Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The State of Our Values

By Maria Luisa Tucker, AlterNet. Posted February 2, 2006.


The religious left goes to church to watch -- and critique -- Bush's state of the union address.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Maria Luisa Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Going to church to watch political debates or discuss legislative action is a whole new deck of saints cards for us spiritually minded lefties, but that's just what hundreds of people across the country did on Tuesday night. We went to houses of worship to watch the State of the Union Address as part of Sojourners' "State of Our Values" event.

Sojourners, a social justice-minded Christian ministry with a knack for organizing via the internet, prompted 160 churches from 40 states to "put forth an alternative vision that embraces the biblical principles of economic and racial justice, healthy families, strong communities, a consistent ethic of life, peacemaking and caring for God's creation."

In my little neck of the desert, the pastor of St. Andrew Presbyterian in Albuquerque, N.M., allowed a group of us to watch the speech in the church library. St. Andrew's is a modern and modest building on a nondescript street in a commercial part of Albuquerque. Not quite middle America, though it is certainly an important place to shift the "values" debate. Swing state New Mexico is home to socially conservative Catholics, desert libertarians, hippie environmentalists and a cadre of hard-core progressive activists. (Even now, almost three years into the Iraq war, Santa Feans hold weekly anti-war protests.)

The St. Andrew's group was comprised of a retired Unitarian minister, a pastor from the National Council of Churches, 10 church-going older ladies and two agnostics. We were an expressive group, grunting when Bush asked Congress to reauthorize the Patriot Act, and bursting into hilarious laughter when Democrats surprised Dubya by applauding his mention of last year's failed Social Security reforms. When Bush said, "Our government has a responsibility to help provide health care for the poor and the elderly, and we are meeting that responsibility," one lady almost jumped out of her chair protesting the unsympathetic TV screen.

When the 51-minute speech was over, we launched into our discussion, committed to do more than just bash Bush. We were going to make a plan of action. We were going to create a response from the quiet Religious Left to let our elected officials know we're here and we're not happy.

The conversation immediately focused in on Bush's plan to "reduce or eliminate more than 140 programs that are performing poorly or not fulfilling essential priorities." Among these programs will be Medicaid, Medicare, tuition assistance and after-school aid.

"He has never addressed the fact that those budget cuts are needed to fund war," commented Beth Daniel, an organizer of the event. These concerns of the Albuquerque group were representative of the worries among the larger community of religious lefties.

Sojourners had earlier reminded its faithful that "this speech will likely come just a day before the House of Representatives votes on whether or not to pass a budget that harms low-income families and children by cutting vital services like child support, Medicaid and assistance for disabled persons. We believe this is the real moral scandal in Washington, yet is receiving little attention."

The National Council of Churches tried to bring attention to the budget earlier in the week with its "Faithful State of the Union Address":

"Congress' cruel and reckless decision to cut billions from aid programs may seem like a small shift in a massive budget, but that tiny shift is critical to those already on life's margins. The consequences will be real -- in the form of more children frozen into lives of poverty, young people succumbing to the fever of despair, unable to afford an education. More and more seniors, many already living below the poverty line, will suffer and die for lack of medical care.
Budgets are moral documents. We may speak of compassion, but in the final analysis, the truest measure of our government's political will is made clear every time our government completes the sentence: "Pay to the order of …"

Digg!

Maria Luisa Tucker is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Is Jesus A Liberal?
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 2, 2006 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's presumptuous, to say the least, to claim Jesus Christ as the representative of ANY political party but I can say this without any doubt: He ain't no conservative, folks.

Can you imagine the Prince of Peace condoning the actions, both domestic and abroad, of the current administration? Can you even contemplate our Lord and Savior (OK, my Lord and Savior) looking on with pride while George W. Bush, as governor of Texas executed more people than any other Governor in American history? "Blessed are the meek for they will inherit the earth" Beautiful words, indeed! And yet the meek have been getting quite a raw deal from the current powers that be, have they not? "Blessed are the peace makers"....I'm not even going to go there. The quote speaks for itself. I have a sneaking suspicion that Jesus is not too happy about the war in Iraq. Which brings me to an interesting question: Has George W. Bush or Pat Robinson or Jerry Falwell or Ralph Reed or Tom Delay or any of these dirty old men who use His name so shamelessly in order to promote a shamefully corrupt political agenda - have any of these fools ever even read the Sermon on the Mount??? Maybe - but if they have, it's a safe bet they've misinterperated it.

There is a Religious left, folks. It's alive and well. Is not a contradiction in terms to be Christ-like and left-leaning. In fact, it's perfectly compatable - the Sermon on the Mount proves that fact beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Suggested reading:
"Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander" by Thomas Merton

"By Little and By Little" by Dorothy Day

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is Jesus A Liberal? Posted by: Prophit
» RE: Is Jesus A Liberal? Posted by: JoeBackward
» RE: Is Jesus A Liberal? Posted by: aida1200
Just a note
Posted by: ladybellringerm on Feb 2, 2006 5:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a left-leaning Christian for as long as I can remember. I was always mystified as to how the religious right could possibly advocate their unjust policies in the name of God. Then I came across a statement that amazed me. They do believe in caring for the poor, the oppressed, the sick. But they believe that it's not the government's job to do anything about it; that work belongs to the Church (or the Synagogue or the Mosque or some other house of worship). For those who espouse that, I say: read Isaiah. Specifically, read Isaiah 10: 1-2. "Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless."

So much for leaving it up to the faithful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jeremiah 22:13-16 rocks, too. Posted by: dirkster42
agitator church and state
Posted by: eileenflmng on Feb 2, 2006 5:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If enough Christians followed the gospel, they could bring any state to its knees"-Father Philip Francis Berrigan re:Vietnam

The Philosophy of Jesus: The Prince of Peace in America has been corrupted by empire seeking war mongers who hold political power and manipulate the masses with FEAR, when the gospel is "FEAR NOT" and "You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free."
- John 8:32


During the historic Holy Land Trusts Celebrating Nonviolent Resistance Conference in Bethlehem, Founder of SABEEL, Rev. Ateek affirmed:

“The God of war, violence, oppression and terror must be rejected. Authentic Christianity is nonviolent and is all about peace, justice and liberation."-read more on Dec 30, 2005 WAWA BLOG:
http://www.wearewideawake.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fear is in the Center of the Frame
Posted by: Stonecutter on Feb 2, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife saw a reference on some website to a BBC documentary called "The Power of Nightmares: Rose of the Politics of Fear". I did some extended research and discovered this film is not readily available on DVD anywhere in the USA. I eventually found it on Ebay and bought it as a birthday gift for my wife (Good old Ebay).

This is one of the most compelling and disturbing pieces of historical journalism I've ever watched, and I'm pushing 60.
It explains in terms previously unheard and unseen in this country how we've arrived at this horrendous moment in our history, governed by a bunch of fascists who are in turn zealously supported by a cadre of fundamentalist Christians and Jews (I am Jewish) no less rigid and absolute in their beliefs and values than the Islamic jihadists on the "other side".

To try and describe this film here could not do it even a modicum of justice...it must be seen by as many Americans as possible. The facts and consequences of it's unfolding story must be absorbed by the viewer, in order for us to finally understand what is at stake in this titanic struggle for the hearts and minds of The American People.

Those of us of a certain age grew up in post-WWII America, born of parents who lived through the Great Depression. We are getting old and soon will be dying out. Our kids and their kids will be left to face the metamorphosis of the America of Jack and Bobbie Kennedy, LBJ's Great Society, Dr. King's Human Rights movement and all the other combined forces of "liberalism", into the Christian Divided States of America of Paul Weyrich, Tim LeHay, Pat Robertson, Grover Norquist, Karl Rove, ad nauseum. George W. Bush is merely the puppet whose strings will go limp after the 2006 elections, but these guys will be around to continue the transformation for a long time. They have already turned the government into an unrecognizable mutation of FDR's and LaGuardia's and Robert Moses' shared vision.

In a few years, and I am not optimistic, they will have completed their gutting of the human side of the federal government, and by attrition, state and local governments as well. Get your hands on the BBC film "The Power of Nightmares". Watch it. Read Chalmers Johnson's books. Become aware of what is really happening, and then decide what you will do to resist, or be ground up by power run wild. Where else have we witnessed this in the past century? Take a guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Typo Correction by Stonecutter Posted by: Stonecutter
» THE FILM IS AT AMAZON.COM!! Posted by: Tom Degan
» I Found it on Netflix Posted by: granz
network coverage of speech
Posted by: porgygirl on Feb 2, 2006 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Democrats surprised Dubya by applauding his mention of last year's failed Social Security reforms."

I was flipping from channel to channel after the SOTU speech, and heard one network's White House correspondent describe that moment as a crafty bait and switch by W. He also said breezily at one point that most Americans aren't troubled by domestic surveillance. I found these lies to be more troubling than the horrible speech itself--because we know the speech is political, but a lot of people think the news folks are just stating the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Network coverage of everything Posted by: feduphoosier
Is a left-leaning fundamentalist possible?
Posted by: Jasonix on Feb 2, 2006 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something I've noticed is that "left-leaning" Christians tend to be those that don't take the Bible literally on matters such as sexuality, science, and history. Right-wing Christians usually believe the earth is really 6,000 years old and that Samson really did slay thousands of Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey, just as true as George Washington crossing the Delaware. I understand the psychological dynamic behind this - right-wing people love authority and certainty, and respond to those who project it. How do we break that cycle? We need people with conservative, even fundamentalist, theology to break their alliance with the Repubs - there are fewer Unitarians, Quakers, United Church of Christ, Reform Jews, ELCA Lutherans and Episcopalians COMBINED than there are Southern Baptists alone. There were probably more people gathered in a single Southern Baptist megachurch to watch James Dobson's "Justice Sunday" than there were people watching Sojourners' event. I'm more than happy to let the fundamentalists continue believing that the earth was literally made in a day if they take the stuff in the Bible about social justice just as literally. Any ideas on breaking the fundamentalist/neocon alliance?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Art is the emerging religion Posted by: drricklippin
OPTIMISM IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE
Posted by: drricklippin on Feb 2, 2006 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent essay by Marie Luisa Tucker of AlterNet- Bravo! Ms. Tucker ends on an optimistic note. All great leaders are optimistist as was Jesus.They are optimistic despite overwhelming evidence not to be. Because great leaders understand that optimisim is a moral imperative.This is not pollyanna speaking. This is someone who genuinely believes that if you are not optimistic (i.e.-lost hope) you are part of the problem. What say you AlterNet readers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OPTIMISM IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE Posted by: feduphoosier
» RE: OPTIMISM IS A MORAL IMPERATIVE Posted by: drricklippin
» The Nihilist Posted by: DDZimm
» RE: The Nihilist Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: The Nihilist Posted by: DDZimm
» RE: The Nihilist Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: The Nihilist Posted by: Edward George
» Well, you are wrong. Posted by: DDZimm
» RE: Well, you are wrong. Posted by: Edward George
Advice to a King
Posted by: peaceangel on Feb 2, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"These are the solemn words whic King Lemuel's mother said to him:...
"Speak up for people who cannot speak for themselves. Protect the rights of all who are helpless. Speak for them and be a righteous judge. Protect the rights of the poor and needy."
Proverbs 31: 1, 8-9

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Advice to a King Posted by: drricklippin
The Least of These
Posted by: sassicatz on Feb 2, 2006 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jesus also said " Forasmuch as ye have done it unto the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." Jesus meant those guys in Washington are doing to Him everything they're doing to the rest of us, and especially those who need the most help.

And if those right-wing churches think churches should be helping the poor, the elderly, the infirm, where are their programs to do it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Reason Conservative Churches Dominate Political Discourse
Posted by: thirdmg on Feb 2, 2006 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A recent report called "David v. Goliath" says that conservative mainline Christian churches receive hundreds of millions of dollars from anti-gay conservative groups and enjoy an 8-to-1 advantage in funding over progressive churches. The report calls for secular progressive organizations to actively support liberal people of faith to counter the religious right. The report in PDF format can be downloaded here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Need for governmental security nets
Posted by: Maryanne on Feb 2, 2006 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time when caring for the poor, the widowed, the helpless was left to families and to religious organizations. Came the Depression of 1929 which completely overwhelmed them: and it was realized that this system could not handle needs.

Since then circumstances have changed. No longer are there large families or several generations living together in one home. Families are smaller, often dispersed around this country, often involved meeting their own needs so not readily there to help..

To meet the basics of modern life- cars, auto insurance, life insurance (can't be buried for $4.00 anymore- even $4000 is cheap these days), medical insurance/ medical care, schooling for children (cost of supplies and books is outrageous!), property, increasing sales taxes, and income tax, etc. etc.- it now takes 2 parents to support a family.

No longer can one depend on even relatives to care for children - they are not always available, and it is no longer safe to leave children alone. Temptations for children abound: drugs, gangs, dangers of pedophiles on the internet, peer pressure; when parents are not there children do not have proper supervision, guidance. or sense of family.

No longer does a family raise its own food, have parents at home (or at least one), involving the children in family activities, values, even survival. Time to shop for food, to pay ulitity and other bills, to take care of other errands, to resolve problems caused by bureaucracy. Al this and more takes away from family life.

Then there are environmental disasters- floods, hurricanes, landslides, earthquakes, fire storms, all beyond the ability of religious organizations do to more than ameliorate the edges.

Examples of our changed environment in the last 50 years could go on, but the point is, we need a safety net now more than ever before. The safety net of extended family, and of nuclear family supporting itself is long gone. If the religious community and social services (ie United Fund) could not handle the needs during the Depression, they are less likely to do so now. While they can provide emergency assistance on an individual basis, only the government has the financial means and the ability to do this on a universal basis to have a system in place and available as needed.

Otherwise, we die, as did all other marginal peoples in history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overwhelm the churches Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Overwhelm the churches Posted by: drricklippin
THE FILM IS AT AMAZON.COM!!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 2, 2006 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear
is now available on Amazon.com!!! I just purchased a copy. Thankyou, sir, for this valuble info. The reviews I read say it it essential.
All the best,
Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE FILM IS AT AMAZON.COM!! Posted by: drricklippin
Lunatic or Proctology case,you decide
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Feb 2, 2006 4:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lunatic' is a slur against folks that really are crazy, No my friend this man is no lunatic. He merely has his head so far up his ass that all he can think of is shit. Cowboy Dub is on the way out,that's fer sure. The real question is,' Can we all survive until that great day?' If we stick together as People,we can. As for me,if I were elected President, I'd have the whole boatload ARRESTED,JAILED,and TRIED FOR HIGH CRIMES AGAINST
HUMANITY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive versus Fundamentalist
Posted by: wdzeller on Feb 7, 2006 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it interesting how the "Progressive Churches" , which were once the exclusive homes of the evil "W.A.S.P.s" and which now make it clear how they are ashamed of such people, constantly wring their collective hands over the success of the Fundamentalist Groups whose memberships are largely comprised of those very same W.A.S.P.'s who have fled the old Mainline Bodies as a result of their disgust in the morally relativistic brand of modern Protestantism now hawked by these organizations.

At current rates of membership loss, most Mainline "Protestant" Churches will be completely extinct within the next 50 years. Perhaps they need to worry less about the Fundies and worry more about their own continuation into the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]