal neocon fund raising ability. When you open shop, count on me for $1.00. We will win.

Rich

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al is centrist????
Posted by: mendomama on Feb 9, 2006 10:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gimme a break! Anybody ever even listen to his show? I've been following for over a year now, and he is far from centrist. Most of the things mentioned in comments that they believe he has no real stance on are some of the very things that he's brought attention to. As well as some not mentioned.

Take the Downing Street Memos. He hit that, and hit it hard. Voter fraud - I've heard him bring this up on several occasions, as one of the most important things that we have to deal with. Including having partisan officials in charge of elections, as opposed to a neutral person with no political ties. He's called out this Administration on their lying ways. From everything to campaign B.S. like the "swiftboat boys", to lying their way into a war in Iraq, to the rampant cronyism, and to the billions of dollars not accounted for in Iraq. As well as pointing out the hypocrisy in Repubs claiming to support the troops, while cutting their war-time wages, their healthcare availability and quality, as well as denying them the gear to keep them safe, like proper body armour. He was doing stories on Abramoff, and all of his ties to politicians, like a year ago -WAAAYYY before the mainstream media started reporting on it. There's so many things he's called these nutjobs out on, I could go on and on.

Al Franken is very progressive on many of the issues important to progressives. Anyone that listens to his show regularly would recognize this. And, I don't find his views on the military centrist. On the contrary, they're genuine. To say that his views on the military is centrist, is to imply that he takes his position for political reasons, which I don't believe is the case. I have a lot of respect for him. And, I look forward to Air America coming to the Midwest, so I don't have to get on the internet to listen, or wait for it to start up on Sundance again. He would be an asset in the Senate, and we should all support him in getting there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Al is centrist???? Posted by: truly scrumptious
kinda?
Posted by: binkey on Feb 9, 2006 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al Franken on Election Stealing (today, here):

"But we barely lost this last election with a sitting president who was at war, which is a big advantage for presidents. And the last election before that, we actually kind of won."

I listen to Air America almost every day. That's why I'm kinda dissappointed. One morning, I heard Mr. Franken dismiss the whole topic, live and on the air, because he didn't feel that there had been enough votes involved to "make a difference". He was so very dismissive. He looked so solid compared to the fringe lefties who keep bringing it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: kinda? Posted by: Andie927
» RE: kinda? Posted by: binkey
» RE: kinda? Posted by: Lizka
Support our troops, not the war
Posted by: truly scrumptious on Feb 9, 2006 11:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many liberals and anti-war folks say, "we support our troops, but we do not support the war." In part, it's a response to the lock-step conservative accusation that if we're against war, we are against our troops. Another part, tho, is that many of us know and love some of the men and women in the military, and we do support them (sometimes despite what we may think personally of military service), even while we hate the Lying A*holes who sent them into an Armchair General's war. We understand that the troops do not make the decisions to go to war, and we know what happens to them if they do not obey or if they conscientiously object. We know they are often good people, maybe hoping to pay for college, maybe hoping to help others and travel - whatever their motivation for joining the Services, they did not start the war and they, the troops, are not directly to blame. So we say we support them.

"Support Our Troops, Question War" and similar phrases make up a common bumper sticker theme. It's a nice sentiment, a nice way to think. I have the sticker - how many of you do? Yet, what good is that, really? At least Franken is showing how to support troops while not supporting the war. He's actively doing something beyond slapping on a bumper sticker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» THANK YOU, Joseph... Posted by: GreenLibbie
What are his qualifications, where are his policies?
Posted by: tohellinahandbasket on Feb 9, 2006 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forgive me for raining on your parade, but shouldn't we be talking about electing people with experience of governing?

What happens when Al Franken, or any other loud-mouth celebrity, gets to Washington and discovers that they have NO experience of working in committees, no experience drafting legislation and no experience lobbying their peers? Furthermore, they may also lack the network of experienced friends to call on to make up their staff and have next to no experience managing the day-to-day grind of constituency services.

It's one thing to be a thorn in the side of the establishment (God knows we need more of these, especially on the left), but it's another thing altogether to frame a set of articulate and workable policies which will be your guiding principles on everything from taxation and pensions to healthcare, foreign policy and education (to name just a few).

Why should anyone be allowed to leapfrog their way to the top of the political pyramid solely on the basis of name recognition? If Al Franken wants to go into politics, let him start like any other conscientious citizen and seek a position at local and state level and work his way up, gaining experience in real politics as he goes.

Honestly -- Does putting inexperienced celebrities into power actually do any good for our democracy? I know a lot of people in California are asking that question right now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Faith healing and magic bullets Posted by: tohellinahandbasket
» RE: HUMOR AMONG POLITIANS Posted by: drricklippin
still waiting...
Posted by: kingfelix on Feb 9, 2006 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i am off to the left of the political spectrum, i take an active interest in politics, i listen to air america, but i still don't get it - when is al franken going to say or write anything to support the idea that he's even the slightest bit funny? all he does is make gold from publishing bathroom books that poke fun at bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Liberal...but
Posted by: truthteller on Feb 9, 2006 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I generally like what Al has to say when I get to listen to his show. However, do we really need another Zionist apologist for the illegal theocratic "State" of Israel in the U. S. Senate? I have never heard a word of criticism from Al for Israeli genocide and land-grabbing against the Palestinians. We, as progressive Democrats, need other voices that will stand-up for fair play for non-Judeo-Christian residents of Countries that our policies oppress. We must stand-up to the outrageous lies that anyone who opposes Israel must, by definition, be anti-Semetic, which is ridiculous, since Palestinians are a Semetic people as well.

Perhaps Minnesota might be a good place to find a candidate not beholden to the Zionist lobby, since there probably isn't much of a Jewish population there, and a Democratic candidate could probably win without pandering to them for their votes. It's time to start electing liberals who want fair treatment for all, and not just those groups they have an affinity to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Suggested correction Posted by: chief of okeefe
» RE: Suggested correction- Posted by: drricklippin
» I refuse to play your game Posted by: truthteller
Will Minnesota fall for it??
Posted by: patagonianomore on Feb 9, 2006 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was at last year's Media Reform Conference in St. Louis where Al Franken spoke.

I talked with a guy from a prominant Internet news website, who also hailed from Minneapolis. I asked what he thought about Franken's chances and his impression was that, a lot of folks in Minnesota (by that he meant a lot of progressives and establisment Dems.) weren't too thrilled.

He said there are many in Minnesota who seem to be disillusioned with candidates promising fresh starts. The Jesse "The Body" Ventura experiment was the case in point. It's very hard for a political candidate to be successful if they had no prior political experience, the ability to govern/manage an administration of a variety of different people with different ideas, styles, political beliefs etc., or who don't have any prior experience developing and implemmenting sound policy (especially with those who disagree on politcal grounds). The point is, you can't really succeed as a politican if you don't have these kinds of skills necessary for the job, espcially if you're going to be the next U.S. Senator from Minnesota.

Does Al Franken have the necessary skills to be a succesful politican and/or U.S. Senator? Probably not, but I may be wrong. After all, I'm not from Minnesota. I only talked to someone who had an overall good picture of the Minnesota political scene.

But I can see why many people may be doubtful of Franken, especially after the Jesse Ventura fiasco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

democratic strategies
Posted by: saywhat? on Feb 9, 2006 7:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it would be nice, and i am dreaming, if a democratic senator could rally the dems and produce tactics , perhaps all addressing the president will alfred e neuman masks. al has that type of credibility....it wouldn't hurt anything at all....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's murder to be a Democrat
Posted by: Meremark on Feb 9, 2006 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Links about Wellstone's crash, and Al F. talked to it today, characterizing 'the conspiracy theory' as "the kooks think somebody put a refrigerator magnet on the altimeter." But, Al, then it would still be in the cockpit for the crash investigators to find.

The more informed idea is directed ElectroMotive Pulse (EMP) weaponry. It mounts in a van. It interferes with electronic instrumentation at a range of a few miles, depending on supplied power input, by emitting concentrated pulses of electro-motive frequency radiation. Think: microwave on steroids. Think: Portable, in case of news of unexplained plane crashes happening anytime, anywhere else in the world.

Here and in subsequent comment are links and material at From The WIlderness(dot)com. And if you haven't seen the site, and don't know Mike Ruppert's bio, and never heard of "Crossing the Rubicon:," (his book detailing the case that Cheney directed and managed the Nine-Eleven Op (n.e.o.) -con), then here's some informative reading to see. Ruppert is a hero for humankind. Among the best we got.
Index of investigations. Refer the following:
(Containing the sort of truth that soft 'D' duhmocrats can't handle, too chickens#!t.)
11/01/02
Was Paul Wellstone Murdered?
Democrats Twice As Likely To Die In Crashes.
-----
11/27/02
WELLSTONE UPDATES
-----
7/6/05
The NTSB Failed Wellstone - IGNORED EVIDENCE AND SUPPRESSED INVESTIGATIONS - by Jim Fetzer and John Costella, Special to From The Wilderness
-----
I wish Al F. would read investigators' reports, just to know the facts. Then make up his own mind, call it as HE sees it.

Quoting Ruppert, from article 11/01/02:
It is a rare occurrence when this writer refers to a quote from an unnamed CIA source. I have demonstrated in at least four interviews with the staffs of both the Senate and House Intelligence committees established that I know sources who have worked for the CIA in some very nasty covert operations.

The day after the crash I received a message from a former CIA operative who has proven extremely reliable in the past and who is personally familiar with these kinds of assassinations. The message read, "As I said earlier, having played ball (and still playing in some respects) with this current crop of reinvigorated old white men, these clowns are nobody to screw around with. There will be a few more strategic accidents. You can be certain of that."
Quo Vadis?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Am I the only one...
Posted by: Kneel on Feb 9, 2006 11:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who finds Franken dull on his radio show. As soon as I saw Introduction by Anonymous, I got it. I groaned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Frankensturmtroopers unite!
Posted by: Gun Bunny on Feb 10, 2006 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have nothing to lose but your minds.... and elections.

Gun Bunny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al is More Centrist Then You May Think
Posted by: cmysticism on Feb 11, 2006 3:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al may talk truly progressive on some issues, but he is definitively centrist on others.
For example, during his PLAYBOY interview he absolutely fawned on Hillary Clinton, and called her a "visionary." Hillary is pro-war, supportive of anti-flag burning laws, a friend of nutcase Janet Reno (and supported her brutal attack on Waco during her husband's presidency) and never fails to try to outdo Republicans on their own policies in order to win red state hearts and minds. Al is also against the U.S. pulling out of Iraq in the immediate future. As can be expected, he didn't bother to elaborate on what exactly makes Hillary a "visionary," since she sounds decidedly Republican Lite to me, and fully right of center on certain issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al is More Centrist Than You May Think
Posted by: cmysticism on Feb 11, 2006 4:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al may talk truly progressive on some issues, but he is definitively centrist on others.
For example, during his PLAYBOY interview he absolutely fawned on Hillary Clinton, and called her a "visionary." Hillary is pro-war, supportive of anti-flag burning laws, a friend of nutcase Janet Reno (and supported her brutal attack on Waco during her husband's presidency) and never fails to try to outdo Republicans on their own policies in order to win red state hearts and minds. Al is also against the U.S. pulling out of Iraq in the immediate future. As can be expected, he didn't bother to elaborate on what exactly makes Hillary a "visionary," since she sounds decidedly Republican Lite to me, and fully right of center on certain issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

missouri state
Posted by: econom25 on Dec 14, 2006 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in our opinion
Posted by: econom25 on Dec 14, 2006 2:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]