Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Credibility 'Gap'

By Steve Benen, AlterNet. Posted February 6, 2006.


Bush critics worry that the White House may have deleted Plame-related emails during a 12-hour head start in the CIA leak probe. The delay is worse than they think.
Advertisement

On the evening of Monday, Sept. 29, 2003, then-White House Chief Counsel Alberto Gonzales had a choice. He had just received formal notice from the Department of Justice that the White House was the subject of a criminal investigation as a result of White House officials' leaking the identity of an undercover CIA agent, Valerie Plame, as part of an effort to discredit her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV.

Gonzales did not immediately alert the White House staff to the investigation, explaining the need to safeguard germane documents. Instead, he asked Justice Department lawyers if he could notify the staff in the morning. Because the call came in after 8:00 p.m. on a weekday, and most of the personnel had left the building, the attorneys agreed. Gonzales, before wrapping up his day, called White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card to notify him of the start of the probe. Twelve hours later, Gonzales informed his colleagues that they must "preserve all materials" relevant to the investigation.

For some of Bush's more imaginative critics, the 12-hour delay generates images of Card, Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby holding a late-night document-destruction party in the West Wing. Indeed, in questioning Gonzales' handling of the issue, Bob Schieffer, host of CBS's Face the Nation, noted that the half-day gap would have "give[n] people time to shred documents and do any number of things."

This delay took on renewed significance last week. The New York Daily News reported that Patrick Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor investigating the Plame scandal, told lawyers representing Libby that "many emails from [Vice President] Cheney's office at the time of the Plame leak in 2003 have been deleted contrary to White House policy." The computer system at the White House is supposed to automatically archive emails sent by the president and his aides. For reasons that are still unclear, these emails -- which may or may not be relevant to the Plame investigation -- were not preserved.

Could aides have used the 12-hour gap to conceal incriminating emails that pointed to staffers' role in exposing the identity of an undercover CIA agent? Prosecutors will no doubt explore this in some detail as the investigation continues, but it's important to note that political observers have understated the length of the delay itself -- by a factor of seven.

Indeed, the timeline of events over the five-day period between Friday, Sept. 26, 2003, and Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2003, highlights the fact that the 12-hour head start Gonzales gave Card is largely irrelevant. There was no reason for Card to call back Bush's top lieutenants to start concealing possible wrongdoing after the heads-up from Gonzales. If suppression was their plan, Rove, Libby and others could have begun covering their tracks several days in advance.

When Gonzales received formal notification about the investigation late on Monday, Sept. 29, the Justice Department was only making official what all of Washington already knew. A full three days before the counsel's office received notice, MSNBC reported that the CIA had directed the Justice Department to launch a criminal probe into the leak. In other words, White House aides with internet access learned on Friday night that they were being investigated but weren't told to start securing relevant materials until Tuesday morning, literally 84 hours later.

Perhaps, Bush supporters might argue, the MSNBC report went unnoticed at the White House. Maybe no one on the staff saw the report or any discussion of it on the many political websites that highlighted its significance at the time. Even assuming this is true, it's significantly harder for Bush aides to claim that they also missed a front-page article published in the Washington Post on Sunday, Sept. 28.


Digg!

Steve Benen is a freelance writer and editor of The Carpetbagger Report.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cover up
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 6, 2006 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course they deleted those emails. What evidence do I have? This is the most corrupt administration in the history of human folly. What else would they have done? I still have enough of a grain of faith in human nature (No, I havn't become totaly cynical) to believe that someone in that administration is going to become a hero/heroine by standing up and saying, "Enough"! Someone in that cesspool of corruption and stupidity has got to come forward, do the right thing and expose these trecherous bastards. Someone in that administration has the opportunity to become a shining light in their country's history. Maybe that is wishful thinking. Maybe not.

Any takers?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember?
Posted by: Eric Forat on Feb 6, 2006 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few decades ago, there was an 18 minute problem with some tapes... Today, there seems to be a similar problem with e-mail erasures! "Those who cannot learn from History are doomed to repeat it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Newsguy
Posted by: Newsguy on Feb 6, 2006 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Years after Watergate, Nixon is reported saying he wished he'd burned the tapes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IMPEACH
Posted by: krose on Feb 6, 2006 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE BASTARD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That Sickening Feeling
Posted by: mrsmagoo on Feb 6, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm getting that same sickening feeling about this whole affair as I did when I watched the Watergate scandal unfold. It'll be years from now before we even get close to the truth. IF we ever get to the truth. It makes me sick to continually watch this administration get away with breaking the law and flaunting it in our faces. I agree with the last comment: IMPEACH THE BASTARD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That Sickening Feeling Posted by: nanapantyhead
» RE: That Sickening Feeling Posted by: willymack
You are not watching the real news
Posted by: chabuka on May 22, 2006 6:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporate media wants you to pay attention to the William Jefferson (Democratic) saga..not this..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone really surprised??
Posted by: Reader11722 on May 22, 2006 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the same three ring circus that brought us no WMDs, NSA wiretaps, steals veterans private records, awards no-bid contracts to every donor and either allowed 9/11 to happen or was in on it. So what type of behavior were you all expecting? As an aside, a good book on bad government is circulating on the internet called "America Deceived" by E.A. Blayre III. Amazon and B&N refuse to sell it, well worth it . Here's the link (or check it out on Google books, very relevant to this discussion):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore
/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]