Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Redemption and Weirdness on the Farm

By Matthew Wheeland, AlterNet. Posted January 27, 2006.


The new documentary 'The Real Dirt on Farmer John' offers a wonderfully eccentric look at the past and future of the family farm.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Matthew Wheeland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

John Peterson is going through a miniature existential crisis. "Do you think I'm a farmer if I'm not farming?" he asked during a recent interview. "Is 'documentary film subject' a career?"

Put in perspective, Peterson's question makes a lot of sense. A farmer his entire life, the 55-year-old from Illinois has spent the better part of a year, and as much of the foreseeable future as he cares to think about, on the road promoting "The Real Dirt on Farmer John," a film about his life.

The constant touring is paying off at long last, and critics and audiences alike are singing its praises. According to director Taggart Siegel, "The Real Dirt" has won 18 film festival awards to date -- among them, grand jury prizes at the Newport Film Festival and the San Francisco International Film Festival and audience awards at Slamdance and the Chicago International Documentary Film Festival.

Among its many fans are Nina Utne, Roger Ebert and Al Gore, who gave a special introduction to the film at last year's Green Screen Film Festival in San Francisco.

Given all this acclaim, it's not surprising that the film is moving toward a wider theatrical release. Earlier this month, "The Real Dirt" opened in Chicago, and it opens today in San Francisco and Berkeley. Over the next few months, it will spread to Minneapolis, Portland, New York City, Los Angeles and beyond.

It's all very exciting, of course -- but as the tours and promotion continue, Peterson's return to his farm drifts off over the horizon. "I'll be there for two hours in probably the next four months," he said. "From 11:00 until 1:00 on the 20th of this month. Isn't that wild?"

What is the real dirt?

This extended touring is a bittersweet experience for Peterson. Clearly, the fact that he's still on the road after a year of steady travel is a sign of success -- an indicator of how passionately audiences respond to his story. But for a man with such deep connections to the land, leaving his Caledonia, Ill., home for so long can be an arduous and uprooting experience.

As Peterson says in the film, "The farm has [gotten] in the way of every romance I've ever had. It's like the farm's my wife. Of course, some of my girlfriends have been very jealous of the farm, because whatever the farm has wanted, I pretty much have been willing to give to it. But I managed to get a date in now and then."

Fortunately for us, Peterson's girlfriends, family and friends -- including director Taggart Siegel -- have documented his life on the farm, leaving behind reels of home movies and professional films. Siegel explained, "It's really amazing that we have all this footage. And it's amazing we had that footage in the 50s, when Mom shot all the home movies. She was like a documentary filmmaker. So we had all that, the 50s and the 60s, and John shot the hippie period [on the farm] in the 70s, and then I came on board and for the last 25 years. I've basically been filming on and off."


Digg!

Matthew Wheeland is AlterNet's managing editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You should see the way farmers out here in South Dakota react when they lose their farmlands
Posted by: SDres11 on Jan 27, 2006 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of blaming the real culprit which is almost always agri-business, they'll blame them praire dogs and be more interested in owning guns. That of course is a large part of the reason Daschle got creamed besides his weak take on the farming issues after allowing the "centrist" Democrats to make a mess of it all. "Conservative backlash" at large. I'll take this article and site and bring it to the attention of these farmers even though I'll be surprised if I can get a fraction of them to listen. Honestly, across the heartland, most farmers are addicted to "conservative backlash" to the point that they give higher priority about keeping their guns and bible rather than their farmlands. It reminds me of the tragic history of how native Americans of different groups and tribes were pitted against one another and exploited of their indifferent weakenesses and then finally wiped out. History has shown how well divide-and-conquer can work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can thank "free" trade and deregulation for much of this mess
Posted by: NDnative on Jan 27, 2006 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can remember back in the late 80s how the so-called US-Canada "free" trade agreement followed a few years later with Clinton's NAFTA and "Freedom to Farm" Act of 1996 crippled the farmers in the heartland and especially up here in North Dakota where farmers get taxed on everything even while Canada dumps most of the goods on us. The author may want to include the hazards of "free" trade in his documentary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Farming
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 27, 2006 3:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This country needs the family farm more than we need the President. The Govt pays farmers to not grow on some lands.
Agri Biz is making a joke out of fields in and near large scale
dairy mega farms. Nitrate runoff in these zone is off the chart.
If farmers were alllowed to grow hemp a small farm of 100 acres would be profitable. If we used Ag products for fuel we increase oxygen output by increasing green space.
For years farming has been looked at like it was the bottom of society. It's not. It's the backbone. Every meal you ever ate no matter if you were home or at the Ritz came from a farm. So does you clothes. Farmers had a bigger say in the old days because our economy was Ag based. After 1933 it was Industrial based. The Chem industry forced more farms out. The Family Farm must be restored,supported and brought back to the conscienceness of the People

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Farming Posted by: Lizka
Agricultural Concentration
Posted by: yellow on Jan 29, 2006 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Agribusiness has undoubtedly promoted dramatic agrarian concentration in the US land tenure system. Since the depression when agribusiness was only a nascent force, independent family farms have shrank from over six million to 1.9 million with only about 960,000 farmers, or half this number, citing farming as the main source of their livlihood.

The distribution of the income from farming is also maldistributed. Roughly speaking about three quarters of farmers share about 7% of the income from the market value of farm product sales while about 7% of the farms get just about three quarters of the value. The remaining fifth, or middle sector whose annual sales range between $50,000 and $249,000, get about their proportional share.

But even this doesn't tell the whole story of the agribusiness impact on US family farming. The return to farm investment has dropped with the average farmer gleaning only 2% profit while the rate of return to the value added sector, the dominant force in US agriculture such as inputs, marketing,etc-ranges between 10 and 18%. Only 18% of the food dollar went to the entire family farm sector with the remainder going to the value added sector in the late 1990s.

It is the value added sector, controlled by monopoly agribusiness giants, that define US agriculture today. Reforms need to address these inequities for the benefit of consumers, farmers, and a hungry world in general.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 4, 2006 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replica Watch
Anadrol
Bontril
Dianabol
Dianobol
Didrex
Reductil
Sustanon
Tamiflu
Winstrol
Carisoprodol

http://rolex.zikforum.com |
http://anadrol.zikforum.com |
http://bontril.zikforum.com |
http://dianabol2.zikforum.com |
http://dianobol.zikforum.com |
http://didrex.zikforum.com |
http://reductil.bb-fr.com |
http://sustanon.zikforum.com |
http://tamiflu.zikforum.com |
http://winstrol.zikforum.com |
http://carisoprodol4u.zikforum.com |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasd
Posted by: corpse on Aug 4, 2006 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Replica Watch
Anadrol
Bontril
Dianabol
Dianobol
Didrex
Reductil
Sustanon
Tamiflu
Winstrol
Carisoprodol

http://rolex.zikforum.com |
http://anadrol.zikforum.com |
http://bontril.zikforum.com |
http://dianabol2.zikforum.com |
http://dianobol.zikforum.com |
http://didrex.zikforum.com |
http://reductil.bb-fr.com |
http://sustanon.zikforum.com |
http://tamiflu.zikforum.com |
http://winstrol.zikforum.com |
http://carisoprodol4u.zikforum.com |

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

asdasdad
Posted by: corpse on Aug 7, 2006 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]