Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The New Face of the Campus Left

By Sam Graham-Felsen, The Nation. Posted February 3, 2006.


Since the 1970s, Republican conservatives have been the dominant political force on American campuses. Now groups like Campus Progress are pushing back.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sam Graham-Felsen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When a group called Campus Progress launched its effort to promote progressive values on college campuses in the fall of 2004, Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz wondered: "Isn't that a bit like pumping sand into the Mojave Desert?"

The assumption that America's campuses are impenetrable bastions of liberalism -- where left-leaning faculty predominate, progressive student activism flourishes and conservatism is fiercely marginalized -- still rules the day. But in reality, since the 1970s, the conservative movement has become the dominant political force on many American campuses. This sea change is not simply a reflection of some students' increasingly right-wing views. Each year, conservative groups pour more than $35 million into hundreds of college campuses. They pay for right-wing speakers, underwrite scores of student papers, provide free leadership training and cushy internships, and equip thousands of new activists with talking points, discipline and missionary zeal.

Today's campus right is unified, on-message and passionate -- in other words, part of a genuine movement. By contrast, the campus left is disparate, undisciplined and segmented along ideological and issue-based lines.

Student progressives have struggled for decades with not only a lack of cohesion but a dearth of resources. "We didn't have our act together," says Joshua Holland, a fair-trade and antiwar activist who graduated from the University of Southern California this past spring. "We tried to keep things nonhierarchical and loosely structured, but at the end of the day, there was a lot of running around in circles, and we weren't getting anything done."

It's a familiar lament among the two dozen student progressives I talked with for this article. But help has arrived. After three decades of unanswered advances by the right, the progressive movement is no longer leaving students to fend for themselves. Campus Progress -- a project of the Center for American Progress (CAP), one of the country's premier think tanks -- is the largest of a handful of organizations that have emerged in the past year to counter the right's campus operations. These groups are offering resources, ideas and training designed to patch up many of the holes that have long deflated the student left. But in attempting to forge a widespread student progressive movement, they face many of the same quandaries that loom large for American progressivism as a whole: What values should define the movement? What tactics should be embraced? And perhaps most difficult of all, to what extent does striving for results mean sacrificing strong principles?

Ever since the heyday of left-wing campus activism in the late 1960s and early '70s, progressive students have struggled with looking frivolous, reactionary or cliched to their peers. At the University of North Carolina, senior Jessica Polk says students have long been "sick of what the left is doing -- they want to walk to class without being handed a flier about a rally or vigil."

Meanwhile, student conservatives have managed to balance organizational and ideological discipline with ragtag rebelliousness, positioning themselves as perpetual underdogs on oppressively liberal campuses. Armed with their version of a screw-the-man mentality, the student right's activism is often shocking: affirmative action bake sales where white students are charged more for cookies than blacks, for instance, or immigrant hunts where students dressed in Border Patrol uniforms chase targeted "illegals" with water guns. As tasteless and offensive as such stunts might be, they make waves on campuses and garner national attention for the movement.

"This is the South Park generation," says Matt Singer, a junior at the University of Montana and creator of the popular right-wing blog Left in the West. "The conservative activism is fun, and it rings with the students in the same way that the left did in the '60s and early '70s."

"The right actually ends up looking cooler than the left," agrees Mani Mostofi, who recently earned his master's degree at the University of Texas. "I don't know how this is possible, but it's true!"

For progressive student activists, attention-getting victories have also been scarce. There have been isolated triumphs in the past year: successful student-led living-wage campaigns for employees at Georgetown University and Washington University of St. Louis, and the multicampus Taco Bell boycott, which helped secure a significant raise for the fast-food chain's tomato pickers.


Digg!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Chomsky won't "do business"? Shocking!
Posted by: stormchilde1975 on Feb 3, 2006 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The last thing we liberal college students need is a lefty version of College Republicans - designed to get students to stump for mainstream Democrats. Mainstream Democrats have failed and will continue to fail. If Noam doesn't want anything to do with an organization, neither do I. A lot of people miss (I think because they don't read or listen) that Noam is not all that radical. He only seems radical because the accepted definition of left now lies just right of center.
I want an organization I can be proud to be part of: one that actually does promote Pragmatic progressive values. "Pragmatic" is too often confused with "prudential" or "politically convenient". Real Pragmatism means solving problems the right way (the hard way) - working from the ground up and helping people help themselves. For an example of how this works, see Jane Addams' Twenty Years at Hull House.
Addams, a fresh-out-of-school young woman still wet behind the ears, had the courage to go to Chicago and set up shop in a struggling neighborhood. She didn't go in to be 'Saint Jane' and share her wealth and wisdom with the poor and disenfranchised. Rather, she let them teach her about their needs, and tried to help them solve their problems for themselves. Sometimes this worked, sometimes it failed; but even cases of failure valuable lessones were learned that enabled progress over time. The solutions were Pragmatic in the purest sense - they worked and they kept working.
If we want to fix the country, rallying behind mainstream Democratic Ideals will not cut it. We have to go out and get our hands dirty, get hurt, make mistakes, teach and learn. No amount of rallies and vigils is going to do it. Absent an organization that Noam would 'do business' with, I recommend joining or starting a group that does real Pragmatic work in your community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The trouble with ideas Posted by: stormchilde1975
» RE: The trouble with ideas Posted by: Lincoln fan
Conservative Lite
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Feb 3, 2006 7:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Students are being channeled into the Democratic Party or other mainstream institutions that will never bring about social change without a challenge and pressure from idealistic and free-thinking campus activists," says Hayden.

I couldn't agree more. The problem with the Democratic Party is that it is Republican Lite. Now they are trying to have copycat "activists" who are Conservative Lite.

Liberal issues are "working class issues". End the war, campaign finance reform, limit the power of lobbyists, stop the exportation of jobs, etc. Any liberal cause pits the interests of the people agains the interests of the corporate establishment.

The reason we have two parties that are Republican Right and Republican Lite is that they both work for the corporatocracy. They are both bought and paid for. The Democrats will not nominate a candidate who is not acceptable to the establishment. Remember Kucinech, Dean, Edwards, Sharpton? Neither party is "the party of the people". This battle must be fought against the leadershp of both parties. This is the level at which the peoples' interests are sold for establishment money.

Liberal activism would best be served by uniting to take control of both parties. Both parties are now "a party of the rich and powerful". There is no reason that both parties can't be forced to become "a party of the people".

This can be done without any person or group compromising its favorite cause. The strategy is to join a grassroots movement, not an organization, to force both parties to choose between the votes of the people and the dollars of the corporate establishment. A movement to make "government of the people, by the people, and for the people", a reality.

The activism required is to enlist every voter to demand that both parties support his/her most important issue and to refuse to support any party or candidate who doesn't agree with him/her.

No demand is effective unless there is an "or else". In this case the "or else" is a threat of a write-in protest vote for Honest Abe if neither party supports your issue.

For sample letters and the address information, Click on join now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conservative Lite Posted by: Paul Cardwell
So What?
Posted by: YogiBear on Feb 3, 2006 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each year, conservative groups pour more than $35 million into hundreds of college campuses. They pay for right-wing speakers, underwrite scores of student papers, provide free leadership training and cushy internships, and equip thousands of new activists with talking points, discipline and missionary zeal.

Not surprising that right-wingers feel they need to "buy" conservative thought where little exists already. Why anyone considers this a threat is beyond me, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So What? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: So What? Posted by: Lincoln fan
Don't get stuck!
Posted by: activatenow87 on Feb 3, 2006 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Left should have nothing to do with the Democratic party; moreover, the Democratic elite (e.g. those in Washington) continue to fail at maintaining even a modicum of the Leftist vision. I've spoken of the Leftist vision before, as I see it. To me, Left-wing politics is "Jane Adams"-esque, grassroots, and radical. It calls for worker control, and an end to discrimination based on class, gender (or non-gender), sexuality, race, and ethnicity.

bell hooks writes about the current situation perfectly in "Class Matters," a book that is her memior and social critique of greed. The "White Male Capitalist Patriarchy" must be overthrown, and students don't need to get stuck with the Democrats. The Democratic party continues to support the president on many issues; in fact, they couldn't even manage to fillibuster Allito. The fact remains, Democratic policies of the past have been morphed into Republican-esque values. They are no longer (if they ever were!) the party for radical change.

Dump the Dems. That's the only viable option for Leftist students seeking real social change; and that's the option I am choosing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't get stuck! Posted by: Iconoclast421
» Beg to Differ. Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Don't get stuck! Posted by: Lincoln fan
Conservatives are unintentionally hilarious
Posted by: ccbite on Feb 3, 2006 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this 'conservative' threat on campus is a bit overstated and unsustainable in the long run. I find this whole idea of a 'liberal' college virus to be a bad joke and the idea that conservatives are trying to infiltrate it to be rather hilarious. Aren't unversities inherently more 'liberal' just by the mere fact that the gravity of a new environment is going to expose a person to a wider world of existence? Unless you go to an in-state university within 1-hour driving distance with all the rest of your high school clique, I can't see how the exposure to new people and new topics makes you more conservative. Still, even if you do travel with clique, eventually people go their own ways and branch out (peer pressure from HS, maturity, etc. all change). Conservatives are fighting an no-win fight here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stephanie Tansey
Posted by: StephanieTansey on Feb 3, 2006 11:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressive should also come to mean "cutting edge." Social currency, time banking, trickle-up economics, the growing Kyoto Protocol connection with the American economy, the developing humanitarian-focused competition these are just a few new, facts on the ground realities that the progressive movement needs to be a part of. It cannot, successfully, just be a mainstream alternative. It has also to be part of the next wave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pragmatism
Posted by: stormchilde1975 on Feb 6, 2006 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, it isn't /my/ philosophy, strictly speaking. It's an American philosophical movement. At any rate, the assertion is that ideas work (or not) in direct proportion to their roots in real-world problem-solving activity. A team sitting around a table can come up with workable ideas if those ideas come from (and return to) whatever field they work in. Otherwise, whether the ideas seem well-reasoned or not, they are setting themselves up for a fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]