Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Letter to President Bush

By Rep. John Murtha, Huffington Post. Posted February 3, 2006.


'Iraq has diverted our attention away from the global fight against terrorism.'
Advertisement

Dear Mr. President,
This March will mark the beginning of the fourth year of the war in Iraq. In contrast, U.S. involvement in WWI came to an end after 19 months. Victory in Europe was declared in WWII after 3 years 5 months. In the Korean War, a cease-fire was signed after 3 years and 1 month. But after more than three and a half years into the war in Iraq, your administration finally produced what is called a "Plan for Victory" in Iraq.

Iraq is not the center for the global war on terrorism. I believe Iraq has diverted our attention away from the fight against global terrorism and has depleted the required resources needed to wage an effective war. It is estimated that there are only about 750 to 1,000 al-Qaeda in Iraq. I believe the Iraqis will force them out or kill them after U.S. troops are gone. In fact, there is now evidence that Iraqi insurgent groups are increasingly turning against al-Qaeda and other foreign terrorists.

Our country needs a vigorous and comprehensive strategy for victory against global terrorism. The architect of 9/11 is still out there but now has an international microphone. We must get back to the real issue at hand -- we have to root out and destroy al-Qaeda's worldwide network.

There are four key elements that I recommend to reinvigorate our global anti-terrorism effort: Redeploy, Replace, Reallocate, and Reconstitute.

Redeploy

The war in Iraq is fueling terrorism, not eliminating it. Our continued military presence feeds the strong anti-foreigner fervor that has existed in this part of the world for centuries. A vast majority of the Iraqi people now view American troops as occupiers, not liberators. Over 80 percent of Iraqis want U.S. forces to leave Iraq and 47 percent think it is justified to attack Americans. 70 percent of Iraqis favor a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. forces, with half favoring a withdrawal in the next six months.

In fact, 67 percent of Iraqis expect day-to-day security for Iraqi citizens will improve if U.S. forces withdraw in six months and over 60 percent believe violent attacks, including those that are ethnically motivated, will decrease.

Our military presence is the single most important reason why the Iraqis have tolerated the foreign terrorists, who account for less than 7 percent of the insurgency. 93 percent of the insurgency is made up of Iraqis. Once our troops are re-deployed, the Iraqis will reject the terrorists and deny them a safe haven in Iraq. The Iraqis are against a foreign presence in Iraq of any kind.

The steadfast and valiant efforts of the United States military and coalition partners have provided the Iraqi people with the framework needed to self govern. The Iraqis held elections that have been touted as highly successful, based primarily on the accounts of Iraqis who went to the polls. But our continued military presence in Iraq, regardless of the motives behind it, is seen by Iraqis as interfering in Iraq's democratic process and undercuts the chances for the newly elected government to be successful.

Recently, Iraq's National Security Adviser accused U.S. negotiators of going behind the back of the Iraqi government on talks with insurgents, saying the process could encourage more violence. He said, "Americans are making a huge and fatal mistake in their policy for appeasement and they should not do this. They should leave the Iraqi government to deal with it… The United States should allow the new Iraqi government to decide on how to quell the insurgency."

In December 2005, an ABC News poll in Iraq produced some noteworthy results. 57 percent of Iraqis identified national security as the country's top priority. When asked to rate the confidence in public institutions, they gave Iraqi police a 68 percent confidence level, the Iraqi army 67 percent , religious leaders 67 percent . But the U.S./U.K. forces scored the lowest, a mere 18 percent .

The longer our military stays in Iraq, the more unwelcome we will be. We will be increasingly entangled in an open-ended nation building mission, one that our military can not accomplish amidst a civil war. Our troops will continue to be the targets of Iraqis who see them as interfering occupiers.


Digg!

John P. Murtha (D) is a congressman serving the 12th district of Pennsylvania.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
bush administration will surely reject this.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 3, 2006 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes too much sense for those war mongers.

There is something I find very interesting about Murtha and Pennsylvania. How could somebody as pragmatic as Murtha get elected when the same state would elect a governor like santorum?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jack Murtha, not Tim Kaine, should have been giving the counter speech at the very least
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 3, 2006 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a native Virginian, I was already disappointed when our new governor Tim Kaine decided to do the unthinkable of going along with much of the GOP on raising sales/property taxes thereby allowing the GOP to use him as an economic scapegoat. His weak speech only further confirms his dedication to staying the "centrist" course to defeat. Unless he changes his "centrist" attitude, I'm giving up supporting him if he runs for any higher office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bajadeano
Posted by: deanmanix on Feb 3, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been 2 days since John Murtha sent this letter to the President and published this editorial. Not one newspaper has mentioned or published anything. The lone voice of reason is being silenced. Our "Liberal Corporate Media" is just as guilty as Bush for his War crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

clinker
Posted by: cottontail on Feb 3, 2006 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Los Angeles Times/ Bloomberg poll and a NYTimes/CBS News poll indicate half of the U.S. population is incapable of acquiring, processing and understanding information. If Bush did read this letter, which I doubt, could he understand it? I'd bet the farm he couldn't. Seems half of the country likes him and warms up to him because they feel he's kind of a dumb cluck, just like us. God help us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: clinker Posted by: condenser
Murtha is no genius
Posted by: ScottP on Feb 3, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, so he figured out the same thing that most of the world knows, that the war is increasing security threats. Duh! The main effect of wars is more war, as it has always been with only a few exceptions like WWII. Tit for tat. Now we're supposed to congratulate him for being a Congressperson with average intelligence in one aspect?

Look at the wrong conclusions he draws after correctly observing the problem:

costly program cuts will lead to costly mistakes and we will be unable to sustain another deployment even if there is a real threat. The future of our military and the future of our country could very well be at stake.

Oh come on! How many times have we heard that in recent decades? Remember the "domino theory", if Vietnam fell all of Southeast Asia would become communist enemies? The war profiteers will make up whatever pablum will sell their next war. If the future of our country he talks about is the one where we go around the world bombing poverty striken nations into being enemies, I think I'm ready to let go of that future. If the future is the one where we fund another coup attempt against another democratically elected leader every year, I'm ready to give that up, too. Just where does he want to deploy to, now? Iran? Syria? Korea? And any of those will help our security? (don't bother quoting NYT fear monger articles, I place more trust in my friends from the regions than Judy Miller and her buddies).

It's not enough to be against the war in Iraq. It's time to cut the funding of the beast that demanded it. Let's use the money from DoD cuts to develop alternative energy sources and conservation, that will bring real security!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Murtha is no genius Posted by: tcx2
Attacks From the Neo-cons?
Posted by: stopthebushies on Feb 3, 2006 2:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fanatical neo-cons must really be getting desperate, attacking Murtha calling him un-patriotic. maybe its just a ploy to get the people that are waking up to think that something is being done to stop the current psycopathic cabal in the white house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GWAT the real tale
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Feb 3, 2006 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war on terrorism is a war against the poor. We won't get rid of terrorism until we get rid of the policies that created it. We must accept responsibility for this and do our best to round up those responsible,either in or out of the Govt, and ARREST THEM. We must stop doing business with nations that indulge in policies of oppression.
Not all that long ago there were terrorists operating in Boston. Lexington and Concord as well. They were fighting against Foriegn Aggression. The same as the ones fighting now. They want their Liberty,their homeland,their right to control thier own destiny,same as we did. The difference is.......WE SCREWED THEM!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uh-oh...
Posted by: adp3d on Feb 3, 2006 9:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I can hear the gears cranking in the swift-boaters smear machine...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

some sense, some stupidity
Posted by: A. James on Feb 3, 2006 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i was with him all the way up to the part where he asks for more money for the defense budget. i'm sorry, "defense" budget - more like 'help my pals rake in lots of dough while cranking more useless military hardware out into the world' budget.
there is absolutely no justification for spending the amount of money we do on 'defense', and this guy wants more? no f'n way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you personally deliver it?
Posted by: BeeMan on Feb 4, 2006 9:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given that W only reads what's scripted before him, I trust that you, Congressman Murtha, personally delivered this open letter in a closed envelope to the man himself. Trouble is you make to much sense for these ideologues!

Keep speaking up in Congress. Wellstone is dead and so is Gene McCarthy, but maybe their spirit is still alive in Congress!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why do we fall for it. War on Terror, for petes sake!
Posted by: medusa on Feb 6, 2006 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel has fought this 'war' for 50 years and has only made it worse for them, England fought against the 'terrorist' IRA for decades, and only did better when they negotiated and dealt with the SinnFein. You cannot fight terrorism except by making the world better for everybody and keeping a strong middle class and equal opportunity for all, that is what kills terrorism. Also the 'war on drugs' hasn't been too successful either, has it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]