Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Gay Bowel Syndrome? Yeah, Right

By David Holthouse, SPLC Intelligence Report. Posted February 9, 2006.


Anti-gay researcher Paul Cameron's falsehoods are well-known. The incredible thing is the people who still cite them.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by David Holthouse

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The Intelligence Report is a project of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Nearly 600 evangelical Christians packed into the gymnasium of the Calvary Christian Academy in Forth Worth, Texas, to witness a ceremony on a Sunday in June. With a flourish of his pen, Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed the first bill while the televangelist at his side praised Jesus.

Gov. Perry shared the stage with celebrity Pentecostal faith healer Rod Parsley, whose television program is carried by 1,400 stations nationwide. In the audience were the leaders of two prominent family values action groups: Donald Wildmon, chairman of the American Family Association, and Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council.

The first document Perry signed that day was a parental notification law requiring girls under 18 to obtain parental permission before having an abortion. The second proposed that the state constitution be amended to specifically prohibit gays and lesbians from marrying. (Texas voters overwhelmingly approved the amendment this Nov. 8.)

Parsley heaped praise on Gov. Perry for "protecting the children of Texas from the gay agenda." Then he rattled off a series of shocking statistics: "Gay sex is a veritable breeding ground for disease," he said. "Only 1 percent of the homosexual population in America will die of old age. The average life expectancy for a homosexual in the United States of America is 43 years of age. A lesbian can only expect to live to be 45 years of age. Homosexuals represent 2 percent of the population, yet today they're carrying 60 percent of the known cases of syphilis."

The televangelist did not reveal where he got those numbers. He stated them starkly as facts to be accepted on blind faith. But they are not facts. They are gross distortions lifted straight from the pages of pseudoscientific studies by Dr. Paul Cameron, a crackpot psychologist and champion of the anti-gay crusade. Under the guise of chairman of the Family Research Institute, his statistical chop shop in Colorado Springs, Colo., Cameron has published dozens upon dozens of research studies that offer homophobes a supposedly scientific justification for their prejudices by invariably concluding that gays and lesbians are dangerous and diseased perverts.

"Homosexuality is an infectious appetite with personal and social consequences," is how Cameron describes the phenomenon he studies. "It is like the dog that gets a taste for blood after killing its first victim and desires to get more victims thereafter with a ravenous hunger."

$27.50 a page

While he makes no attempt to disguise his personal bias, Cameron dresses up his studies with footnotes, bibliographies and charts, and then publishes them in bogus "academic" journals. His work is propaganda masquerading as science and has been repeatedly unmasked as such by many legitimate scientists. Cameron himself has been cast out of both the American Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association. The ASA declared that, "Dr. Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality and lesbianism."

But no matter how low his professional reputation sinks or how patently ludicrous his findings become (one recent Cameron study concluded that lesbians are 300 times more likely to die in car accidents than heterosexual women), the social impact of Cameron's so-called research far exceeds that of all but a few genuine research psychologists. Cameron's findings are repeated ad nauseam by lawmakers, radio talk show hosts, preachers and anti-gay activists across the country. In 2003, his research was cited by dissenting justices on the Massachusetts Supreme Court in the case that led to legalizing same-sex marriage in that state. In 2004, a majority decision by the Florida Supreme Court that upheld a law banning adoption by same-sex couples specifically cited Cameron's research as being "consonant with the notion that children raised by homosexuals disproportionately experience emotional disturbance and sexual victimization."

Religious right action groups, including Focus on the Family, the American Family Association, the Family Research Council and the Traditional Values Coalition, promote Cameron's statistics on their websites. The Christian Communications Network, a public relations firm run by anti-abortion zealot Gary McCullough -- media adviser to Operation Rescue and the parents of Terri Schiavo, whose feeding tube removal sparked a major controversy -- publicizes Cameron's findings to religious newspapers and helps distribute tens of thousands of his heavily footnoted pamphlets to church congregations.

Not one of Cameron's anti-gay studies has been published in a respected scientific journal with rigorous content review standards. Instead, Cameron props up his facade of credibility by publishing his studies in Psychological Reports, a Montana-based vanity magazine that advertises itself as "The Scientific Manifestation of Free Speech" and will publish practically anything for $27.50 per page.

Unlike a serious academic journal, Psychological Reports does not employ a peer review panel of scientists to guard against flawed studies. But its title looks good in footnotes, and Cameron has been publishing his work in the magazine since 1972, long before he joined the anti-gay crusade. His first study in Psychological Reports concerned the relationship between pet and non-pet owners and animals. Cameron concluded that pet owners are far more likely to be kind to animals than non-pet owners.

'Too powerful to resist'

While Cameron describes homosexuality as a "crime against humanity," he seems fascinated with the mechanics and pleasures of gay sex. In a widely publicized 1999 interview, he said, "Marital sex tends toward the boring end. Generally, it doesn't deliver the kind of sheer sexual pleasure that homosexual sex does. If you isolate sexuality as something solely for one's own personal amusement, if all you want is the most satisfying orgasm you can get, then homosexuality seems too powerful to resist. The evidence is that men do a better job on men."

In a separate interview, in 1996, Cameron traced his distaste for homosexuality back to his childhood, claiming that, when he was four years old, a pedophile approached him in an apple orchard and forced him to perform oral sex. "I must have been a beautiful and charming little boy. But I didn't like it very much," Cameron said. "I remember that he was kind of dirty, and this bothered me." A year later, according to Cameron, a female stranger lured him into a bathtub. "I had a much more pleasant experience with the woman."

Now 66 years old, Cameron received his doctorate in psychology from the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 1966, and became one of the first researchers to look into the adverse health effects of secondhand smoke. He also studied what he called "the happiness of handicapped versus normal persons," publishing his findings in 1971 under the title, "Satisfaction of the Malformed."

In 1978, Cameron authored a sex guide for Christian teenagers called Sexual Gradualism in which he assigned numeric values to sexual acts: kissing, level three; heavy petting, level five; intercourse, level eight. In it, he suggested that teens experiment with heterosexual sex, short of intercourse, as a means of preventing homosexuality. "While no parent wants his child starting the sexual process 'too young,'" he wrote, "better too young than homosexual."

Cameron first waded into the fray over gay rights in 1982, when he became chairman of the Committee to Oppose Special Rights for Homosexuals, which formed to fight a proposed ordinance in Omaha, Neb., to extend civil rights protections to gays and lesbians. Cameron was then a professor at the University of Nebraska. Campaigning against the ordinance, Cameron told the congregation of the University of Nebraska Lutheran Church that a local four-year old boy had recently been dragged into a shopping mall bathroom and castrated by a homosexual. The story was totally false. The Omaha Police Department and local hospitals had no record of such an assault. But the tale of the homosexual castration attack upon a child quickly became a popular myth, and Cameron kept defending it in the media as "an example of what could happen," even after admitting that his source for the information was a friend of a friend who'd supposedly heard it from a police officer. The Omaha gay rights ordinance was voted down by a 4-to-1 margin.

Cameron had learned an important lesson: The more sensational a falsehood is about homosexuals, the more it will be repeated, and the more it's repeated, the less it matters whether or not it's true.

550 sex questions

A year after his victory in Nebraska, Cameron announced himself as the head of a new scientific research group he called the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality (ISIS). He said the institute's first project would be a nationwide sex survey. And Cameron boldly predicted in media interviews that, "The results will tend to indicate that those who lead sexually venturesome lives are more inclined toward suicide, are less happy and contract more diseases." (Legitimate researchers do not publicize their findings in advance of data collection).

A 550-item questionnaire designed by Cameron was at the heart of the ISIS study. The questions were oddly constructed and deeply personal: "With how many homosexual virgins have you had homosexual relations?" and "How would you feel about sharing toilet facilities with a homosexual?" (Multiple-choice answers to the latter question included, "Very positive. I'd enjoy it greatly.") Another question asked respondents why they thought they had developed their sexual orientation and gave a checklist of 44 reasons, including "I was seduced by a homosexual adult" and "I failed at heterosexuality." According to contemporary newspaper articles, residents in several neighborhoods targeted by Cameron's field teams called the police to report that perverts in the area were asking sleazy questions.

Legitimate scientists have identified and described in detail multiple fundamental flaws in the ISIS study's methodology and statistical analysis, any one of which would be enough to destroy its credibility. But still, to this day, Cameron's 1983 survey serves as the religious right's primary wellspring of anti-gay fear mongering. "Whenever frightening claims about homosexual sex habits or child molestation are reported in pamphlets, videotapes or other materials, chances are the information has been taken from this single study," writes David Williams, director of the Kentucky Gay and Lesbian Library and Archives, who tracks the use of Cameron's statistics. "As propaganda, it has taken on a life of its own. As information, however, it's stunningly useless."

The same year Cameron conducted the ISIS survey, he released a separate study claiming that homosexuals are "10 to 20 times more likely than heterosexuals to molest children," a startling figure that still frequently pops up in hard-right religious sermons and AM radio screeds.

Cameron based that finding on a 1978 study by Nicholas Groth, the highly respected director of the Sex Offender Program at the Connecticut Department of Corrections. Groth had interviewed 175 convicted child molesters and found that more of them had molested boys than girls. Cameron's statistic is derived from the false assumption that men who molest boys are gay, despite the fact that Groth's original study found that none of the men identified himself as homosexual. Instead, the pedophiles were either heterosexual outside of their criminal behavior or were what Groth termed "fixated pedophiles with no interest in sex with adults."

Groth was outraged and filed a formal complaint with the American Psychological Association that led to Cameron losing his professional accreditation. "Dr. Cameron misrepresents my findings and distorts them to advance his homophobic views," Groth wrote the APA. "He disgraces his profession."

AIDS abetting

Cameron took his act to the national stage in the mid-'80s against the backdrop of the escalating AIDS panic. In 1986, he co-authored the book "Special Report: AIDS," which advocated establishing concentration camps immediately for "sexually active homosexuals," theorized that HIV is transmissible by casual contact and popularized a fictional medical condition labeled "Gay Bowel Syndrome."

In 1987, Cameron moved to Washington, D.C., and changed the name of his organization to the Family Research Institute. Later that year, his institute set up a booth in the exhibit hall at the Third International Conference on AIDS featuring banners that read, "Stop the pipeline: Cut homosexual travel" and "Problem: A worldwide homosexual network. Solution: Destroy the homosexual infrastructure. Punish homosexual acts."

The booth was swarmed with angry AIDS victims and gay rights activists, some of whom repeatedly sneezed on him before being arrested and dragged from the hall. An Associated Press journalist recorded a confrontation between Cameron and a reporter for the Gay Cable News Network.

"All we're saying is, screen and quarantine until we come up with a cure," Cameron said. "Rights have run amok in our society, particularly sexual ones. Homosexuals were hung 300 years ago in our society."

"Is that what you're advocating today, that gay people be hung?" the gay journalist replied.

Cameron continued, "Homosexuals were castrated 200 years ago."

"So things are getting better then?"

"Homosexuals were imprisoned 100 years ago."

"What sort of concentration camps do you have in mind, Dr. Cameron?"

'Hobos and jailbirds'
Cameron moved his base of operations to Colorado five years later, in 1992, after supporters of a state constitutional amendment to ban civil rights protections for gays and lesbians distributed 100,000 copies of his study 'What Homosexuals Do" (sample statistic: 17 percent eat human feces) to Colorado voters one week before they went to the polls. The amendment passed. Later that year, during the raging debate over President Clinton's proposal to allow gays in the military, Army officials circulated Cameron's studies inside the Pentagon.

In 1994, Cameron attended a secret anti-gay summit in Colorado Springs that was attended by the leaders of virtually every major religious right political action group in the country. They gathered to discuss how best to combat "the homosexual agenda." Infiltrators recorded Cameron saying that when considering "what should be done with queers," it was important to keep in mind that "most people who engage in homosexuality are of the lower strata; these are people who are waiters and busboys and bums and hobos and jailbirds, and so forth."

That same year, the Family Research Institute released Cameron's infamous "Gay Obituary Study," in which he calculated the "average gay life span in America." He did this by culling 6,000 obituaries from gay publications at the height of the AIDS crisis, tallying the ages of death in each, dividing them by 6,000, and thus arriving at the conclusion that the average life span for a gay man is 43 years.

In 1997, former Secretary of Education, Book of Virtues author and gambling enthusiast William Bennett cited Cameron's obituary study in a Weekly Standard column titled, "Clinton, Gays, and the Truth." Later that year on the ABC news program This Week, Bennett said, "The best available research suggests that the average life span of male homosexuals is around 43 years of age. Forty-three."

After Bennett took Cameron's life expectancy figure for gays to a mainstream audience, the online magazine Slate published a devastating critique of Cameron's work by Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute. The average age at death for AIDS victims, the magazine noted, was about 40. For Cameron's figure of 43 years to be true, Slate pointed out, gay people who never contract AIDS could have a life expectancy of no more than 46 years -- a truly absurd proposition -- even assuming that half the gay population will eventually contract AIDS.

"Looked at another way," Slate reported, "if even half the gay male population stays HIV-negative and lives to an average age of 75, an average overall life span of 43 implies that gay males with AIDS die at an implausibly early age (11, actually)."

In the end, Bennett retracted his claim. "Given what I now know, I believe there are flaws with Paul Cameron's study," he said.

But the 43-years figure will not die. It gains new life with every repetition, whether by a neo-Nazi posting online or a televangelist standing with the governor of Texas.

The big lie

Cameron's newest batch of research concludes that gay sex is more dangerous than smoking. These studies basically recycle the obituary study with a new twist. First, Cameron presents it as a given that the average gay life span is 43 years, citing his own 1995 study as evidence. Then he compares 43 years to the average life span of smokers to conclude that having gay sex is far more dangerous that cigarettes.

"No one argues that people smoke because they are smokers. They are called smokers because they smoke. Yet gay rights activists maintain that homosexuals engage in homosexual acts because they are homosexuals," Cameron said in a recent interview with a born-again Christian online magazine. "Thus sex with nearly anonymous partners of the same gender becomes a constitutionally protected means of self-expression, something a homosexual is compelled to do the way pear trees are compelled to produce fruit."

It appears the smoking versus gay sex propaganda seeds Cameron planted last year are beginning to bear their own fruits. In June, the Rev. Bill Banuchi, executive director of the New York chapter of the Christian Coalition, said in a speech protesting Gay Pride Day that gays should be legally required to wear warning labels, not unlike Jewish stars under the Nazis.

"We put warning labels on cigarette packs because we know that smoking takes one or two years off the average life span, yet we celebrate a lifestyle that we know spreads every kind of sexually transmitted disease and takes at least 20 years off the average life span, according to the 2005 issue of the revered [sic] scientific journal Psychological Reports."

One month later, Dr. John Whiffen, chairman of the board of the National Physicians Center for Family Resources, a faith-based advocacy group that was contracted by Bush administration federal health officials to develop an abstinence education curriculum, said, "There are obvious effects for male homosexuals from a health standpoint. Parents should discuss those with their child." Then he added: "It's fairly well-accepted that smoking is not a good idea. It takes seven years off your life. It appears that male homosexuality takes more than that off your life. Naturally, you should warn them about that."

Somewhere, Paul Cameron is smiling.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

The Intelligence Report is a project of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where's the Stats?
Posted by: scottfr on Feb 9, 2006 3:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, since this televangelist is wrong with the stats, what's the true stats?
How much is homosexuals' lives shortened by their lifestyle choices?
How bad is the STDs and HIV situation among homosexuals?

Instead of complaining, offer the truth, the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where's the Stats? Posted by: decembrist
» RE: Where's the Stats? Posted by: scottfr
» RE: Where's the Stats? Posted by: cold2touch
» RE: Where's the Stats? Posted by: scottfr
» Consider the question first Posted by: oldsmobile_
» RE: Consider the question first Posted by: ALANHESTER
The high cost of Scientific Illiteracy includes repression.
Posted by: Elendil on Feb 9, 2006 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that hacks who write imaginative fiction masquerading as various forms of "truth", scientific or otherwise (in this case Mr. Cameron), can be cited and believed by impressively large proportions of the general populace and even by many who really should know better than to fall for such improbably notions as "The average gay life span in the USA is 43 years", bespeaks a general and quite disturbing scientific illiteracy in the country which is known worldwide for its former glory in the realm of scientific discovery and technical innovation. If the Bushites REALLY wished to create and foster a first-class educational system in their country, they would test just as hard for scientific literacy as they do for the ability to add 2 and 3 and come with an answer which approximates 5 most of the time. As this well-written article so adroitly points out, the costs of the appalling level of scientific understanding in the USA in these fear-plagued times, is high. The dangers of this situation are partly created, and distinctly ampified by the growing streak of "anti-intellectualism" in mainstream American society, fueled largely by the unholy alliance of regressive "right wing" forces of radical religious views ("Jesus is coming REAL soon now - why should we bother to learn stuff like science what makes our brains hurt, when we won't need to know any scientific nonsense in heaven anyway?? Besides, them scientists teach heretical stuff like evilution and a world WAY older than the Bible tells us.....") and extreme-right "conservatives" who have as their goals things like gaining social and political power for various distinctly un-progressive ends such as maximizing material wealth, maintaining ancient prejudices of all sorts, and "looking out for #1 first". A truly progressive society simply can't thrive in such a climate.

From the Semi-Progressive shores of New Scotland.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ordinary illiteracy too, evidently Posted by: Bic Pentameter
Gay Bowel Syndrome WAS real
Posted by: medstudgeek on Feb 9, 2006 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a medical term used to describe intestinal infections spread by anal-genital contact; think about it, if you are going to insert your genitals in one person's anus and place them in another person's anus this is obviously a vector for disease transmission. The term has since fallen out of favor.

Part of taking a complete sexual history is asking about homosexual behavior, at least among men, because it is a risk factor for HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, etc. Many physicians
are reluctant to ask about this topic, but it is considered very important in primary care. Note that lesbians are actually at LESS risk for STDs, which I doubt these right-wingers want to draw any attention to!

Cameron's math is of course ridiculous and his motives homophobic, but there are additional risks associated with anal sex, as well as for men who have sex with men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gay Bowel Syndrome WAS real Posted by: antoshakartosha
» RE: Gay Bowel Syndrome WAS real Posted by: marytom777
Protect The Children!
Posted by: Jesse on Feb 9, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, here's an idea: let's run an ad citing the number of kids attacked by Catholic priests and see if we can get an amendment to the state constitution someplace to outlaw Christianity. Obviously, it leads men to pedophilia, and is highly dangerous, since Christians seem more likely to engage in violent behavior (all those clinic bombings) and seem more likely to spread STDs (since a lot of them oppose condom use).

:-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Protect The Children! Posted by: ALANHESTER
» Gay not Pedophile Priests Posted by: fides et ratio
My suspicions
Posted by: Allison on Feb 9, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would place a money wager that this man spends a good chunk of his day thinking about penises. From sun up to sundown his brain is assailed with lurid images of hot, sweaty gay intercourse, which he believes is "less boring" and far more pleasurable than straight sex. At night his dreams resemble a Jeff Stryker film.

Honestly, if you're going to commit libel, it looks like the thing to do is libel a whole group of people, rather than just one. That way you can apparently spread any sorts of lies you wish, legally, without being sued. This guy is a menace to gays and scientific truth at the same time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: My suspicions Posted by: libertyfan
Not very good parenting
Posted by: bookwoman on Feb 9, 2006 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds as if Cameron either didn't live in a very nice neighborhood or had parents who didn't watch him very carefully. I am the same age as he, and I can't imagine my parents leaving me in situations where anyone would have had a chance to do with me what was supposedly done to him as a child. Also, was the woman a Lesbian? Maybe his real problem is bad parenting he received as a child.

Also, how does he know that homosexual sex is a lot more exciting than heterosexual sex. Having never been involved in the former, I would have no idea what the relative value would be. Also, if this guy is or has ever been married, I think I would be a little peeved to have our sex life described as boring if I was his wife.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not very good parenting Posted by: Arianna
» RE: Orchard story Posted by: Jackhappy
» RE: Not very good parenting, or marriage Posted by: antoshakartosha
» RE: Not very good parenting Posted by: saywhat?
This makes me sick!
Posted by: Lizmv on Feb 9, 2006 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Cameron is a very sick man. I would venture to say he is homosexual himself, but unable to accept it so he spews vile hatred at those he identifies with. Self-hatred disguised as science and Christian values. Well, hatred is not and has never been a Christian value. When are the Christian churches in this country going to stand up and state loud and clear that hatred and bigotry is not acceptable?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's The Hate Speech, Stupid
Posted by: Stonecutter on Feb 9, 2006 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sheer power of unvarnished hate speech, in this case dressed up as soft science by a clearly sick, professionally ostracized lowlife like Cameron, is the most frightening thing about a revelation like this article. Other comments here eloquently unmask this creep for what he truly is: a demented, likely closet homosexual with a virulent, self-loathing fixation on destroying gays and lesbians in our society through means of his pseudo-scientific propoganda.

I echo the previous comment about the very scary growth of anti-intellectualism in many areas of this country, a trend that is at the core of the polarization and hardening division among various factions, and even whole states in the U.S. The Divided States of America is moving from parody into reality, and promises to be the dark mutation of what many of us considered the enlightened, post-Great Depression, post-WW II America of the 20th century.

I won't be around to see the full metastasis of this mutation, although I'm getting a real taste of it since Bush stole the presidency. But my young sons will be here for 60-70 more years, and God help them and their children if we don't find our way back to some version of the original American paradigm of shared values that embrace strong ethical standards, private and public accountability, a renewed sense of shame for illegal or immoral acts against the commonwealth, and an enlightened legal and social regard for all citizens regardless of race, gender or sexual orientation.

Fancy words, I know, but once real and largely shared beliefs and principles which we relied on as a nation to deal with both domestic and international political conflict, policy priorities and public and private behavior. Today, too often maginalized, ignored or openly shat on by the forces of darkness, of which "Dr." Cameron is but one front man. How is this twisted purveyor of lies and distortions any different from the worst Gestapo or SS scum of Nazi Germany? The obvious answer is, he is no different. Hate is a force of historic potency and pervasiveness down through the ages.

Calling this guy "homophobic" may be technically accurate, but it's missing the boat...he is a fascist, and a practitioner of hate on a grand scale. He's a symbol of the living underbelly of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The most amazing thing...
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 9, 2006 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about all of this is that orthodox Christian doctrine teaches that God has given people free will choice.

If God, according to Christian doctrine, does not seek to force people into a certain behavior-- why should people who claim to be followers and servants of God seek to by force of law.

If bearing false witness-- lying, is a sin, why would people who claim to be doing God's work misrepresent data and 'cook the books' to support their agenda?

If Christians are to 'render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and to God that which is God's' why are Churches and Quasi-Church organizations playing so profoundly in civil affairs and politics?

As a Christ-follower I reject these quacks, charlatans and users who see the church and our society's granted legal status for religious organizations as some kind of 'dodge' or cover for their thinly veiled political and social agendas. There are far more important and compelling issues for the church to be addressing than the sexual conduct of private consenting adults.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Articles Exposing Cameron
Posted by: thirdmg on Feb 9, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above AlterNet article is a reprint from the Southern Poverty Law Center, which offers these additional revealing articles about Cameron:

Anything But Gay - "Paul Cameron doesn't like homosexuality. But his 1978 recipe for avoiding it -- sex play for teens -- will shock many a parent."

Garbage In, Garbage Out - "Paul Cameron's discredited research remains a mainstay of the anti-gay religious right. But one key expert aims to change that."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This makes me mad on so many levels...
Posted by: scryberwitch on Feb 9, 2006 8:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so angry! Not only is this guy a raging homophobe *and* a liar, but his bogus "Insititute" is acronym'ed with the Divine Goddess' name, ISIS. To take Her name for such a hateful, lying organization...this is the absolute insult! How would they like it if I made some horrible organization for, I don't know, killing babies, and made an acronym of it: JESUS????
Seriously, I want to protest this somehow. This is the gravest insult to Her name I have ever heard. I believe in freedom of speech, but I also should have the freedom to protest my Goddess' name being used in such a, dare I say, blasphemous manner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truthiness
Posted by: eringhorm on Feb 9, 2006 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then again, the anti-gay set doesn't really need science in the first place. God hates fags, and he told each and every one of them so personally. Or something like that.

The statistics are just created to give a veneer of respectability when they try to impose their views on the reality-based community, or to sway those that are sympathetic but not willing to take a stand on faith alone. Another fine example of truthiness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Germany in the 1930's---deja vu all over again
Posted by: zooeyhall on Feb 9, 2006 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This sort of thing is precisely like the psuedo-scientific research that was done in Nazi Germany to justify racial hatred, euthanasia of the "unfit", etc. Back then they also had "experts" and whole academic "disciplines" complete with "scholarly research" and "data".

My God, to think that this is happening again, and in the U.S. of all places. Is it going to lead to the same ultimate result that it did in Europe during WWII?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brush up your Eco
Posted by: mtnprof on Feb 9, 2006 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of you who express fear and surprise at this torrent of hatred and its chilling effectiveness would do well to acquaint yourself with Umberto Eco's "Eternal Fascism: Fourteen Ways of Looking at a Blackshirt" (a Google search will cough up a number of sites where the article's located). Written in 1995, it describes life in the U.S. in 2006 (not really, but you'll know what I mean when you read the article). Eco had first-hand experience with Italian fascism as a young man, so he knows what he's talking about. We're in those times, folks, and people like Paul Cameron are no different than individuals like Fritz Hipler, the mastermind behind that masterpiece of filth, The Eternal Jew.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brush up your Eco Posted by: thirdmg
Homophobic? Must be Gay!
Posted by: rob94116 on Feb 9, 2006 2:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few well-intentioned commenters here have suggested that Cameron is probably a closeted self-hating homosexual, as an explantion for his virulent homophobia. This line of "reasoning" is often applied to anti-gay crusaders, and sometimes it's true, but more often that not the homophobe is simply a hate filled angry bigot or a self-promoting professional bigot (Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Cameron?, etc). It occurs to me that racists are rarely accused of being "closeted" members of the race they hate. (Was the KKK a group of self-hating African Amercans? Were the Nazis all closeted Jews? Clearly ridiculous!). Gays are the only minority group that not only suffer the effects of discrimination but are also frequently "blamed" for producing the worst practitioners of bigotry against themselves. Sadly, some disturbed and repressed gay people do attack their own. But this shouldn't be the first assumption when regarding a creep like Cameron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homophobic? Must be Gay! Posted by: CPT_Doom
Scary
Posted by: redjenny on Feb 9, 2006 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hate-spewing pseudoscientists are awful both for what they say, and for the doubt they cast on real facts. How to trust science and research if it is so easy to fake. Those in the know get ever-more cynical, and those who don't care just use the "facts" indiscriminately to push their platforms - guess who mainstream america listens to? It's scary and it makes me so mad. How would they like it if we started throwing out fake data about how being straight makes you die earlier?

I feel sick. Read my rant if you want.
Red Jenny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Strange Character
Posted by: sassicatz on Feb 9, 2006 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do know that Paul Cameron is a very strange character. I knew him in Lincoln, Nebraska, because he came in to a printing/copy center where I worked. Whenever he needed to use the restroom (just a tiny room with a sink and toilet), he left the door open. I saw him myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An update on age-at-death study
Posted by: grantdale on Feb 9, 2006 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those interested, we have updated the study by Hogg and collegues that also gets a great deal of misuse.

It was orginally posted over at ExGayWatch.

Are Homosexual Men's Lives 20 Years Shorter?

(we would not even bother "updating" the Cameron nonsense. It was a rubbish study then, and the methodology remains rubbish.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pseudo-science
Posted by: pursah on Feb 9, 2006 5:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pseudo science was a hallmark of the Nazi's. They sent scientists to Greenland and Tibet in order to "proove" their racist theories. Hitler is the patron saint of the far right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My own research was defiled by Cameron.
Posted by: Abigail Garner on Feb 9, 2006 9:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article has prompted me to document the details of my own Cameron experience. My book, Families Like Mine, was one of just three sources he twisted and distorted to justify his bogus report, "Children of Homosexuals and Transsexuals More Apt To Be Homosexual." It was published last year in the Journal of Biosocial Science.

I very much appreciate this article, and my thanks to Alternet for re-printing it to draw more attention to Cameron's completely unethical reporting and how his myths are perpetuated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Religious/Far Right and Bad Science
Posted by: RedRobin on Feb 11, 2006 4:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Using Cameron's research shows that the far right do not care about science, facts, reality, or truth. The fact that Cameron has been kicked out of the APA and the ASA should stop in their tracks anyone who even thinks of using his "work".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More about Cameron here.
Posted by: jfburroway on Feb 13, 2006 4:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been studying Cameron's stuff for a while now. I have just posted my findings about one of his pamphlets on my web site, where I looked at his footnotes and compared what he said to what the source material actually says. It's all right here.

A Critical Examination of Paul Cameron's "Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement