Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

If You Build It, They Will Come -- on Foot

By Jay Walljasper, Ode. Posted February 18, 2006.


From Copehagen to Bellevue, a movement has emerged to reclaim public spaces.
Advertisement

It's a dark and wintry night in Copenhagen, and the streets are bustling. The temperature stands above freezing, but winds blow hard enough to knock down a good share of the bicycles parked all around. Scandinavians are notorious for their stolid reserve, but it's all smiles and animated conversation here as people of many ages and affiliations stroll through the city center on a Thursday evening.

A knot of teenage boys, each outfitted with a slice of pizza, swagger down the main pedestrian street. Older women discreetly inspect shop windows for the coming spring fashions. An accomplished balalaika player draws a small crowd in a square as he jams with a very amateur guitarist. Earnest young people collect money for UNICEF relief efforts. A surprising number of babies in strollers are out for a breath of fresh January air. Two African men pass by, pushing a piano. Several stylishly dressed women sit at the edge of a waterless fountain, talking on mobile phones. Candlelit restaurants and cafes beckon everyone inside.

"Cultures and climates differ all over the world," notes architect Jan Gehl, "but people are the same. They will gather in public if you give them a good place to do it." Gehl, an urban design professor at the Danish Royal Academy of Fine Arts and international consultant, has charted the progress of Copenhagen's central pedestrian district since it opened in 1962. At that time cars were overrunning the city, and the pedestrian zone was conceived as a way to bring vitality back to the declining urban center. "Shopkeepers protested vehemently that it would kill their businesses," he recalls, "but everyone was happy with it once it started. Some now even claim it was their idea."

The pedestrian zone has been expanded a bit each year ever since, with parking spaces gradually removed and biking and transit facilities improved. Cafes, once thought to be an exclusively Mediterranean institution, have become the center of Copenhagen's social life. Gehl documents that people's use of the area has more than tripled over the past 40 years. The pedestrian district is now the thriving heart of a reinvigorated city.

Copenhagen's comeback gives hope to growing numbers of citizens around the world who want to make sure that lively public places don't disappear in this era of rampant traffic, proliferating malls, heightened security measures, overpowering commercialization and the general indifference of many who think the internet and their own families can provide all the social interaction they need.

While only a century ago streets almost everywhere were crowded with people, many are now nearly empty -- especially in the fast-growing suburbs sprouting all over the globe, but in some older towns and cities, too. Walking through the center of certain North American communities can be a profoundly alienating experience, as if the whole place had been evacuated for an emergency that no one told you about.

Even in the crowded urban quarters of Asia and Africa, public spaces are suffering under the onslaught of increasing traffic and misguided development plans imported from the West. The decline of public places represents a loss far deeper than simple nostalgia for the quiet, comfortable ways of the past. "The street, the square, the park, the market, the playground are the river of life," explains Kathleen Madden, one of the directors of the New York-based Project for Public Spaces, which works with citizens around the world to improve their communities.

Public spaces are favorite places to meet, talk, sit, look, relax, play, stroll, flirt, eat, drink, smoke, peoplewatch, read, soak in sunshine and feel part of a broader whole. They are the starting point for all community, commerce and democracy. Indeed, on an evolutionary level, the future of the human race depends on public spaces. It's where young women meet and court with young men -- an essential act for the propagation of the species.

Numerous studies in fields ranging from social psychology to magazine cover design have proved that nothing grabs people's attention more than other people, especially other people's faces. We are hard-wired with a desire for congenial places to gather. That's why it's particularly surprising how much we overlook the importance of public places today.

"If you asked people 20 years ago why they went to central Copenhagen, they would have said it was to shop," observes Jan Gehl, sitting in the former navy barracks that houses his "urban quality" consulting firm Gehl + Associates. "But if you asked them today, they would say, it was because they wanted to go to town." That small change of phrase represents the best hope for the future of public spaces. Historically, Gehl explains, public spaces were central to everyone's lives. It's how people traveled about town, where they shopped and socialized.


Digg!

Jay Walljasper is the executive editor of Ode magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
otto
Posted by: otto on Feb 18, 2006 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Canada there has been a growing grassroots movement to "Take Back the Commons". The 20th Century saw a frightening movement to privatize everything to profit those with money and power; it's good to see "the people" starting to take back what they own collectively.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death of the Common Wealth.
Posted by: Slowburn on Feb 18, 2006 6:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The trend in in my community over the last dozen years has been one of having any tax payer funded green spaces be self sufficient. witch of course locks out the poor and immobile.
The notion that if it does not make money it by definition is a burden. of course the people that believe this always have the means to pay for their own recreation. it is the common wealth and well being of a community that suffers most when commercialization moves in to bleed tax funds like it has done in my community.
I believe this trend will continue in my community because people that can afford to pay for recreation will always try to get rid of and forsake the green space that they would have to share with those who could not.
ergo, the continuing emaciation of the common wealth and an perpetuating exclusive class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Death of the Common Wealth. Posted by: ravengrrrl
More complete article than most
Posted by: anothername on Feb 18, 2006 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is well written, albeit rather long and repetitive at points. Yet, it does not even begin to touch upon all of the issues, history, and consequences of past and current themes and actions.

The caution with which I will start my response is that open space does not mean noisy space. Too many cities, following the Richard Florida concept of creative class, approach open space as needing programmed activity. While such space lends itself to organized musical events, farmers markets, and protests (must always remember the importance of open public space for democracy), it also means quiet enjoyment and observation, to which the article did refer. Coffee houses and inexpensive eateries are great, unless you're trying to write or to read over the pounding beat of some loudly-played music on a poor sound system.

There also is the question of open space as a destination or as part of a neighborhood, although it can be both. Riverside walks are a hot commodity in the United States for the past two decades, but they are often events-only destinations in many communities that are now being encouraged to create them. Malls are good places to people watch and to gather, but cars are required to reach them.

I also want to comment that open spaces, public spaces, pedestrian spaces, and revitalization ideas have come, been implemented, gone, decayed, come again, been implemented again, gone again, and are now coming again, which seems to be a ten-year cycle based on my 30 years of observations. But what drives me insane this time, is the constant buzz of people who excuse away the status quo by saying things such as, "people won't stop driving," "people won't take the bus in this town," "people don't walk when it's cold," and so forth. It is amazing what people will "do" if they are given the opportunity.

The topic of this article, as I stated at the beginning of my response, is very complicated. It also is very important to the vitality of America's communities, large and small, and to its practice of democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cities turn people into liberals
Posted by: medstudgeek on Feb 18, 2006 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See, we all think that's a good thing, but that's why the Repugs work so hard to get rid of them. This is politically motivated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SoCal City Councils Should Read This!!
Posted by: ravengrrrl on Feb 18, 2006 4:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My work often takes me driving through southern CA, esp the "Inland Empire" along I-5 and I-215. The place is one of the most-rapidly growing in the country.

I don't believe I see any public spaces being created in these new housing and retail mall developments. The greedy developers squeezed homes into every quarter acre, with barely any room for infrastructure. And the city councils and planning committees couldn't have cared less. They let them build with no recourse.

I wonder what these neighborhoods will be like in several decades. The youth and young adults have no places to gather and interact. No parks for recreation and playing in the sun. The older folks also have no public spaces for interaction and recreation. Its going to be an ugly place to live!!

I believe these places should actually use eminent domain to reclaim space and create public zones before its too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Down with Eminent Domain!
Posted by: medstudgeek on Feb 18, 2006 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I know libertarians hate eminent domain too but I think it's just used by governments to push the common people around by stealing their stuff. Not very liberal if you ask me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Down with Eminent Domain! Posted by: ravengrrrl
» RE: Down with Eminent Domain! Posted by: kittynboi
Ann Arbor city council needs to read this
Posted by: Lulu Gee on Feb 20, 2006 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The citizens of Ann Arbor have been struggling to get the city to commit to the development of a Greenway in a floodway/plain on the downtown's western edge. We realize it is not an easy thing to develop but our city prefers to denegrate citizens who dare nose their way into the development decision making process as nimbys rather than looking at ways to create needed public, civic amenities. Our present council and mayor are set to use public funds to subsidize the development of highrises (10 stories plus) in a town of 150k souls. The push for this development at this time is curious, since the Michigan economy is tanking and in Ann Arbor we have a glut of vacancies in retail, office and condo space. The money being used for these development subsidies could instead be used to support and expand existing civic spaces and create new public spaces. Our agora is shrinking and development schemes that include private rooftop gardens don't answer that need. LuLu Gee

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]