Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dead Man Talking

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted February 1, 2006.


State of the Union -- Bush's address laid it all out in the open: His presidency is finished.
020106_story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Joshua Holland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

George Bush is hanging by a thread. As he gamed his way through his fifth State of the Union speech last night, it was clear that his is a presidency laying in ruin. Except for a reactionary judiciary that will be his continuing legacy -- pushed past the too-little, too-late efforts of a limp Democratic Party -- Bush has no accomplishments he can look forward to in the next three years.

George is dead, spun-out of spin, yet like his zombie followers, he just keeps on talking.

Gone was the swagger, the big ideas for shaping his corporatist "Ownership Society." As his party enters its Year of the Perp-walk, as many expect 2006 to play out, any semblance of a true politics of opposition will bring down the whole sordid experiment that he represents. We've come light years from the time when the White House's soft-peddle of compassionate conservatism could soothe public concern.

The roid-rage foreign policy that marked his earlier speeches -- focused on the the now infamous "Axis of Evil" -- was replaced last night with the tamer statement that military force could only go so far in the "War on Terra."

He addressed the threat posed by Iran, Axis of evil member and big winner after the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. But in doing so, he betrayed his own impotence in facing down Iran's nuclear program. At one point, Bush spoke "directly to the Iranian people," and the best he could come up with was: "We respect your right to choose your own future and win your own freedom."

On the domestic front, there were no grand plans to privatize Social Security, no talk of a major tax overhaul. It was yesterday's thin soup, reheated. He told a country that's becoming increasingly anxious about globalization's impact on the middle class that America needs to be more competitive in a wide-open global economy. The only other choice, as usual, is "the road of isolationism and protectionism."

"We will build the prosperity of our country by strengthening our economic leadership in the world," Bush said. No mention of median incomes dropping every year of his presidency, or of the 71 percent increase in average health care premiums American families have shouldered since he took office. No mention of the 14-cent hike in the price of a gallon of gas announced last week. No mention of the national savings rate going negative for the first time in history even as the Fed raised rates, hiking the cost of debt.

What he did mention, naturally, was making his tax cuts for the wealthiest permanent: "The tax relief you passed has left $880 billion in the hands of American workers, investors, small businesses and families," he said. It's really his only economic policy. The trillions in debt that Bush has built on those tax cuts? Just one mention of the "plan" to cut the deficit in half by 2009, a bit of voodoo economics that leaves out military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan, among other sleights of hand.

"Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy," he said. "Here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil …" Bush proposed new tax credits and an "Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22 percent increase in clean-energy research" -- laudable ideas if not for the fact that the same promises have turned into giveaways for the energy industry throughout his presidency. This, a day after Exxon announced that it had turned an all-time record profit in 2005.

He told the American people, 46 million of whom are uninsured, that their problem was too much insurance, and that he would beef up his Health Savings Accounts proposal. He said it even as seniors are in a gray revolt, trying to figure out how to maintain coverage under the prescription drug benefit, his last health care scheme.

And he continued to spin out his fantasy of how Iraq is shaping up. Things are going great, Iraqi forces are being trained, and a tolerant, Jeffersonian democracy will break out any day. He has a Plan for Victory.

And Bush was equally deranged in offering his solutions to the real-world problems he talked about: We heard platitudes and Bizarro-World market-based fixes, Wall Street brokers and the insurance companies in their portfolios will mend a broken health care system, lavishing taxpayers' largesse on big agribusiness and energy companies will break our dependency on oil.

That's it. That's all he had. After five years running the country, without a single policy he could point to that hasn't turned out to be a failure, George Bush has only one thing left to say: "My presidency is finished."

Digg!

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Perhaps it isn't a failed presidency..
Posted by: Rolomax on Feb 1, 2006 12:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One man's definition of failure is another man's definition of a success. Depending on how you look at it and from whose point of view you expand upon..

Speaking accordingly, you could say that his presidency is a success, and that the next three (3) YEARS is just a downhill ride.

The damage is done, and it was a success. His friends are richer, his family is richer, and they will continue to become wealthier. Halliburton stock is doubled, and so the VP has done a great job as well. The news networks are under the 'thumb' as well as the entertainment programs. How could it possibly be better at this day and age?

Total and complete success! Even medical coverage is at an all-time low. Perhaps it will be even lower by 2009. They've got 3 years to work on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Josh: are you a damn fool? Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: Josh: are you a damn fool? Posted by: drricklippin
» How about facts, not cliches? Posted by: Citizendeane
» Now, now Posted by: Citizendeane
» Stolen Elections Posted by: drricklippin
» Place a bet? Posted by: Citizendeane
» Forecasting is my specialty Posted by: drricklippin
» Chicken! Posted by: Citizendeane
» RE: Place a bet? Posted by: AlienSlave
Failure?  You Seem To Forget. . .
Posted by: The Old Hippie on Feb 1, 2006 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That even in the face of the failures, they have successfully...

  1.
  Emptied, the entire U. S. treasury, all of the tax-cuts, and all of the borrowed monies from foreign governments, into their pockets.

  2.  Done away with the checks and balances.

  3.  Completed a full one-party-rule.

  4.  Taken full corporate control of the media.

  5.  Completed a corporate take-over of all the regulatory agencies.

  6.  Destroyed the Separation of Church and State.

  7.  Transferred real power from the Legislative to the Executive.

  8.  Sabotaged science in favor of corporate profits.

  9.  Legalized "Free-Speech Zones."

10.  Legalized torture.

11.  Created a "Unitary Executive Theory."

12.  Ignored all international environmental treaties.

13.  Gotten away with using chemical weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

14.  Broken all international nuclear non-proliferation treaties.

15.  Avoided capturing the enemy, Bin Laden/Al-Qaeda, and taken this nation into a never ending Orwellian "war of corporate profit" on a tactic, "terrorism," not a state/government/nation.

16.  Turned "our" representative Constitutional Republic into an openly criminally corrupt one-party-ruled Theocratic/Corporatist Empire.

And they have successfully accomplished all this, and so much more - Without any real protests, or revolt - They were "allowed" to get away with all of it, and "allowed" to get away with all of the monies, in a "perfect theft" of power - and the money.

Did I forget to mention, they are still in power - Still getting away with it all, and that your expressed frustrated anger in this article. . .  Is now "too little - too late," and meaningless?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Failure? You Seem To Forget. . . Posted by: mountainrider
» RE: JSquercia Posted by: kww355
» Who is that masked hippy? Posted by: Bic Pentameter
» RE: Failure?  You Seem To Forget. . . Posted by: The Old Hippie
» RE: White Phosphorus Posted by: The Old Hippie
» RE: Do Something? What? Posted by: The Old Hippie
» RE: Old Hippie Posted by: kww355
» RE: Old Hippie Posted by: The Old Hippie
He's melting
Posted by: decembrist on Feb 1, 2006 2:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing Bush has to hold on to is his "war" on terror. He'll continue to pull Osama out of his hat and he'll use his "war" to defend his criminal evesdropping.

The absence of any real substantive proposals points to capital all spent up or leaked away.

Now, Bush has the NSA wiretap hearings in less than a week. We should all try to make sure these hearings are kept real hot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A truly sad thing about this is... Posted by: GreenLibbie
Proof when Emperor Bush opens his mouth, He's lying
Posted by: Cardinal Spellman on Feb 1, 2006 2:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't watch the SOU address because it takes "courage" to listen to this man try to put coherent words together. However, I did print out the speech so I could read it word for word. There are a couple of points that I found interesting.

1) Bush said " On September 11, 2001 we found that problems originating in a failed and oppressive state [ keep a close eye on this word] seven thousand miles away could bring murder and destruction to our country”
 Once again he is CLEARLY doing what he has been saying since 9/11 which is combining 9/11 terrorism and the Invasion of Iraq without a shred of evidence to the contrary.
2) Also on Iraq, Bush said that criticism should be “responsible criticism …. And second guessing is not a strategy”
 I almost laughed aloud when I read this because if my memory serves correct, we went into Iraq on the basis of them harboring weapons of mass destruction but it turned out that we still haven’t found them. Would this also be called second guessing?
3 Lastly I thought the idea that while W is saying " no one can deny the success of freedom, but some men rage and fight against it", Cindy Sheehan is getting arrested for protesting against Bush and getting dragged out of the Capitol and thrown in jail. Yes..... Emperor Bush is sure protecting our freedom -- It reminds me of a bumper sticker I saw recently -- it reads " AFTER WE BRING DEMOCRACY TO IRAQ, CAN WE HAVE SOME HERE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stare him down Posted by: drricklippin
Hitler-like
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 1, 2006 2:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw the state of the union debacle last night. There was one thing in particular that really bothered me. Adolf Hitler had this habit, during a break for applause in the midst of a particular speech, to gaze out at his admiring audience of robots with a look of smug, self satisfaction written all over his face. Whether consciously or unconsciously, the First Fool has adopted the exact same mannerisms. Am I nit-picking? Maybe. But I'm starting to think that this guy's not just your run-of-the-mill corrupt politician. I'm really starting to believe, in fact I've believed it for some time, that he is demonic. The book of revelations warned about false prophets coming in Christ's name...Dubya fits the bill to a tee. Would someone please point out to me anything, ANYTHING in this administration's policies that are in accord with the word of Jesus Christ? Please, just point out one thing and I promise I'll shut up forever.

Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
tomdegan@frontiernet.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: kww355
» Tertiary stage syphilis? Posted by: ksfc
» Unfortunately, no blog. Posted by: ksfc
» My thoughts exactly! Posted by: Prophit
» RE: My thoughts exactly! Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: libladyco
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: johnsh
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: haystack1317
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: macdon1
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: tcx2
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: krose
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: Dale Dressler
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: billfaster
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: tcx2
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: billfaster
» RE: Hitler-like.. Yes!!! Posted by: newqiplayer
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: kelly.nickell
» Time for our own Musharaff Posted by: ng1944
» RE: Hitler-like Posted by: zen7
A conservative pundit gets it right
Posted by: bulbman on Feb 1, 2006 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Craig Roberts, as much as a card-carrying rightie as one could be, has become one of the most trenchant critics of this administration on the left or right. In his recent post he had this to say:

"Two recent polls, a Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll and a New York Times/CBS News poll, indicate why Bush is getting away with impeachable offenses. Half of the US population is incapable of acquiring, processing and understanding information."

Sadly, that core, along with their indifferent fellow travellers, will make it possible for this administration to "stay the course." The only way to limit the damage is take back Congress this year, and it behooves everyone of us to work tirelessly to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You Are Describing. . . Posted by: The Old Hippie
» RE: SCARY Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: SCARY Posted by: Jasonix
» "Caesar" Worship Posted by: GreenLibbie
» I LOVE LewRockwell.com Posted by: GreenLibbie
» Bulbman: Also add the CT scans! Posted by: mythbuster
Tha Monkey Gives A Speech!
Posted by: Ottomatic on Feb 1, 2006 4:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fascism is on the March
Right
Across your
Living room
Watching the Puppet Talk
Is
Torture

Help!

While he puts
Everyone
In a Trance
The Replicon Clones
Applaud
More
BU__! SH__!
&
More
Cheap beer
for the
Drones.
Keep them stupid, drugged and stoned
Just like their Leader

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tha Monkey Gives A Speech! Posted by: mountainrider
» And they would have us believe. . . Posted by: Bic Pentameter
Unto each his or her own
Posted by: anothername on Feb 1, 2006 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Listening to the post-speech critiques last night, the one constant was that there was no constant. Every commentator, whether a paid professional or 15-minute amateur, reacted to a different comment of Bush's speech. The first one I heard, from a reporter on ABC, was that Bush was concilatory. Apparently, she was just paying attention to words and not to the record.

Bush has three years left in his presidency. There is no heir apparent to the presidency and Republican candidates for president do not want to be saddled with Bush's losing policies. That takes out all of 2008 and much of 2007 from Bush's opportunity to do anything new. As a result, Bush could not offer any new agenda.

For my own observations: 1) I have heard no comments about Bush's religious reason for stopping stem cell research. 2) The clapping when Bush said his Social Security reform failed was entertaining, and I would swear that Dick Cheney was amused as the camera caught him. 3) Many people still fail to understand this Bush War on Evil is akin to white blood cells that fight an infection, but then the autoimmune system turns inward and starts to destroy the body (or the country) of which it is a part.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A failure of a president for a failure of a people.
Posted by: jreinhart1 on Feb 1, 2006 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American people think, act and talk like W. Most don't bother to look up facts and shoot at the hip when talking or planning before taking action. That is how we ended up in Iraq (almost 90% were for the invasion), when the evidence clearly stated otherwise. We continue to suck down oil like an alcoholic swilling beer when confronted by a keg.

Until the American people wise up about the world around them and the history that has led this country to what it is today, I expect more of the same or even worse. Orwell was not writing about the Soviet Union but about totalitarian states in general. In the end, the American people will be for big brother.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Half This Country
Posted by: dlf on Feb 1, 2006 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Half of this country has lost all semblance of reason. What they hear is blah, blah, blah, patriot, blah, blah, blah, 9/11, it's as if they have been hypnotized and these are the words they have been told to react to. On the other hand the Democrats have learned to play dead for so long they have begun to excell at it. Everytime I have to call people for the party I have to listen to hours of anger, real anger. At the grassroots people are seething because they feel abandoned. The party keeps saying give us your money we will change this. In the meantime, a lot of elderly people who could better spend their SS funds continue to support as best they can, without any returns. It breaks my heart to have to ask, on one hand it seems a necessary evil, on the other it feels totally dishonest. I hope Howard Dean reads this board to measure the response of Bush's speech. He needs to understand Democrats feel defeated by both parties, and will bolt to the first third party candidate with a mandate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Half This Country Posted by: kww355
» RE: Half This Country Posted by: kipleitner
» RE: Half This Country Posted by: dlf
You underestimate him
Posted by: oneMan on Feb 1, 2006 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is true that almost all of Bush's official policies have fallen flat and been an embarassment to both himself and his party. For some reason, however, this doesn't appear to have phased them. They still seem well pleased with themselves and for a good reason. George W. Bush's legacy will have nothing to do with the failed legislation he introduced, the economic policies which have only served to lengthen what could have been a short and mild recession or even the military debacle in the Middle East. Our president's legacy will be the precedents he has set. Over the last six years I have seen the powers of the executive branch explode exponentially. Whoever our next president is will have much more power than we ever thought a president could have. And each time they do something such as violate the bill of rights, pen secret executive orders or brazenly use sledge hammer subtle fear tactics they will simply say, "Hey Bush did it, why can't I?" If Bush were impeached, which he won't be, it would have some small effect to lessen the precedents he has set. Barring this, however, the presidency as we know it has fundamentally changed. That is Bush's legacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You underestimate him Posted by: gonzoskismet
» RE: You underestimate him Posted by: Lizka
la mer
Posted by: la mer on Feb 1, 2006 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CLAP YOUR HANDS IF YOU BELIEVE
This evening while watching the State of the Union Address, it struck me that reality was being held at bay as the chamber cheered on the President while he told us all this tale. The economy is strong---clap your hands if you believe. We are winning the global war on terror---clap your hands if you believe. Our proud soldiers are dying for an honorable cause---clap your hands if you believe. We are helping those in need, victims of Katrina, Medicare recipients------clap your hands if you believe. We must make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy because this is helping us all thrive---clap your hands if you believe.

Well I wasn’t clapping because the fairy is already dead. She was killed by a U.S. bomb in Iraq. Then she died from and insurgent IED. She also died several times in New Orleans. She probably died waiting for her prescription drugs after she fell through cracks of the new Medicare plan. She suddenly died when she fell through the ice of the thinning Polar Ice Caps. She died of AIDS many times over all over the world. She died of exposure and neglect on the city streets of America. She died of profound ignorance when she decided to ignore the reality beyond the halls of U.S. power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: la mer Posted by: dlf
» RE: la mer Posted by: libladyco
» RE: la mer Posted by: ALANHESTER
Class Warfare
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Feb 1, 2006 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many readers have cited that "success" or "failure" depends on one's point of view. If you are an ordinary citizen it was a dismal failure. If you are a member of the corporate establishment it was a howling success. This defines the sides in our class war.

Working class people don't want to admit that we are in a class war. Class warfare is alien to our ideals. Until we do admit it, we the people will continue to lose.

The facts are that both parties have been moving to the right for years and that both are financed by the same corporatocracy. They are Republican Right and Republican Lite. Yet most Liberals look to a Democratic victory as the answer to our problems. This is not so. The Democrats are no longer "the party of the people". There is no "party of the people". The working class majority has no representation in our government. Both parties represent the rich corporate establishment.

I don't believe that a third party is a viable solution for many reasons. Among them are, lack of time, lack of money, and lack of leaders. Again, this war is between the working class and the corporate elite. It is not between working class conservatives and working class liberals. As soon as a third party refuses to support one side or the other of divisive non-economic issues they lose some support.

I believe that the battle can be won by a grassroots movement, not an organization. A movement doesn't need leaders, or money. It only needs members who will recruit more members. Through the power of the internet we the people could be in control of our government virtually overnight.

The Lincoln Initiative is such a movement. It is not divisive because it takes no stand on any issue. It is not about issues. It is about who controls the government. Is it the people or the corporatocracy? It is revolutionary because it throws down the gauntlet to both parties. They must choose which is more important to them, the peoples' votes or the establishment's dollars. Click on join today

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To fight the corporatocracy Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: To fight the corporatocracy Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: To fight the corporatocracy Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: To fight the corporatocracy Posted by: AlienSlave
Dead Man Walking?
Posted by: Colin on Feb 1, 2006 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny headline for the title given that *even if* his political career comes to an early close (which it won't), he'll still get to walk off with all the money he and his friends will have made/conned/extorted, all the influence he's gained and with his reputation - as far as the people he'll care about are concerned - furthered.

If that's how dead men walk maybe I should jump under a bus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny New Cartoon about Exxon's Greed
Posted by: GinnyS22 on Feb 1, 2006 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out this funny new flash cartoon: http://www.ExxposeExxon.com/movie

Today Exxon announced that it made a net profit of $36.1 BILLION DOLLARS in 2005!!


While Americans were suffering through hurricanes Katrina and Rita and sky-high spikes in oil prices last year, ExxonMobil was busy pulling down the largest profit in the history of corporate America!!

The flash cartoon was put out by the Exxpose Exxon coalition to try to pressure Exxon to stop sabotaging efforts to fight global warming, quit lobbying to open the Arctic Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, and get the company to use some of their huge profits to invest in renewable energy like wind and solar.

ExxonMobil is such a huge company. I think we should all post this (http://www.ExxposeExxon.com/movie) on our own blogs and websites to show our support for the fight!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you missed something Posted by: Bic Pentameter
In sum, Bush Presidency is...
Posted by: douglashoyt on Feb 1, 2006 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OJ Land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush/Nazi Ties Not Coincidental
Posted by: haystack1317 on Feb 1, 2006 6:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush family money originally comes from an intense 15 year relationship with the Nazi Party in Germany, spanning from their earliest rise to power to 1942, when Prescott Bush, our president's grandfather, was sanctioned under the Trading With the Enemies Act. It is not an exaggeration to stress the ties between the Bush administration and the Nazi Party in Germany. Certainly, if you only look at the Nazis in terms of the Holocaust, then the connection appears to be false. But the Holocaust was the end of a path that the Nazis had been treading down for decades, and the Bush administration is well along the same path. Will they follow it to genocide? No. But that doesn't discount all the other Fascist policies and tactics they've employed.

Please look at this site: www.tarpley.net/bush2.htm

Prescott Bush's close, personal relationship with the Nazis made his fortune. It was that fortune that allowed George Bush Sr. to invest in the oil business, which in turn allowed him an entry into politics. This information should be part of everyone's understanding. The media won't allow the story to be told. Don't believe me? Check out this story that the New York Times censored:

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/06/01/con06046.html

There are not just similarities but direct ties from the Bush Empire to the Nazis. It is not an exaggeration. It is a fact. Anyone who denies this or downplays it is, in fact, participating in the propaganda of one of the most notorious ideologies in modern history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush/Nazi Ties Not Coincidental Posted by: haystack1317
Addicted to oil? Devious and cunning....
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale on Feb 1, 2006 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He is setting the stage for the next phase: now that Americans know it is not about WMD, not about links to al-Qaeda, etc. what's left? Admit the truth, it was a naked grab for oil. But first, blame the American people. Set them up in the State of the Union address in 2006 by scolding them for their addiction to oil. That way, when the truth finally does come out, he can place the blame for the war squarely on our shoulders. The man is a genius at ducking responsibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» True! but.... Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: True! but.... Posted by: ScottP
» RE: True! but.... Posted by: krose
» He doesn't have to be "capable" Posted by: GreenLibbie
» RE: True! but.... What did happen. Posted by: Conan the Younger
Not a failure for everybody...
Posted by: Pete29 on Feb 1, 2006 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush may have failed most of America and the world, but his presidency has been a raving success for several constituencies: Big Pharma, health insurers and defense contractors, each of which has fed gluttonously at the federal trough during his reign; multimillionaires who just can't get enough tax breaks; and radical Islam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kahoonies
Posted by: mcbride on Feb 1, 2006 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh that it were so - what a wonderful world this would be.

Alito was confirmed with the help of the Dems. The Supreme Court is primed to confirm the Unitary Presidency and legalize the use of governmental agencies to control the population in times of emergency. The bird flu is on its way along with quaranteens.

Are we sure there are only three years left for the roots of the Bush to spread?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Optimism or Naivete?
Posted by: haystack1317 on Feb 1, 2006 8:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember the smug, excited, assured smiles on Bush and his clan's faces as they awaited the supposedly disputed Florida predictions on election night in 2000? Remember how they looked like they knew something we didn't? They did.

The same image comes to mind from stories of Karl Rove in the White House on election night in 2004. When it became clear that it all came down to Ohio, Bush and company started celebrating despite the unknown results. Rove knew he had Ohio in the bag, regardless of what voters there did. Though the images weren't in the press, you can bet that the same bullying, cat-that-ate-the-canary smile of a lifelong brat was on his lips. He knew something we didn't.

Bush's failures might have meant an end to his reign in an earlier era in American history. He might have been held accountable. As it now stands, absolutely nothing is guaranteed. When Republicans privatize elections, as is happening around the country, one cannot be sure that even the most abysmal failures would result in removal from office. They control the vote. It's going to take a lot more than clear incompetence to bring about "regime change."

This state of the union address was intended to be a mild, relatively uncontroversial statement. Attention was drawn to only a few things. But holding his hand close for a change, rather than throwing it on the table, does not mean that he has losing cards. He's stalling. I can guarantee you that by next year something will have happened, be it a terrorist attack or an "axis of evil" development that we don't like the sound of, which will require the cowboy attitude to return. By 2008 it will be of a caliber we have not yet seen, as Bush gets ready to pass on the baton.

To assume anything less is to count the chickens well before they hatch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hypocracy
Posted by: Rojo on Feb 1, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush condemned Iranian nuclear ambitions and then promoted nuclear energy as a piece of US energy independence. How is it that radioactive nuclear waste can be effectively dealt with? How is it right for the US to consider nuclear energy for the post-oil economy we are entering and other countries, like Iran, cannot? Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous. It's waste is unmanageable. No nukes for any of us ... but let no nuke future begin with those who already possess it getting rid of theirs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran is Bush's failure
Posted by: lamar on Feb 1, 2006 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's Iran strategy is laughable. First, he tells the Iranian people "We respect your right to choose your own future and win your own freedom," but then has put conditions on the result of Palestine's democratic experiment. What he meant to say was that we respect your right to choose your own future so long as it fits into our plan. Second, he talks about alternative energy, then challenges Iran in the same arena. Out of the Axis of Evil, North Korea and Iran have nuclear programs, while our troops are tracking down weapons of relatively insignificant destruction in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lame Duck?
Posted by: bookwoman on Feb 1, 2006 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Granted that the State of the Union speech was an insipid piece of nothing which didn't need 52 minutes to relate, the Houses of Congress are still in control of the Republicans. Although they are moving away from the President now that his poll figures are dropping, yesterday's vote for Samuel Alito shows that they are still willing to do his bidding.

We can only hope that Bush, under attack from so many sources, will pull back on his arrogant ways and be a bit more reasonable. However, given his record so far, this is, I am sure, wishful thinking. He will, I am sure, continue the "throw it against the wall, and see if it sticks" kind of policy making he used in the past. We can only hope that this administration doesn't do much more to destroy our country and its civil rights.

Also, given that so many of our people are still afraid of another attack, and really think that this President or any President can protect them and that the Democrats don't seem to have a viable candidate (Kerry and Clinton are moving targets, and I am sure the "Swift Boat guys" are already getting their lies ready for 2008), we will probably end up with another Republican in the White House unless the Democrats get their act together with a coordinated plan for 2006 and 2008.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OH MY gaaawwwwd, THE EYEBROW!
Posted by: fairleft on Feb 1, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unbelievable! With our democracy and rights right now being eliminated by King Terror War George, the Democrats give us "Look at My Crazy Eyebrow" as their official response! What an embarrassing, pathetic party I belong to.

I think now that my Democrats are throwing the fight, that they just don't really care. A club full of rich folks just like the Republicans, I guess they love the big tax breaks for the upper 1%, King George's only accomplishment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get With The Program or They Really Will Win
Posted by: mikespindell on Feb 1, 2006 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Josh is trying to do, as in fact are most writers on alternet and in the progressive blogosphere, is to rally the troops of opposition. As I read the variety of responding comments they range from hopelessness to contempt for the public to fascist conspiracy theories. In truth I believe in much of what the comments say and share many of the posters thoughts and feelings. I bet that most progressives share many of the same sentiments.

We progressives keep getting beaten by the forces of greed and oppression, because we all are so in love with our own ideas that we disdain working in unity with even those with whom we share commonality. This is about gaining the power to remake our country into the land of equality, opportunity and fairness that it has often professed to be, but rarely has achieved.

-We are on the brink of fascism, but it's not here yet.
-We still have a chance to gain power for our side.
-To gain power we must work in unity with eachother.
-To gain power we must convince the majority of the
correctness of our cause and address their own concerns.

By going off on our individual ego-trips and our own particular concerns, we turn the discussion of how to provide a viable opposition into a babble of individual voices, signifying only our own gratification.

Josh's article addressed the weakness that underlies our opponents positions and enumerates that there has been some success in our efforts of opposition. Viable strategy evolves from just such formulations, if we could only quell our egos long enough to pay attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raising the rates makes the debt hike?
Posted by: secretchief on Feb 1, 2006 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not to be nitpicking, but doesn't hiking the interest rate make the debt shrink, and not the contrary?
<