Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

End Of The Road Map

By Robert Dreyfuss, TomPaine.com. Posted January 28, 2006.


Hamas' victory in the Palestinian elections is a disaster built on short-sighted policies by the PLO, Israel and the U.S.
Advertisement

Hamas' shocking, but not surprising, victory in the Palestinian parliamentary elections on Jan. 25 is a disaster -- for the peace process, and for the Palestinians.

It is indeed a shock. But it is not a surprise, because the strength of political Islam in the region is growing nearly everywhere -- from Iraq, whose government is controlled by three Shiite fundamentalist parties, to Egypt, where the fanatical Muslim Brotherhood made huge gains in elections in 2005 -- and because Hamas was able to capitalize on anger, bitterness and frustration among Palestinians disenchanted with the Palestine Liberation Organization, Fatah and the Palestinian Authority (PA).

But it's a disaster, above all, for the Palestinians themselves. It's the equivalent of an election in the United States in which voters went to the polls and elected the Rev. Pat Robertson president. If the Christian right is bad for America -- not because they are terrorists, but because their anti-abortion, anti-evolution, anti-gay, prayer-in-schools philosophy is so abhorrent -- then the Islamic right is bad for Palestine. This is not because Hamas is a terrorist movement, which it is. The Islamic right is bad because its slogans -- "the Koran is our constitution" and "Islam is the solution" -- are incompatible with a complex, 21st-century society, and because Hamas' vision for society is a benighted, medieval one.

The most obvious effect of the Hamas win will be its aftershock in Israel, which goes to the polls in March. The victory by Hamas will strengthen the Israeli far-right, weaken pro-peace centrists and put the Israeli left and the Labour Party on the defensive. The most likely beneficiary in Israel will be Richard Perle's favorite Israeli politician, Bibi Netanyahu, whose Likud bloc is likely to gain. The Ariel Sharon-founded centrist bloc will be pulled to the right, and most Israeli voters will react to Hamas' victory by seeking the protection of strongmen, not peaceniks. So polarization will intensify dramatically between Israel and the PA. The consequences are incalculable. And they will be regional, not confined to Palestine and Israel. Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq and beyond will feel the effects of the Hamas earthquake.

Does the Hamas vote indicate that Palestinian voters have suddenly become religious extremists? Certainly not. Like the Christian right in the United States, the Islamic right in Palestine has a core support bloc -- but it is far smaller than the 58 percent of the total seats secured by Hamas. Many Palestinians voted for Hamas because they believed that the PA had failed to deliver social and economic benefits or to make progress toward peace. Or because Fatah, since the death of Yasser Arafat, seemed divided and rudderless. Or because the Palestinian old guard was hopelessly corrupt. Whatever the reasons, however, the vote for Hamas empowers a dangerously radical movement.

It's important to note, as detailed in my book, Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam , that Israel has only itself to blame for the emergence of Hamas. After 1967, when Israel occupied Gaza and the West Bank, the Israeli authorities encouraged the growth of Islamism as a counter to Palestinian nationalism and the PLO. In 1967, Israel freed Ahmed Yassin, the Muslim Brotherhood leader who founded Hamas in 1978-88, and they encouraged the Islamic right and the Brotherhood to take control of mosques and student groups. In 1977-78, the Israeli government of Menachem Begin's Likud officially licensed Yassin's Islamic movement and gave it official Israeli blessing. Throughout the 1980s, the Muslim Brotherhood fought pitched battles against the PLO. In an interview not long before he died, Arafat said: "Hamas is a creature of Israel," and he quoted slain Israeli Prime Minister Rabin as having told him that Israeli support for Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood was a "fatal error." Several U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials told me about Israel's support for Yassin and the Brotherhood, and Chas Freeman, the former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, told me bluntly: "Israel started Hamas."


Digg!

Robert Dreyfuss is the author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam. He is a contributing editor at The Nation, a contributing writer at Mother Jones, a senior correspondent for The American Prospect, and a frequent contributor to Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
On terrorists. . .
Posted by: redstarwraith on Jan 28, 2006 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, okay. . . but what the author fails to mention (as does everyone else so quick to point out that Hamas is a terrorist organization) -- many of the grey wolves on the Israeli knessit were, at one time, by ANY definition of the word, "terrorists" (as were nearly all of America's earliest patriots for that matter). It's to the point where this word, "terrorist" has practically lost all meaning these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On terrorists. . . Posted by: Democritus
» RE: On terrorists. . . Posted by: Charaud
All you say maybe true........ but it may also do some good!
Posted by: Pepper on Jan 28, 2006 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe this landslide victory that has shocked the world, may well preclude an attack against Iran. In that sense, I think hte good far outweighs the bad.

I have noticed since the victory there has been no more talk of imminent attack of Iran. Its not because I believe Iran is a good country that I say this, its because the Islamic shias have made it clear in all those countries that they will in fact ban together against the US and Isreal to conduct a Jihad against us if we attack Iran.

Sadr of the Shias has said, in Iraq, that if we attack Iran they will come to the aid of Iraq in such force that we won't be able to survive. Hamas, with such large support from the general population in Isreal, would be able to keep the Isreali's occupied and unable to aid in any action in Iran. I think we have overcommitted ourselves and finally will shoot ourselves in the foot. Our troops would be in most serious risk in any action take there.

This could lead to a world war III which we are incapable of fighting. Korea, Russia and other areas have committed to Iran's support.

Add all that up and I believe the result would be a whooping that we could not afford. Besides, I don't think Iran will take all this lying down at all. They are a whole nother story when it comes to taking on that ancient country.

Because of that and the fact that negotiations for peace must be done by pressuring two equally committed parties with a known option of serious violences by either side, can be a great incentive to finding a peaceful solution. Its about time someone took this whole area seriously. I am kind of glad to see this. It certainly is better than the options that could have been which would have represented "more of the same" for everyone. An ongoing spiral of violence and retaliation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Pot & The Kettle
Posted by: afrothetics on Jan 28, 2006 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is being lamented here exactly? That a roadmap not a roadmap for the true liberation of Palestinian people failed? Or, that the party of choice failed? In 2004, the US electorate chose to re-elect a a right-wing, evangelical sectarian cabal bent upon the overthrow of priniciples on which the nation has stood for over 250 years. The Palestinians chose the ballot as another strategy over the bullet after more than 50 years. Now, they can claim for their resistance army, the same oxymoronic claim that Israel and the US makes -- legitimate power as in "...absolute power corrupts absolutely."

It's clear not only in the Middle East, but at home, that the US is not standing on the kind of high moral ground by which either its government or its citizens can claim any right to criticize the right of another people to seek its destiny through the ballot box. The US has never been a "democracy" why does it expect other nations to be so? Perhaps because it serves the interests of predatory military industrial complex and its proxies? Let there be little doubt, the abuse of military power in the 21st century will certainly not serve US long-term interests or those of other nations. And, those who pay for these debacles--taxpayers--are the real losers. The price-tag in Iraq alone could have resurrected the economy through the reconstruction of the nation's infrastructure and expansion of rail and mass transit services. That's a big IF, however, as corruption is so blatant, it's possible that the Halliburton's of the world would siphon off those funds as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The cetre of power is the needs of people
Posted by: IanA on Jan 28, 2006 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hamas victory puts the future of Israel and Palestinian on a new track, giving an opportunity to clear the log-jam and renewed perspectives. America the delusional terrorist super-state, Israel the terrorist quisling in the service of its financier, both bristling with arms of mass destruction, threats of force and dirty deeds and the two approaching all conflicts with that one tool fits all mentality, the hammer.

The problem in Palestine or Israel is not terrorism it is a long sore injustice. Hamas has power today because the Palestinians were given no other choice. There is no choice for fair treatment, better housing, better drains, roads, security, or even not to have their homes bulldozed.

To find the solution apply the logic of the non-competitive Japanese martial art of Aikido.

It is pointless to appose any force with a force even if the force is stronger, because you and the opponent must react to move your centres to balance such opposition. Israel chose Lakud and Sharon, Palestine now have chosen Hamas.

Trace the origin of the force. Direct it towards where you can avoid its lethal effect. Then take it to a neutral place of safety and resolution. Both want peace.

The people that gave Hamas power need peace, an end to inhumane apartheid the humiliation and acts of land theft and genocide. Don’t ask people to choose between the rights of a human being to exist and the rights of a state to exist. The answer is obvious which is fundamental. Palestinians need economic development, an integral state that does not depend on Israel or America’s let or dictates. They need self determination, freedom of movement, a port, an airport, etc. Israel and the international community have the power to make this happen. Weapons to defend their families are only on the list today because of the constant and ever more encroaching occupation, terror, racism, and genocide, integral in the power and political weave of the Israeli state and backed by America’s blind ignorance and racist view that Jews are like “us” and Palestinians like “them” don’t matter.

It is interesting to reflect that perhaps the reason Mao’s PRC could exist and grow to what it is today is that he left a place, an island for the nationalists to go to. You cannot destroy a people and you can never destroy an idea, but everyone and everything can be transformed by finding their centre.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lost Without a Map
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 28, 2006 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So much for the Roadmap For Peace. But who should be surprised? Bush isn't smart enough to FOLD a map, let alone read one. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's called True Believers...
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 28, 2006 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...when the end justifies the means -- any and every means.

I had not paid attention to Hamas except to notice the frequent headline associating them with acts of violence. They have my attention now, because, like the religious radicals on the right, they show that what they claim to believe justifies whatever they do. Our Bill of Rights, on the contrary, protects individuals from exactly such True Belief.

I appreciate the comments in this thread that point out the parallels between the Christian radical right and the Islamic radical right. Both look to the past. It seems those of us who look to the future have lost the contest, at least, for the moment.

But this could be a long, long moment since our race to expoit the Earth's resources has now become nothing more than a struggle to get what you can before it all runs out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could Hamas' Election hold the Unexpected Key to Peace?
Posted by: Mondo on Jan 28, 2006 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now that Hamas has been elected to form the government of Palestine, there is a clear disincentive to continue suicide bombing and/or terrorist attacks against Israel Such acts could constitute an act of wr, with a full military response, unless Hamas and Palestine officially renounced the use of terror and recognized Israel's right to exist, with appropriate supporting action. Therefore suicide bombings supported or sponsored by Hamas can no longer be "business as usual," since the consequences are far too unpleasant to contemplate. The election of Hamas could actually eliminate future acts of terrorism against Israel, reduce tension in the region, and contribute to outright peace. As unlikely as it may seem, there is an unexpected glimmer of hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LP
Posted by: lpforti on Jan 28, 2006 5:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The arrogance of your article is really the point. It's symptomatic of our nation's opinions of most things "foreign." We are forever telling other people what is in their best interests and what is acceptable to other nations, i.e, Europe and the US (which is Europe), with disasterous results to that country's society and ethics . Islamic democracy is the solution at this point and we really should get over it and start adjusting and start communicating in order to find common ground. If I'm correct Islamic cultures have more or less been exposed to most of the isms the West has had to offer with the result being what we see today. Islamc nations have the right to self-determination and self-expression, and really the impracticallity of it is that we will have to change. And quite frankly, we need to change, our thinking is fat and our ideas are in neutral. We've never come to any reconciliation with our own past and its effect on our indigenous culture, and we just keep on making the same mistakes. Our thinking needs to be freed from its white supremicist mentality that sees its ideas and its ethos as superior to all others. Well you know what there are millions and millions of people who no longer will "buy" that product, and quite frankly that's they're right. How dare you suggest that somehow the "great white leader" slow down the democracy movement. What you really don't seem to understand is that these movements were never about us but about a people's right to live and use the mores they feel express their people needs to be free and independent from "US."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hamas Victory: An Understandible Protest but a Horrible Outcome
Posted by: yellow on Jan 28, 2006 10:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The election of Hamas to almost two-thirds of the seats in the expanded Palestine Legislative Council (PLC) is quite understandible but a disaster for peace and the future of Palestinian. democracy. The horribly corrupt and heavy-handed dictatorial rule of the Fatah regime which is aloof from the masses and seems to care not for their interests needed to be replace and Hamas had been a popular alternative for some time. Their victory shows much frustration with the status quo.

This does not mean that the democratic and egalitarian state the most Palestinians have always seemed to want will come from the Hamas legislative electoral victory. The Palestinian People have always been among the more enlightened and modern in the Arab World. Women have always played a big role in the struggle which was based on a progressive nationalism promising a middle and working class democracy. Hamas seeks to transcend the Israel/Palestine issue by seeking a medieval pan-Islamic theocracy which will set one of the most educated and skilled communities in the Arab world back several centuries. This is a tragedy!

The peace movement will also suffer a set back since despite Hamas's seeming willingness to recognize Israel and negotiate in good faith, the Israeli right will come to dominate politics with the center and left marginalized along with the Israeli peace camp. This impass is the result of many decades of Israeli stubborness and vain hopes of destroying any viable Palestinian representitives like the PLO in hopes of avoiding the peace process altogether and imposing a unilateral solution on the Arabs in the Occupied Territories. The recent attempts of Israel to continue this policy resulted in the Hamas victory.Hopefully this will demonstrate the foolishness of past Israeli approaches to peace with the Palestinians. Unfortunately, the wrong lesson will be learned and a consequent victory for the hard line might will out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so what is different here?
Posted by: CO on Jan 29, 2006 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is one aspect to the Palestinian election that seems obvious to me, that I don't see anyone mentioning.

We have a militant, extremist, conservative Christian government in the US.

We have a militant, extremist, conservative Jewish government in Israel.

So why is everybody so shocked and outraged that Palestine elected a militant, extremist, conservative Islamic government?

Who is pointing the finger at who here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted by: Prophit
Religious Extremism
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2006 10:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is quite correct to point out that Hamas is not the only reactionary fundamentalist game in town. Still, there is a question of degree.

US fundamentalism and drive toward theocracy is countered by a large secular and democratic political culture. The Fundamentalism of the Bush camp makes it isolated from its traditional allies abroad. The Hamas victory was part of a general theocratic wave the Middle East; a sort of connect the dots with other similar regimes like Iran, Afghanistan and now, possibly, the "new" Iraq. All of this poses extreme problems for the US/Israel axis and is in no way complimentary or compatible with their goals.

Israel and the US have vast secular traditions as do the Palestinians. All three have past histories of religious fanatics who made bids for hegemony like US Fundamentalist Protestantism or Jewish orthodoxy while the Palestinians had the Mufti of Jerusalem-regarded as a Nazi collaberator and war criminal by the western allies. All three tendencies are, or have been in the past, associated with extreme chauvanism and nationalism.

Yet the Hamas example stands out because of its connection to a surrounding wave of theocracy that, admittedly, we have been encouraging as a counter-wieght to the more feared secular nationalism in the Middle East. Further, Hamas is connected to terrorism and must prove that it is a responsible player (not that US/Israeli violence or disregard for international law or UNSC resolutions is acceptible either!) The Hamas agenda is also reactionary, theocratic, and not a basis for a sustainable society in modern times despite their apparent administrative and political acumen. Finally, their extreme views are a non-starter in the peace process (as is Israeli refusal to end the occupation unconditionally).

Though it is hard to say where the real danger comes from we know that a failure to separate church and state is chief among the core obsticles to peace. Hamas's identity as a totally religious movement unlike the other two makes it a real problem for the resolution of the region's woes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

has anyone else heard the exit polls didn't match the results?
Posted by: nebgirl on Jan 29, 2006 1:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i don't know if it was just gossip or not, but i heard the exit polls didn't match the results of the election. if true, i can only think of a couple of reasons for this. 1: the people voting were afraid to admit who they voted for or 2: the election was stolen as it was in the U.S. Since the election was monitored by outside parties, then if the election was stolen they had to have been in on it. who were the people monitoring the election and what advantage would there be in letting Hamas win?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hamas Election
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2006 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't make sense that Hamas supporters would be the key monitors and throw them the election like the US military and others may have thrown the Iraqi Constitutional Referendum in the Sunni Province of Ninevah to guarantee its national approval. Hamas is genuinely popular and as you suggest few are going to publically admit support as individuals to questioners. Israeli repression is widely feared. We have a far bigger problem than electoral fraud to deal with in Palestine. We have to deal with the growing wave of Islamic fundamentalist response in the face of failing and frustrated secular options for Palestine's political future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 4, 2006 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replica Watch
Anadrol
Bontril
Dianabol
Dianobol
Didrex
Reductil
Sustanon
Tamiflu
Winstrol
Carisoprodol

http://rolex.zikforum.com |
http://anadrol.zikforum.com |
http://bontril.zikforum.com |
http://dianabol2.zikforum.com |
http://dianobol.zikforum.com |
http://didrex.zikforum.com |
http://reductil.bb-fr.com |
http://sustanon.zikforum.com |
http://tamiflu.zikforum.com |
http://winstrol.zikforum.com |
http://carisoprodol4u.zikforum.com |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
asdas
Posted by: seogirl on Aug 8, 2006 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1
Posted by: extremist on Oct 7, 2006 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
102
Posted by: extremist on Oct 7, 2006 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]