Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's Troubling SOTU Guest

By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. Posted February 6, 2006.


Cindy Sheehan wasn't welcome -- but a Saudi accused of supporting al Qaida was.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Jeremy Scahill

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

While Cindy Sheehan was being dragged from the House gallery moments before President Bush delivered his State of the Union Address for wearing a T-shirt honoring her son and the other 2,244 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, Turki al-Faisal was settling into his seat inside the gallery. Al-Faisal, a Saudi, is a man who has met Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants on at least five occasions, describing the al Qaida leader as "quite a pleasant man." He met multiple times with Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. Yet, unlike Sheehan, al-Faisal was a welcomed guest of President Bush on Tuesday night. He is also a man that the families of more than 600 victims of the 9/11 attacks believe was connected to their loved ones' deaths.

Al-Faisal is actually Prince Turki al-Faisal, a leading member of the Saudi royal family and the kingdom's current ambassador to the United States. But the bulk of his career was spent at the helm of the feared Saudi intelligence services from 1977 to 2001. Last year, the New York Times pointed out that "he personally managed Riyadh's relations with Osama bin Laden and Mullah Muhammad Omar of the Taliban. Anyone else who had dealings with even a fraction of the notorious characters the prince has worked with over the years would never make it past a U.S. immigration counter, let alone to the most exclusive offices in Washington." Al-Faisal was also named in the $1 trillion lawsuit filed by hundreds of 9/11 victims' families, who accused him of funding bin Laden's network. Curiously, his tenure as head of Saudi intelligence came to an abrupt and unexpected end 10 days before the 9/11 attacks.

"Nobody explained the circumstances under which he left," says As'ad AbuKhalil, author of "The Battle for Saudi Arabia: Royalty, Fundamentalism, and Global Power." "We know for sure that he was tasked by the United States government back in the late 1970s and on to assemble the kind of Arab Muslim fanatical volunteers to help the United States and the CIA in the fight against the Soviet Communist regime [in Afghanistan]. In the course of doing that, this man is single-handedly most responsible for the kind of menace that these fanatical groups now pose to world peace and security." Yet, there al-Faisal sat on Tuesday as President Bush spoke of his war on terror and Cindy Sheehan was being booked. At one point, the cameras even panned directly on al-Faisal listening intently to Bush.

The 9/11 families' lawsuit charged that al-Faisal secretly traveled to the southern Afghan city of Kandahar twice in 1998, where he met with bin Laden's representatives and Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar. Based on sworn testimony from Taliban intelligence chief, Mullah Kakshar, the lawsuit claimed that al-Faisal allegedly received assurances that al Qaida would not use "the infrastructure in Afghanistan to subvert the royal families' control of Saudi government." In return, according to the lawsuit, the Saudis promised not to seek bin Laden's extradition or the closing of his training bases. Al-Faisal also allegedly promised Mullah Omar financial assistance. Shortly after the meetings, the Saudis reportedly shipped the Taliban 400 new pickup trucks. According to the London Observer, Kakshar also said that al-Faisal "arranged for donations to be made directly to al-Qaida and bin Laden by a group of wealthy Saudi businessmen. 'Mullah Kakshar's sworn statement implicates Prince Turki as the facilitator of these money transfers in support of the Taliban, al Qaida and international terrorism,'" according to the lawsuit.

Al-Faisal does not deny he traveled to Afghanistan in 1998 for meetings with Mullah Omar, but he insists it was to "convey an official Saudi request to extradite Osama bin Laden." Al-Faisal has a long history in Afghanistan. He worked closely in the 1980s with the both the CIA and the mujahadeen that would later form both al Qaida and the Taliban.

Ultimately, a judge dismissed the 9/11 families' lawsuit against al-Faisal and his cohorts, saying U.S. courts lacked jurisdiction over the matter. But many of those families believe firmly that al-Faisal was connected to the attacks that killed their loved ones. The obvious question is: How does the president justify the ejection of a Gold Star Mother from the State of the Union, while openly welcoming a man believed by hundreds of victims' families to be connected to the attack Bush uses to justify every shred of his violent policies?

During his speech, Bush said, "It is said that prior to the attacks of September the 11th, our government failed to connect the dots of the conspiracy." Perhaps he should have just looked over his wife's shoulder up there in the gallery during the State of the Union.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Jeremy Scahill, a correspondent for the national radio/TV program Democracy Now!, is a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Others, also
Posted by: mizipi on Feb 6, 2006 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not see the SOTU, but I have to believe that Dick Cheney was there....oops, I forgot that this regime prefers to jail the innocents, not the criminals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mmacb
Posted by: mmacb on Feb 6, 2006 6:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think I know why the Saudi was there and why we haven't found bin Laden: They're all in it together! What if there is no al Qaida separate from the CIA? What if it's all just a ruse to justify giving billions to defense contractors, steal billions for themselves, and to justify fascism in the US? What if it's just a charade to keep us afraid and to keep us from seeing how they're robbing us blind? And has anyone looked in Cheney's basement for bin Laden? A year or so ago they were blasting underground 24/7 at Cheney's house -- maybe they were building an underground palace for bin Laden or any other boogie men they need to hide? I would have guessed their old friend Saddam was down there too -- and maybe he is if the guy on trial is one of Saddam's infamous doubles! What the bleep do we know anyway??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mmacb Posted by: bayway35
» RE: mmacb Posted by: tcx2
» RE: Bush Sr. used to head the CIA Posted by: jim's op/ed
» RE: mmacb Posted by: whatwhatwhat
connecting the dots is not what this Administration is about
Posted by: eileenflmng on Feb 6, 2006 6:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A week after 9/11 Bush told us to all go shopping if we wanted to do something to help and that evil was all "out there".

'We the people' allowed ourselves to be manipulated by fear and consumerism has been many American's 'drug' of choice.

REFLECTING upon WHY would a small [at that time] number of people in the world hate us and learning about America's undemocratic foreign policies would have served the world much better than retaliating with violence as violence only begats more violence.

Murdering innocent people is never justified.
Killing Innocent people and the destruction of Mother Nature are not collateral damage!
No matter who wears the uniform or how noble they believe their cause, WAR is the ultimate form of terrorism.


Cindy Sheehan wore her heart on her shirt and was evicted from the 'show.'
Our hearts can redeem us but that only happens when we are able to open them to 'the other' with the desire to understand.

Read more: THAT DAY, chapter 6 on WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ugh
Posted by: Paul D on Feb 6, 2006 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Cindy goes, and Turki stays.

Lovely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ugh Posted by: blueneck
» RE: ugh Posted by: saywhat?
» RE: ugh Posted by: paulaH
» RE: ugh Posted by: saywhat?
Here is why.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Feb 6, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"How does the president justify the ejection of a Gold Star Mother from the State of the Union, while openly welcoming a man believed by hundreds of victims' families to be connected to the attack Bush uses to justify every shred of his violent policies?"

First, Ms. Sheehan broke the law. She was protesting the citizens governments' war in Iraq. That is a punishable thought crime under the Bush regime. It is bad manners to question the supreme leader in his domain.

Second, the abassador to the USA from the Saudi family, is allowing Mr. Bush and friends to control the largest known oil reserves in the world. And to continue trading oil in US Dollars.

I don't believe any more explanation is necessary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here is why. Posted by: antu
» RE: Here is why. Posted by: JSquercia
AMBASSADOR Prince Turki al-Faisal
Posted by: CJC on Feb 6, 2006 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real question is why we accept as an ambassador the former head of Saudi intelligence.
It's not news that the Bush family and the Bush administration is up to their eyeballs and then some with Saudi Arabia, and have been for a long time. The previous Saudi ambassador, Prince Bandar - aka "Bandar Bush" - was the first guest in the White House post 9/11. He had a "private" dinner with the president on Sept. 13 or 14. Why has this fact rather slipped under the radar? 15 of 19 hijackers from one country and the first thing the president could think to do was invite the ambassador to dinner!

The removal of Cindy Sheehan from the Capitol is just a sideshow.

For more about Prince Turki al Faisal etc etc read Steve Coll's "Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, From the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001," Penguin Press NY, 2004. Coll was a managing editor of the Washington Post and now writes for The New Yorker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, of course, Prince Turki is an honored guest at SOTU
Posted by: sausage on Feb 6, 2006 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why after all, in his past capacity as head of the Saudi secret service in 1979, he recruited Osama bin Laden, fresh out of university, to set up a clandestine Muslim Brotherhood-linked terrorist organization to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. Then again, when bin Laden returned home to Saudi Arabia in 1989, Turki instructed him to form an Islamist-terror organization to fight the Marxist government of South Yeman!

Why Prince Turki is the best ally His Highness and Protector Of The Republic, young King George has in promot...oops!...in "fighting" (*wink, wink*) terror in the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Connecting the Dots
Posted by: Ming on Feb 6, 2006 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THe US only connects the dots openly when they lead to the outcome we are seeking. No sense spending time connecting dots that don't support our position. This is the "other" reality that has been part of American history since the first white men landed on these shores.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gramps
Posted by: gramps on Feb 6, 2006 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read The War on Truth by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmned. Your suspicions are facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's easy. There always has to be some culture war distraction or other
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 6, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would happen if Osama was actually caught by the US? Or if Roe v Wade gets overturned? Or Social Security no longer exists?

Answer, America would wake up and realize how culturally distracted we've been to the point of letting our own great nation go down like the fallen Roman empire but only faster.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Perhaps not. Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
from a Canadian's point of view
Posted by: concerned Canadian on Feb 6, 2006 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US's current situation points to, unless this politically amoral downward spiral is stopped, a return to fuedal times when the masses outside the castle walls were basically only masses whose only purpose was to be squeezed to pay taxes. Until the US citizens develop sufficient energy and courage to return to their post WW2 roots, their 'leaders' will keep building their own castles bigger, the castle walls will become more manned and the citizens will be outcasts - the result will be that simple. There will come a tipping point in this scenario too and then the citizens will look for a Robin Hood figure. It is time to study the American Constitution and remind the government of its role to govern. They are the representatives of the people - yes, or no?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prior Service Marine...RVN...66 thru 68
Posted by: bayway35 on Feb 6, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are only a few Good Marines left for these problems today... we are spread out pretty thin etc. And we always get the short end of the stick...But We Know How to Use That Stick...OhhRahh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's time for a re-peek at 9/11 commission report!
Posted by: neilemac on Feb 6, 2006 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I think I know why the Saudi was there and why we haven't found bin Laden: They're all in it together! What if there is no al Qaida separate from the CIA?" said 'mmacb' above.

Some time ago, I witnessed five short films pretaining to that very subject; the questions they pose are relevant now as much as ever. You can find many more answers and questions regarding the entire 9/11 fiasco by clicking into Jimmy Walter's research with videos, "confronting the evidence." I find it a shame that most Americans have not had or taken the opportunity to view JW's work.

There's another site involving JM pretaining to a call for the reopening of the 9/11 investigation report, with links to the evidence and more here.

As each day goes by, the free and deomocratic America I once knew ebbs toward a sea of 'fascism.' Thanks to The FreeDictionary, here's a definition of the word.

1. Fascism
a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

2. Oppressive, dictatorial control.

Hope you American readers that back the BushCo cabal will take heed and dauntlessly take action to thwart the growing mediocrity in your nation that allows this fascist administration to thrive. It's all your fault. You put the lying corrupt cabal in power. In the name of everything decent, next time the opportunity arises (municipal, state and federal) vote the repugnants out.

Namasté, neil E mac

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it Possible
Posted by: Omar23 on Feb 6, 2006 5:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Cindy Sheehan was invited to the SOTU, to serve as a distraction from the fact that Turki Al-Faisal was in the audience?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]