Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

100% Indian Hair

By Tanzila Ahmed, Pop and Politics. Posted February 8, 2006.


How can women consciously get human hair weaved into their own without knowing where the hair came from?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" the Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Tanzila Ahmed

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Every time I drive down La Brea here in L.A., I always do a double take when I cross Pico. There is this huge red sign in front of a store in a strip mall that says, "100% Indian Hair." As a South Asian woman, I find this sign ridiculously strange and wonder just what exactly would happen if I walked into the store. Would they turn me away? Would they kidnap me into the back room for a hair hijacking? Should I start collecting the hair out of my drain and bring it in for some extra money to pay for grad school? What is it about my kind of hair that makes beauty shops so excited about advertising that they have "100% Indian Hair?"

I am reminded of a former African-American co-worker of mine every time I think of hair weaves. I remember the first time she told me she was getting hair extensions in her hair, how she was so excited and ecstatically told me, "I'm paying more money for my extensions because it's real human hair!"

I was mortified. "Whose human hair is it?!?!"

She thought about it for a minute. "You know, I don't know. I just know it's human hair."

I was seriously grossed out by this thought. I likened it to using old nail clippings and glueing it onto someone else's nail. You see, in the process of getting hair extensions, one gets long strands of hair, sometimes fake, some times real. These strands are then placed into people's hair to give the appearance of longer, fuller hair overnight. The hair can be braided in, glued in, sewed in, or clamped in. People pay a lot of money to get this hair placed into their own. But the thing that they don't know is where this human hair comes from.

Why Indian hair? Because our hair is the best. No, for real, that's what the research shows. Indian hair is thicker than European hair and thinner than Chinese hair. Once treated, it is less prone to breaking. The best kind of hair is long and untreated, with all the cuticles in the same direction. It is collected in plaits. Where, oh where, can you find such hair?

Well, the web research show that plaits of hair in India are cut off for weddings or offered to god at religious temples. This hair is then collected by "hair factories" that buy it for 15 rupees (25 cents) per gram. This one hair retailer based out of Chennai says, "Indian women donate their hair as an offering to their god as a sign of modesty. It is their understanding that it will be sold by the monks for a substantial sum of money that will be used to finance schools, hospitals and other publicly favored facilities."

I have some serious problems believing this. First of all, I don't remember an Indian wedding I’ve attended or a Bollywood movie I’ve seen where the hair was cut off the women. Secondly, women in India are ridiculously vain about their hair and will spend hours going through the ritual of soaking their hair in warm coconut oil and shampooing twice. A woman would have to be desperate and really in need of the 15 rupees per gram to cut her hair. Thirdly, supposing that women cut off their hair at the temple as an offering to a god. I'm not so sure that they'd be happy in knowing that their hair is really going around the world to be weaved into someone's hair for $50 a plait.

OK, here comes the speech. The thing that disturbs me about the whole hair trade is the "south corrupts the south" mentality, i.e., women of color in the United States are the ones benefiting from the exploitation of woman of color in South Asia. How can women consciously get human hair weaved into their own without knowing where the hair came from? Or that it came from the exploitation of other women of color? It's the same way people of color will go to Wal-Mart to buy their clothes without consciously thinking of the people of color who created the clothes in sweatshops. Where's the solidarity, people?

I'm all about looking good and spending the money on making that happen. I'm also totally aware that I have cream of the crop hair that is the envy of all, and whatever I say will be met with, "What do you care, you have 100 percent Indian hair." I also understand that there is a whole culture of getting hair weaves that I am not a part of, and that by telling people not to get hair weaves anymore, I am inflicting my cultural values on theirs. I get it. But I do think that, as one woman of color to another woman of color, it is important to know the truth about 100 percent human hair, that this hair was actually alive and had a life before it entered into a weave.

As for me, I'm going to start collecting the hair off my pillow and see if I can make some money with my 100 percent Indian hair.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Tanzila "Taz" Ahmed is a writer living in Los Angeles.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hair
Posted by: FedUp on Feb 8, 2006 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few weeks ago, I saw a PBS program about small businesses funded thru small loans by various international groups that encourage people, primarily in Africa, Latin America, and South Asia to start their own businesses and therefore get out from the cycle of poverty.
One of the businesses mentioned is owned and operated by an Indian woman that had been a victim of spousal abuse. She had lived in poverty and at the cruel whims of her husband.
With a small loan, she started collecting hair from towns-people, who collected the hair from combs and brushes. She has become so successful that she is now hiring people to work for her, and has started an cooperative.
My Latína mother had long lustrous hair, and I certainly recall her having to clean her combs and brushes, as did her sisters. As a matter of fact, she collected her own hair into a net, and used it as a foundation for formal hairdos for special occasions.
That women have been selling their hair is a custom that is thousands of years old.
I don't see the problem, unless they're forced to part with their locks by others. Even the healthiest head of hair experiences some loss. It's normal.
Why are you so creeped out by it?
Is it any creepier than wearing wool, silk, cashmere, vicuña, or alpaca?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You need to get educated
Posted by: butthead on Feb 8, 2006 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is perhaps one of the most retarded articles I've read on this site. You consider yourself to be Indian, yet you have no knowledge of India.

At the Sri Venkateshwara temple in Tirupathi, thousands of people (men and women) have their hair cut and donated right there at the temple - I know because I've been there and was even asked to donate myself (I refused). I suggest you spend less time cooped up in your stupid university and spend more time traveling.

As for your 'solidarity' bunkum, I suggest you take that somewhere else, because it doesn't work. People get hair extensions and weaves because they want to look good, and they could give a flying f**k where it came from. Nobody gave a sh*t where their Nike shoes came from for years, until it was deliberately pointed out to them. Now you don't hear jack about Indonesia anymore.

Anyway, get a brain and travel, that's my advice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What an apt moniker! Posted by: Bic Pentameter
Same for shoes & clothes
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Feb 8, 2006 6:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple of years ago I bought a pair of tennis shoes from WalMart for $9.97, and shortly afterwards a woman told me she'd bought a smaller version of the same for $5.97.

It occurred to me that I couldn't mail them back to where they were made for that amount. It seemed to me that by the time they are shipped, sorted (no one WalMart store gets a whole shipment), warehoused, loaded, distributed, shelved etc., there must be nearly that amount in overhead. Considering the cost of raw materials at the source, I wonder if the workers got more than 10 cents to make those shoes.

I recently read about silicosis of the lungs in Chinese gem-stone polishers that were practically indentured servants, obliged to live near their work and earning just enough to give most of it back in rent. Their workplaces were strategically located for apparently just that purpose. The companies frequently changed names or simply traded ownership to avoid on-going responsibilities. One of the workers interviewed was near death at 36 and obliged to continue working.

I've never owned a piece of jewelry, but I will have to think twice next time I need shoes. I've heard that expensive brands are made the same way, and more profits and advertizing make up the difference.

Short of buying shoes and clothing made in the US, Canada or western Europe where laborers have some rights, I know of no other way to avoid this exploitation. Until we require OUR corporations to provide for basic rights, capitalism will always exploit the most desperate people in the world wherever they may be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hair DO!
Posted by: FedUp on Feb 8, 2006 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's it to you if some sistahs want to look like this?

http://www.geocities.com/ghettofabhairdos/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Collection of hair
Posted by: zipper696 on Feb 13, 2006 3:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There may well be certain temples of certain sects that encourage their followers to grow and donate their hair but the bulk of the Indian hair provided is "grown commercially"- that is to say, hair buyers tour the most impoverished areas and offer cash for suitable lengths of hair, this is not collected from combs, brushes and pillows (a bizarre idea) but cut complete from the head.
It's exploitation of the weak and vulnerable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Collection of hair Posted by: ainahunter
intresing
Posted by: pretty_mimi on Feb 15, 2006 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I'm also totally aware that I have cream of the crop hair that is the envy of all, and whatever I say will be met with, "What do you care, you have 100 percent Indian hair."

I'm sorry but this comment here rub me the wrong way and i find it a bit insulting.This shows u have alot of pride. White women get extentions too but they don't use indian hair, which u claim is"thebest"They use european hair.. I'm a light skin black womanand i wear my hair naturaly(no perm straight tool or weaves 100%mine). I don't envy "indian hair" i do belive that everyone is unqiue and has there own beauty.

I'm not going to go too deep in this.U don't seem to understand what is behind black women wearing weaves or striaghting their hair it the whole "slave mentality" It's not just beauty or fashion it's a problem and it needs to be fixed. black woman need to start appreciating what they have. It is happening slowly but it is happening. More black women are starting to grow their hair naturaly and wearing their kinky hair texture

I suggest that next time u see 100 indian hair some where don't take it as a insult or as something to boast your ego but try to understand the deeper meaning of why many black women do that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: intresing Posted by: Taz
why?
Posted by: allie030 on Feb 18, 2006 11:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why would you condemn individuals who are already oppressed by society? I thought you as an educated woman of color would understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

silly text
Posted by: mia41003 on Feb 27, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black women are not the only ones who are getting hair extensions. Many white women, including myself, are doing it too. Yet curiously enough, it's only when black women get extensions that it seems to become political, and it seems to become a problem. No one says anything about a white hollywood star or model getting hair extensions, and no one has said anything to me other than you look great.

Seeing as people are paid, hair grows back, and for people whose hair grows very long and is very strong, grows back quickly, I fail to see your point as to the exploitative relationship you purport is imposed upon Indian women by African American women.

I disagree with your negative judgement of black women who are merely seeking a styling alternative. What is wrong with that? Why does it have to become political when a black woman chooses to try a new hairstyle, but no one accuses a white woman who curls, dyes and does half the things that I've done to my hair of lacking solidarity or as some of the threads seem to indicate, going against my (WASP) ethnicity? As well, I find your comment "I'm also totally aware that I have cream of the crop hair that is the envy of all" arrogant and offensive. Good for you, but you don't have to knock other women who are different to you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LOL
Posted by: guavagrl7 on Mar 1, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whats great about overly curly unmanageable frizzy indian hair? Who ever said Indian hair is the best? I would hate to have indian hair! I know alot of Indians who hate there hair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4real Posted by: SLOTTIE
» RE: 4real Posted by: guavagrl7
that is stupid
Posted by: musique on Aug 7, 2006 11:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i have never heard that indian hair was the best. also, women of other etnicities get extensions. especially white women. your article was very insulting. i know alot of indians, who tell me they wish they had MY hair because of it's versitality. it can go from curly to straight and it holds curls. you have no idea of what you are talking about. and alot of hair that i have seen says european hair. but like i said, different cultures use weave not just black women. maybe you need to do alittle more research before you publish an article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It seems like an ideal interchange!
Posted by: Godleypa on Aug 29, 2006 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always thought the fact American women (black or white) buy hair from India was a good thing for Indians. It seems to me that Indians in general are making substantial amounts of money for their hair and that is a good thing. If American women use wigs, extensions, or weaves to look a certain way that makes them feel better about themselves then that too is a good thing. I have heard that virgin Indian and virgin European hair are most suitable for weaves, wigs, and extensions. So even though your comments seem silly to me, I will say that I am happy that you are proud of your hair, everyone should be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement